Skip to main content

Advertisement

We’d like to understand how you use our websites in order to improve them. Register your interest.
Download PDF

Beneficial association of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and statins on the occurrence of possible Alzheimer’s disease after traumatic brain injury

Alzheimer's Research & Therapy volume 12, Article number: 33 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Pathological analysis of brain tissue from animals and humans with a history of traumatic brain injury (TBI) suggests that TBI could be one of the risk factors facilitating onset of dementia with possible Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but medications to prevent or delay AD onset are not yet available.

Methods

This study explores four medication classes (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), beta blockers, metformin, and statins) approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for other indications and evaluates their influence when used in combination on the risk of possible AD development for patients with a history of TBI. We identified patients with history of TBI from an existing Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) national database. Among 1,660,151 veterans who used VA services between the ages of 50 to 89 years old, we analyzed 733,920 patients, including 15,450 patients with a history of TBI and 718,470 non-TBI patients. The TBI patients were followed for up to 18.5 years, with an average of 7.7 ± 4.7 years, and onset of dementia with possible AD was recorded based on International Statistical Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9 or 10 codes. The effect of TBI on possible AD development was evaluated by multivariable logistic regression models adjusted by age, gender, race, and other comorbidities. The association of ACEI, beta blockers, metformin, statins, and combinations of these agents over time from the first occurrence of TBI to possible AD onset was assessed using Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for demographics and comorbidities.

Results

Veterans with at least two TBI occurrences by claims data were 25% (odds ratio (OR) = 1.25, 95% confidence intervals (CI) (1.13, 1.37)) more likely to develop dementia with possible AD, compared to those with no record of TBI. In multivariable logistic regression models (propensity score weighted or adjusted), veterans taking a combination of ACEI and statins had reduced risk in developing possible AD after suffering TBI, and use of this medication class combination was associated with a longer period between TBI occurring and dementia with possible AD onset, compared to patients who took statins alone or did not take any of the four target drugs after TBI.

Conclusions

The combination of ACEI and statins significantly lowered the risk of development of dementia with possible AD in a national cohort of people with a history of TBI, thus supporting a clinical approach to lowering the risk of dementia with possible AD.

Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the leading cause of dementia and the sixth leading cause of death in the USA. Retrospective cohort studies of the associations between use of selected medications and occurrence of probable AD have been conducted using large claims databases to examine associations between medications that may impact positively with lower risk of dementia and possible AD. These classes of medications include angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) [1, 2], simvastatin [3, 4], beta blockers [5], and metformin [6, 7]. Currently, there is no effective treatment to prevent or slow the progression of AD.

Possible association of traumatic brain injury (TBI) with dementia has been extensively investigated. TBI is a broad term defining neurological injury resulting from an external impact involving the head. TBI is a leading cause of long-term disability in the USA and is common in military personnel and veterans, especially in service members with blast exposure from improvised explosive devices. Since 2000, over 350,000 US service members have been clinically diagnosed with TBI; a total of 23% of 4000 soldiers from a brigade combat team deployed in Iraq were reported to have blast-related TBIs [8]. TBI history is associated with significant comorbidities, including posttraumatic stress disorder [9, 10], mood disorders [11], sleep disturbances [12], and increased risk for neurodegenerative diseases such as AD [13] and Parkinson’s disease (PD) [14].

History of TBI has been associated with an increased risk of dementia [15]. A retrospective study of 188,000 veterans found that history of TBI was associated with a 60% increase in the risk of developing dementia [15]. Another retrospective study found a 1.68 times greater risk of dementia in those with TBI after adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics and comorbidities [16]. Several early reports described associations between TBI and AD [17,18,19]. Lee et al. found a significant association between mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and AD based on International Statistical Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9 code in medical records [20]. Based on the data from the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center (NACC) that collects AD patients’ data from 39 past and present AD clinical centers (ADC) since 1999 [21, 22], a retrospective study supports a significant association of the early-onset AD with self-reported head injury [23]. A systematic review from 18 studies on the association of TBI severity and AD between 1998 and 2014 revealed that 55% of patients with TBI develop cognitive deficits that meet the clinical diagnostic criteria of AD [24]. At the molecular level, elevated tau-containing neurofibrillary tangle formation and cerebral atrophy are apparent in AD mouse models after TBI exposure compared to mice without TBI [25]. Moreover, progressive spreading of tau proteinopathy has been triggered in wild-type mice by impact or blast TBI [26,27,28,29]. Quantitation of tau and phosphorylated tau (p-tau) in mice show that tau and p-tau levels are significantly changed within 1 day after blast, then return to the pre-blast stage when mouse brains were examined at 15 weeks post-blast [30], consistent with previous findings in mini-pigs [31] and mice [32]. Other studies conducted in mice have shown long-term persistence and even progression of blast- and impact-induced p-tauopathy [26,27,28, 33, 34]. In humans, effort has been made to search for an association (or a lack of) between cognitive decline and overlapping neurodegenerative pathologies [35, 36], and possible biomarkers that reflect those changes [37]. Repetitive mild TBI was found to be associated with tau pathology and allied neurodegenerative changes in the brain [38]. AD-like pathology, amyloid plaques, and neurofibrillary tangles have also been shown to be more prevalent in patients following a single TBI relative to uninjured, age-matched controls [39]. Currently, it is not clear whether TBI-induced molecular changes (such as tau protein phosphorylation) cause irreversible damages leading to AD onset, and equally important, whether available medications can prevent or suppress AD initiation and progression.

