Skip to main content
Download PDF

White matter hyperintensities in autopsy-confirmed frontotemporal lobar degeneration and Alzheimer’s disease

Alzheimer's Research & Therapy volume 13, Article number: 129 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

We aimed to systematically describe the burden and distribution of white matter hyperintensities (WMH) and investigate correlations with neuropsychiatric symptoms in pathologically proven Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD).

Methods

Autopsy-confirmed cases were identified from the Sunnybrook Dementia Study, including 15 cases of AD and 58 cases of FTLD (22 FTLD-TDP cases; 10 FTLD-Tau [Pick’s] cases; 11 FTLD-Tau Corticobasal Degeneration cases; and 15 FTLD-Tau Progressive Supranuclear Palsy cases). Healthy matched controls (n = 35) were included for comparison purposes. Data analyses included ANCOVA to compare the burden of WMH on antemortem brain MRI between groups, adjusted linear regression models to identify associations between WMH burden and neuropsychiatric symptoms, and image-guided pathology review of selected areas of WMH from each pathologic group.

Results

Burden and regional distribution of WMH differed significantly between neuropathological groups (F5,77 = 2.67, P’ = 0.029), with the FTLD-TDP group having the highest mean volume globally (8032 ± 8889 mm3) and in frontal regions (4897 ± 6163 mm3). The AD group had the highest mean volume in occipital regions (468 ± 420 mm3). Total score on the Neuropsychiatric Inventory correlated with bilateral frontal WMH volume (β = 0.330, P = 0.006), depression correlated with bilateral occipital WMH volume (β = 0.401, P < 0.001), and apathy correlated with bilateral frontal WMH volume (β = 0.311, P = 0.009), all corrected for the false discovery rate. Image-guided neuropathological assessment of selected cases with the highest burden of WMH in each pathologic group revealed presence of severe gliosis, myelin pallor, and axonal loss, but with no distinguishing features indicative of the underlying proteinopathy.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that WMH are associated with neuropsychiatric manifestations in AD and FTLD and that WMH burden and regional distribution in neurodegenerative disorders differ according to the underlying neuropathological processes.

Background

Regional gray matter atrophy has been linked to the clinical expression of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) [1,2,3]. Antemortem hippocampal atrophy has been associated with episodic memory deficits [4] while orbitofrontal atrophy has been linked to disinhibition [5]. While regional gray matter atrophy represents an important biomarker for these disorders, these changes occur late in their respective pathological cascades and therefore development of other imaging biomarkers is warranted.

Changes in white matter, such as hyperintensities on T2-weighted MRI sequences, have gained interest as potential biomarkers in neurodegenerative disorders. Historically, white matter hyperintensities (WMH) have been associated with cerebrovascular disease, vascular risk factors, and age, and to parallel global and regional cortical atrophy [6]. More recently, WMH in AD and congophilic amyloid angiopathy (CAA) may represent microvascular dysfunction secondary to amyloid β deposition in the cerebral vasculature [7] as well as venous collagenosis [8], independent of age and vascular risk factors. Furthermore, WMH may be associated with clinical manifestations. In prospective longitudinal studies of older cognitively normal adults and AD patients, periventricular WMH correlated negatively with mental processing speed, while left temporal WMH correlated negatively with memory performance [9, 10]. However, neural correlates of WMH have not been extensively and rigorously studied in pathologically proven cases of AD and FTLD.

Mapping the distribution and burden of WMH in AD and FTLD may further our understanding of the underlying pathological mechanisms of these disorders. In this study, we aimed to: (1) using antemortem MRI, describe WMH burden and distribution in these neuropathological entities, (2) investigate brain WMH-behavioural correlates of neuropsychiatric manifestations, and (3) perform an image-guided, detailed neuropathological assessment of regions where WMH were observed in representative cases from each of the neuropathological subtypes with the highest burden of WMH.

Methods

Participants

This research was carried out as part of the Sunnybrook Dementia Study, a prospective longitudinal cohort study of cognitively normal ageing, mild cognitive impairment, and neurodegenerative dementias conducted at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01800214). The design and methods have been previously published [11]. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Board at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and all participants, or their caregivers when appropriate, provided written informed consent, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consecutive deceased participants with autopsy-confirmation of pure FTLD (i.e., without other pathological comorbidity) were retrospectively identified, including cases of FTLD due to Pick’s disease (i.e., FTLD-Tau [Pick’s]), TDP-43 proteinopathy (i.e., FTLD-TDP), Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (i.e., FTLD-Tau [PSP]), and Corticobasal Degeneration (i.e., FTLD-Tau [CBD]). Cognitively impaired participants with autopsy-confirmation of pure Alzheimer’s pathology without other proteinopathies (e.g., synucleinopathy or FTLD-TDP) or large vessel cerebrovascular disease were consecutively selected. Healthy matched controls were randomly selected from the Sunnybrook Dementia Study cohort and included in the present study for comparison purposes for the antemortem MRI study. For enrolment in the study, these participants had to be between the age of 40 and 90, be fluent in English, completed 8 years of education or higher, and have no significant memory complaints. They were excluded if they were being treated or had a history of being treated for a psychiatric or neurological illness (i.e., other than primary neurodegenerative diagnoses), history of alcohol or substance abuse or dependence, were currently using psychoactive medications not indicated for their primary neurodegenerative diagnoses, or had medical contraindications to MRI.

Genetic studies

Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood using Qiagen kits. DNA from participants with a clinical diagnosis of a frontotemporal dementia spectrum disorder was screened for pathogenic mutations known to cause FTLD: C9orf72 [12], GRN [13], and MAPT [14]. A pathogenic expansion of C9orf72 was considered as having more than 30 repeats. All selected cases of AD were sporadic in nature, free of mutations in the APP, PSEN1, and PSEN2 genes [14].

Neuropathology

Autopsies limited to the brain and spinal cord were performed by an experienced neuropathologist (author JK). Neuropathological diagnoses and staging were made for the primary disease process and any co-existing neurodegenerative phenomena at the time of original autopsy based on a standardized blocking and staining protocol for dementia, applying consensus criteria for AD [15,16,17,18] and FTLD [19, 20]. Cases were included in the study and assigned into the following neuropathological diagnostic categories based on the original autopsy reports: (i) AD (n = 15), (ii) FTLD-Tau (Pick’s) (n = 10), (iii) FTLD-Tau (PSP) (n = 15), (iv) FTLD-Tau (CBD) (n = 11), and (v) FTLD-TDP (n = 22).

