Clinical, imaging, and pathological heterogeneity of the Alzheimer's disease syndrome
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy volume 5, Article number: 1 (2013)
With increasing knowledge of clinical in vivo biomarkers and the pathological intricacies of Alzheimer's disease (AD), nosology is evolving. Harmonized consensus criteria that emphasize prototypic illness continue to develop to achieve diagnostic clarity for treatment decisions and clinical trials. However, it is clear that AD is clinically heterogeneous in presentation and progression, demonstrating variable topographic distributions of atrophy and hypometabolism/hypoperfusion. AD furthermore often keeps company with other conditions that may further nuance clinical expression, such as synucleinopathy exacerbating executive and visuospatial dysfunction and vascular pathologies (particularly small vessel disease that is increasingly ubiquitous with human aging) accentuating frontal-dysexecutive symptomatology. That some of these atypical clinical patterns recur may imply the existence of distinct AD variants. For example, focal temporal lobe dysfunction is associated with a pure amnestic syndrome, very slow decline, with atrophy and neurofibrillary tangles limited largely to the medial temporal region including the entorhinal cortex. Left parietal atrophy and/or hypometabolism/hypoperfusion are associated with language symptoms, younger age of onset, and faster rate of decline - a potential 'language variant' of AD. Conversely, the same pattern but predominantly affecting the right parietal lobe is associated with a similar syndrome but with visuospatial symptoms replacing impaired language function. Finally, the extremely rare frontal variant is associated with executive dysfunction out of keeping with degree of memory decline and may have prominent behavioural symptoms. Genotypic differences may underlie some of these subtypes; for example, absence of apolipoprotein E e4 is often associated with atypicality in younger onset AD. Understanding the mechanisms behind this variability merits further investigation, informed by recent advances in imaging techniques, biomarker assays, and quantitative pathological methods, in conjunction with standardized clinical, functional, neuropsychological and neurobehavioral evaluations. Such an understanding is needed to facilitate 'personalized AD medicine', and eventually allow for clinical trials targeting specific AD subtypes. Although the focus legitimately remains on prototypic illness, continuing efforts to develop disease-modifying therapies should not exclude the rarer AD subtypes and common comorbid presentations, as is currently often the case. Only by treating them as well can we address the full burden of this devastating dementia syndrome.
Alzheimer's disease (AD) most commonly presents in later life as an amnestic syndrome, with impairment in other domains, including language and executive function emerging as disease progresses . Symptoms occur in association with a breakdown in the brain's acetyl choline network [2, 3] and pathological degeneration, the hallmarks of which are beta-amyloid senile plaques (SPs) and neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) containing hyperphosphorylated tau . In addition to this disease prototype, there are AD subtypes. Variations in cognitive profile, age of onset, and rate of decline exemplify the heterogeneity of AD .
Similar patterns of variability within neuropsychiatric features may define behavioural AD subsyndromes  with consistent symptom-lesion correlates  and association with specific neurotransmitter dysfunction, such as dopamine . Familial AD syndromes may also exist, resulting from highly penetrant but variably expressed mutations in key genes, such as presenilin (PSEN)-1, PSEN-2, and amyloid precursor protein . As with sporadic AD syndromes, there is significant heterogeneity among the different mutations. These behavioural and familial-genetic subsyndromes represent a potentially rich area of inquiry, which is beyond the scope of the current discussion. Instead this review will focus on sporadic cognitive subsyndromes.
The growing recognition in recent years of AD variability reflects increasing understanding of its complexity, building upon convergent streams of evidence from clinical, imaging, and pathological studies. While it is legitimate to focus on prototypic illness, as this represents the majority of cases and thus the bulk of disease burden, understanding the rarer AD subtypes and the influence of common comorbidities may open new targets for therapy and better allow the tailoring of existing ones - personalized medicine. Concurrently, knowledge of AD's syndromic inhomogeneity may disentangle its confounding effects in clinical trials, as efforts to exclude atypical subtypes are not always successful.
Origins of the AD heterogeneity concept: a historical perspective
The observation that AD demonstrates phenotypic heterogeneity is not new. In 1969, McDonald  identified two distinct subgroups among dementia patients in a chronic geriatric hospital setting. Using simple tests of memory, parietal function, and aphasia, he noted that some had difficulties predominantly with praxis, visual construction, and cortical sensation. They exhibited more severe progression on follow-up. These he termed the 'parietal group'. Other patients had predominantly memory dysfunction, later age of onset, and slower disease progression. These he termed 'benign memory dysfunction of aging'. Unfortunately, this early demonstration of AD heterogeneity failed to generate widespread recognition for subtype variability. In large part this was due to the prevailing theory of the time, which held that clinical variation arose from observing the disease at different stages of progression (phase hypothesis), rather than truly distinct disease phenotypes (subtype hypothesis) .
Additional support for the subtype hypothesis would later be provided by early positron emission tomography (PET) studies. These demonstrated that just as there were clinically distinct profiles of AD, there were distinct topographic patterns of brain hypometabolism. Asymmetry in PET imaging among AD subjects [12, 13] was consistently associated with greater language impairment if the left hemisphere was more affected. Conversely, visuospatial impairment predominated in those with mainly right parietal hypometabolism [14, 15]. This variability exhibited good anatomic correlation. Left angular hypometabolism, for example, was associated with Gerstmann's syndrome in AD . Importantly, longitudinal follow-up demonstrated that these different syndromes remained distinct over time , and with clinical worsening of disease .
The one remaining observation that still supported the phase hypothesis was that these variant cases were associated with an earlier age of onset [18, 19]. This was later addressed in studies taking advantage of standardized neuropsychological assessments. Using the CERAD (Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease) database, Fisher and colleagues  demonstrated neuropsychologically defined subtypes of AD. Subjects with predominantly anomia, impairment of constructional praxis, and mixed impairments mirrored the left, right, and general subgroups of the earlier PET studies, respectively. Importantly, Fisher's subtypes had the same age of onset, strongly suggesting that these observed differences were not merely alternative stages, but true variants of AD. As with PET studies, these subtypes remained distinct over longitudinal follow-up, again supporting the idea of true distinct subtypes of disease .