On the other hand, analysis of the data from the Religious Orders Study (ROS), Memory and Aging Project (MAP), and Adult Changes in Thought study (ACT) reveals that TBI with loss of consciousness (LOC) is associated with risk for Lewy body accumulation, progression of parkinsonism, and PD, but not dementia, AD, pathologic neuritic plaques, or neurofibrillary tangles [40]. The Adult Changes in Thought data (ACT) is a community-based database to reveal the correlation between clinical characteristics and biochemical/structural features of dementia [41]. Both the Nun study and ACT data were explored to seek correlations between the pathological factors and cognitive function [42]. Similarly, in ROS and the Rush MAP studies, pathology alteration and clinical observations were explored and correlated [43, 44]. A recent study on the dataset from NACC reveals failure of self-reported TBI to predict neuropathologic changes in postmortem brain tissue, indicating that self-reported TBI may not be an independent risk factor for clinical or pathological AD [45]. The self-reported TBI did not predict AD neuropathological changes and was not associated with dementia severity or cognitive function in subjects [45].

In this study, we use an existing VA national database which contains rich longitudinal patient medical information to address two questions, namely, whether TBI contributes to the development of dementia with possible AD, and for those with a history of TBI, whether treatment with ACEI, beta blockers, metformin, statins, or a combination of these medications prolongs the interval between the occurrence of TBI and the onset of possible AD. Previous retrospective cohort studies using claims databases support a protective role for statin treatment with respect to possible AD onset [3]. Therefore, we used statin treatment as the control condition in comparing the association of single and combination of medications on onset of possible AD after TBI. The choices of our medications are based on previously published studies on these medication classes related to AD therapeutics and with the consideration of the sample sizes of our databases. For example, possible benefit of ACEI [2], beta blockers [5], and metformin [7] for AD patients has been explored. Statins with higher blood–brain barrier (BBB) penetration capacity (e.g., lipophilic statins) may have more influence on AD progression [4]. The use of ACEI, beta blockers, metformin, and statins was assessed using Cox proportional hazard models [46] with survival time from initial TBI to occurrence of dementia with possible AD, adjusted for demographics and comorbidities. In previous studies, we found reduced hazard rates or relative risks for dementia occurrence in veterans using ACEI [1] or simvastatin [3]. In this study, we explored the associations of selected concomitant medication use with the occurrence of dementia with possible AD after TBI. We found that combination treatments with ACEI and statins reduce the risk of AD and prolongs the time between the occurrence of TBI and onset of dementia with possible AD.

Material and methods

Subjects

This study was approved by the Bedford VA Hospital Institutional Review Board. We used administrative data from the VA Informatics and Computing Infrastructure (VINCI) Resource Center for both inpatient and outpatient visits, vital status, and patients’ prescriptions from October 1, 1998, to April 1, 2018. To extract our study cohort for the analysis of TBI occurrence and AD development, we excluded patients whose age was outside 50 to 89 at the end of the study window. From 1,660,151 VA patients, we applied inclusion and exclusion rules to define our patient and comparison groups for both the TBI model and the medication model. The TBI patient group is comprised of subjects based on ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes (Supplementary Table 1) since October 1, 1998, with two or more outpatient diagnoses or at least one inpatient diagnosis during the study period and at least one medication prescription in the study period. We assembled a control population by random sampling of 10% of VINCI subjects without a claims diagnosis of AD. For subjects taking different medications, the comparison group is the one taking no medication or only statins as a single medication after an occurrence of TBI. TBI patients who initiated any of the four classes of medications before a TBI occurrence and after 1998 were excluded from the study.

Definition of the survival time (interval between TBI occurrence and AD diagnosis)

In this study, we identified patients with a history of TBI and/or AD based on review of VINCI medical records. Patients who received two or more TBI outpatient diagnoses during the study period (October 1, 1998, to April 1, 2018) were defined as a qualified TBI patient with the first date of diagnosed TBI as the first occurrence date. Based on ICD-9 (331.0) and ICD-10 (G30.x) codes, subjects with Alzheimer’s dementia, AD, primary degenerative dementia of Alzheimer type, or dementia due to AD were included in our study and are collectively termed as those carrying dementia with possible AD. We excluded patients with a diagnosis of dementia with possible AD outside the defined study period or before the occurrence of TBI. Patients with prior recorded diagnosis of AD or with any of the other types of dementia (e.g., vascular dementia, Parkinson’s Disease) were excluded from the study. After a TBI occurrence, a patient who received an outpatient diagnosis of dementia with possible AD or one inpatient diagnosis was considered a TBI patient who developed dementia with possible AD. Our study identified 1057 qualified TBI patients with dementia/AD after a first occurrence of TBI and 13,641 TBI patients without a record of an AD claim diagnosis after an occurrence of TBI during the study period. Survival time was defined as the interval from TBI occurrence to first AD claim diagnosis.

Medications

Prescription data for ACEI, beta blockers, metformin, and statins were obtained from VINCI. A medication class was included if it was initiated after the first occurrence of TBI and before the diagnosis of dementia with possible AD, or in the control group, before the censoring date. Mortality was included in the model for analysis of survival time. We defined single medication users as patients who initiated at least one of the four target medication classes during the study period. We defined no medication users as patients who did not initiate treatment with medications in any of the four classes after the first TBI diagnosis. The combined medication group was defined as patients who initiated two different drugs after the first TBI occurrence. An initiation of combined medication treatment was considered to be present if the patient was issued prescriptions for two different medications during the study period. Association of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) with the risk of dementia has been previously explored [1], and ARB was not included in our analysis as many more subjects use ACEI than those on ARB medications.

Demographics and covariates

Demographic characteristics (age, race, gender) were included in the study design to adjust for purported effects of these variables and reported comorbidities on TBI occurrence and possible AD diagnosis [47, 48]. Mental health comorbidities included anxiety, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and substance use disorders. Other medical comorbidities included sleep disorder, thyroid disorder, cardiac dysrhythmia, cancer, congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, liver disease, lung disease, and renal failure. We included the number of TBI events and medication duration as covariates in the model. We defined a new TBI event as one that occurred 60 days after a preceding TBI diagnosis. Medication duration was defined as the total days of prescribed medication.