The pathologic classification of FTLD-TDP has evolved in recent years; thus, these cases were subjected to a central pathology review. Slides from the original autopsy were retrieved from the Sunnybrook pathology archive and reviewed by authors JK and AG. Additional slides were cut from selected original tissue blocks and stained with antibodies for TDP-43, alpha-synuclein, tau (AT8), and/or p62 (antibody information provided in the Additional file 1). Based on this central pathology review, cases within the FTLD-TDP category were re-classified using the harmonized consensus criteria for FTLD-TDP pathology as types A-D [21, 22].

Cases were excluded from the study if (i) neuropathological diagnosis could not be accurately assessed (n = 1), (ii) immunohistochemical staining examination was incomplete and could not be retrospectively completed (n = 2), and (iii) multiple co-morbid neuropathologies were present, none of which could be assigned unequivocally as the predominant cause of dementia (n = 25; 10 cases of FTLD had concomitant alpha-synucleinopathy, amyloid plaques, or infarcts, and 15 cases of AD had concomitant alpha-synucleinopathy, infarcts, or TDP43).

MRI acquisition and analysis

All participants underwent MRI on a 1.5 Tesla GE Signa (Milwaukee, WI, USA) system in compliance with consensus panel imaging recommendations for studies examining vascular cognitive impairment [23]. The following sequences were used for volumetric analysis: T1-weighted-axial three-dimensional (3D) Spoiled Gradient Recalled Echo (SPGR): 5 ms echo time (TE), 35 ms repetition time (TR), 1 number of excitations (NEX), 35o flip angle, 22 × 16.5cm (FOV), 0.859 × 0.859 mm in-plane resolution, 1.2 to 1.4 mm slice thickness depending on head-size, and a whole head interleaved proton density and T2 (interleaved axial dual-echo spin echo: TEs of 30 and 80 ms, 3 s TR, 0.5 NEX, 20 × 20 cm FOV, 0.781 × 0.781 mm in-plane resolution, 3-mm slice thickness with no gaps between slices).

MR images were analyzed with the semi-automatic brain region extraction (SABRE) and Lesion Explorer (LE) processing pipeline [24], which permits semi-automatized segmentation and parcellation procedures and to obtain regionalized and whole-brain volumetrics for normal appearing tissues and WMH. An automated 3D connectivity algorithm was applied to segment periventricular from deep WMH. Volumes for gray matter, normal appearing white matter, and WMH were obtained in 26 regions of interest, 13 per hemisphere (frontal: superior, middle, inferior, medial inferior, medial superior, medial middle; parietal: superior, inferior; occipital; temporal: anterior, posterior; basal ganglia/thalamus: anterior, posterior). Intracranial volumetric data (gray matter and WMH) were normalized for total intracranial volume (TIV). For analysis, all WMH values were log-transformed after normalizing for TIV due to their known skewed distribution [24].

Neuropsychological and neuropsychiatric assessments

Participants underwent a standardized clinical evaluation at baseline within 12 weeks of MRI acquisition. This comprised a medical history, physical examination, and a neuropsychological and neuropsychiatric battery [25]. The following vascular risk factors were collected: hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and history of stroke and/or transient ischemic attack. For the purpose of this study, cognitive and neuropsychiatric testing results were retrieved for the following: (i) the Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) [26], (ii) the Dementia Rating Scale (DRS) [27], and (iii) the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) [28]. For the latter, the total score (maximum of 144 points) and the 12 items, i.e., neuropsychiatric symptom subscores (maximum of 12 points for each item), were obtained, as well as the caregiver distress subscore (maximum of 60 points).

Image-guided neuropathology review of white matter regions with highest burden of WMH

For each neuropathologic group (FTLD-TDP, FTLD-Tau [PSP], FTLD-Tau [CBD], and FTLD-Tau [Pick’s], AD with CAA, and AD without CAA), antemortem T2-weighted MRI images were examined to determine the one case per group with the greatest volume of WMH. These cases subsequently underwent further pathologic evaluation of the affected white matter using annotated coronal MRI images as a guide (see Additional Figure 1, in Additional file 1). One periventricular white matter region that was heavily affected by WMH on MRI was identified within the previous coronally dissected formalin-fixed archived cadaveric brain tissue. For one case, no white matter region of interest could be found in the remaining brain tissue. For the other seven cases, this single region of interest was sampled. FFPE sections were cut at 6 microns and stained with H&E/LFB as well as immunohistochemistry for neurofilament, GFAP, CD68, Tau (AT8), and TDP43 (antibody information provided in Additional file 1). These slides were scanned at 40X on an Aperio ScanScope AT Digital Pathology Slide Scanner and examined digitally synchronously by two experienced neuropathologists (authors AG and JK) who were blinded to the neuropathologic diagnosis/group of each case. Correlating the H&E/LFB stained slide to the annotated coronal MRI image, the white matter region of interest was located within the sampled tissue. On H&E/LFB, pallor of myelin staining was assessed semi-quantitatively (0–3: none, mild, moderate, severe) using subcortical U-fibers as the internal control for none. Arteriolosclerosis, hemosiderin deposition, and collagenosis of the small and large caliber periventricular veins were determined to be present or absent. TDP43 and tau (AT8)-positive inclusions, axonal loss (neurofilament), gliosis (GFAP), and macrophage/microglial infiltration/activation (CD68) were assessed semi-quantitatively (0–3) on immunohistochemistry.

Statistical analyses

We compared baseline characteristics between each of the neuropathological groups and the healthy control group using ANOVA with post hoc Bonferroni tests for continuous, normally distributed variables, χ2/Fisher exact tests for categorical/dichotomous variables, respectively, and Kruskal-Wallis with post hoc Mann-Whitney U tests for non-normally distributed data. Differences in total and regional volumes of WMH on T2-weighted imaging (i.e., dependent variables) among neuropathological groups and the healthy control group were assessed by using ANCOVA, controlling for age at imaging and vascular risk factors.

