Skip to main content
Download PDF

Synergistic interaction of high blood pressure and cerebral beta-amyloid on tau pathology

Alzheimer's Research & Therapy volume 14, Article number: 193 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Hypertension has been associated with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) dementia as well as vascular dementia. However, the underlying neuropathological changes that link hypertension to AD remain poorly understood. In our study, we examined the relationships of a history of hypertension and high current blood pressure (BP) with in vivo AD pathologies including β-amyloid (Aβ) and tau and also investigated whether a history of hypertension and current BP respectively affect the association between Aβ and tau deposition.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted as part of the Korean Brain Aging Study for Early Diagnosis and Prediction of Alzheimer’s Disease, a prospective cohort study. Cognitively normal older adults who underwent both Aβ and tau positron emission tomography (PET) (i.e., [11C]-Pittsburgh compound B and [18F] AV-1451 PET) were selected. History of hypertension and current BP were evaluated and cerebral Aβ and tau deposition measured by PET were used as main outcomes. Generalized linear regression models were used to estimate associations.

Results

A total of 68 cognitively normal older adults (mean [SD] age, 71.5 [7.4] years; 40 women [59%]) were included in the study. Neither a history of hypertension nor the current BP exhibited a direct association with Aβ or tau deposition. However, the synergistic interaction effects of high current systolic (β, 0.359; SE, 0.141; p = 0.014) and diastolic (β, 0.696; SE, 0.158; p < 0.001) BP state with Aβ deposition on tau deposition were significant, whereas there was no such effect for a history of hypertension (β, 0.186; SE, 0.152; p = 0.224).

Conclusions

The findings suggest that high current BP, but not a history of hypertension, synergistically modulate the relationship between cerebral Aβ and tau deposition in late-life. In terms of AD prevention, the results support the importance of strict BP control in cognitively normal older adults with hypertension.

Background

Hypertension is related to a higher risk of dementia and more rapid cognitive decline in older adults [1,2,3,4,5]. More specifically, hypertension is associated not only with the development of vascular dementia and vascular cognitive impairment [6,7,8], but also with that of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) dementia [9,10,11]. However, the underlying pathological changes that link hypertension to AD remain poorly understood.

While one postmortem study showed that midlife hypertension was associated with more senile plaque and neurofibrillary tangle pathologies at death [12], other studies reported that late-life high blood pressure (BP) was related only to neurofibrillary tangles or even to neither neurofibrillary tangles nor senile plaques [13, 14]. In vivo AD biomarker studies based on positron emission tomography (PET) imaging or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis yielded similarly conflicting findings. Although a couple of studies demonstrated a significant association between high BP and cerebral β-amyloid (Aβ) deposition in older adults [15, 16], many other studies did not find such direct relationship [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24]. In terms of tau pathology, while a recent CSF study revealed that current BP had a significant positive association with tau level [17] and a PET study showed that systolic BP (SBP) synergistically interacted with Aβ on tau deposition [25], other studies reported that a history of hypertension was not related to CSF tau level or tau deposition on PET [19, 24]. As the current BP level reflects the appropriateness of hypertension management and a large proportion of hypertensive individuals exhibit poorly controlled BP, current BP status may explain the adverse effects of hypertension better than a history thereof [26,27,28]. However, few studies have evaluated the effects of both a history of hypertension and current BP on AD pathologies in the same population.

In this context, we aimed to examine the relationships of a history of hypertension and current BP with in vivo AD pathologies (cerebral Aβ and tau deposition on PET) in cognitively normal (CN) older adults. We also investigated the modulatory effects of hypertension and current BP on the association between Aβ and tau deposition.