Statistical methods

We used logistic regression to assess the effect of first TBI occurrence on possible AD diagnosis [46, 49]. Possible AD diagnosis (ICD-9 331.0 and ICD-10 G30.x) during our study period was the binary outcome in this model, and first TBI occurrence was included in the model as a primary factor for evaluation. Demographics and comorbidities were employed as covariates. Statistical significance was set at an alpha level of p < 0.05, and maximum likelihood estimation was used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

We used survival analysis [50] to investigate the association of target medications on the risk of AD diagnosis after the first occurrence of TBI claims diagnosis in the study cohort. Survival time and medication groups were defined as indicated above. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to determine the median survival time from TBI occurrence to diagnosis of dementia with possible AD and to compare cumulative survival between medication groups [51]. Multivariate Cox regression models were used to compare different medication groups while adjusting for demographics and comorbidities [46].

To determine the robustness of the primary association between medication groups and the risk of AD claims diagnosis and to cross-check the consistency of our findings, we conducted several sensitivity analyses. First, we used different reference groups (no medications, statins, or with demographics and comorbidities). Second, we employed a propensity score derived from demographics for adjusting the Cox model, which was entered either as a weighting factor or a covariate [52]. Weigh observations with inverse probability weighting (IPW) is the reciprocal of their estimated probabilities of being observed in event/treatment group [47, 48]. Our study used IPW as a part of a robust check for consistency of results. We also did propensity score as covariates in the regression modeling to test the robustness of our approaches in data analysis. Both are common applications of propensity scores to adjust confounding errors [52]. Third, we performed “leave-one-out cross-validation” (Supplementary Table 2) to cross-check the sensitivity of the primary findings in the medication study.

Results

Characterization of study subjects

We have characterized our study cohort and created several groups of subjects. The average age of the dementia patients with possible AD is 80.9 ± 6.7 years, and the average age for the non-AD patients is 70.1 ± 10.1 years. The majority (94.9%) of the study cohort is male. Overall, this study population is composed of 76.2% White, 16.0% African American, 5.4% Hispanic, and 2.4% other ethnic groups (Table 1A).

Table 1 Characteristics of subjects
Full size table

We analyzed medication records of our cohort and created the second group of 6700 subjects with medication history of ACEI, beta blockers, metformin, and statins. The average ages for dementia patients with possible AD were 76.9 ± 8.5 years and 64.5 ± 9.8 years for non-AD patients (Table 1B); 89.2% of this population is male (Table 1B).

Association of TBI incidents with development of dementia with possible AD

After controlling for demographics variables and comorbidities, TBI was associated with dementia with possible AD in our study population (Table 2). The odds ratio (OR) of TBI initial occurrence and demographic factors from the logistic model is 1.25 (OR [95% CI] 1.25 [1.134–1.378]) and was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Age and ethnicity are the most probable confounding factors and showed positive significant associations with possible AD (p < 0.05). Stroke and mental diseases (bipolar disorder, PTSD, schizophrenia, depression) also significantly increased the risk of possible AD (Fig. 1). However, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, alcohol, and drug/substance use disorders showed negative associations likely resulting from collinearity in the models (variance inflation factor > 10). After controlling for the demographic factors and comorbidities, patients with a confirmed TBI initial occurrence was 25% higher in the odds of developing dementia with possible AD, compared with patients who have not experienced TBI (p < 0.0001).

Table 2 Association of TBI and other factors with the development of dementia with possible AD
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure1

Odds ratio plot for TBI and demographic factors. Odds ratio for developing dementia with possible AD based on demographic factors and history of TBI indicates that prior history of TBI results in a 25% increased chance of developing dementia with possible AD later in life

Full size image

Influence of ACEI, beta blockers, metformin, statins, and combined therapy on the hazard risk of AD development

From the single medication initiation comparison model, after controlling for demographic variables and comorbidities, we found that beta blockers are negatively associated with the hazard risk of AD development (hazard ratio (HR) [95% CI] 0.36 [0.23–0.57] compared with no medication; 0.56 [0.36–0.88] compared with statin) (Table 3A, B). Patients taking beta blockers are 64% less likely to develop possible AD after an initial occurrence of TBI than patients who are not prescribed these medications (p < 0.001, Table 3A). Patients prescribed beta blockers are also 44% less likely to develop possible AD after an initial occurrence of TBI than those taking statins (p = 0.01, Table 3B).

Table 3 Association of single medication with the development of dementia with possible AD after TBI occurrence
Full size table

To check the stability of the results, we included demographic factors and comorbidities in our model and used statin as the reference group. Our results support a significant negative correlation between beta blocker prescription use and AD claims-based diagnosis among single medication users (Fig. 2a). This result is also confirmed by the propensity score-adjusted Cox regression model with demographics and comorbidities (Fig. 2b), where a propensity score of demographic factors is used as an inverse probability weight in the model.

Fig. 2
figure2

Hazard ratio for association of single medication use with the development of dementia with possible AD after TBI occurrence. a Mono medication users were compared to those taking statins using the Cox regression model. Beta blockers show the lowest hazard ratio relative to the statins group. b Mono medication users were compared to those taking statins using the Cox regression model with a propensity score adjusted for demographic factors. Beta blockers remain the lowest hazard ratio of developing dementia with possible AD compared to statins. c Mono medication users were compared to no medication group using the Cox regression model. d Mono medication users were compared with no medication group using the Cox regression model with propensity score adjusted for demographic factors. Beta blocker users have the lowest hazard ratio among all classes of medications analyzed in this study

Full size image

In addition, we included demographic factors and comorbidities in our model and used patients who were not prescribed any target medications as the reference group. Patients who took ACEI or beta blockers as single medication showed a significantly lower hazard risk to develop possible AD after TBI initial occurrence compared to patients not taking any of these medications (Fig. 2c). The propensity score-adjusted Cox regression model (Fig. 2d) confirmed the significance of our outcomes for ACEI or beta blocker treatment.