Alzheimer's disease syndromes
Typical Alzheimer's disease
Prototypic AD is a late-onset AD syndrome with amnestic impairment predominating in association with hippocampal and temporal-parietal atrophy and/or decreased perfusion/metabolism . It is the most commonly observed AD phenotype in the clinical setting and serves as a good starting point against which the rare AD subtypes can be compared. Clinically, memory decline is accompanied by similar worsening in other cognitive domains, setting typical AD apart from temporal variant AD where memory decline occurs in isolation, and the other variants wherein non-amnestic presentations predominate. Relatively symmetric and generalized atrophy and hypometabolism/hypoperfusion distinguish typical AD from the more focal topography of temporal variant (hippocampal), frontal variant (frontal), language variant (left parietal), and visuoperceptive variant (right parietal) AD. Typical AD progresses more slowly than language, visuoperceptive, and frontal variant AD. Conversely, deterioration is quicker than temporal variant AD, perhaps owing to greater cognitive reserve in these individuals (consistent with their older ages of onset), the more focal mesiotemporal distribution of pathology that tends to spare cortical areas, or some combination of both.
Temporal (pure amnestic) variant Alzheimer's disease
Focal temporal lobe dysfunction, pure amnestic AD, and temporal variant AD all refer to the late-onset AD syndrome of isolated episodic memory impairment with notably slow decline (Figure 1) . Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging in temporal variant AD demonstrates hypoperfusion limited to the mesiotemporal lobes, while the temporal-parietal changes seen in typical AD are absent . Longitudinal studies of temporal variant AD individuals demonstrate slow or no change in Mini-Mental State Examination scores, and even when memory is significantly impaired, visuospatial and executive function remain borderline to normal [23, 25]. Pathologically, studies have demonstrated a subgroup of patients with plaques and neurofibrillary tangles limited to the limbic regions with little or no spread to the neocortical areas . Clinically these individuals have a later age of onset and slower rates of cognitive decline. Although the genetic factors contributing to temporal variant AD remain unknown, there is some evidence to suggest that the apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 allele is absent . Unique among atypical AD variants, temporal variant AD is a late-onset AD syndrome, and may present even later than typical AD.
Left (language) variant and logopenic progressive aphasia
Language variant AD is often an early-onset AD (EOAD) syndrome of gradually worsening non-fluent speech typified by significant agrammatism, phonemic paraphasias, relative preservation of memory, and often atrophy of the left perisylvian region on imaging (Figure 2) [27–29]. These individuals have pathologically confirmed AD with a topographically atypical distribution of neurofibrillary tangles predominantly within the left neocortex, sparing in some cases the hippocampus.
The early non-fluent language impairment of this subtype distinguishes it from the language syndrome of later stage typical AD, which is generally fluent in nature, with anomia, semantic paraphasias, progressing to surface dyslexia and jargon speech [30, 31].
This non-fluency also distinguishes language variant AD from the second atypical AD language syndrome, logopenic progressive aphasia (LPA). In LPA, speech rate is slowed but grammar and articulation are preserved ; rather, impaired repetition typifies LPA . LPA is commonly associated with AD pathology , demonstrates left posterior temporal and inferior parietal hypoperfusion , and strong association with β-amyloid deposition on Pittsburgh compound B PET .
Despite their shared features, both being language predominant syndromes, the basis for these two forms of different aphasic manifestations is unclear.
Right (visuoperceptive) variant (visuoperceptive AD)
Visuospatial dysfunction does not commonly occur as the initial or predominant symptom in AD. When it does, it may portend the onset of PCA (Figure 3) . In other cases, visuospatial dysfunction suggests a subtler, non-memory variant, associated with greater right versus left hemisphere pathology and atrophy (Figure 4), a distinct pattern that is maintained over time and with disease progression [14, 15, 17, 21].
As with language variant AD and LPA, the relationship between visuoperceptive AD and PCA remains relatively unknown. Also unknown is whether individuals with visuoperceptive impairment represent a prodromal stage of diffuse Lewy body disease, rather than a true AD subtype, as sometimes happens anecdotally. While it is true that Lewy bodies can co-occur in PCA alongside AD pathology with clinically evident hallucinations and parkinsonism, AD changes can also be seen in isolation, with topography being the only apparent driver of phenotype . Pathologic and biomarker imaging studies may help resolve some of these questions.
Frontal (executive) variant (frontal variant AD)
Frontal variant AD is an extremely rare EOAD subtype, associated with significant frontal cognitive and behavioural symptoms (Figure 5), first described by Johnson and colleagues , who found 3 cases among 63 individuals with pathologically confirmed AD. Alladi and colleagues  likewise identified only 2 instances among their 100 case series, of whom only one had a true dysexecutive syndrome, the other having only behavioural features. Pathologically there is a predominance of NFTs in the frontal regions (ten-fold increase over typical AD), with comparable loading in the entorhinal cortex and other regions . Amyloid plaques and the lack of cell loss, microvacuolarization, and gliosis in layers II and III distinguish frontal variant AD from FTD. Biochemically, frontal variant AD shows focally reduced calcium-independent phospholipase A2 activity within the frontal regions compared to typical AD on post-mortem protein assay (8.8 pmol/mg versus 15.2 pmol/mg), a neuronal-specific isoform of phospholipase and indirect marker of neuronal health . In one case report, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amyloid beta (Aβ) was found to be decreased, although tau levels were only borderline .
In part because of its rarity, the clinical identification of frontal variant AD has proven troublesome. One study used the Frontal Behavioural Inventory to define a 'high frontality' AD group based on the presence of frontal symptoms such as apathy, aspontaneity, loss of empathy (negative symptoms) and disinhibition, utilization behaviour, and alien limb phenomenon (positive symptoms) . However, except for three items on the Frontal Behavioural Inventory - hyperorality, perseveration, and aspontaneity - there was no distinction between Woodward's 'high frontality' group and FTD and there were no between-group differences on global cognition screening tests. Furthermore, Woodward and colleagues in another study  found that frontal variant AD can be associated with co-occurring FTD pathology. In light of this overlapping pathology and diagnostic uncertainty, CSF biomarker profiles and amyloid imaging will likely be needed to convincingly demonstrate frontal variant AD in a cohort large enough to perform the necessary neuropsychological, imaging, and genetic studies to define this subtype.
Common features and potential factors contributing to AD heterogeneity
Age of onset
EOAD accounts for 32% of atypical, that is, non-amnestic, cases of AD, in contrast to only 6% of typical AD . In retrospect, this is consistent with earlier studies, wherein atypical subgroups of AD were consistently associated with younger age. As alluded to previously, these early-onset individuals evince a more aggressive disease course, in distinction from the more gradual progression of typical AD, and in contrast to the very slow decline of temporal variant AD. The mechanism and significance of this association remain unclear.
