Skip to main content
Download PDF

Leading mediators of sex differences in the incidence of dementia in community-dwelling adults in the UK Biobank: a retrospective cohort study

Alzheimer's Research & Therapy volume 15, Article number: 7 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Little is known regarding whether sex assigned at birth modifies the association between several predictive factors for dementia and the risk of dementia itself.

Methods

Our retrospective cohort study included 214,670 men and 214,670 women matched by age at baseline from the UK Biobank. Baseline data were collected between 2006 and 2010, and incident dementia was ascertained using hospital inpatient or death records until January 2021. Mediation analysis was tested for 133 individual factors.

Results

Over 5,117,381 person-years of follow-up, 5928 cases of incident all-cause dementia (452 cases of young-onset dementia, 5476 cases of late-onset dementia) were documented. Hazard ratios (95% CI) for all-cause, young-onset, and late-onset dementias associated with the male sex (female as reference) were 1.23 (1.17–1.29), 1.42 (1.18–1.71), and 1.21 (1.15–1.28), respectively. Out of 133 individual factors, the strongest mediators for the association between sex and incident dementia were multimorbidity risk score (percentage explained (95% CI): 62.1% (45.2–76.6%)), apolipoprotein A in the blood (25.5% (15.2–39.4%)), creatinine in urine (24.9% (16.1–36.5%)), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the blood (23.2% (16.2–32.1%)), and blood lymphocyte percentage (21.1% (14.5–29.5%)). Health-related conditions (percentage (95% CI) explained: 74.4% (51.3–88.9%)) and biomarkers (83.0% (37.5–97.5%)), but not lifestyle factors combined (30.1% (20.7–41.6%)), fully mediated sex differences in incident dementia. Health-related conditions combined were a stronger mediator for late-onset (75.4% (48.6–90.8%)) than for young-onset dementia (52.3% (25.8–77.6%)), whilst lifestyle factors combined were a stronger mediator for young-onset (42.3% (19.4–69.0%)) than for late-onset dementia (26.7% (17.1–39.2%)).

Conclusions

Our analysis matched by age has demonstrated that men had a higher risk of all-cause, young-onset, and late-onset dementias than women. This association was fully mediated by health-related conditions or blood/urinary biomarkers and largely mediated by lifestyle factors. Our findings are important for understanding potential mechanisms of sex in dementia risk.

Introduction

Dementia is a neurocognitive disorder that is associated with significant functional deficits in language, behaviour, and cognition [1]. Cognitive impairment is associated with decreased functionality in activities of daily living among those with dementia [2]. The epidemic of dementia and its related disability-adjusted life year, mortality, and economic cost imposes a tremendous burden on the health care system globally [3,4,5]. Women are more likely to experience dementia than men [6], particularly at older ages [7, 8]. However, the underlying mechanisms for sex differences in dementia risk are largely unknown.

Many modifiable risk factors including lifestyle, chronic conditions, biomarkers, and air pollutants as well as non-modifiable risk factors such as apolipoprotein E epsilon 4 (APOE4) have been linked to dementia risk [9, 10]. Previous studies have investigated whether these risk factors modify the association between sex and dementia [6, 11, 12]. Recent evidence suggests sex hormones such as follicle-stimulating hormone, endogenous and exogenous oestrogen, luteinizing hormone, and testosterone may influence female susceptibility to dementia onset [12,13,14]. The interplay between genetic risk factors and sex as well as sex-specific changes at molecular levels in the brain, blood, or cerebrospinal fluid may also explain sex differences in dementia risk [15]. It is also possible that medical history and socioeconomic factors mediate the association between sex and dementia risk [16, 17]. However, how much sex differences in dementia risk could be explained by a wide range of individual determinants in isolation and in combination remains to be explored.

Identifying important mediators for sex differences in the incidence of dementia would facilitate understanding of underlying mechanisms. Using retrospective data from the UK Biobank cohort study, we sought to examine the association between sex and incident all-cause, young-onset, and late-onset dementias and whether a wide range of risk factors mediated this association.