When the multivariable Cox regression model was used to analyze combined medications, ACEI + statins and ACEI + metformin, we found a significantly lower HR compared to the reference group (no medication), with HR [95% CI] 0.44 [0.23, 0.85] and 0.21 [0.05, 0.90], respectively (Table 4A). Since both statin and metformin were previously reported to show a protective, lower risk for the occurrence of dementia [24, 25], the combination of statins + metformin was examined as a reference group. Compared to this reference group, ACEI + statins and ACEI + metformin both exhibited a significantly lower risk, with HR [95%CI] 0.35 [0.15–0.82] and 0.18 [0.04–0.87] respectively (Table 4B). With demographic factors and comorbidities as covariates, results for ACEI + statin combination were consistent (Fig. 3a, c). Models with comorbidities and propensity scores adjusted for demographic factors revealed similar results (Fig. 3b, d).

Table 4 Association of combined medications with the development of dementia with possible AD after TBI occurrence
Full size table
Fig. 3
figure3

Hazard ratio for association of combined medication use with AD diagnosis after TBI. a Patients taking two combined medications were compared to those taking both statins and metformin using the Cox model. The ACEI and statin group showed the most stable reduction in hazard ratio for developing dementia with possible AD. b Hazard ratio of same group of patients was analyzed using the Cox model with a propensity score adjusted for demographic factors. c Patients taking two combined medications were compared to those taking no medication using the Cox regression model. d Hazard ratio from the same group of patients was analyzed using the Cox regression model with a propensity score adjusted for demographic factors

Full size image

The Kaplan-Meier plot for the unadjusted survival time suggested that TBI patients taking ACEI + statins increased the time to claims-based diagnosis of dementia with possible AD (Fig. 4). The adjusted survival time for TBI patients revealed similar outcomes (Fig. 5). Our results suggest that patients taking combined ACEI + statin after the occurrence of TBI lower the hazard risk for possible AD (p = 0.01). The number of patients prescribed metformin with other medications is small in our sample population (ACEI + metformin group: N = 135, 2% of patients). Consequently, HR confidence interval of this combined medication group is wide (Table 4A and B) and requires a larger sample size for further investigation.

Fig. 4
figure4

Kaplan-Meier unadjusted survival plot reveals stable and unstable outcomes from different combination of medications. Survival plot was created to illustrate the time from first occurrence of TBI to diagnosis of dementia with possible AD in patients taking no or two combined medications. ACEI and metformin (red) showed the greatest but unstable prolonged time from first occurrence of TBI to diagnosis of dementia with possible AD due to a small sample size. ACEI and statin (green) showed the most stable result for prolonging time from first occurrence of TBI to diagnosis of dementia with possible AD

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure5

Kaplan-Meier adjusted survival plot reveals rank order of different combinations of medications. Adjusted survival plot was created to illustrate the rank order of two combined medications that affect the time from first occurrence of TBI to diagnosis of dementia with possible AD. Compared to those not taking any medication, patients taking metformin and statin (yellow) appear to develop dementia/AD faster. Except for those taking ACEI and metformin, ACEI and statin users (green) showed the most prolonged time from first occurrence of TBI to diagnosis of dementia with possible AD

Full size image

We also compared both single-agent and combined-agent treatment groups against the no medication group in the adjusted models (Table 5). We found that ACEI and statins as combined medications (p = 0.005), ACEI and metformin (p = 0.02), and beta blockers (p < 0.001) had significantly lower HR for possible occurrence of AD compared to the no medication group (Fig. 6). Given the potential for confounding effect of TBI with that of psychiatric sequelae, we conducted a subcohort analysis to examine effects of combined medication treatment in TBI patients with mental conditions (bipolar disorder, PTSD, or schizophrenia). We found a significant effect of combined treatment with ACEI + statin compared with the no medication group (0.29 [0.19, 0.45], p < 0.001).

Table 5 Association of single or combined medications with the development of dementia with possible AD after TBI occurrence
Full size table
Fig. 6
figure6

Hazard ratio plot for single and combined medications. Hazard ratio for developing AD was compared between all single and combined medication users and those taking no medication. Due to low sample size, combinations including metformin have a large variation and unstable outcomes. The combination of ACEI and statin reveals the most stable hazard ratio lowering the risk of dementia diagnosis with possible AD after the occurrence of TBI

Full size image

To confirm the validity of these findings, we used different statistical approaches to estimate the main effects of the first claims-based occurrence of TBI including multivariable logistic regression models, propensity score-weighted and adjusted multivariable logistic models, and logistic model cross-validation. The major findings from these different approaches were similar, and the significant reduction of the HR by ACEI + statins was consistently found across all methods utilized.

Discussion

Our study results showed that a history of TBI was associated with increased hazard risk of developing dementia with possible claims-based AD (defined by clinical diagnosis) compared to patients without TBI history. This finding supports emerging data implicating TBI as one of the risk factors for AD [53, 54].

We performed statistical analyses of medical records from a large national VA database of over 1.6 million veterans to investigate the relationship of prior TBI on onset of dementia with possible AD and the therapeutic potential of monotherapy and combination therapy with ACEI, beta blockers, metformin, and statins to postpone onset of dementia with possible AD.

We selected four commonly prescribed medication classes—ACEI, statins, metformin, and beta blockers—based on prior reports suggesting potential prophylactic effectiveness for AD [1, 3, 5, 6]. To estimate the association of two-medication combination therapy on first claims-based diagnosis of dementia with possible AD after initial occurrence of TBI, we used multivariable Cox regression models with propensity score weighting for demographic factors and other covariates. Subjects treated with two-medication combination therapy were compared to reference groups without medication treatment. We performed similar analyses for non-TBI patients. Beta blocker users had significantly lower possible AD risk compared to statin users and to the no medication group in our Cox regression model. Interestingly, the impact of ACEI + statin combination was less clear, and the ACEI + statin combination does not show a significant association with AD risk in the multivariate Cox regression model after controlling for all other variables. Our results suggest that this combined medication regimen is specific for the TBI + dementia/AD population compared to the general population of dementia with possible AD without a history of TBI.