The distribution of AD pathology and associated atrophy varies among individuals  and may affect phenotype. For example, histopathological asymmetry with associated left (language) and right (visuospatial) syndromes similar to those found in PET studies have been described . Conversely, focal cortical, non-amnestic presentations can be associated with underlying AD in 34% of cases, including bilateral PCA, aphasia, behavioural executive syndromes, and cortical basal syndrome, all of which tended to be EOAD .
In one recent study, Armstrong and colleagues  used principal components analysis to identify three clusters of NFT and senile plaque distribution: cortical (cingulate gyrus, gyrus rectus, orbital frontal gyrus, occipital lobe), deep grey (thalamus, nucleus basalis of Meynert, striatum), and limbic (ventral tegmentum, raphe, amygdala). Similarly, Murray and colleagues  described three pathologically distinct patterns of AD in a large cohort of 889 cases: hippocampal-sparing, limbicpredominant, and 'typical'. These subdivisions were based on NFT and senile plaque burden, as defined by thioflavin-S counts, comparing between mesiotemporal lobe (CA1, subiculum) and cortical (middle frontal, inferior parietal, superior temporal association areas) regions of interest. Hippocampal-sparing AD occurred in younger individuals (mean age 72 years, versus 79 for typical and 86 for limbic-predominant AD), consistent with the association between atypicality and EOAD. Hippocampal-sparing AD revealed the fastest rate of cognitive decline (-4.8 on Mini-Mental State Examination per year, versus -2.8 for typical and -1.4 for limbic-predominant AD). In keeping with their neocortically predominant pathological burden, hippocampal-sparing cases were more likely to have an atypical, non-amnestic clinical onset (30% of cases), versus individuals with typical pathological distribution, where this occurred less frequently (17%).
ApoE genotype may be one important factor contributing to heterogeneity in sporadic AD, as non-ε4 status among EOAD patients correlates with atypicality . What underlies this relationship is unknown; perhaps the absence of ε4, rather than the presence of ε2 or ε3, is important. ApoE ε4 is associated with greater hippocampal atrophy , suggesting that symptoms in non-carriers may instead reflect damage to areas normally eclipsed by hippocampal pathology (for example, parietal, temporal or frontal regions). This is in keeping with the 'cortically predominant' topographies of disease observed among non-ε4 EOAD carriers. This greater degree of cortical damage could be reasonably expected to result in significant, wide-spread neurologic dysfunction, potentially explaining the observation that such individuals experience a more rapid clinical decline. Alternatively, this same 'hippocampal effect' of ApoE ε4 may mask the influence of other genetic and epigenetic factors. If so, such factors may have a greater role in the absence of ε4; their variability in turn explaining the greater heterogeneity of non-ε4 EOAD.
Another consideration is the role of autosomal dominant mutations causing familial AD. Although a complete discussion of genotype-phenotype correlations in familial AD is beyond the scope of this review, mutations in PSEN1 and amyloid precursor protein (APP) can both produce non-amnestic, atypical EOAD [48, 49]. For example, PSEN1 can result in non-fluent aphasia  in addition to more typical amnestic AD, while APP can be associated with severe cerebral amyloid angiopathy presenting with hemorrhage and seizures along with memory decline . The same mutation may even result in different syndromes. PSEN1 has been described in spastic paraparesis, frontotemporal dementia, myoclonus with seizures, and predominantly psychiatric presentations . Even within the same family, the APP mutation presented with bradykinesia and hallucinations in one individual, memory and behavioural changes in another, and memory decline followed by intracerebral hemorrhage from angiopathy in a third .
Ultimately, imaging-genetic endophenotype studies may provide a link between genetics and disease topography by elucidating those areas of the brain most associated with known and potential pathological genotypes. Should these patterns correlate with the topography of syndromic phenotypes of AD, it may lend support that genotype underlies at least some of these phenotypic variations. Until such links can be established, and given the variability with which genetic mutations/polymorphisms can present, decisions around genetic testing when a suspected case of atypical AD is encountered must be adjudicated on a case by case basis.
Co-occurring pathology: Lewy body pathology
Lewy bodies composed in part of alpha-synuclein aggregates are the hallmark of Lewy body disease, presenting in prototypic cases with visual hallucinations, extra pyramidal symptoms, and marked clinical fluctuations . These same alpha synuclein inclusions can be found in pathologically confirmed AD, with neocortical Lewy bodies occurring in 10 to 30% of cases at autopsy [55, 56]. These co-occurring Lewy bodies also appear associated with AD proven cases of PCA [29, 57]. More generally, the presence of Lewy bodies in AD is associated with more perceptual impairment, though milder than what occurs in 'pure' diffuse Lewy body disease .
Co-occurring pathology: white matter hyperintensities
Best seen on T2 and FLAIR imaging by MRI, white matter hyperintensities (WMHs) reflect an array of pathophysiological processes, the precise causes of which remain under active investigation . They occur in 95% of healthy adults aged over 65 years (Figure 6) , 92% of individuals with mild cognitive impairment aged 45 to 87 years , and is more common in the presence of pathologically confirmed AD (57% versus 33% in age-matched normal controls) . WMHs appear associated mostly with impaired executive function, speed of processing, and mental flexibility [63–69], functions attributable to frontal lobe networks. More generally, it is associated with global decline, dementia, depression, and death [70–73]. WMHs frequently occur in the frontal regions [61, 74–76], although some evidence suggests that WMH is associated with frontal-executive symptoms regardless of location . The importance of WMH topography remains an area of active investigation, with periventricular WMH possibly related to venous collagenosis [78, 79].
As the degree of WMH varies widely, investigators have explored whether a dose-effect relationship for WMH exists, and if so what minimum degree of WMH is necessary for cognitive changes to be observed. To this end, Boone and colleagues  identified a 'threshold' of >10 cm3 for cognitive changes to be observed. DeCarli and colleagues  demonstrated similar findings using PET, showing that a threshold of >0.5% of brain parenchymal fraction was significantly associated with poorer performance on executive function and mental flexibility tasks (phonemic fluency, Trails B). They also demonstrated an association with worsened visual memory, suggesting that the influence of WMHs is potentially more widespread. Importantly, even when only accounting for those cases where WMH met or exceeded the minimum 'threshold' for associated clinical symptoms, co-pathology was common (6 to 20%) [60, 80, 81], underscoring its importance in overall AD phenotype.