Methods

Participants

This study was performed as part of the Korean Brain Aging Study for the Early Diagnosis and Prediction of Alzheimer’s Disease (KBASE), an ongoing prospective cohort study commenced in 2014. The KBASE study aimed to search for new AD biomarkers and investigate how different lifetime experiences and bodily changes contribute to the brain alterations related to AD [29]. The subject recruitment process was described previously [29]. Among the overall subjects of the KBASE cohort, 68 CN older adults (aged 55–90 years) who underwent both amyloid and tau PET imaging were included in the present study. All CN participants were free from diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment or dementia; they all had global Clinical Dementia Rating score of 0. The exclusion criteria were any serious medical, psychiatric, or neurological disorders that could affect mental functioning; history of loss of consciousness after head trauma; severe communication or behavioral problems that would make clinical examination or brain scans difficult; illiteracy; any significant visual or hearing difficulty; and participation in clinical trial with an investigational product. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Seoul National University Hospital and Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea. The study was performed in accordance with the recommendations of the current version of the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided written informed consent.

Clinical assessment

All participants were examined by neuropsychiatrists with advanced training in dementia research according to the KBASE clinical assessment protocol, which incorporates the Korean version of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD) Assessment Packet [30]. A history of hypertension was defined as either a documented diagnosis of hypertension or treatment with antihypertensive medication, based on data collected by trained research nurses via interviews with participants and reliable informants. SBP and diastolic BP (DBP) were manually measured three times by a trained nurse at 5-min intervals in supine position after 5 min of rest. The mean SBP and DBP were used for the analysis. SBP and DBP were also categorized into high or low state using the following cutoffs: ≥ 140 vs. < 140 mmHg, and ≥ 90 vs. < 90 mmHg, respectively [31]. Comorbid vascular risk factors other than hypertension (diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, transient ischemic attack, and stroke) were assessed in the same manner as the evaluation of hypertension history. A vascular risk score (VRS) reflecting the vascular burden other than hypertension was calculated based on the number of vascular risk factors other than hypertension [32].

Measurement of cerebral Aβ and tau deposition

All participants underwent three-dimensional [11C]-Pittsburgh compound B (PiB)-PET using a 3.0 T Biograph mMR scanner (Siemens, Washington DC, USA) at the visit for clinical assessment including BP measurement. The details of PiB-PET image acquisition and preprocessing were described in our previous report [33]. The autonomic anatomical labeling algorithm and region combining method were used to set the regions of interest (ROIs) when characterizing the PiB retention in the frontal, lateral parietal, posterior cingulate-precuneus, and lateral temporal cortices [34, 35]. The standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) for each ROI was calculated by dividing each value by the mean cerebellar uptake value in the same image. A global cortical ROI comprising the four ROIs was also defined, and a global Aβ retention value was generated by dividing the mean value for all voxels of the global cortical ROI by the mean cerebellar uptake value in the same image.

Participants also underwent [18F] AV-1451 PET scans using a Biograph True point 40 PET/CT scanner (Siemens, USA) per the manufacturer’s approved guidelines. While PiB-PET was performed during the baseline visit, AV-1451 PET imaging was performed at an average of 72 days after the baseline visit. The details of AV-1451 PET image acquisition and preprocessing were described in our previous report [33]. AV-1451 PET SUVR images based on the mean uptake over 80 to 100 min post-injection were normalized by the mean inferior cerebellar gray matter uptake, according to the published code [36]. To estimate cerebral tau deposition, we quantified the partial volume-corrected AV-1451 SUVR of inferior temporal (IT) ROI, which is the neocortical site of tau deposition in early AD [37, 38].