We also assessed for the association between regional WMH volumes and corresponding regional gray matter volumes using multiple linear regression analyses, controlling for age, education, sex, and vascular risk factors, with regional WMH volume as the independent variable and the corresponding grey matter volume as the dependent variable.

We conducted linear regressions to assess for associations between global and regional WMH volumes and scores on the NPI (total scores and 12 subscale scores) across all neuropathological groups. For the linear regressions, a model was designed a priori and contained age, sex, vascular risk factors, and corresponding regional gray matter volumes as covariates, with WMH volume as the independent variable and NPI score as the dependent variable. Considering (1) the exploratory nature of our study, (2) that NPI subscores are highly correlated with each other, and (3) that regional WMH volumes are also highly correlated with each other, the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure was used to control for the false discovery rate across all regression analyses for each brain region, with a false discovery rate (FDR; Q) set at 0.10. A Bonferroni correction is too strict due to the non-independence of these variables as outlined above. Statistical analyses were performed with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 24.0.

Results

Participant characteristics

A summary of demographic and clinical characteristics of participants with the various neuropathological diagnoses is provided in Table 1 and in the Additional Table 1 (Additional file 1). No significant differences were present except for, as expected, overall performance on the cognitive tests, specifically on the MMSE and on the DRS. These were significantly lower in the pathologic neurodegenerative disease groups compared to the healthy control group (F5,95 = 10.27, P < 0.0001, and F5,90 = 13.42, P < 0.0001, respectively), but did not differ significantly between pathologic neurodegenerative disease groups (F4,61 = 1.69, P = 0.112 and F4,56 = 0.59, P = 0.680 for the mean scores on the MMSE and DRS, respectively). There were six cases of FTLD with pathogenic mutations: 4 GRN and 2 C9orf72 mutation carriers.

Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics
Full size table

Neuropsychiatric symptoms

Baseline neuropsychiatric symptom profile of participants according to neuropathological diagnosis is shown in Fig. 1. Overall score on the NPI differed between groups (F4,45 = 4.39, P < 0.0001), with FTLD-Tau (Pick’s) (42.2 ± 23.7 points) and FTLD-TDP (25.1 ± 10.9 points) having significantly higher mean scores than for the AD group (11.9 ± 8.0 points, P < 0.001 for both comparisons). Apathy was the most prevalent neuropsychiatric manifestation in all neuropathological groups, while hallucinations and delusions were infrequently reported symptoms. Of all the subgroups, FTLD-Tau due to Pick’s disease had the highest caregiver burden mean score (18.2 ± 10.8 points) as well as the highest mean scores for 8 of the 12 NPI subscales.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Neuropsychiatric symptoms at baseline. Mean score and standard deviation on the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) for all of the pathological subgroups. A Total NPI score. B Caregiver score. C Subscale items. P values for differences between subgroups (ANOVA) are found underneath graphs. All bars in the figure are significant differences between each pair with * = P < 0.05 and ** = P < 0.005. Abbreviations: AD Alzheimer’s disease, CBD corticobasal degeneration, FTLD frontotemporal lobar degeneration, PSP progressive supranuclear palsy

Full size image

WMH volumetrics among neuropathological groups and controls

In the healthy control group, total WMH and periventricular WMH volumes were significantly associated with age (r = 0.481, P = 0.009 and r = 0.490, P = 0.008, respectively) but not for deep WMH (r = 0.119, P = 0.546). After adjusting for vascular risk factors and age at time of imaging, WMH burden and cerebral distribution significantly differed between neuropathological groups and the healthy control group (Fig. 2). There were significant differences between groups in the total burden of WMH (F5,77 = 2.67, P’ = 0.029), with FTLD-TDP having the highest mean volume (8032 ± 8889 mm3) and FTLD-Tau (Pick’s) having the lowest mean volume (3088. ± 3238 mm3). Groups also differed significantly in volumes of WMH in the periventricular region (F5,77 = 2.82, P’ = 0.022) and frontal regions (F5,77 = 2.59, P’ = 0.020), more specifically in lateral frontal regions (F5,77 = 2.13, P’ = 0.029), with FTLD-TDP having the highest burden in these regions (7404 ± 8539 mm3; 4897 ± 6163 mm3; and 3761 ± 5069 mm3, respectively). The AD group had the highest mean volume of WMH in the occipital region (468 ± 420 mm3; Fig. 2). Post hoc analyses revealed that AD with CAA was associated with significantly higher burden of WMH in the bilateral parietal region than for AD without CAA (3241 ± 2911 mm3 vs. 672 ± 664 mm3, P = 0.042). For FTLD-TDP, Harmonized type was determined for 19 of 22 cases: type A (n = 11), type B (n = 2), mixed type A+B (n = 2), and type C (n = 4). We did not have adequate power to run statistical analyses due to small FTLD-TDP subgroup sizes.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Comparison of white matter hyperintensity volumes between groups. Box plots show white matter hyperintensity volumes on T2-weighted images according to neuropathological diagnosis, with lower and upper hinges of each boxplot corresponding to 25th and 75th percentiles of data. A SABRE parcellation of brain regions. B Total intracranial white matter hyperintensity burden. C Deep white matter and periventricular white matter hyperintensity burden. D Regional white matter hyperintensity volumetrics. Underneath the graphs are P values for differences between subgroups (ANOVA) and P’ values for differences between subgroups adjusting for age and vascular risk factors (ANCOVA). All bars in the figure are significant differences between each pair with * = P < 0.05 and ** = P < 0.005, corrected for age at imaging and vascular risk factors. Abbreviations: AD Alzheimer’s disease, CBD corticobasal degeneration, FTLD frontotemporal lobar degeneration, HC healthy controls, PSP progressive supranuclear palsy

Full size image

Multiple linear regressions between regional WMH volumes and corresponding gray matter volumes for each pathologic neurodegenerative disease group and healthy controls were performed. There were no significant associations found in the healthy control and AD groups. In FTLD, increased regional volumes of WMH were associated with decreased volumes of gray matter in the corresponding area in the right frontal region (β = −0.425, P = 0.004), in the right lateral frontal region (β = −0.345, P = 0.034), in the right parietal region (β = −0.299, P = 0.049), and in the right occipital region (β = −0.462, P = 0.002). All of these correlations survived FDR correction.