A major challenge to investigating independent contributions of WMHs in AD is disentangling their contributory role to cerebral atrophy. Controlling for atrophy can eliminate the observed influence of WMHs on cognition [81, 82], although Swartz and colleagues , using factor analysis in a dementia population, discerned an independent association between WMH burden on executive function and memory even after atrophy was accounted for. Furthermore, vasculopathy, especially lacunar infarcts, appears to contribute to the expression of AD dementia in pathology series [84, 85].
Co-occurring pathology: other pathologies
TDP-43 (TAR DNA-binding protein 43) inclusions and agyrophillic grains are two other pathologies that have been associated with AD pathology and that may nuance the phenotype of AD . A full review of their association is beyond the scope of this review, although given their association with FTD, one might expect that they would result in a blending of FTD symptomatology with prototypic AD.
Framing heterogeneity and complexity in the AD syndrome
AD phenotype is strongly affected by age of onset, genetic profile, and comorbidities. AD subtypes reflect the interactions between these three axes. When the onset is later, ApoE ε4 is present, and comorbidities absent, the resulting pattern is generally prototypic AD. Changes along any of these three axes shift the observed phenotype towards one of the rarer AD variants (Figure 7).
Several important questions remain. Frontal variant AD appears to be the rarest variant and the potential role of WMHs in its expression needs to be further explored, in particular the role of venous collagenosis, which may contribute to executive control network dysfunction. The relationships between visuoperceptive AD and PCA, and between language variant AD and LPA remain unclear. ApoE ε4 is hypothesized to be absent in the early onset subtypes: frontal, visuoperceptive, and language variant AD, but its relative absence in temporal variant AD, the only late onset subtype, is also worthy of further investigation. Finally, the role of rarer co-pathologies such as TDP43, and genetic polymorphisms, other than ApoE, and epigenetic factors on clinical profile remain to be explored.
Translational implications: diagnosis and therapy
Phenotypic heterogeneity among AD subtypes and co-pathology may have particular importance for biomarker-based ante mortem diagnosis. Factors such as ApoE status, gender, age, education, and brain size appear associated with differences in CSF Aβ42 levels , with education inversely correlated with CSF Aβ42 in early disease . Such findings suggest that, at least in the case of CSF Aβ42, biomarkers must be interpreted in the context of phenotype. This interpretation in turn requires a greater understanding of AD phenotypic variation than is presently available. As atypical subtypes are relatively rare, multi-site studies specifically addressing them are urgently needed to delineate the full spectrum of AD and its interaction with biomarkers.
Beyond the clinical need for diagnostic certainty, the ability to recognize and control for phenotypic variation is important to continuing clinical trials design. The very slow rate of decline in temporal variant AD is but one example of how subtype heterogeneity can confound results. More generally, as it appears that all AD subtypes exhibit divergent trajectories of symptom progression from prototypic disease, characterizing the onset and decline across the AD syndrome spectrum [89, 90], including comorbid cases, is a priority. Similarly, it is unknown how often an initially typical AD case evolves into an atypical subtype over time, or vice versa. As the occasional inclusion of an atypical individual in clinical trials may thus be unavoidable, understanding these subtypes may allow researchers to disentangle their influence from their findings.
Phenotypic variation may likewise affect response to therapeutic strategies, requiring a personalized medicine approach that will only be possible with a greater understanding of AD subtypes and their causes. For example, the presence of comorbid WMHs involving peri-insular cholinergic pathways in a case-controlled cohort study was associated with more favourable response to cholinesterase therapy , in contrast to more generally distributed WMHs, which show no such association. Cholinergic therapies may therefore be particularly appropriate in such co-morbid cases. Another example is the observation that synapse loss, a key correlate of cognition, is greater in early onset AD [92, 93], implying a more aggressive neuronal degeneration. Clinical trials in these subgroups would therefore have to target symptoms much earlier than would normally be done for prototypic disease, in order to address the more severe cellular damage of EOAD. Along similar lines, it has been observed that early onset AD is associated with more widespread neurotransmitter dysfunction , affecting noradrenaline, γ-amino-butyric acid, and somatostatin levels in addition to acetylcholine. Hence, combination therapy that restores multiple neurotransmitters may be more symptomatically effective than cholinergic agents alone in EOAD. While the medications for such a clinical trial are already available, the lack of clear diagnostic criteria for EOAD subtypes hampers implementation, further underscoring the urgent need for further research in AD heterogeneity.
Prototypic and atypical AD subtypes exist along continuums of age, genotype, and co-pathology within the AD syndrome, presenting challenges and opportunities for both researchers and clinicians. While the pursuit of treatments and salient criteria for the more common AD prototype understandably remains a priority, these rarer subtypes pose a substantial burden of disease faced by those affected by them and their caregivers. Furthermore, unless atypical variants are understood and recognized, controlling for their potentially confounding effects in clinical trials will be more difficult, hindering treatment development even for prototypic disease.
amyloid precursor protein
early-onset Alzheimer's disease
logopenic progressive aphasia
magnetic resonance imaging
posterior cortical atrophy
positron emission tomography
single-photon emission computed tomography
white matter hyperintensity.
McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM: Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease. Neurology. 1984, 34: 939-944. 10.1212/WNL.34.7.939.
Bartus RT, Dean RL, Beer B, Lippa AS: The cholinergic hypothesis of geriatric memory dysfunction. Science. 1982, 217: 408-414. 10.1126/science.7046051.
Francis PT, Palmer AM, Snape M, Wilcock GK: The cholinergic hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease: a review of progress. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999, 66: 137-147. 10.1136/jnnp.66.2.137.
Braak H, Braak E: Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes. Acta Neuropathol. 1991, 82: 239-259. 10.1007/BF00308809.
McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, Hyman BT, Jack CR, Kawas CH, Klunk WE, Koroshetz WJ, Manly JJ, Mayeux R, Mohs RC, Morris JC, Rossor MN, Scheltens P, Carrillo MC, Thies B, Weintraub S, Phelps CH: The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011, 7: 263-269. 10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005.
Lyketsos CG, Sheppard JM, Steinberg M, Tschanz JA, Norton MC, Steffens DC, Breitner JC: Neuropsychiatric disturbance in Alzheimer's disease clusters into three groups: the Cache County Study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2001, 16: 1043-1053. 10.1002/gps.448.