Our analyses indicate that patients prescribed a combination of two of these medication classes were at a lower risk of the initial occurrence of possible claims-based AD after the first claims-based diagnosis of TBI. However, we note one important exception, TBI patients treated with metformin and statins had a claims-based diagnosis of dementia with possible AD sooner than TBI patients in the other medication treatment groups (Fig. 5) and also sooner than TBI patients without medication treatment. This interesting finding may point to an unidentified synergistic pathway that potentiates dementia with possible AD and, as such, may provide clues to mechanisms that link TBI and AD. For individual medication, there was no significant association among metformin users (p = 0.12, Table 3B). This result is consistent with a recent study based on pooled analyses from multiple studies [55]. The result for statin was also not significant compared with the reference group (p = 0.07, Table 3B). Therefore, there is not sufficient evidence derived from our analysis to support their respective impact on possible claims-based AD after the first claims-based diagnosis of TBI.

Patients taking a combination of ACEI and statins showed prolonged time to development of claims-based diagnosis of dementia with possible AD following TBI. The validity of this finding is supported by other modeling approaches that yielded similar conclusions. Other combinations also had a significant association, namely, the combinations of beta blockers + metformin and ACEI + metformin, albeit exhibited wider variation than ACEI + statins.

There were several important limitations to our study. First, the study identified ACEI + metformin as a combination of possible interest, having the protective, lowest risk ratio in the Cox regression model (HR [95% CI] 0.18 [0.04–0.75]; p = 0.02, see Table 5). However, owing to the small sample size of this medication group, this low HR was not estimated with significance as we were limited by the small sample sizes from selected subgroups. Furthermore, we do not have sufficient statistical power for subgroups to adjust for other important covariates including hypertension and diabetes as well as other drugs used for those conditions, since medications often are administered for off-label use and are prescribed for more than one indication in routine practice. A second limitation is that clinical severity measures for TBI are not available in this claims database. In our study, we used two or more clinical visits with diagnosis of TBI as criteria to screen TBI patients for inclusion. This criterion was used as a proxy measure of TBI severity. Currently, it is not possible to create subpopulations among TBI subjects corresponding to hemorrhage, concussion, or other indicators of TBI severity, which is not available in this dataset. Larger datasets with this rich clinical information would be needed in the future. A third limitation is the presence of unmeasured variables in our analysis, including indicators of direct medication adherence and measures related to selection bias due to provider and patient preferences for prescribing specific medications. The significant effect of medication switching (including adding or dropping of one medication) needs to be explored in future investigations. The fourth limitation is that our study was based on a Department of Veterans Affairs database with a population that is predominantly male with a smaller fraction of females, with higher proportion of those veterans with physical and mental health conditions than in a general community-wide population. This would limit the generalizability of the findings. The fifth limitation is the sparse information on biomarkers related to amyloid, tau, and neurodegeneration from the existing database we used. NIA-AA criteria on clinical diagnosis of AD published in 2011 [56, 57] and the guidelines under the research framework published in 2018 refer AD to an aggregate of neuropathologic changes and define it by biomarkers and by postmortem examination in vivo [58]. In this study, we obtained clinical records between 1998 and 2018 with minimum data on amyloid, tau, and neurodegeneration (ATN biomarkers). Information of preclinical AD and genetic information (such as apoE) is not available for our analysis, and we could not create a simulation study to predict its influence. Finally, the occurrence of TBI attributable to medications promoting falls was not considered; our analysis only focused on risk of dementia with possible AD after the TBI occurrence.

At the molecular level, our findings of candidate medications (ACEI and statins) to be used in delaying onset of dementia with possible AD are supported by mechanistic studies. Previous studies have shown that ACE activity is elevated in AD and correlates with the Braak stage, and ACE density is 70% higher in the temporal cortex of AD patients relative to control subjects [59]. ACE activity is also correlated with Aβ load in AD patients [60], and cultured neurons exposed to Aβ showed increases in levels and activity of ACE [61]. Population studies have shown that antihypertensive medication usage is associated with reduced occurrence of AD [62]. Statins have been tested as potential therapeutics, as high cholesterol levels are implicated as a risk factor for AD [63]. Cholesterol depletion in neuronal cells resulted in complete inhibition of Aβ formation, and this inhibition was fully reversible upon re-addition of cholesterol to the neurons [64]. Transgenic mice subject to cholesterol-lowering drugs showed reduced brain Aβ peptides and amyloid load by greater than twofold relative to non-treated mice [65]. Additionally, treatment with simvastatin has been shown to reduce Aβ peptide levels in both cellular models and Guinea pigs [66].

In addition to brain pathology manifested in a number of neurocognitive disorders, which are diagnosed using ICD-9 and 10 codes, it is well known that cognitive and brain reserve plays an important role in the maintenance of cognitive function and prevention of neurodegeneration [67]. Difference in cognitive reserve may enable individuals to be more resilient to neural dysfunction, while difference in brain structure may differentiate individuals who may have higher tolerance to brain pathological alteration [67].

Our results have implications in examining FDA-approved drugs for the purposes of testing novel hypotheses and introducing new therapeutics for possible future indications for AD. The challenge of addressing treatment of AD could be targeted in part by the wide-scale use of “big data” sources that have integrated electronic health record information with rich clinical data and provide a valuable data source to link medication use with clinical manifestations. This ultimately gives a viable alternative for future investigations of AD treatment [68]. Similar approaches are already being used in improving detection, treatment, and prevention of complex diseases such as cancer [69] and type 2 diabetes [70]. Further in vivo studies are needed to determine the effectiveness of our drug combinations in Alzheimer’s treatment.

Conclusion

We have developed a list of FDA-approved drugs with potential effectiveness as therapeutics for dementia with possible AD. This study revealed that the combination of ACEI and statins shows potential in delaying the onset of claims-based diagnosis of dementia with possible AD following the first occurrence of TBI. Future in vitro and animal studies will allow us to establish associations between prescribed medications and effectiveness readouts. Proof of concept studies with those candidate medications will be carried out for consideration in future clinical trials as AD therapeutics. They hold great promise for preventing or delaying disease onset and slowing down its progression.