Neuropsychiatric symptoms and WMH volumetrics

Across the entire pathologically confirmed neurodegenerative disease cohort, positive associations between neuropsychiatric symptoms and total and regional burden of WMH (Tables 2, 3, and 4) were observed; specifically, between the total NPI score and WMH volume in frontal regions (bilateral frontal region, β = 0.330, P = 0.006), with the strongest correlation found in the right lateral frontal region (β = 0.339, P = 0.008). Regarding specific neuropsychiatric manifestations, significant positive correlations were identified for the depression, apathy, euphoria, and night-time behaviors NPI subscores. For depression, increased bilateral occipital and right parietal WMH were associated with higher mean scores (β = 0.401, P < 0.001; and β = 0.326, P = 0.007, respectively). For euphoria, a significant correlation was identified with WMH in deep white matter (β = 0.317, P = 0.006). For apathy, several significant positive correlations were identified with WMH burden in frontal regions, with the strongest correlation being in the bilateral frontal region (β = 0.311, P = 0.009). Similarly, several significant positive correlations were identified with night-time behaviors and WMH in frontal regions, with the strongest correlation being in the right lateral frontal region (β = 0.390, P = 0.003). These regression analyses were corrected for age, sex, vascular risk factors, and corresponding regional gray matter volumes.

Table 2 Linear regression between white matter hyperintensities and neuropsychiatric symptoms across all subgroups
Full size table
Table 3 Linear regression between white matter hyperintensities and neuropsychiatric symptoms across all subgroups
Full size table
Table 4 Linear regression between white matter hyperintensities and neuropsychiatric symptoms across all subgroups
Full size table

Neuropathological findings within sampled WMH guided by MRI

Cases of each pathologic neurodegenerative disease group with the highest burden of WMH on T2-weighted images were selected for further neuropathological assessment, and these results are shown in Fig. 3. All white matter regions of interest appeared normal macroscopically. The most frequent histologic correlate of WMH was the presence of moderate-severe gliosis on GFAP staining. Moderate-severe myelin pallor and axonal loss were also present in the majority of cases. Vascular pathology in the form of venous collagenosis was occasionally present, but no cases showed arteriolosclerosis, infarction, or perivascular hemosiderin (microbleeds). Macrophage infiltration was present in the majority of cases, but only in sparse amounts. All cases lacked TDP43 and tau (AT8) immunopositive inclusions, except for 1 case of FTLD-Tau (CBD) having very rare tau immunopositive glial inclusions. A summary of the pathological findings is provided in the Additional Table 2 (Additional file 1).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Selected examples of neuropathological findings in area of maximal white matter hyperintensity. A H&E/LFB staining of an FTLD-TDP case showing moderate (2) pallor of myelin staining within periventricular white matter (black arrow) in comparison to subcortical U fibers (green arrow); B H&E/LFB staining of an FTLD-tau (Pick’s) case showing pallor of periventricular myelin staining; C H&E/LFB staining of FTLD-tau (PSP) case showing severe myelin pallor; D H&E/LFB staining of an FTLD-tau (CBD) case showing collagenosis of large caliber periventricular veins; E GFAP immunolabeling of an FTLD-TDP case showing severe gliosis; F tau (AT8) immunohistochemistry of an FTLD-tau (CBD) case showing rare glial cytoplasmic tau immunopositive inclusions within the white matter region of interest (black arrow); G CD68 immunostaining of an FTLD-tau (Pick’s) case showing mild macrophage infiltration; H NF staining of an FTLD-tau (CBD) case showing severe axonal loss. Abbreviations: AD Alzheimer’s disease, CAA congophilic amyloid angiopathy, CBD corticobasal degeneration, CD68 cluster of differentiation 68, FTLD frontotemporal lobar degeneration, GFAP glial fibrillary acid protein, H&E/LFB Hematoxylin Eosin with Luxol Fast Blue, NF neurofilament, PSP progressive supranuclear palsy

Full size image

Discussion

We systematically analyzed and compared the volume and distribution of WMH seen on antemortem T2-weighted MRI in a cohort of neuropathologically proven cases of AD and FTLD and investigated the brain-behavioral associations between WMH and neuropsychiatric manifestations. We also reviewed the histologic findings within WMH in cases from each pathologic neurodegenerative disease group presenting the highest burden on brain imaging. We found a differential burden and varying distribution of WMH on T2-weighted MRI between these neuropathologies with cases of FTLD-TDP having a notably higher burden of WMH, particularly in frontotemporal regions, and AD cases having a higher burden of WMH in parieto-occipital regions (Fig. 4). In AD, concomitant presence of CAA was associated with a higher burden of WMH in the bilateral parietal regions. Moreover, we found that WMH burden correlated negatively with cortical volume in FTLD but not in AD, suggesting potentially different underlying neurobiological mechanisms. After controlling for several potential confounders, most importantly gray matter atrophy and multiple comparisons, we demonstrated that increased volume of WMH in distinct regions, notably in frontal white matter, was associated with greater neuropsychiatric manifestations as measured by the NPI. Lastly, neuropathological assessment of white matter regions with the highest burden of WMH on T2-weighted MRI revealed moderate to severe gliosis, myelin pallor, and axonal loss with minimal vascular pathology other than venous collagenosis.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Selected examples of T2-weighted axial images and neurodegenerative neuropathological findings of participants. A T2-MRI of FTLD-TDP case with severe burden of WMH and prominent atrophy in medial and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex bilaterally; B T2-MRI of FTLD-tau (Pick's) case with prominent atrophy in medial and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex bilaterally with little WMH; C T2-MRI of AD case with WMH in posterior regions; and D T2-MRI of a healthy control. E H&E staining of FTLD-tau (Pick’s) case showing severe neuronal loss and gliosis in the frontal cortex with a ballooned neuron (black arrow); F H&E staining of FTLD-tau (CBD) case showing a ballooned neuron (black arrow) in frontal cortex; G beta-amyloid immunostaining of AD case showing frequent neuritic amyloid plaques (black arrows) and amyloid angiopathy (red arrow) in frontal cortex; and H tau (AT8) immunostaining of FTLD-tau (PSP) case showing a neurofibrillary tangle (black arrow) and astrocytic inclusions (red arrows). I FTLD-TDP Harmonized type A with short dystrophic neurites (black arrow) and compact neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions (red arrow) preferentially located in superficial cortical layers. J FTLD-TDP Harmonized type B with diffuse granular neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions (black arrow). K Mixed FTLD-TDP Harmonized A+B type with superficial dystrophic neurites (black arrow) and compact neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions (red arrow). L FTLD-TDP Harmonized type C with long thick dystrophic neurites (black arrow). Abbreviations: AD Alzheimer’s disease, CBD corticobasal degeneration, FTLD frontotemporal lobar degeneration, PSP progressive supranuclear palsy