Statistical analysis

For demographic and clinical characteristics, comparisons between participants with and without a history of hypertension were performed using the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical data, and the independent t-test for continuous data. We used generalized linear regression model (GLM) to determine whether global Aβ and IT tau deposition were directly associated with a history of hypertension and high current BP (SBP and DBP; using both categorical and continuous variable) after adjusting for age, sex, apolipoprotein ε4 (APOE4) positivity, and the VRS. To analyze the moderating effect of a history of hypertension and current BP on the association between Aβ on tau deposition, a similar GLM including an interaction term of history of hypertension (or current SBP or DBP) × global Aβ retention as an additional independent variable was used. All statistical analyses utilized SPSS software (version 22.0, SPSS Inc; Chicago, IL, USA), and two-tailed p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Participant characteristics

A total of 68 participants (mean [SD] age, 71.5 [7.4] years; 40 women [59%]) were included in the study. Their demographic and clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Of the 34 participants with a history of hypertension, 32 (94%) were on antihypertensive medication. Participants with a history of hypertension had higher VRS than the others, but there was no difference in age, sex, education, APOE4 positivity, SBP, or DBP between the two groups.

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of participants
Full size table

Relationships of a history of hypertension and current BP with in vivo AD pathologies

Neither global Aβ nor IT tau deposition was significantly different according to history of hypertension and high current SBP or DBP state (categorical variable), although IT tau deposition was marginally greater in high- than low-DBP group (Tables 2 and 3; Fig. 1). Current SBP or DBP (continuous variable) also exhibited no significant associations with Aβ and tau deposition (Table 4).

Table 2 Cerebral Aβ and tau deposition in participants with and without a history of hypertension
Full size table
Table 3 Cerebral Aβ and tau deposition in participants with and without high current blood pressure
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Global Aβ and IT tau deposition according to A history of hypertension, B current SBP state, and C current DBP state. The p-values are from linear regression models adjusted for age, sex, apolipoprotein E ε4 positivity, and the vascular risk score. Abbreviations: Aβ, β-amyloid; IT, inferior temporal; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; BP, blood pressure; SUVR, standardized uptake value ratio

Full size image
Table 4 Associations of current systolic and diastolic blood pressure level with cerebral Aβ and tau deposition
Full size table

Interaction effect between a history of hypertension (or current BP) and Aβ deposition on tau deposition

The interaction effect of a history of hypertension with global Aβ deposition on IT tau deposition was not significant (β, 0.186; SE, 0.152; p = 0.224) (Table 5 and Fig. 2A). In contrast, significant synergistic interaction effects of high current SBP and DBP states (categorical variables) with global Aβ on IT tau deposition were observed (β, 0.359; SE, 0.141; p = 0.014; β, 0.696; SE, 0.158; p < 0.001, respectively) (Table 5, Fig. 2B and C). Similarly, current SBP and DBP (continuous variables) also showed significant synergistic interactions (β, 0.011; SE, 0.004; p = 0.005; β, 0.019; SE, 0.006; p = 0.002, respectively) with global Aβ deposition on IT tau deposition (Table 5). As shown in Fig. 2B and C, the relationship between Aβ and tau deposition was stronger in individuals with high SBP (or DBP) than those with low SBP (or DBP).

Table 5 Interaction effects of history of hypertension or current blood pressure with global Aβ on inferior temporal tau deposition
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Moderating effects of A history of hypertension, B current SBP state, and C current DBP state on the relationship between global Aβ and IT tau deposition. a Each line and statistical values represent the relationship between cerebral Aβ and tau stratified by each blood pressure marker (e.g., history of hypertension, current SBP state, or current DBP state), based on the repeated linear regression model for tau deposition using global Aβ SUVR as independent variable with adjusting for age, sex, apolipoprotein E ε4 positivity, and the vascular risk score. Shaded regions demonstrate the 95% confidence interval for each regression line. b The p-values are from the generalized regression models including interaction term of each blood pressure marker and global Aβ SUVR, as well as each blood pressure marker, global Aβ SUVR, age, sex, apolipoprotein E ε4 positivity, and the vascular risk score. Abbreviations: SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; Aβ, β-amyloid; IT, inferior temporal; SUVR, standardized uptake value ratio