Migneco O, Benoit M, Koulibaly PM, Dygai I, Bertogliati C, Desvignes P, Robert PH, Malandain G, Bussiere F, Darcourt J: Perfusion brain SPECT and statistical parametric mapping analysis indicate that apathy is a cingulate syndrome: a study in Alzheimer's disease and nondemented patients. Neuroimage. 2001, 13: 896-902.
Ismail Z, Nguyen MQ, Fischer CE, Schweizer TA, Mulsant BH, Mamo D: Neurobiology of delusions in Alzheimer's disease. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2011, 13: 211-218. 10.1007/s11920-011-0195-1.
Wu L, Rosa-Neto P, Hsiung GY, Sadovnick AD, Masellis M, Black SE, Jia J, Gauthier S: Early-onset familial Alzheimer's disease (EOFAD). Can J Neurol Sci. 2012, 39: 436-445.
McDonald C: Clinical heterogeneity in senile dementia. Brit J Psychiatry. 1969, 115: 267-271. 10.1192/bjp.115.520.267.
Ritchie K, Touchon J: Heterogeneity in senile dementia of the Alzheimer type: Individual differences, progressive deterioration or clinical subtypes?. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992, 45: 1391-1398. 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90201-W.
Foster NL, Chase TN, Fedio P, Patronas NJ, Broks RA, Di Chiro G: Alzheimer's disease: focal cortical changes shown by positron emission tomography. Neurology. 1983, 33: 961-965. 10.1212/WNL.33.8.961.
Haxby JV, Duara R, Grady CL, Culter NR, Rapoport SI: Relationships between neuropsychological and cerebral metabolic asymmetries in early Alzheimer's disease. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1985, 5: 193-200. 10.1038/jcbfm.1985.25.
Chase TN, Fedio P, Foster NL, Brooks R, Di Chiro G, Mansi L: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale performance: cortical localization by fluorodeoxyglucose F18-positron emission tomography. Arch Neurol. 1984, 44: 1244-1247.
Duara R, Grady C, Haxby J, Sundaram M, Cutler NR, Heston L, Moore A, Schlageter N, Larson S, Rapoport SI: Postitron emission tomography in Alzheimer's disease. Neurology. 1986, 36: 879-87. 10.1212/WNL.36.7.879.
Friedland RP, Koss E, Haxby JV, Grady CL, Luxenberg J, Schapiro MB, Kaye J: Alzheimer's disease: clinical and biological heterogeneity. Ann Internal Med. 1988, 109: 298-311.
Grady CL, Haxby JV, Schlageter NL, Berg G, Rapoport SI: Stability of metabolic and neuropsychological asymmetries in dementia of the Alzheimer's type. Neurology. 1986, 36: 1390-1392. 10.1212/WNL.36.10.1390.
Seltzer B, Sherwin I: A comparison of clinical features in early- and late-onset primary degenerative dementia One entity or two?. Arch Neurol. 1983, 40: 143-146. 10.1001/archneur.1983.04050030037006.
Filley CM, Kelly J, Heaton RK: Neuropsychologic features of early- and late-onset Alzheimer's disease. Arch Neurol. 1986, 43: 574-576. 10.1001/archneur.1986.00520060038014.
Fisher NJ, Rourke BP, Bieliauskas L, Giordani B, Bernet S, Foster NL: Neuropsychological subgroups of patients with Alzheimer's disease. J Clin Exp Neuropsych. 1996, 18: 349-370. 10.1080/01688639608408993.
Fisher NJ, Rourke BP, Bieliauskas L, Giordani B, Bernet S, Foster NL: Unmasking the heterogeneity of Alzheimer's disease: case studies of individuals from distinct neuropsychological subgroups. J Clin Exp Neuropsych. 1997, 19: 713-754. 10.1080/01688639708403756.
Dubois B, Feldman HH, Jacova C, Dekosky ST, Barberger-Gateau P, Cummings J, Delacourte A, Galasko D, Gauthier S, Jicha G, Meguro K, O'brien J, Pasquier F, Robert P, Rossor M, Salloway S, Stern Y, Visser PJ, Scheltens P: Research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: revising the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria. Lancet Neurol. 2007, 6: 734-746. 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70178-3.
Butters MA, Lopez OL, Becker JT: Focal temporal lobe dysfunction in probable Alzheimer's disease predicts a slow rate of cognitive decline. Neurology. 1996, 46: 687-692. 10.1212/WNL.46.3.687.
Cappa A, Calcagni ML, Villa G, Giordano A, Marra C, De Rossi G: Brain perfusion abnormalities in Alzheimer's disease: Comparison between patients with focal temporal lobe dysfunction and patients with diffuse cognitive impairment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001, 70: 22-27. 10.1136/jnnp.70.1.22.
Marra C, Villa G, Quaranta D, Valenza A, Vita MG, Gainotti G: Probable Alzheimer's disease patients presenting as 'focal temporal lobe dysfunction' show a slow rate of cognitive decline. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2012, 18: 144-150. 10.1017/S1355617711001287.
Armstrong RA, Nochlin D, Bird TD: Neuropathological heterogeneity in Alzheimer's disease: A study of 80 cases using principal components analysis. Neuropathology. 2000, 1: 31-37.
Green J, Morris JC, Sandson J, McKeel DW, Miller JW: Progressive aphasia: a precursor of global dementia?. Neurology. 1990, 40: 423-429. 10.1212/WNL.40.3_Part_1.423.
Greene JD, Patterson K, Xuereb J, Hodges JR: Alzheimer disease and nonfluent progressive aphasia. Arch Neurol. 1996, 53: 1072-1078. 10.1001/archneur.1996.00550100158027.
Galton CJ, Patterson K, Xuereb JH, Hodges JR: Atypical and typical presentations of Alzheimer's disease: a clinical, neuropsychological, neuroimaging and pathological study of 13 cases. Brain. 2000, 123: 484-498. 10.1093/brain/123.3.484.
Price BH Gurvit H, Weintraub S Geula C, Leimbkuhler E, Mesulam M: Neuropsychological patterns and language defecits in 20 consecutive cases of autopsy-confirmed Alzheimer's disease. Arch Neurol. 1993, 35: 394-397.
Patterson K, Graham N, Hodges J: Reading in Alzheimer's type dementia. Neuropsychology. 1994, 8: 395-407.