Full size image

Mechanisms and distribution of WMH in AD and FTLD

The highest burden of WMH was found in FTLD-TDP cases. Extensive and widespread white matter involvement has been previously described in symptomatic GRN mutation carriers without significant vascular risk factors or other white matter diseases [29]. Although anomalies in white matter on diffusion tensor imaging have been described in chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9orf72) mutation carriers [30], hyperintensities on T2-weighted or FLAIR imaging in white matter have not been reported for other known FTLD-causing genetic mutations. In the Genetic Frontotemporal Dementia Initiative (GENFI), only symptomatic GRN mutation carriers were found to have an increased global load of WMH when compared to normal controls, presymptomatic GRN mutation carriers, and both presymptomatic and symptomatic C9orf72 and MAPT mutation carriers [31]. In the symptomatic GRN mutation subgroup, increased WMH burden was reported in the frontal and occipital lobes [31]. Although the precise mechanisms leading to white matter lesions in the context of progranulin deficiency are still not known, it has been hypothesized that progranulin’s functions in neuroinflammation and vasoprotection may play pivotal roles [32]. Interestingly in our cohort, FTLD-TDP cases were predominantly sporadic. While the underlying mechanisms leading to preferential involvement of the frontotemporal white matter and related neurocircuits still remain uncertain, the distribution of white matter lesions in our study appears to parallel areas of greater gray matter atrophy, suggesting common pathological factors, such as Wallerian degeneration.

In comparison to FTLD-TDP, FTLD-Tau (Pick’s) had a lower burden of WMH, suggesting that WMH load and distribution could have clinical utility in differentiating between these two proteinopathies that have overlapping clinical presentations. For FTLD-Tau (PSP) and FTLD-Tau (CBD), a few studies have described patterns of white matter atrophy as well as white matter anomalies on DTI [33, 34]. However, these studies have not systematically assessed nor reported the presence of WMH. Increased signal intensity changes on FLAIR images have been described in a small case series of patients with corticobasal syndrome with a higher burden noted more in frontal and parietal subcortical white matter, ipsilateral to the clinically affected hemisphere [35]. However, corticobasal syndrome is a pathologically heterogeneous group with cases due to CBD, PSP, TDP-43, Pick’s disease, and AD being described. Interestingly, in our cohort, FTLD-Tau (PSP) cases were found to have a significantly higher burden of WMH in parietal regions compared to healthy controls and to have a greater deep white matter burden than CBD cases, findings that have not been previously reported.

In contrast, white matter lesions in AD, such as signal changes and lacunar infarcts [9, 36], have been previously and extensively investigated and appear to be intricately interconnected with AD pathology [37]. WMH in AD have been attributed to periventricular small-vessel disease and neurodegenerative changes such as beta-amyloid deposition in arteries, arterioles, and veins and to contribute independently to brain atrophy and to onset of AD [8, 37]. WMH in AD have also been suggested to result from axonal loss secondary to cortical atrophy resulting from neuronal loss due to tau and beta-amyloid deposition [38]. Interestingly in our study, higher WMH load in the AD group was not associated with more severe cortical atrophy. Possible explanations for this finding include that WMH in AD may represent cerebral small vessel disease that preferentially affects deep branches, sparing superficial cortical branches early in the course of AD and that we adjusted for age in our model, controlling for the normal cortical atrophy seen with age. Moreover, the preferential distribution of WMH in periventricular regions in AD has been previously hypothesized to be linked to tissue properties such as a relatively lower normal perfusion of this region due to its location in watershed zones [8].

The histologic correlates within the WMH regions of interest, namely myelin pallor, axonal loss, and gliosis, were shared between all subjects, and there were no substantial differences in the white matter histology between pathologic disease groups. This may reflect the fact that only one case from each disease group underwent detailed pathologic analysis within the WMH region of interest. Therefore, additional work studying the histology within WMH in larger neuropathological case series is needed. The exact histologic footprint and pathogenesis of WMH has been somewhat elusive in the literature with some of the strongest associations to date being arteriolosclerosis and venous collagenosis associated with cerebrovascular risk factors. Since our cases were selected to minimize heterogeneity by exclusion of those with pathological comorbidity, this may be one reason why arteriolosclerosis and venous collagenosis were not seen. Questions left to be answered include the following: (1) In the absence of small vessel disease, are WMH simply epiphenomena of the underlying neurodegenerative process whatever that may be or are they associated with the specific underlying neuropathological substrate? (2) If they are epiphenomena only, why is the severity of WMH so variable across different neuropathologies?

Association between WMH and manifestations of AD and FTLD

The significant positive correlations between WMH burden and neuropsychiatric manifestations on the NPI despite adjustment for gray matter volume suggest that WMH contribute independently to the clinical manifestations of AD and FTLD. WMH most likely contribute to neuropsychiatric manifestations across these neuropathologies by affecting the organization of networks. Only a few studies have specifically investigated brain-behavior relationships between WMH and neuropsychiatric manifestations in neurocognitive disorders, but no studies have focused on cases with autopsy confirmation of their neurodegenerative diagnosis. Similar to our results, a recent study in behavioral variant FTD and AD reported increased WMH in these disorders, partly independent of vascular pathology and cortical atrophy, with increased WMH being associated with cognitive deficits [39]. A study in participants with subcortical vascular cognitive impairment and AD reported an association between higher WMH volume in the frontal region with a higher level of apathy [40]. Similarly, a study in participants with probable AD reported increased WMH volumes in frontal regions for patients with apathy and increased WMH volumes in the right parietal region for those with depression [41]. In PSP, behavioral changes measured on the Frontal Behavioral Inventory (FBI) were found to correlate with atrophy in the orbitofrontal cortex and midbrain, but no significant correlations were identified with white matter disease [34]. However, comparable clinico-radiological correlations have been previously described in other neurological disorders, including multiple sclerosis. Findings of these studies highlight the contribution of WMH to neuropsychiatric manifestations across different clinical constructs.