Abbreviations

ACEI:

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors

AD:

Alzheimer’s disease

Aβ:

Amyloid β protein

FDA:

Food and Drug Administration

ICD:

International Statistical Classification of Disease

IPW:

Inverse probability weighting

TBI:

Traumatic brain injury

References

  1. 1.

    Li NC, Lee A, Whitmer RA, Kivipelto M, Lawler E, Kazis LE, et al. Use of angiotensin receptor blockers and risk of dementia in a predominantly male population: prospective cohort analysis. BMJ. 2010;340(340):b5465.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Singh B, Sharma B, Jaggi AS, Singh N. Attenuating effect of lisinopril and telmisartan in intracerebroventricular streptozotocin induced experimental dementia of Alzheimer's disease type: possible involvement of PPAR-gamma agonistic property. J Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone Syst. 2013;14(2):124–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Wolozin B, Wang SW, Li NC, Lee A, Lee TA, Kazis LE. Simvastatin is associated with a reduced incidence of dementia and Parkinson's disease. BMC Med. 2007;5(20):20.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Sierra S, Ramos MC, Molina P, Esteo C, Vazquez JA, Burgos JS. Statins as neuroprotectants: a comparative in vitro study of lipophilicity, blood-brain-barrier penetration, lowering of brain cholesterol, and decrease of neuron cell death. J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;23(2):307–18.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Rosenberg PB, Mielke MM, Tschanz J, Cook L, Corcoran C, Hayden KM, et al. Effects of cardiovascular medications on rate of functional decline in Alzheimer disease. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008;16(11):883–92.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Li J, Deng J, Sheng W, Zuo Z. Metformin attenuates Alzheimer’s disease-like neuropathology in obese, leptin-resistant mice. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2012;101(4):564–74.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Farr SA, Roesler E, Niehoff ML, Roby DA, McKee A, Morley JE. Metformin improves learning and memory in the SAMP8 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;68(4):1699–710.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Terrio H, Brenner LA, Ivins BJ, Cho JM, Helmick K, Schwab K, et al. Traumatic brain injury screening: preliminary findings in a US Army brigade combat team. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2009;24(1):14–23.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Mac Donald CL, Adam OR, Johnson AM, Nelson EC, Werner NJ, Rivet DJ, et al. Acute post-traumatic stress symptoms and age predict outcome in military blast concussion. Brain. 2015;138(5):1314–26.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Schneiderman AI, Braver ER, Kang HK. Understanding sequelae of injury mechanisms and mild traumatic brain injury incurred during the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan: persistent postconcussive symptoms and posttraumatic stress disorder. Am J Epidemiol. 2008;167(12):1446–52.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Jorge RE, Arciniegas DB. Mood disorders after TBI. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2014;37(1):13–29.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Mathias JL, Alvaro PK. Prevalence of sleep disturbances, disorders, and problems following traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis. Sleep Med. 2012;13(7):898–905.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Fleminger S, Oliver DL, Lovestone S, Rabe-Hesketh S, Giora A. Head injury as a risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease: the evidence 10 years on; a partial replication. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003;74(7):857–62.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Gardner RC, Byers AL, Barnes DE, Li Y, Boscardin J, Yaffe K. Mild TBI and risk of Parkinson disease: a chronic effects of neurotrauma consortium study. Neurology. 2018;90(20):e1771–e9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Barnes DE, Kaup A, Kirby KA, Byers AL, Diaz-Arrastia R, Yaffe K. Traumatic brain injury and risk of dementia in older veterans. Neurology. 2014;83(4):312–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Wang HK, Lin SH, Sung PS, Wu MH, Hung KW, Wang LC, et al. Population based study on patients with traumatic brain injury suggests increased risk of dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012;83(11):1080–5.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Graves AB, White E, Koepsell TD, Reifler BV, van Belle G, Larson EB, et al. The association between head trauma and Alzheimer's disease. Am J Epidemiol. 1990;131(3):491–501.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Mortimer JA, van Duijn CM, Chandra V, Fratiglioni L, Graves AB, Heyman A, et al. Head trauma as a risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease: a collaborative re-analysis of case-control studies. EURODEM Risk Factors Research Group. Int J Epidemiol. 1991;20(Suppl 2):S28–35.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Guo Z, Cupples LA, Kurz A, Auerbach SH, Volicer L, Chui H, et al. Head injury and the risk of AD in the MIRAGE study. Neurology. 2000;54(6):1316–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Lee YK, Hou SW, Lee CC, Hsu CY, Huang YS, Su YC. Increased risk of dementia in patients with mild traumatic brain injury: a nationwide cohort study. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e62422.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Morris JC, Weintraub S, Chui HC, Cummings J, Decarli C, Ferris S, et al. The uniform data set (UDS): clinical and cognitive variables and descriptive data from Alzheimer disease centers. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2006;20(4):210–6.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Beekly DL, Ramos EM, van Belle G, Deitrich W, Clark AD, Jacka ME, et al. The National Alzheimer’s coordinating center (NACC) database: an Alzheimer disease database. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2004;18(4):270–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Mendez MF, Paholpak P, Lin A, Zhang JY, Teng E. Prevalence of traumatic brain injury in early versus late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;47(4):985–93.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Julien J, Joubert S, Ferland MC, Frenette LC, Boudreau-Duhaime MM, Malo-Veronneau L, et al. Association of traumatic brain injury and Alzheimer disease onset: a systematic review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2017;60(5):347–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Yoshiyama Y, Uryu K, Higuchi M, Longhi L, Hoover R, Fujimoto S, et al. Enhanced neurofibrillary tangle formation, cerebral atrophy, and cognitive deficits induced by repetitive mild brain injury in a transgenic tauopathy mouse model. J Neurotrauma. 2005;22(10):1134–41.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Goldstein LE, Fisher AM, Tagge CA, Zhang X-L, Velisek L, Sullivan JA, et al. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy in blast-exposed military veterans and a blast neurotrauma mouse model. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4(134):134ra60.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Huber BR, Meabon JS, Martin TJ, Mourad PD, Bennett R, Kraemer BC, et al. Blast exposure causes early and persistent aberrant phospho- and cleaved-tau expression in a murine model of mild blast-induced traumatic brain injury. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;37(2):309–23.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Tagge CA, Fisher AM, Minaeva OV, Gaudreau-Balderrama A, Moncaster JA, Zhang XL, et al. Concussion, microvascular injury, and early tauopathy in young athletes after impact head injury and an impact concussion mouse model. Brain. 2018;141(2):422–58.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Zanier ER, Bertani I, Sammali E, Pischiutta F, Chiaravalloti MA, Vegliante G, et al. Induction of a transmissible tau pathology by traumatic brain injury. Brain. 2018;141(9):2685–99.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Chen M, Song H, Cui J, Johnson CE, Hubler GK, DePalma RG, et al. Proteomic profiling of mouse brains exposed to blast-induced mild traumatic brain injury reveals changes in axonal proteins and phosphorylated tau. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;66(2):751–73.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Goodrich JA, Kim JH, Situ R, Taylor W, Westmoreland T, Du F, et al. Neuronal and glial changes in the brain resulting from explosive blast in an experimental model. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2016;4(1):124.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Mouzon B, Bachmeier C, Ojo J, Acker C, Ferguson S, Crynen G, et al. Chronic white matter degeneration, but no tau pathology at one-year post-repetitive mild traumatic brain injury in a tau transgenic model. J Neurotrauma. 2019;36(4):576–88.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kondo A, Shahpasand K, Mannix R, Qiu J, Moncaster J, Chen CH, et al. Antibody against early driver of neurodegeneration cis P-tau blocks brain injury and tauopathy. Nature. 2015;523(7561):431–6.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Albayram O, Kondo A, Mannix R, Smith C, Tsai CY, Li C, et al. Cis P-tau is induced in clinical and preclinical brain injury and contributes to post-injury sequelae. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):1000.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Boyle PA, Wilson RS, Yu L, Barr AM, Honer WG, Schneider JA, et al. Much of late life cognitive decline is not due to common neurodegenerative pathologies. Ann Neurol. 2013;74(3):478–89.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Rabinovici GD, Carrillo MC, Forman M, DeSanti S, Miller DS, Kozauer N, et al. Multiple comorbid neuropathologies in the setting of Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology and implications for drug development. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2017;3(1):83–91.