Methods

Study population

The UK Biobank is a population-based cohort of more than 500,000 participants aged 40–73 years at baseline between 2006 and 2010 [18]. These participants attended one of the 22 assessment centres throughout the UK [18]. The study design and population have been detailed elsewhere [18]. Individuals with dementia or cognitive impairment at baseline were excluded from the analysis. To enable the comparability of lifestyle factors and biomarkers between genders, those of non-European ancestry were excluded. In addition, individuals without medical record linkage were excluded from the analysis. Notably, age is the most important determinant of dementia, and only adjusting for age might not be able to fully control the confounding due to age when comparing the difference in dementia risk by sex. Meanwhile, age is also highly related to lifestyle factors and biomarkers such that matching by age may help reduce the bias when exploring the mediation effects of these factors. Therefore, one woman for each man was matched by age at baseline (±1 year) in the analysis. Our study adhered to the AGReMA guidelines [19].

Ascertainment of incident dementia

Dementia cases were ascertained using hospital inpatient records or death registers. Dementia was defined by a primary/secondary diagnosis using the international classification diseases coding system (detailed in Additional file 1: Table S1). Dementia was also defined as an underlying/contributory cause of death through linkage to death register data. Dementia diagnosed <65 years of age was categorized as young-onset dementia and that diagnosed ≥65 years was considered late-onset dementia [20]. The earliest recorded date was used as the onset date of dementia. Person-years were computed from the baseline assessment date to the date of onset dementia, date of death, or the end of follow-up (31 December 2020 for England and Wales and 31 January 2021 for Scotland), whichever came first.

Sociodemographic data

Data on age, ethnicity, education, and household income were collected using a self-reported questionnaire on a touchscreen tablet. Townsend index of material deprivation was used to assess the neighbourhood-level socioeconomic status.

Sex (female/male) was self-reported. “Sex” refers to biological differences such as levels of hormones, whereas “gender” refers to differences in the impact of psychosocial and socioeconomic factors on biological markers between genders [21]. The effect of both “sex” and “gender” was involved in the present study, and “sex” was used in the text.

Lifestyle factors

Self-reported data on lifestyle factors at baseline were collected via a touchscreen tablet. A short version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire was used to estimate excess metabolic equivalent (MET)-hours/week of physical activity during work and leisure time. Intakes of food groups in the last year were self-reported using a structured questionnaire. A healthy diet score was calculated based on seven commonly eaten food groups (whole grains, refined grains, vegetable, fruit, fish, red meat, and processed meat) following recommendations on dietary priorities for cardiometabolic health [22]. A higher healthy diet score has been shown to be associated with a lower risk of dementia [23]. Sleep duration per day on average in the last 4 weeks was assessed with the survey item “About how many hours sleep do you get in every 24 h?” Alcohol consumption, as well as supplements including vitamins, folate, glucosamine, calcium, zinc, iron, and selenium per week in the last year, was self-reported.

Genetic data

Affymetrix using a bespoke BiLEVE Axiom array or the UK Biobank Axiom array was used for genotyping [24]. All genetic data were quality controlled and imputed by the UK Biobank team. APOE genotype was directly genotyped based on two single-nucleotide polymorphisms (rs7412 and rs429358). APOE4+ dominant model of E3/E4 or E4/E4 was used to define the presence of APOE4.

Blood tests

Blood samples were collected and analysed at a central laboratory at baseline between 2006 and 2010. Cholesterol was measured by direct enzymatic methods (Konelab, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). Glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was measured using high-performance liquid chromatography. Serum cystatin C was measured by latex-enhanced immunoturbidimetric method on a Siemens ADVIA 1800 instrument. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D, a proxy for vitamin D levels, was measured using a chemiluminescent immunoassay (DiaSorin Liaison XL, DiaSorin Ltd., UK). Quality control was conducted by the UK Biobank central team (https://biobank.ctsu.ox.ac.uk/crystal/ukb/docs/serum_biochemistry.pdf).

Urinary biomarker data

Urine assays for sodium, potassium, microalbumin, and creatinine were measured by ion-selective electrode analysis on a Beckman Coulter AU5400 (https://biobank.ndph.ox.ac.uk/showcase/ukb/docs/urine_assay.pdf).