Full size image

Discussion

In the current study, neither a history of hypertension nor the current BP was directly associated with Aβ or tau deposition (Tables 2 and 3; Fig. 1). However, the synergistic interaction effect of current BP with Aβ on tau deposition was significant, whereas the interaction effect between a history of hypertension and Aβ was not (Table 5 and Fig. 2). Our finding of no direct association of hypertension history or current BP with Aβ deposition is in line with many previous in vivo AD biomarker studies [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24], although one postmortem study reported a positive association between BP measured in midlife and senile plaque pathology at death [12] and a biomarker study reported a positive relationship between BP and Aβ deposition in late middle-aged adults [15]. Taken together, although we cannot exclude the possibility that high BP in midlife may influence cerebral Aβ accumulation, high current BP or history of hypertension in late-life does not seem to be directly related to an increased Aβ burden.

We found no significant direct association of current BP or hypertension history with cortical tau deposition as well, which is comparable to the results in previous CSF and PET studies [18, 19, 24]. In contrast to these findings, a recent Chinese study reported a significant association of hypertension history and higher SBP with greater CSF tau level in individuals aged between 40 and 90 years [17]. However, its subgroup analyses revealed that association was significant only for the younger subgroup (< 65 years of age), but not for the older subgroup (≥ 65 years of age), of which the age distribution and result are similar to those of our study.

While we found no direct association between current BP and tau deposition, there was a significant synergistic interaction effect of current SBP and DBP with Aβ on tau deposition. The relationship between Aβ and tau deposition was greater in individuals with high SBP (or DBP) than in those with low SBP (or DBP), suggesting that current (late-life) BP moderates the relationship between cerebral Aβ and tau. Similarly, a synergistic interaction of SBP and cerebral Aβ burden on cortical tau deposition was recently reported, although the effect of DBP was not investigated [25]. It is difficult to determine the exact mechanism by which high BP acts in AD pathobiology. However, decreased cerebral blood flow and damaged blood-brain barrier, both of which can be caused by high BP, might be the contributing factors since both of them interact with Aβ to increase tau deposition [39]. Tau pathology may be exacerbated by increased tau hyperphosphorylation associated with chronic cerebral hypoperfusion and reduced tau clearance related with impairment of blood-brain barrier and glymphatic system [40,41,42]. Additionally, given that tau pathology is related to the missorting of axonal tau into somatodendritic compartment by Aβ deposition and other neuronal insults [43], we assessed the potential mediation of cerebrovascular insult, measured by white matter hyperintensities (WMHs), for the synergistic interaction effect of current BP with Aβ on tau deposition. We first analyzed the interaction effect of global WMH volume (instead of a history of hypertension or current BP) with global Aβ on tau deposition. As shown in Additional file 1: Supplementary Table 1, the interaction effect was not significant. Furthermore, the results presented in Table 5 were largely unchanged even when we controlled global WMH volume as an additional covariate (See Additional file 1: Supplementary Table 2). These findings indicate that cerebrovascular injury measured by WMHs does not mediate the synergistic effect of high BP on tau pathology.

In contrast to high current BP, the interaction effect of a history of hypertension with Aβ on tau deposition was not significant. This may support the importance of strict BP monitoring and control in individuals with hypertension in order to prevent AD-related cognitive decline. Multiple studies reported that individuals with untreated hypertension or less intensive BP control were at higher risk of cognitive decline [44,45,46]. In the present study, most (32/34, 94%) participants with a history of hypertension were on antihypertensive medication. However, 14 (44%) of them still had high current SBP or DBP, i.e., poorly controlled hypertension.