Gorno-Tempini ML, Brambati SM, Ginex V, Ogar J, Dronkers NF, Marcone A, Perani D, Garibotto V, Cappa SF, Miller BL: The logopenic/phonological variant of primary progressive aphasia. Neurology. 2008, 71: 1227-1234. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000320506.79811.da.
Gorno-Tempini ML, Hillis AE, Weintraub S, Kertesz A, Mendez M, Cappa SF, Ogar JM, Rohrer JD, Black S, Boeve BF, Manes F, Dronkers NF, Vandenberghe R, Rascovsky K, Patterson K, Miller BL, Knopman DS, Hodges JR, Mesulam MM, Grossman M: Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology. 2011, 76: 1006-1014. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31821103e6.
Alladi S, Xuereb J, Bak T, Nestor P, Knibb J, Patterson K, Hodges JR: Focal cortical presentations of Alzheimer's disease. Brain. 2007, 130: 2636-2645. 10.1093/brain/awm213.
Leyton CE, Villemagne VL, Savage S, Pike KE, Ballard KJ, Piguet O, Burrell JR, Rowe CC, Hodges JR: Subtypes of progressive aphasia: application of the international consensus criteria and validation using β-amyloid imaging. Brain. 2011, 134: 3030-3043. 10.1093/brain/awr216.
Tang-Wai DF, Graff-Radford NR, Boeve BF, Dickson DW, Parisi JE, Crook R, Caselli RJ, Knopman DS, Petersen RC: Clinical, genetic, and neuropathologic characteristics of posterior cortical atrophy. Neurology. 2004, 63: 1168-1174. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000140289.18472.15.
Johnson JK, Head E, Kim R, Starr A, Cotman CW: Clinical and pathological evidence for a frontal variant of Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 1999, 56: 1233-1239. 10.1001/archneur.56.10.1233.
Talbot K, Young RA, Jolly-Tornetta C, Lee VMY, Trojanowski JQ, Wolf BA: A frontal variant of Alzheimer's disease exhibits decreased calcium-independent phospholipase A2 activity in the prefrontal cortex. Neurochem Int. 2000, 37: 17-31. 10.1016/S0197-0186(00)00006-1.
Habek M, Hajnsek S, Zarkovic K, Chudy D, Mubrin Z: Frontal variant of Alzheimer's disease: Clinico-CSF-pathological correlation. Can J Neurol Sci. 2010, 37: 118-120.
Woodward M, Brodaty H, Boundy K, Ames D, Blanch G, Balshaw R, PRIME Study Group: Does executive impairment define a frontal variant of Alzheimer's disease?. Int Psychogeriatr. 2010, 22: 1280-1290. 10.1017/S1041610210001596.
Woodward M, Mackenzie IR, Hsiung GY, Jacova C, Feldman H: Multiple brain pathologies in dementia are common. Eur Geriatr Med. 2010, 1: 259-265. 10.1016/j.eurger.2010.07.012.
Koedam EL, Lauffer V, van der Vlies AE, van der Flier WM, Scheltens P, Pijnnburg YA: Early-versus late-onset Alzheimer's disase: More than age alone. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010, 19: 1401-1408.
Neary D, Snowden JS, Bowen DM, Sims NR, Mann DM, Benton JS, Northen B, Yates PO, Davison AN: Neuropsychological syndromes in presenile dementia due to cerebral atrophy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1986, 49: 163-174. 10.1136/jnnp.49.2.163.
Giannakopoulos P, Hof PR, Bouras C: Alzheimer's disease with asymmetric atrophy of the cerebral hemispheres: morphometric analysis of four cases. Acta Neuropathol. 1994, 88: 440-447. 10.1007/BF00389496.
Murray ME, Graff-Radford NR, Ross OA, Petersen RC, Duara R, Dickson DW: Neuropathologically defined subtypes of Alzheimer's disease with distinct clinical characteristics: a retrospective study. Lancet Neurol. 2011, 10: 785-796. 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70156-9.
Van der Flier WM, Pijnenburg YA, Fox NC, Scheltens P: Early-onset versus late-onset Alzheimer's disease: the case of the missing APOE ε4 allele. Lancet Neurol. 2010, 10: 280-288.
Pievani M, Galluzzi S, Thompson PM, Rasser PE, Bonetti M, Frisoni GB: APOE4 is associated with greater atrophy of the hippocampal formation in Alzheimer's disease. Neuroimage. 2011, 55: 909-919. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.12.081.
Ryan NS, Rossor MN: Correlating familial Alzheimer's disease gene mutations with clinical phenotype. Biomark Med. 2010, 4: 99-112. 10.2217/bmm.09.92.
Larner AJ, Doran M: Clinical phenotypic heterogeneity of Alzheimer's disease associated with mutations of the presenilin-1 gene. J Neurol. 2006, 253: 139-158. 10.1007/s00415-005-0019-5.
Godbolt AK, Beck JA, Collinge J, Garrard P, Warren JD, Fox NC, Rossor MN: A presenilin 1 R278I mutation presenting with language impairment. Neurology. 2004, 63: 1702-1704. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000143060.98164.1A.
Rovelet-Lecrux A, Hannequin D, Raux G, Le Meur N, Laquerrière A, Vital A, Dumanchin C, Feuillette S, Brice A, Vercelletto M, Dubas F, Frebourg T, Campion D: APP locus duplication causes autosomal dominant earlyonset Alzheimer disease with cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Nat Genet. 2006, 38: 24-26. 10.1038/ng1718.
Menéndez M: Pathological and clinical heterogeneity of presenilin 1 gene mutations. J Alzheimers Dis. 2004, 6: 475-482.
Guyant-Marechal I, Berger E, Laquerrière A, Rovelet-Lecrux A, Viennet G, Frebourg T, Rumbach L, Campion D, Hannequin D: Intrafamilial diversity of phenotype associated with app duplication. Neurology. 2008, 71: 1925-1926. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000339400.64213.56.
McKeith IG, Galasko D, Kosaka K, Perry EK, Dickson DW, Hansen LA, Salmon DP, Lowe J, Mirra SS, Byrne EJ, Lennox G, Quinn NP, Edwardson JA, Ince PG, Bergeron C, Burns A, Miller BL, Lovestone S, Collerton D, Jansen EN, Ballard C, de Vos RA, Wilcock GK, Jellinger KA, Perry RH: Consensus guidelines for the clinical and pathologic diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB): report of the consortium on DLB international workshop. Neurology. 1996, 47: 1113-1124. 10.1212/WNL.47.5.1113.