Health-related conditions

Chronic conditions at baseline were based on self-reported data or interviews. Participants were asked whether they had ever been told by a doctor that they had certain common medical conditions, such as cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes, and depression. Additional disease cases at baseline were defined using inpatient data (initial diagnosis date before baseline interview date). Inpatient hospital data for the UK Biobank participants were available since 1997 [18]. Body mass index (BMI) was computed based on measured weight and height at baseline, and obesity was defined as BMI≥30 kg/m [2, 25]. A multimorbidity score was then computed based on 61 major diseases (Additional file 1: Table S2) [26].

Familial medical history

The medical history of the father, mother, and siblings was collected using a touchscreen device. Medical conditions included heart disease, stroke, hypertension, diabetes, cancer, dementia, Parkinson’s disease, and depression.

Environment measures

Air pollution and local environment measures were conducted by the Small Area Health Statistics Unit (http://www.sahsu.org/) and were linked centrally to the UK Biobank data (http://biobank.ctsu.ox.ac.uk/crystal/docs/EnviroExposEst.pdf). Particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide, and total nitrogen oxides were measured as annual average values in microgrammes per cubic metre. Road traffic measures were provided for the year 2008 from the Road Traffic Statistics Branch at the Department for Transport attached to the local road network; traffic data for unmonitored links were estimated based on surrounding monitored links. Data were also available regarding noise pollution, such as daytime, evening, and night-time average level of noise pollution (dB).

Statistical analysis

Baseline characteristics were expressed as frequency (percentage) and means±standard deviations (SDs). T-test for continuous variables and chi-square for categorical variables were used to test the difference of between sexes. Cox regression models were conducted to examine the sex effect on the incidence of all-cause, young-onset, and late-onset dementias adjusted for age.

The potential mediation effects of a wide range of individual factors on the association between sex and incident dementia were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for age [27]. We used the following criteria to establish mediation [27]: (1) the mediator was significantly associated with sex; (2) sex was significantly associated with dementia; (3) the mediator was significantly associated with dementia; and (4) the association between sex and dementia was attenuated by the mediator (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). Potential mediators examined included socioeconomic factors (n=3), lifestyle factors (n=19), health-related conditions (n=3), familial history of medical conditions (n=24), genetics (n=1), blood biomarkers (n=49), urinary biomarkers (n=4), and pollution measures (n=30, Additional file 1: Table S3). We also examined the mediation effect of these groups of factors combined. Whether individual chronic conditions used to create multimorbidity risk score mediated the association between sex and dementia was also tested. The mediation analysis was conducted using macro programmes created by Spiegelman et al. [28] Benjamin-Hochberg’s procedure was used to control the false discovery rate at a 5% level for multiple comparisons [29].

A sensitivity analysis was conducted to examine whether the important determinants mediated the association between sex and incident dementia by excluding those cases diagnosed in the first 5 years of follow-up. A further sensitivity analysis was conducted to test mediation associations among individuals with complete data.

Multiple imputations for missing data were conducted, and all covariates were included in the imputation models to create 5 imputed datasets.

Data analyses were conducted using SAS 9.4 for Windows (SAS Institute Inc.) and all P values were two-sided with statistical significance set at <0.05.

Results

Population selection and baseline characteristics

Baseline data were collected among 502,505 participants. After excluding individuals of non-European ancestry (n=30,380), those who could not be linked to inpatient data (n=27), those with prevalent dementia (n=345) or cognitive impairment (n=232), or those who developed dementia in the first year of follow-up (n=36), 471,485 participants were included in the matching analysis. After excluding those women who were not matched in pairs, 429,340 participants (214,670 men, 214,670 age-matched women) aged 40–71 years (mean ± SD: 57.0±8.1) were included in the final analysis (Additional file 1: Fig. S2). Women were more likely to have a lower income, to be less physically active, and to be non-smokers than men. Women had a higher healthy diet score and lower multimorbidity risk score, BMI, and HbA1c (Table 1). Women had higher apolipoprotein A, but lower creatinine in blood and urine than men (Additional file 1: Table S4). Percentages of participants with missing values in each variable and values in imputed and non-imputed data are listed in Additional file 1: Tables S5 and S6.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics in women and men
Full size table