A novel point of this study is that we specifically identified that high SBP and DBP in late-life, but not a history of hypertension, synergistically interact with in vivo cerebral amyloid deposition on tau accumulation. However, several limitations should be considered. First, as the study was cross-sectional, we could not infer causality in the relationship between high BP and AD pathology. In addition, long-term BP variability may be a more important factor than BP at single point [47]. Further longitudinal studies with larger sample size and sufficient long-term BP variability data are required. Second, the participants had relatively narrow ranges of BP (SBP, 80 mmHg to 160 mmHg; DBP, 50 mmHg to 100 mmHg). Even in the group with a history of hypertension, most individuals (32/34, 94%) were on anti-hypertensive medication and only a few had very high BP (three with SBP ≥ 160 mmHg and three with DBP ≥ 100 mmHg). This might have reduced the likelihood of detecting any direct association between very high BP and in vivo AD pathology. Third, we did not consider the effect of specific details for antihypertensive medication history, such as onset, duration, and dosage of the medication, and specific drug(s) administered, although such details may affect the association between hypertension history and AD biomarkers. Finally, the impact of cerebral blood flow alteration, caused by hypertension, on PET radioligand binding dynamics needs to be considered when interpreting the results. High BP reduces cerebral blood flow, which can potentially decrease estimates of PET ligand binding (i.e., estimates of Aβ or tau deposition) in the brain [48, 49]. However, given that high BP, synergistically with Aβ, increased cerebral tau deposition rather than decreased it, it is not likely that the influence of cerebral blood flow on estimates of PET ligand binding was a major determinant of our results.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that high current BP, rather than a history of hypertension, may synergistically modulate the relationship between cerebral Aβ burden and tau deposition in later life. In terms of AD prevention, our results support the importance of strict BP control in cognitively normal older adults with hypertension.

Availability of data and materials

The data of the current research are not freely accessible because the Institutional Review Boards of Seoul National University Hospital prohibits public data-sharing for privacy reasons. However, the data may be available from the independent data-sharing committee of the KBASE research group on reasonable request, after approval by the Institutional Review Boards. Requests for data access can be submitted to the administrative coordinator of the KBASE group by e-mail (kbasecohort@gmail.com); the coordinator is independent of the authors.

Abbreviations

AD:

Alzheimer’s disease

BP:

Blood pressure

Aβ:

β-amyloid

PET:

Positron emission tomography

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

SBP:

Systolic blood pressure

CN:

Cognitively normal

KBASE:

Korean Brain Aging Study for the Early Diagnosis and Prediction of Alzheimer’s Disease

CERAD:

Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease

DBP:

Diastolic blood pressure

VRS:

Vascular risk score

PiB:

Pittsburgh compound B

ROI:

Region of interest

SUVR:

Standardized uptake value ratio

IT:

Inferior temporal

GLM:

Generalized linear regression model

APOE4:

Apolipoprotein ε4

WMH:

White matter hyperintensity

References

  1. Kilander L, Nyman H, Boberg M, Hansson L, Lithell H. Hypertension is related to cognitive impairment: a 20-year follow-up of 999 men. Hypertension. 1998;31(3):780–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Launer LJ, Masaki K, Petrovitch H, Foley D, Havlik RJ. The association between midlife blood pressure levels and late-life cognitive function. The Honolulu-Asia Aging Study. JAMA. 1995;274(23):1846–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Elias MF, Elias PK, Sullivan LM, Wolf PA, D'Agostino RB. Lower cognitive function in the presence of obesity and hypertension: the Framingham heart study. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003;27(2):260–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Waldstein SR, Giggey PP, Thayer JF, Zonderman AB. Nonlinear relations of blood pressure to cognitive function: the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Hypertension. 2005;45(3):374–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Köhler S, Baars MA, Spauwen P, Schievink S, Verhey FR, van Boxtel MJ. Temporal evolution of cognitive changes in incident hypertension: prospective cohort study across the adult age span. Hypertension. 2014;63(2):245–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sharp SI, Aarsland D, Day S, Sønnesyn H, Ballard C, Group AsSVDSR. Hypertension is a potential risk factor for vascular dementia: systematic review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2011;26(7):661–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Muller M, Sigurdsson S, Kjartansson O, Aspelund T, Lopez OL, Jonnson PV, et al. Joint effect of mid- and late-life blood pressure on the brain: the AGES-Reykjavik study. Neurology. 2014;82(24):2187–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. van Dijk EJ, Prins ND, Vrooman HA, Hofman A, Koudstaal PJ, Breteler MM. Progression of cerebral small vessel disease in relation to risk factors and cognitive consequences: Rotterdam Scan study. Stroke. 2008;39(10):2712–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kivipelto M, Helkala EL, Laakso MP, Hanninen T, Hallikainen M, Alhainen K, et al. Apolipoprotein E epsilon4 allele, elevated midlife total cholesterol level, and high midlife systolic blood pressure are independent risk factors for late-life Alzheimer disease. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(3):149–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Luchsinger JA, Reitz C, Honig LS, Tang MX, Shea S, Mayeux R. Aggregation of vascular risk factors and risk of incident Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2005;65(4):545–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lennon MJ, Makkar SR, Crawford JD, Sachdev PS. Midlife Hypertension and Alzheimer's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;71(1):307–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Petrovitch H, White LR, Izmirilian G, Ross GW, Havlik RJ, Markesbery W, et al. Midlife blood pressure and neuritic plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, and brain weight at death: the HAAS. Honolulu-Asia aging Study. Neurobiol Aging. 2000;21(1):57–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Arvanitakis Z, Capuano AW, Lamar M, Shah RC, Barnes LL, Bennett DA, et al. Late-life blood pressure association with cerebrovascular and Alzheimer disease pathology. Neurology. 2018;91(6):e517–e25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang LY, Larson EB, Sonnen JA, Shofer JB, McCormick W, Bowen JD, et al. Blood pressure and brain injury in older adults: findings from a community-based autopsy study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57(11):1975–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Langbaum JB, Chen K, Launer LJ, Fleisher AS, Lee W, Liu X, et al. Blood pressure is associated with higher brain amyloid burden and lower glucose metabolism in healthy late middle-age persons. Neurobiol Aging. 2012;33(4):827 e11-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Toledo JB, Toledo E, Weiner MW, Jack CR Jr, Jagust W, Lee VM, et al. Cardiovascular risk factors, cortisol, and amyloid-beta deposition in Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Alzheimers Dement. 2012;8(6):483–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hu H, Meng L, Bi YL, Zhang W, Xu W, Shen XN, et al. Tau pathologies mediate the association of blood pressure with cognitive impairment in adults without dementia: The CABLE study. Alzheimers Dement. 2022;18(1):53–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Glodzik L, Mosconi L, Tsui W, de Santi S, Zinkowski R, Pirraglia E, et al. Alzheimer's disease markers, hypertension, and gray matter damage in normal elderly. Neurobiol Aging. 2012;33(7):1215–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kester MI, van der Flier WM, Mandic G, Blankenstein MA, Scheltens P, Muller M. Joint effect of hypertension and APOE genotype on CSF biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;20(4):1083–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gottesman RF, Schneider AL, Zhou Y, Coresh J, Green E, Gupta N, et al. Association Between Midlife Vascular Risk Factors and Estimated Brain Amyloid Deposition. JAMA. 2017;317(14):1443–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Vemuri P, Knopman DS, Lesnick TG, Przybelski SA, Mielke MM, Graff-Radford J, et al. Evaluation of Amyloid Protective Factors and Alzheimer Disease Neurodegeneration Protective Factors in Elderly Individuals. JAMA Neurol. 2017;74(6):718–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rodrigue KM, Rieck JR, Kennedy KM, Devous MD Sr, Diaz-Arrastia R, Park DC. Risk factors for beta-amyloid deposition in healthy aging: vascular and genetic effects. JAMA Neurol. 2013;70(5):600–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lane CA, Barnes J, Nicholas JM, Sudre CH, Cash DM, Parker TD, et al. Associations between blood pressure across adulthood and late-life brain structure and pathology in the neuroscience substudy of the 1946 British birth cohort (Insight 46): an epidemiological study. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(10):942–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Vemuri P, Lesnick TG, Przybelski SA, Knopman DS, Lowe VJ, Graff-Radford J, et al. Age, vascular health, and Alzheimer disease biomarkers in an elderly sample. Ann Neurol. 