Hansen L, Salmon D, Galasko D, Masliah E, Katzman R, DeTeresa R, Thal L, Pay MM, Hofstetter R, Klauber M: The Lewy body variant of Alzheimer's disease: a clinical and pathologic entity. Neurology. 1990, 40: 1-8.
Schneider JA, Arvanitakis Z, Leurgans SE, Bennett DA: The neuropathology of probable Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment. Ann Neurol. 2009, 66: 200-208. 10.1002/ana.21706.
Tang-Wai DF, Josephs KA, Boeve BF, Petersen RC, Parisi JE, Dickson DW: Coexistent Lewy body disease in a case of 'visual variant of Alzheimer's disease'. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003, 74: 389-10.1136/jnnp.74.3.389.
Calderon J, Perry RJ, Erzinclioglu SW, Berrios GE, Dening TR, Hodges JR: Perception, attention, and working memory are disproportionately impaired in dementia with Lewy bodies compared with Alzheimer's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001, 70: 157-164. 10.1136/jnnp.70.2.157.
Schmidt R, Schmidt H, Haybaeck J, Loitfelder M, Weis S, Cavalieri M, Seiler S, Enzinger C, Ropele S, Erkinjuntti T, Pantoni L, Scheltens P, Fazekas F, Jellinger K: Heterogeneity in age-related white matter changes. Acta Neuropathol. 2011, 122: 171-185. 10.1007/s00401-011-0851-x.
Longstreth WT, Manolio TA, Arnold A, Burke GL, Bryan N, Jungreis CA, Enright PL, O'Leary D, Fried L: Clinical correlates of white matter findings on cranial magnetic resonance imaging of 3301 elderly people. The Cardiovascular Health Study. Stroke. 1996, 27: 1274-1282. 10.1161/01.STR.27.8.1274.
Bombois S, Debette S, Delbeuck X, Braundet A, Delmaire C, Leys D, Pasquier F: Prevalence of subcortical vascular lesions and association with executive function in Mild Cognitive Impairment subtypes. Stroke. 2007, 38: 2595-2597. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.486407.
Jellinger KA, Attems J: Prevalence and pathogenic role of cerebrovascular lesions in Alzheimer disease. J Neurol Sci. 2005, 229-230: 37-41.
Ylikoski R, Ylikoski A, Erkinjuntti T, Sulkava R, Raininko R, Tilvis R: White matter changes in healthy elderly persons correlate with attention and speed of mental processing. Arch Neurol. 1993, 50: 818-824. 10.1001/archneur.1993.00540080029009.
Breteler MM, van Swieten JC, Bots ML, Grobbee DE, Claus JJ, van den Hout JH, van Harskamp F, Tanghe HL, de Jong PT, van Gijn J: Cerebral white matter lesions, vascular risk factors, and cognitive function in a population-based study: the Rotterdam Study. Neurology. 1994, 44: 1246-1252. 10.1212/WNL.44.7.1246.
Gunning-Dixon FM, Raz N: The cognitive correlates of white matter abnormalities in normal aging: A quantitative review. Neuropsychology. 2000, 14: 224-232.
Gunning-Dixon FM, Raz N: Neuroanatomical correlates of selected executive functions in middle-aged and older adults: a prospective MRI study. Neuropsychologia. 2003, 41: 1929-1941. 10.1016/S0028-3932(03)00129-5.
O'Sullivan M, Morris RG, Huckstep B, DK Jones, Williams SCR, Markus HS: Diffusion tensor MRI correlates with executive dysfunction in patients with ischaemic leukoaraiosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004, 75: 441-447. 10.1136/jnnp.2003.014910.
Au R, Massaro JM, Wolf PA, Young ME, Beiser A, Seshadri S, D'Agostino RB, DeCarli C: Association of white matter hyperintensity volume with decreased cognitive functioning: The Framingham Heart Study. Neurobiol Aging. 2002, 23: 421-443. 10.1016/S0197-4580(01)00319-0.
Jokinen H, Kalska H, Ylikoski R, Madureira S, Verdelho A, van der Flier WM, Scheltens P, Barkhof F, Visser MC, Fazekas F, Schmidt R, O'Brien J, Waldemar G, Wallin A, Chabriat H, Pantoni L, Inzitari D, Erkinjuntti T, LADIS group: Longitudinal cognitive decline in subcortical ischemic vascular disease-the LADIS Study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009, 27: 384-391. 10.1159/000207442.
Pantoni L: Cerebral small vessel disease: from pathogenesis and clinical characteristics to therapeutic challenges. Lancet Neurol. 2010, 9: 689-701. 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70104-6.
Debette S, Markus HS: The clinical importance of white matter hyperintensities on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2010, 341: c3666-10.1136/bmj.c3666.
Gorelick PB, Scuteri A, Black SE, Decarli C, Greenberg SM, Iadecola C, Launer LJ, Laurent S, Lopez OL, Nyenhuis D, Petersen RC, Schneider JA, Tzourio C, Arnett DK, Bennett DA, Chui HC, Higashida RT, Lindquist R, Nilsson PM, Roman GC, Sellke FW, Seshadri S, American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia: Vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American heart association/American stroke association. Stroke. 2011, 42: 2672-2713. 10.1161/STR.0b013e3182299496.
The LADIS Study Group, Poggesi A, Pantoni L, Inzitari D, Fazekas F, Ferro J, O'Brien J, Hennerici M, Scheltens P, Erkinjuntti T, Visser M, Langhorne P, Chabriat H, Waldemar G, Wallin A, Wahlund A: 2001-2011: A decade of the LADIS (Leukoaraiosis And DISability) Study: what have we learned about white matter changes and small-vessel disease?. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2011, 32: 577-588.
Scheltens PH, Barkhof F, Valk J, Algr PR, Van Der Hoop RG, Nauta J, Wolter CH: White matter lesions on magnetic resonance imaging in clinically diagnosed Alzheimer's disease. Brain. 1992, 115: 735-748. 10.1093/brain/115.3.735.
Prins ND, van Dijk EJ, den Heijer T, Vermeer SE, Koudstaal PJ, Oudkerk M, Hofman A, Breteler MMB: Cerebral white matter lesions and the risk of dementia. Arch Neurol. 2004, 61: 1531-1534. 10.1001/archneur.61.10.1531.