Incidence of dementia

Over 5,117,381 person-years of follow-up, 5928 cases of incident all-cause dementia were documented. Over 4,029,006 person-years of follow-up, 452 cases of young-onset dementia were documented. Over 3,478,484 person-years of follow-up, 5476 cases of late-onset dementia were documented. For all-cause, young-onset, and late-onset dementias, women had a higher survival probability than men. The aged-adjusted hazard ratios ([HRs] 95% CIs) for all-cause, young-onset, and late-onset dementias associated with the male sex were 1.23 (1.17–1.29), 1.42 (1.18–1.71), and 1.21 (1.15–1.28), respectively (Fig. 1). Men had a higher risk of Alzheimer’s disease (HR (95% CI): 1.14 (1.05–1.24)) and vascular dementia (1.48 (1.32–1.66)) compared with women after adjustment for age.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Survival probability of dementia in women and men. Panels A, B, and C display the survival probability of all-cause, young-onset, and late-onset dementias in women and men

Full size image

Mediators of sex differences in all-cause dementia

The strongest mediators for the association between sex and incident dementia were multimorbidity risk score (percentage explained (95% CI): 62.1% (45.2–76.6%)), apolipoprotein A in the blood (25.5% (15.2–39.4%)), creatinine in urine (24.9% (16.1–36.5%)), LDL-C in the blood (23.2% (16.2–32.1%)), and blood lymphocyte percentage (21.1% (14.5–29.5%)). Health-related conditions (74.4% (51.3–88.9%)), or biomarkers (83.0% (37.5–97.5%)), but not lifestyle factors combined (30.1% (41.6–20.7%)) fully mediated sex differences in incident dementia (Fig. 2). For individual chronic diseases used to create multimorbidity risk score, coronary heart disease (27.4% (20.0–36.2%)), diabetes (19.2% (14.2–25.5%)), hearing impairment (17.8% (12.7–24.5%)), high cholesterol (14.2% (10.3–19.2%)), and hypertension (11.2% (8.2–15.2%)) were the strongest mediators (Additional file 1: Fig. S3). The results on the association between induvial mediators and incident dementia are shown in Additional file 1: Table S7.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Mediators for sex differences in the incidence of all-cause dementia. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the potential mediation effects of 133 individual factors on the association between sex and incidence of all-cause dementia. HR adjusted for mediator shows whether the association between sex and dementia was attenuated by the mediator (criterion 4). Results for the test of the other three criteria are shown in Tables 1 and S4 (criterion 1), Fig. 1 (criterion 2), and Table S7 (criterion 3)

Full size image

Mediators of sex differences in young-onset dementia

Percentages (95% CIs) of sex differences in the incidence of young-onset dementia explained by multimorbidity risk score, diet score, creatinine in urine, overall health rating, and gamma glutamyltransferase in blood were 41.2% (21–64.8%), 36.6% (16.8–62.4%), 33.0% (13.6–60.6%), 27.8% (15.2–45.3%), and 24.0% (12.6–40.9%), respectively. Health-related conditions (52.3% (25.8–77.6%)), lifestyle factors (42.3% (19.4–69.0%)), or biomarkers combined (63.6% (21.4–91.8%)) fully mediated the association between sex and incident young-onset dementia. Townsend index and air pollution were also significant mediators (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Mediators for sex differences in the incidence of young-onset dementia. Dementia diagnosed <65 years of age was categorized as young-onset dementia. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the potential mediation effects of 133 individual factors on the association between sex and incidence of young-onset dementia. HR adjusted for mediator shows whether the association between sex and dementia was attenuated by the mediator (criterion 4). Results for the test of the other three criteria are shown in Tables 1 and S4 (criterion 1), Fig. 1 (criterion 2), and Table S7 (criterion 3)

Full size image

Coronary heart disease (17.7% (8.4–33.6%)), hearing impairment (16.6% (8.6–29.6%)), alcohol problems (13.8% (6.6–26.5%)), hypertension (12.5% (6.1–23.8%)), and high cholesterol (12.2% (5.4–25%)) were the leading mediators (Additional file 1: Fig. S4).