2017;82(5):706–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Rabin JS, Yang HS, Schultz AP, Hanseeuw BJ, Hedden T, Viswanathan A, et al. Vascular Risk and beta-Amyloid Are Synergistically Associated with Cortical Tau. Ann Neurol. 2019;85(2):272–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mills KT, Stefanescu A, He J. The global epidemiology of hypertension. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020;16(4):223–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Waldstein SR, Brown JR, Maier KJ, Katzel LI. Diagnosis of hypertension and high blood pressure levels negatively affect cognitive function in older adults. Ann Behav Med. 2005;29(3):174–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kjeldsen SE, Narkiewicz K, Burnier M, Oparil S. Intensive blood pressure lowering prevents mild cognitive impairment and possible dementia and slows development of white matter lesions in brain: the SPRINT Memory and Cognition IN Decreased Hypertension (SPRINT MIND) study. Blood Press. 2018;27(5):247–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Byun MS, Yi D, Lee JH, Choe YM, Sohn BK, Lee JY, et al. Korean Brain Aging Study for the Early Diagnosis and Prediction of Alzheimer's Disease: Methodology and Baseline Sample Characteristics. Psychiatry Investig. 2017;14(6):851–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee JH, Lee KU, Lee DY, Kim KW, Jhoo JH, Kim JH, et al. Development of the Korean version of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Packet (CERAD-K): clinical and neuropsychological assessment batteries. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002;57(1):P47–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, et al. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension. 2003;42(6):1206–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. DeCarli C, Mungas D, Harvey D, Reed B, Weiner M, Chui H, et al. Memory impairment, but not cerebrovascular disease, predicts progression of MCI to dementia. Neurology. 2004;63(2):220–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Park JC, Han SH, Yi D, Byun MS, Lee JH, Jang S, et al. Plasma tau/amyloid-beta1-42 ratio predicts brain tau deposition and neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease. Brain. 2019;142(3):771–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rolls ET, Joliot M, Tzourio-Mazoyer N. Implementation of a new parcellation of the orbitofrontal cortex in the automated anatomical labeling atlas. Neuroimage. 2015;122:1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Reiman EM, Chen K, Liu X, Bandy D, Yu M, Lee W, et al. Fibrillar amyloid-beta burden in cognitively normal people at 3 levels of genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(16):6820–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Baker SL, Maass A, Jagust WJ. Considerations and code for partial volume correcting [(18)F]-AV-1451 tau PET data. Data Brief. 2017;15:648–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Braak H, Alafuzoff I, Arzberger T, Kretzschmar H, Del Tredici K. Staging of Alzheimer disease-associated neurofibrillary pathology using paraffin sections and immunocytochemistry. Acta Neuropathol. 2006;112(4):389–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Johnson KA, Schultz A, Betensky RA, Becker JA, Sepulcre J, Rentz D, et al. Tau positron emission tomographic imaging in aging and early Alzheimer disease. Ann Neurol. 2016;79(1):110–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Albrecht D, Isenberg AL, Stradford J, Monreal T, Sagare A, Pachicano M, et al. Associations between Vascular Function and Tau PET Are Associated with Global Cognition and Amyloid. J Neurosci. 2020;40(44):8573–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhao Y, Gong CX. From chronic cerebral hypoperfusion to Alzheimer-like brain pathology and neurodegeneration. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2015;35(1):101–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Mortensen KN, Sanggaard S, Mestre H, Lee H, Kostrikov S, Xavier ALR, et al. Impaired Glymphatic Transport in Spontaneously Hypertensive Rats. J Neurosci. 2019;39(32):6365–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Michalicova A, Majerova P, Kovac A. Tau Protein and Its Role in Blood-Brain Barrier Dysfunction. Front Mol Neurosci. 2020;13:570045.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Zempel H, Mandelkow E. Lost after translation: missorting of Tau protein and consequences for Alzheimer disease. Trends Neurosci. 2014;37(12):721–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Gao S, Jin Y, Unverzagt FW, Liang C, Hall KS, Ma F, et al. Hypertension and cognitive decline in rural elderly Chinese. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57(6):1051–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Turana Y, Tengkawan J, Chia YC, Hoshide S, Shin J, Chen CH, et al. Hypertension and Dementia: A comprehensive review from the HOPE Asia Network. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2019;21(8):1091–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Group SMIftSR, Williamson JD, Pajewski NM, Auchus AP, Bryan RN, Chelune G, et al. Effect of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control on Probable Dementia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019;321(6):553–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Sible IJ, Nation DA. Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging I. Visit-to-Visit Blood Pressure Variability and CSF Alzheimer Disease Biomarkers in Cognitively Unimpaired and Mildly Impaired Older Adults. Neurology. 2022;98(24):e2446–e53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Muller M, van der Graaf Y, Visseren FL, Mali WP, Geerlings MI, Group SS. Hypertension and longitudinal changes in cerebral blood flow: the SMART-MR study. Ann Neurol. 2012;71(6):825–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Cselenyi Z, Farde L. Quantification of blood flow-dependent component in estimates of beta-amyloid load obtained using quasi-steady-state standardized uptake value ratio. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2015;35(9):1485–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the members of the KBASE Research Group for their contribution. A complete list of KBASE research group members can be found at http://kbase.kr/. We sincerely appreciate the time and effort of all the participants in the research.