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Alexopoulos P, Roesler J, Werle L, Thierjung N, Lentzari I, Ortner M, et al. Fluid biomarker agreement and interrelation in dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2018;125(2):193–201.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Gavett BE, Cantu RC, Shenton M, Lin AP, Nowinski CJ, McKee AC, et al. Clinical appraisal of chronic traumatic encephalopathy: current perspectives and future directions. Curr Opin Neurol. 2011;24(6):525–31.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Johnson VE, Stewart W, Smith DH. Widespread tau and amyloid-beta pathology many years after a single traumatic brain injury in humans. Brain Pathol. 2012;22(2):142–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Crane PK, Gibbons LE, Dams-O'Connor K, Trittschuh E, Leverenz JB, Keene CD, et al. Association of traumatic brain injury with late-life neurodegenerative conditions and neuropathologic findings. JAMA Neurol. 2016;73(9):1062–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Sonnen JA, Larson EB, Haneuse S, Woltjer R, Li G, Crane PK, et al. Neuropathology in the adult changes in thought study: a review. J Alzheimers Dis. 2009;18(3):703–11.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    SantaCruz KS, Sonnen JA, Pezhouh MK, Desrosiers MF, Nelson PT, Tyas SL. Alzheimer disease pathology in subjects without dementia in 2 studies of aging: the Nun study and the adult changes in thought study. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2011;70(10):832–40.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Bennett DA, Schneider JA, Arvanitakis Z, Wilson RS. Overview and findings from the religious orders study. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2012;9(6):628–45.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Bennett DA, Schneider JA, Buchman AS, Barnes LL, Boyle PA, Wilson RS. Overview and findings from the rush memory and aging project. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2012;9(6):646–63.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Sugarman MA, McKee AC, Stein TD, Tripodis Y, Besser LM, Martin B, et al. Failure to detect an association between self-reported traumatic brain injury and Alzheimer's disease neuropathology and dementia. Alzheimers Dement. 2019;15(5):686–98.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Cox D. Regression models and life tables. Breakthroughs Stat. 1972;34:187–220.