Strengths and limitations

A main strength of our study is the inclusion of neuropathologically proven cases of AD and FTLD, including both FTLD-tau and FTLD-TDP, which allowed us to study relationships between neuroanatomical locations of WMH and neuropsychiatric manifestations in pathologically confirmed neurodegenerative disease groups. We were also able to control for several factors associated with WMH in our models. By controlling for regional gray matter atrophy, we assessed the independent contribution of WMH to neuropsychiatric manifestations in these neuropathological entities. Nonetheless, there are limitations to acknowledge. First, genetic mutation carriers constituted only a small proportion of our cohort, and therefore, our results cannot be generalized to genetic cases of frontotemporal dementia or AD. Hence, we were unable to corroborate the potential differential effects of genetic mutations found in FTLD on neuroimaging findings that have been previously described [31]. As well, cases without co-existing neurodegenerative phenomena were selected for the present study, affecting generalization of findings to these highly prevalent mixed cases. While we included a remarkable number of pathology-proven cases, subgroup analyses were limited by the small sample size. Consequently, we could have missed other significant regional differences in WMH volumetrics between subgroups and subgroup-specific neural correlates of neuropsychiatric manifestations. Most statistically significant and robust differences and correlations identified in the present study pertain to the largest size subgroups, FTLD-TDP and AD. Conversely, while we adjusted our analyses for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate, type I errors may not have been completely avoided. Finally, while we report several statistically significant correlations between WMH volumes, gray matter volumes, and neuropsychiatric manifestations in cross-sectional analyses, the temporal relationships between these variables remains to be further studied using longitudinal data before causation can be firmly ascribed.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that WMH seen on T2-weighted brain MRI are associated with neuropsychiatric manifestations in AD and FTLD and that WMH burden and regional distribution in neurodegenerative disorders differ according to the underlying neuropathological processes, where gliosis, myelin pallor, and axonal loss are prevalent pathological findings at autopsy. Future longitudinal studies need to be conducted to understand the temporal relationship between the occurrence of WMH and presentation with neuropsychiatric symptoms in FTLD and AD.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AD:

Alzheimer’s disease

ANCOVA:

Analysis of covariance

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

APP:

Amyloid precursor protein

C9orf72 :

Chromosome 9 open reading frame 72

CAA:

Congophilic amyloid angiopathy

CBD:

Corticobasal degeneration

DRS:

Dementia Rating Scale

DTI:

Diffusion tensor imaging

FBI:

Frontal Behavioral Inventory

FDR:

False discovery rate

FTLD:

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration

FTLD-Tau:

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration due to tauopathy

FTLD-TDP:

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration due to TDP-43 proteinopathy

GENFI:

The Genetic Frontotemporal Initiative

GRN :

Progranulin gene

HC:

Healthy controls

LE:

Lesion explorer

MAPT :

Microtubule- associated protein tau gene

MMSE:

Mini-Mental Status Examination

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

NPI:

Neuropsychiatric Inventory

PSEN1 :

Presenilin-1 gene

PSEN2 :

Presenilin-2 gene

PSP:

Progressive supranuclear palsy

SVD:

Small-vessel disease

TDP-43:

TAR DNA-binding protein 43

TIA:

Transient ischemic attack

TIV:

Total intracranial volume

WMH:

White matter hyperintensity

References

  1. Jack CR, Shiung MM, Gunter JL, O'Brien PC, Weigand SD, Knopman DS, et al. Comparison of different MRI brain atrophy, rate measures with clinical disease progression in AD. Neurology. 2004;62(4):591–600. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.WNL.0000110315.26026.EF.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rosen HJ, Gorno-Tempini ML, Goldman WP, Perry RJ, Schuff N, Weiner M, et al. Patterns of brain atrophy in frontotemporal dementia and semantic dementia. Neurology. 2002;58(2):198–208. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.58.2.198.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rohrer JD, Geser F, Zhou J, Gennatas ED, Sidhu M, Trojanowski JQ, et al. TDP-43 subtypes are associated with distinct atrophy patterns in frontotemporal dementia. Neurology. 2010;75(24):2204–11. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318202038c.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Chetelat G, Desgranges B, de la Sayette V, Viader F, Berkouk K, Landeau B, et al. Dissociating atrophy and hypometabolism impact on episodic memory in mild cognitive impairment. Brain. 2003;126(9):1955–67. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awg196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Finger E, Zhang J, Dickerson B, Bureau Y, Masellis. Disinhibition in Alzheimer’s disease is associated with reduced right frontal pole cortical thickness. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;60(3):1161–70. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-170348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ylikoski A, Erkinjuntti T, Raininko R, Sarna S, Sulkava R, Tilvis R. White-matter hyperintensities on MRI in the neurologically nondiseased elderly - analysis of cohorts of consecutive subjects aged 55 to 85 years living at home. Stroke. 1995;26(7):1171–7. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.26.7.1171.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gurol ME, Irizarry MC, Smith EE, Raju S, Diaz-Arrastia R, Bottiglieri T, et al. Plasma beta-amyloid and white matter lesions in AD, MCI and cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Neurology. 2006;66(1):23–9. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000191403.95453.6a.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Keith J, Gao F, Noor R, Kiss A, Balasubramaniam G, Au K, et al. Collagenosis of the deep medullary veins: an underrecognized pathologic correlate of white matter hyperintensities and periventricular infarction? J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2017;76(4):299–312. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnen/nlx009.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ramirez J, McNeely AA, Scott CJM, Stuss DT, Black SE. Subcortical hyperintensity volumetrics in Alzheimer’s disease and normal elderly in the Sunnybrook Dementia Study: correlations with atrophy, executive function, mental processing speed, and verbal memory. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2014;6(4):49. https://doi.org/10.1186/alzrt279.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Smith EE, Salar DH, Jeng J, McCreary CR, Fischl B, Schmahmann JD, et al. Correlations between MRI white matter lesion location and executive function and episodic memory. Neurology. 2011;76(17):1492–9. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318217e7c8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Nestor SM, Mišić B, Ramirez J, Zhao J, Graham SJ, Verhoeff NPLG, et al. Small vessel disease is linked to disrupted structural network covariance in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2017;13(7):749–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2016.12.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Xi Z, Zinman L, Grinberg Y, Moreno D, Sato C, Bilbao JM, et al. Investigation of c9orf72 in 4 degenerative disorders. Arch Neurol. 2012;69(12):1583–90. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2012.2016.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Masellis M, Momeni P, Meschino W, Heffner R Jr, Elder J, Sato C, et al. Novel splicing mutation in the progranulin gene causing familial corticobasal syndrome. Brain. 2006;129(11):3115–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awl276.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Farhan SMK, Dilliot AA, Ghani M, Sato C, Liang E, Zhang M, et al. The ONDRISeq panel: custom-designed next-generation sequencing of genes related to neurodegeneration. NPJ Genom Med. 2016;1(1):16032. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjgenmed.2016.32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Braak H, Alafuzoff I, Arzberger T, Kretzschmar H, Del Tredici K. Staging of Alzheimer disease-associated neurofibrillary pathology using paraffin sections and immunocytochemistry. Acta Neuropathol. 2006;112(4):389–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-006-0127-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Alafuzoff I, Arzberger T, Al-Sarraj S, Bodi I, Bogdanovic N, Braak H, et al. Staging of neurofibrillary pathology in Alzheimer’s disease: a study of the BrainNet Europe Consortium. Brain Pathol. 2008;18(4):484–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3639.2008.00147.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Hyman BT, Phelps CH, Beach TG, Bigio EH, Cairns NJ, Carrillo MC, et al. National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association guidelines for the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2012;8(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2011.10.007.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Montine TJ, Phelps CH, Beach TG, Bigio EH, Cairns NJ, Dickson DW, et al. National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association guidelines for the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer's disease: a practical approach. Acta Neuropathol. 2012;123(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-011-0910-3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cairns NJ, Bigio EH, Mackenzie IRA, Neumann M, Lee VMY, Hatanpaa KJ, White CL 3rd, Schneider JA, Grinberg LT, Halliday G, Duyckaerts C, Lowe JS, Holm IE, Tolnay M, Okamoto K, Yokoo H, Murayama S, Woulfe J, Munoz DG, Dickson DW, Ince PG, Trojanowski JQ, Mann DM, Consortium for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Neuropathologic diagnostic and nosologic criteria for frontotemporal lobar degeneration: consensus of the Consortium for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration. Acta Neuropathol 2007;114:5-22, 1, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-007-0237-2.

  20. Mackenzie IRA, Neumann M, Bigio EH, Cairns NJ, Alafuzoff I, Kril J, et al. Nomenclature for neuropathologic subtypes of frontotemporal lobar degeneration: consensus recommendations. Acta Neuropathol. 2009;117(1):15–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-008-0460-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mackenzie IRA, Neumann M, Baborie A, Sampathu DM, Du Plessis D, Jaros E, et al. A harmonized classification system for FTLD-TDP pathology. Acta Neuropathol. 2011;122(1):111–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-011-0845-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Neumann M, Mackenzie IRA. Review: neuropathology of non-tau frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2019;45(1):19–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/nan.12526.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hachinski V, Iadecola C, Petersen RC, Breteler MM, Nyenhuis DL, Black SE, et al. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Canadian Stroke Network vascular cognitive impairment harmonization standards. Stroke. 2006;37(9):2220–41. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000237236.88823.47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ramirez J, Gibson E, Quddus A, Lobaugh NJ, Feinstein A, Levine B, et al. Lesion Explorer: a comprehensive segmentation and parcellation package to obtain regional volumetrics for subcortical hyperintensities and intracranial tissue. Neuroimage. 2011;54(2):963–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.013.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Misch MR, Mitchell S, Francis PL, Sherborn K, Meradje K, McNeely AA, et al. Differentiating between visual hallucination-free dementia with Lewy bodies and corticobasal syndrome on the basis of neuropsychology and perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2014;6(9):71. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-014-0071-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Dementia MS, Scale R. Professional manual. Florida: Psychological Assessment Resources; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cummings JL. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: assessing psychopathology in dementia patients. Neurology. 1997;48(Issue 5, Supplement 6):S10–6. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.48.5_Suppl_6.10S.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Caroppo P, Le Ber I, Camuzat A, Clot F, Naccache L, Lamari F, et al. Extensive white matter involvement in patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration: think progranulin. JAMA Neurol. 2014;71(12):1562–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.1316.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Papma JM, Jiskoot LC, Panman JL, Dopper EG, den Heijer T, Donker Kaat L, et al. Cognition and gray and white matter characteristics of presymptomatic C9orf72 repeat expansion. Neurology. 2017;89:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sudre CH, Bocchetta M, Cash D, Thomas DL, Woolacott I, Dick KM, et al. White matter hyperintensities are seen only in GRN mutation carriers in the GENFI cohort. NeuroImage Clin. 2017;15:171–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2017.04.015.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Ahmed Z, Mackenzie IRA, Hutton ML, Dickson DW. Progranulin in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and neuroinflammation. J Neuroinflammation. 2007;4(1):7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-2094-4-7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Boxer AL, Geschwind MD, Belfor N, Gorno-Tempini ML, Schaeur GF, Miller BL, et al. Patterns of brain atrophy that differentiate corticobasal degeneration syndrome from progressive supranuclear palsy. Arch Neurol. 2006;63(1):81–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.63.1.81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cordato NJ, Duggins AJ, Halliday GM, Morris JGL, Pantelis C. Clinical deficits correlate with regional cerebral atrophy in progressive supranuclear palsy. Brain. 2005;128(6):1259–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awh508.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Koyama M, Yagishita A, Nakata Y, Hayashi M, Bandoh M, Mizutani T. Imaging of corticobasal degeneration syndrome. Neuroradiology. 2007;49(11):905–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-007-0265-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Englund E. Neuropathology of white matter changes in Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disorder. 1998;9(suppl 1):6–12. https://doi.org/10.1159/000051183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Alosco ML, Sugarman MA, Besser LM, Tripodis Y, Martin B, Palmisano J, et al. A clinicopathological investigation of white matter hyperintensities and Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;63(4):1347–60. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-180017.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. McAleese KE, Firbank M, Dey M, Colloby SJ, Walker L, Johnson M, et al. Cortical tau load is associated with white matter hyperintensities. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2015;3(1):60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-015-0240-0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Huynh K, Piguet P, Kwok J, Dobson-Stone C, Halliday GM, Hodges JR, et al. Clinical and biological correlates of white matter hyperintensities in patients with behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2021;96(13):e1743–54. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000011638.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kim HJ, Kang SJ, Kim C, Kim GH, Jeon S, Lee JM, et al. The effects of small vessel disease and amyloid burden on neuropsychiatric symptoms: a study among patients with subcortical vascular cognitive impairments. Neurobiol aging. 2013;34(7):1913–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.01.002.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Starkstein SE, Mizrahi R, Capizzano AA, Acion L, Brockman S, Power BD, et al. Neuroimaging correlates of apathy and depression in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2009;21(3):259–65. https://doi.org/10.1176/jnp.2009.21.3.259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