Mediators of sex differences in late-onset dementia

Multimorbidity risk score was the leading mediator for sex differences in the incidence of late-onset dementia (63.6% (44.1–79.4%)). Health-related conditions combined fully mediated the association between sex and late-onset dementia. The percentage (95% CI) of sex differences in late-onset dementia mediated by lifestyle factors combined was 26.7% (17.1–39.2%). Biomarkers combined fully mediated the association between sex and incident late-onset dementia (88.2% (26.8–99.4%), Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Mediators for sex differences in the incidence of late-onset dementia. Dementia diagnosed ≥65 years of age was considered late-onset dementia. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate the potential mediation effects of 133 individual factors on the association between sex and incidence of late-onset dementia. HR adjusted for mediator shows whether the association between sex and dementia was attenuated by the mediator (criterion 4). Results for the test of the other three criteria are shown in Tables 1 and S4 (criterion 1), Fig. 1 (criterion 2), and Table S7 (criterion 3)

Full size image

Of the individual chronic diseases investigated, coronary heart disease (28.5% (20.1–38.2%)), diabetes (20.4% (14.6–27.7%)), hearing impairment (17.6% (11.9–25.2%)), high cholesterol (14.5% (10.2–20.3%)), and hypertension (11.2% (7.9–15.6%)) largely mediated the association between sex and risk of late-onset dementia (Additional file 1: Fig. S5).

Sensitivity analysis

Mediation analysis among individuals by excluding dementia cases diagnosed in the first five of follow-up showed that health-related conditions (74.6% (48.5–90.2%)), lifestyle factors (64.8% (44.7–80.7%)), or biomarkers combined (93.8% (5.2–100%)) fully mediated sex differences in incident dementia (Additional file 1: Fig. S6). Similar results were found among those with complete data compared to those of the main findings (Additional file 1: Fig. S7).

Discussion

In this large population of community-dwelling adults, men had a higher risk of all-cause dementia than women and this association was stronger for young-onset dementia than for late-onset dementia. Multimorbidity risk score, apolipoprotein A, creatinine in urine, LDL-C, and lymphocyte percentage were the leading mediators for sex differences in incident dementia. Health-related conditions and biomarkers combined fully mediated sex differences in incident dementia. Lifestyle factors explained more sex differences in young-onset than in late-onset dementia.

Around two-thirds of adults living with dementia are women [30], and this is possibly due to the fact that women live longer, on average, than men [31]. However, our analysis matched by age has demonstrated that men had a higher risk of dementia than women independent of age. This indicates sex differences in the incidence of dementia may be due to other mechanisms rather than ageing. It has been reported that the risk for Alzheimer’s disease associated with APOE Ɛ4/Ɛ4 was higher in men than in women [32]. Men had a higher risk of dementia than women possibly due to the observed worse memory in men than in women overall and more specifically beyond age 40 years [33]. A recent cohort study has demonstrated that education might be more likely to act as a contributor to cognitive reserve in women than in men [34]. These findings may partly explain why men than women were more prone to develop dementia in later life. Compared with women, men had a higher degree of cerebral amyloid angiopathy [35], higher uptake of Pittsburgh compound B [36], and greater age-related brain atrophy in frontal, parietal, and temporal regions [33], which may also partly explain the higher incidence of dementia in men than in women. A recent meta-analysis showed that women had a higher prevalence of moderate to severe neuropsychiatric symptoms whereas men had a higher prevalence of more severe apathy [37]. Another recent meta-analysis has shown that the prevalence of young-onset dementia was 293.1 per 100,000 population for men and 216.5 per 100,000 population for women [20]. We found the risk associated with the female sex was larger for young-onset dementia than for late-onset dementia. This needs to be confirmed by future cohort studies.