Funding

This study was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea (grant No: NRF-2014M3C7A1046042), a grant from the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (HI18C0630 & HI19C0149), a grant from the Seoul National University Hospital, Republic of Korea (No. 3020200030), and a grant from the National Institute on Aging, USA (U01AG072177). The funding sources played no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, writing of the manuscript, or decision to submit it for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Taewon Kim, Min Soo Byun, Joon Hyung Jung, Nayeong Kong & Dong Young Lee

  2. Institute of Human Behavioral Medicine, Medical Research Center Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Dahyun Yi, Hyejin Ahn, Gijung Jung & Dong Young Lee

  3. Department of Psychiatry, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Min Soo Byun & Dong Young Lee

  4. Department of Neuropsychiatry, Nowon Eulji University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Min Jung Kim

  5. Department of Neuropsychiatry, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Jun-Young Lee

  6. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Yun-Sang Lee

  7. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Yu Kyeong Kim

Authors
  1. Taewon Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dahyun Yi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Min Soo Byun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hyejin Ahn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Joon Hyung Jung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nayeong Kong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Min Jung Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Gijung Jung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jun-Young Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Yun-Sang Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Yu Kyeong Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Dong Young Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

for the KBASE Research Group

Contributions

TK — conceptualization, formal analysis, writing – original draft. DY — methodology, investigation, data curation, writing – review and editing. HA — formal analysis, data curation. GJ — investigation, data curation, project administration. Y-SL — methodology, writing – review and editing. YKK — methodology, writing – review and editing. DYL — conceptualization, writing – review and editing, supervision, funding acquisition. All other authors — investigation, data curation, writing – review and editing. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong Young Lee.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Seoul National University Hospital and Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea. All participants provided written informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Supplementary Table 1.

Interaction effect of global WMH volume and global Aβ on inferior tau deposition. Supplementary Table 2. Interaction effect of BP marker and global Aβ on inferior temporal tau deposition with additional adjustment with global WMH volume.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, T., Yi, D., Byun, M.S. et al. Synergistic interaction of high blood pressure and cerebral beta-amyloid on tau pathology. Alz Res Therapy 14, 193 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-022-01149-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-022-01149-7

Keywords

  • Hypertension
  • Blood pressure
  • Alzheimer’s disease
  • Positron emission tomography
  • Beta-amyloid
  • Tau

Alzheimer's Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1758-9193