PD would like to thank the Fondation du Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal for supporting his postdoctoral training in Cognitive Neurology. SEB and MM are supported by the Department of Medicine (Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and the University of Toronto), the Sunnybrook Foundation, the Hurvitz Brain Sciences Research Program, and the Sunnybrook Research Institute. MM also receives support as co-lead of the Ontario Neurodegenerative Disease Research Initiative funded by the Ontario Brain Institute. We are grateful to Sylvain G. Bélisle for his help with the creation of figures, as well as to Christopher Scott for his support with the processing of brain images. We would also like to acknowledge all of the patients and their families who kindly volunteered to take part in this study and who consented to autopsy.

Funding

This work was supported by operating grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research to MM and SEB (MOP327387; MOP13129) and from the Weston Brain Institute to MM.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Donald T. Stuss is deceased.

  2. Philippe Desmarais and Andrew F. Gao shared co-first authorship.

  3. Mario Masellis and Julia Keith Shared co-last authorship.

Affiliations

  1. Cognitive & Movement Disorders Clinic, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave., Room A4 42, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada

    Philippe Desmarais & Mario Masellis

  2. L.C. Campbell Cognitive Neurology Research Unit, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Philippe Desmarais, Joel Ramirez, Sandra E. Black & Mario Masellis

  3. Hurvitz Brain Sciences Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Philippe Desmarais, Krista Lanctôt, Joel Ramirez, Nathan Herrmann, Donald T. Stuss, Sandra E. Black & Mario Masellis

  4. Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Philippe Desmarais, Ekaterina Rogaeva, Donald T. Stuss, Sandra E. Black & Mario Masellis

  5. Laboratory Medicine and Molecular Diagnostics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Andrew F. Gao & Julia Keith

  6. Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Krista Lanctôt & Nathan Herrmann

  7. Tanz Centre for Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Ekaterina Rogaeva

  8. Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Mario Masellis

Authors
  1. Philippe Desmarais
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrew F. Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Krista Lanctôt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ekaterina Rogaeva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Joel Ramirez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nathan Herrmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Donald T. Stuss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Sandra E. Black
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Julia Keith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Mario Masellis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Concept and design: PD, KL, NH, SEB, and MM; Data acquisition: AG, JK, ER, JR, NH, DTS, SEB, and MM; Statistical analysis: PD and MM; Data interpretation: PD and MM; Drafting of the manuscript: PD, JK, and MM; Obtained funding: SEB and MM; The authors participated in the critical review of the manuscript and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Masellis.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Sunnybrook Research and Ethics board and all participants, or their caregivers when appropriate, provided written informed consent, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Dr. Black reports grants and personal fees from Eli Lilly, grants and personal fees from Novartis, grants from GE Healthcare, grants from Biogen, grants from Genentech, grants from Optina, grants, and personal fees from Roche, outside the submitted work.

Dr. Masellis reports grants from Canadian Institutes of Health Research, during the conduct of the study; other from Associate Editor, Current Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine, personal fees from Bioscape Medical Imaging CRO, personal fees from GE Healthcare, personal fees from UCB, grants from Canadian Institutes of Health Research, grants from Early Researcher Award, Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation of Ontario, grants from Ontario Brain Institute, grants from Sunnybrook AFP Innovation Fund, grants from Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation (ADDF), grants from Brain Canada, grants from Heart and Stroke Foundation Centre for Stroke Recovery, grants from Weston Brain Institute, personal fees from Novartis, personal fees from Henry Stewart Talks, other from Novartis, grants from Roche, grants from Washington University, grants from Teva, and others from Teva, outside the submitted work.

The other authors report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Methods.

Manufacturer and dilution of employed immunohistochemical antibodies. Antibody information. Table 1. Individual clinical data. Demographic and clinical characteristics of participants according to neuropathological diagnosis. Table 2. Pathology review of selected area of white matter hyperintensity from each neuropathologic group. Semi-quantitative pathological findings. Figure 1. Example of image-guided neuropathology review of white matter regions with highest burden of WMH.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Desmarais, P., Gao, A.F., Lanctôt, K. et al. White matter hyperintensities in autopsy-confirmed frontotemporal lobar degeneration and Alzheimer’s disease. Alz Res Therapy 13, 129 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-021-00869-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-021-00869-6

Keywords

  • Alzheimer’s disease
  • Frontotemporal lobar degeneration
  • White matter hyperintensity
  • Magnetic resonance imaging
  • Neuropsychiatric symptoms
  • Neuropathology

Alzheimer's Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1758-9193