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Helzner EP, Scarmeas N, Cosentino S, Tang MX, Schupf N, Stern Y. Survival in Alzheimer disease: a multiethnic, population-based study of incident cases. Neurology. 2008;71(19):1489–95.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Burke SL, Cadet T, Alcide A, O'Driscoll J, Maramaldi P. Psychosocial risk factors and Alzheimer’s disease: the associative effect of depression, sleep disturbance, and anxiety. Aging Ment Health. 2017;27:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Walker SH, Duncan DB. Estimation of the probability of an event as a function of several independent variables. Biometrika. 1967;54(1):167–79.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Korn EL, Graubard BI, Midthune D. Time-to-event analysis of longitudinal follow-up of a survey: choice of the time-scale. Am J Epidemiol. 1997;145(1):72–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Kaplan ELPM. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc. 2012;53(282):457–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Rosenbaum PR. Donald. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika. 1983;70(11):41–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Jellinger KA, Paulus W, Wrocklage C, Litvan I. Effects of closed traumatic brain injury and genetic factors on the development of Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Neurol. 2001;8(6):707–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Dams-O’Connor K, Guetta G, Hahn-Ketter AE, Fedor A. Traumatic brain injury as a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease: current knowledge and future directions. Neurodegener Dis Manag. 2016;6(5):417–29.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Weinstein G, Davis-Plourde KL, Conner S, Himali JJ, Beiser AS, Lee A, et al. Association of metformin, sulfonylurea and insulin use with brain structure and function and risk of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease: pooled analysis from 5 cohorts. PLoS One. 2019;14(2):e0212293.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, Hyman BT, Jack CR Jr, Kawas CH, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):263–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Albert MS, DeKosky ST, Dickson D, Dubois B, Feldman HH, Fox NC, et al. The diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):270–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Jack CR Jr, Bennett DA, Blennow K, Carrillo MC, Dunn B, Haeberlein SB, et al. NIA-AA research framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2018;14(4):535–62.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Barnes NM, Cheng CH, Costall B, Naylor RJ, Williams TJ, Wischik CM. Angiotensin converting enzyme density is increased in temporal cortex from patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Pharmacol. 1991;200(2–3):289–92.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Miners JS, Ashby E, Van Helmond Z, Chalmers KA, Palmer LE, Love S, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) levels and activity in Alzheimer’s disease, and relationship of perivascular ACE-1 to cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2008;34(2):181–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Miners S, Ashby E, Baig S, Harrison R, Tayler H, Speedy E, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme levels and activity in Alzheimer’s disease: differences in brain and CSF ACE and association with ACE1 genotypes. Am J Transl Res. 2009;1(2):163–77.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Khachaturian AS, Zandi PP, Lyketsos CG, Hayden KM, Skoog I, Norton MC, et al. Antihypertensive medication use and incident Alzheimer disease: the Cache County study. Arch Neurol. 2006;63(5):686–92.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Wolozin B, Kellman W, Ruosseau P, Celesia GG, Siegel G. Decreased prevalence of Alzheimer disease associated with 3-hydroxy-3-methyglutaryl coenzyme a reductase inhibitors. Arch Neurol. 2000;57(10):1439–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Simons M, Keller P, De Strooper B, Beyreuther K, Dotti CG, Simons K. Cholesterol depletion inhibits the generation of beta-amyloid in hippocampal neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(11):6460–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Refolo LM, Pappolla MA, LaFrancois J, Malester B, Schmidt SD, Thomas-Bryant T, et al. A cholesterol-lowering drug reduces beta-amyloid pathology in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2001;8(5):890–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Fassbender K, Simons M, Bergmann C, Stroick M, Lutjohann D, Keller P, et al. Simvastatin strongly reduces levels of Alzheimer’s disease beta -amyloid peptides Abeta 42 and Abeta 40 in vitro and in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(10):5856–61.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Stern Y. Cognitive reserve in ageing and Alzheimer's disease. Lancet Neurol. 2012;11(11):1006–12.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Hampel H, O'Bryant SE, Castrillo JI, Ritchie C, Rojkova K, Broich K, et al. PRECISION MEDICINE - the golden gate for detection, treatment and prevention of Alzheimer's disease. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2016;3(4):243–59.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Chantrill LA, Nagrial AM, Watson C, Johns AL, Martyn-Smith M, Simpson S, et al. Precision medicine for advanced pancreas cancer: the individualized molecular pancreatic cancer therapy (IMPaCT) trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(9):2029–37.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Scheen AJ. Precision medicine: the future in diabetes care? Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2016;117:12–21.

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not represent the views of the US Department of Veterans Affairs or the US Government.

Funding

This study was supported by the award I21BX002215, I21BX003807 and IO1 BX003527 from the Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development Service of the Veterans Affairs Office of Research and Development (WX), R01AG063913 from National Institute on Aging, NIH (WX, LEG), and the Cure Alzheimer’s Fund (WX).

Availability of data and materials

Materials and data described in the manuscript will be freely available to any researcher wishing to use them for non-commercial purposes, without breaching participant confidentiality.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Hospital, Bedford, MA, USA
    • Mingfei Li
    • , Joel Reisman
    • , Shirley X. Qian
    •  & Lewis E. Kazis
  2. Department of Mathematical Sciences, Bentley University, Waltham, MA, USA
    • Mingfei Li
  3. Geriatric Research Education Clinical Center, Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital, Bedford, MA, 01730, USA
    • Benjamin Morris-Eppolito
    •  & Weiming Xia
  4. Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
    • Shirley X. Qian
    •  & Lewis E. Kazis
  5. Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
    • Benjamin Wolozin
    •  & Weiming Xia
  6. Departments of Radiology, Psychiatry, Neurology, and Pathology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
    • Lee E. Goldstein
  7. Departments of Biomedical, Electrical, and Computer Engineering, Boston University College of Engineering & Photonics Center, Boston, MA, USA
    • Lee E. Goldstein
  8. Boston University Alzheimer’s Disease Center, Boston, MA, USA
    • Lee E. Goldstein
Authors
  1. Mingfei Li
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  2. Joel Reisman
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  3. Benjamin Morris-Eppolito
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  4. Shirley X. Qian
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  5. Lewis E. Kazis
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  6. Benjamin Wolozin
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  7. Lee E. Goldstein
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in
  8. Weiming Xia
    View author publications
    You can also search for this author in

Contributions

ML, LK, BW, and WX designed the study; SQ and JR accessed the VINCI data; ML, SQ, and JR performed the statistical analysis; ML, BME, LK, LG, and WX wrote the manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weiming Xia.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All contributing authors declare no potential competing interests. This study was approved by the Bedford VA Hospital Institutional Review Board. Access of administrative database for outpatient visit data and corresponding patients’ prescription data was approved by the Bedford VA Hospital Institutional Review Board, Research and Development and the VA Informatics and Computing Infrastructure (VINCI) Resource Center. The content of the manuscript has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere.

Consent for publication

All contributing authors have approved the manuscript for submission.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, M., Reisman, J., Morris-Eppolito, B. et al. Beneficial association of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and statins on the occurrence of possible Alzheimer’s disease after traumatic brain injury. Alz Res Therapy 12, 33 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-020-00589-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Alzheimer’s disease
  • Traumatic brain injury
  • Statins
  • Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors
  • Treatment
  • Prevention

Alzheimer's Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1758-9193