Holland CM, Smith EE, Csapo I, Gurol ME, Brylka DA, Killiany RJ, Blacker D, Albert MS, Guttmann CR, Greenberg SM: Spatial distribution of white-matter hyperintensities in Alzheimer disease, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, and healthy aging. Stroke. 2008, 39: 1127-1133. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.497438.
Tullberg M, Fletcher E, DeCarli C, Mungas D, Reed BR, Harvey DJ, Weiner MW, Chui HC, Jagust WJ: White matter lesions impair frontal lobe function regardless of their location. Neurology. 2004, 63: 246-253. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000130530.55104.B5.
Moody DM, Brown WR, Challa VR, Anderson RL: Periventricular venous collagenosis: association with leukoaraiosis. Radiology. 1995, 194: 469-476.
Black S, Gao F, Bilbao J: Understanding white matter disease: imaging-pathological correlations in vascular cognitive impairment. Stroke. 2009, 40 (3 Suppl): S48-52.
Boone KB, Miller BL, Lesser IM, Mehringer CM, Hill-Gutierrez E, Goldberg MA, Berman NG: Neuropsychological correlates of white-matter lesions in healthy elderly subjects. Arch Neurol. 1992, 49: 549-554. 10.1001/archneur.1992.00530290141024.
DeCarli C, Murphy DGM, Tranh M, Grady CL, Haxby JV, Gillette JA, Salerno JA, Conzales-Aviles A, Horwitz B, Rapoport SI, Schapiro MB: The effect of white matter hyperintensity volume on brain structure, cognitive performance, and cerebral metabolism of glucose in 51 healthy adults. Neurology. 1995, 45: 2077-2084. 10.1212/WNL.45.11.2077.
DeCarli C, Grady CL, Clark CM, Katz DA, Brady DR, Murphy DGM, Haxby JV, Salerno JA, Gillette JA, Gonzalez-Aviles A, Rapoport SI: Comparison of positron emission tomography, cognition, and brain volume in Alzhiemer's disease with and without severe abnormalities of white matter. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996, 60: 158-167. 10.1136/jnnp.60.2.158.
Swartz RH, Stuss DT, Gao F, Black SE: Independent cognitive effects of atrophy and diffuse subcortical and thalamico-cortical cerebrovascular disease in dementia. Stroke. 2008, 39: 822-830. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.491936.
Snowdon DA, Greiner LH, Mortimer JA, Riley KP, Greiner PA, Marksbery WR: Brain infarction and the clinical expression of Alzheimer's disease. The Nun Study. JAMA. 1997, 277: 813-817. 10.1001/jama.1997.03540340047031.
Esiri MM, Nagy Z, Smith MZ, Barneston L, Smith AD: Cerebrovascular disease and threshold for dementia in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease. Lancet. 1999, 354: 919-920. 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)02355-7.
Hsiung GY, DeJesus-Hernandez M, Feldman HH, Sengdy P, Bouchard-Kerr P, Dwosh E, Butler R, Leung B, Fok A, Rutherford NJ, Baker M, Rademakers R, Mackenzie IR: Clinical and pathological features of familial frontotemporal dementia caused by C9ORF72 mutation on chromosome 9p. Brain. 2012, 135: 709-722. 10.1093/brain/awr354.
Roe CM, Fagan AM, Williams MM, Ghoshal N, Aeschleman M, Grant EA, Marcus DS, Mintun MA, Holtzman DM, Morris JC: Improving CSF biomarker accuracy in predicting prevalent and incident Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2011, 76: 501-510. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31820af900.
Dumurgier J, Paquet C, Benisty S, Kiffel C, Lidy C, Mouton-Liger F, Chabriat H, Laplanche JL, Hugon J: Inverse association between CSF Aβ 42 levels and years of education in mild form of Alzheimer's disease: the cognitive reserve theory. Neurobiol Dis. 2010, 40: 456-459. 10.1016/j.nbd.2010.07.007.
Doody RS, Massman P, Dunn JK: A method for estimating progression rates in Alzheimer's disease. Arch Neurol. 2001, 58: 449-454. 10.1001/archneur.58.3.449.
Doody RS, Pavlik V, Massman P, Rountree S, Darby E, Chan W: Predicting progression of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2010, 2: 2-9. 10.1186/alzrt25.
Behl P, Bocti C, Swartz RH, Gao F, Sahlas DJ, Lanctot KL, Streiner DL, Black SE: Strategic subcortical hyperintensities in cholinergic pathways and executive function decline in treated Alzheimer patients. Arch Neurol. 2007, 64: 266-272. 10.1001/archneur.64.2.266.
Terry RD, Masliah E, Salmon DP, Butters N, DeTeresa R, Hill R, Hansen LA, Katzman R: Physical basis of cognitive alterations in Alzheimer's disease: synapse loss is the major correlate of cognitive impairment. Ann Neurol. 1991, 30: 572-580. 10.1002/ana.410300410.
Bigio EH, Hynan LS, Sontag E, Satumtira S, White CL: Synapse loss is greater in presenile than senile onset Alzheimer disease: implications for the cognitive reserve hypothesis. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2002, 28: 218-227. 10.1046/j.1365-2990.2002.00385.x.
Rossor MN, Iversen LL, Reynolds GP, Mountjoy CQ, Roth M: Neurochemical characteristics of early and late onset types of Alzheimer's disease. BMJ. 1984, 288: 961-964. 10.1136/bmj.288.6422.961.
BL receives support from the Brill Chair in Neurology Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (SHSC) and University of Toronto and the CIHR Training Program in Neurodegenerative Lipidomics. MM receives support from the Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and the Sunnybrook Foundation. MF receives support from the Saul A Silverman Family Foundation as a Canada International Scientific Exchange Program and Morris Kerzner Memorial Fund. SEB receives support from the Brill Chair in Neurology Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (SHSC) and University of Toronto. We gratefully acknowledge Isabel Lam, Christopher Scott, and Gregory Szilagyi for their help in preparing the figures. We gratefully acknowledge financial support by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, grant MT13129.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Authors’ original submitted files for images
Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.
About this article
Cite this article
Lam, B., Masellis, M., Freedman, M. et al. Clinical, imaging, and pathological heterogeneity of the Alzheimer's disease syndrome. Alz Res Therapy 5, 1 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/alzrt155
- Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy
- Diffuse Lewy Body Disease
- Visuospatial Dysfunction
- Frontal Behavioural Inventory
- Mesiotemporal Lobe