The importance of lifestyle factors including diet, physical activity, smoking, and alcohol consumption on the development of dementia has been highlighted in previous studies [9, 11, 12]. Recent research has investigated whether the association between lifestyle factors and dementia differed between sexes [11, 12]. We found lifestyle factors largely mediated the association between sex and incident dementia and even fully mediated the association between sex and incident young-onset dementia. It is possible that women had healthier lifestyle habits such as never smoking and higher diet quality such that they were less likely to develop dementia especially young-onset dementia. Although whether sex differences in the incidence of dementia are mediated by lifestyle factors has not been reported in previous studies, our findings are supported by research reporting that a healthy diet is particularly protective of dementia for women [38].

Strong evidence has demonstrated the importance of chronic diseases and their multimorbidity in the development of dementia [9, 26]. A previous study has investigated the associations between cardiovascular risk factors and dementia stratified by sex [39]; however, whether the association between sex and incident dementia was mediated by chronic diseases remains to be explored. We found that a multimorbidity risk score was the most important individual mediator for the association between sex and incident dementia. In our study, men had higher multimorbidity risk score than women and multimorbidity risk score was an important risk factor for dementia. This explained why multimorbidity risk score largely mediated the association between sex and dementia risk. For individual chronic conditions used to create multimorbidity risk score, coronary heart disease was the leading mediator followed by other cardiometabolic disorders including diabetes, high cholesterol, hypertension, stroke, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation in our study. Hearing impairment, alcohol problems, and Parkinson’s disease also play an important role in sex differences in incident dementia. Although the effect size is small, mother’s history of hypertension was a significant mediator for the association between sex and incident dementia. However, it is unknown whether individuals were born before or after the development of hypertension among their mothers. Therefore, mother’s history of hypertension may not be a reliable mediator. Our research highlights the importance of the prevention or treatment of specific diseases to fill the gap in dementia risk between sexes.

The role of biomarkers in the development of dementia should not be overlooked. We found lipid-related factors including apolipoprotein A, apolipoprotein B, LDL-C, and HDL-C, which are highly correlated with cardiometabolic disorders, were significant mediators of the association between sex and incident dementia. This was consistent with our results for cardiometabolic disorders as leading important mediators as sex differences in incident dementia. The mediation effect of these biomarkers on sex difference in dementia risk may be partly attributable to the fact that the male sex was associated with adverse levels of biomarkers and these biomarkers were strongly associated with dementia risk as shown in our analysis. Similarly, recent studies have shown that the potential effect of lipids in the development of dementia may differ between sexes [40, 41]. We found both blood and urinary creatinine mediated the association between sex and dementia. This is in line with a cohort study showing that the association between glomerular filtration rate and dementia risk was significant in women only [42]. Some other biomarkers also slightly mediated sex differences in incident dementia, but this needs to be supported by follow-up studies. Although individual biomarkers did not contribute much to the association between sex and dementia, these biomarkers combined fully mediated the association. This suggests it is critical to monitor, manage, and control important biomarkers for the prevention of dementia.

To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate important mediators from a wide range of factors for the association between sex and incident dementia. The present study has several limitations. Firstly, some cases of all-cause dementia may not be captured in the medical records or death registers [43]. However, more recent studies have shown that routine health care data can achieve a high accuracy of dementia ascertainment [43, 44]. Notably, previous research has shown that positive predictive value for all-cause dementia was 87.3% and 80.0% for hospital admissions and mortality data respectively in the UK Biobank [45]. Secondly, dementia might have occurred before the diagnosis using inpatient data, as the prodromal period of dementia can last many years [46]. Therefore, dementia might have occurred before the assessment of mediators. However, our sensitivity analysis by excluding dementia cases developed in the first 5 years of follow-up showed similar results to the main findings, which may have reduced the possibility that mediators occurred before the diagnosis of dementia. Thirdly, although sex-related hormones including sex hormone-binding globulin, testosterone, and oestradiol were analysed as mediators, data on potential changes in sex assigned at birth and gender identity were not available in our study. Fourthly, pregnancy complications including preeclampsia have been linked to dementia risk [47], but pregnancy complications and reproductive health were not included in our analysis given the unavailability of data. Fifthly, some unmatched individuals were excluded from the analysis, which might have resulted in lower precision of estimates compared to using the whole cohort. However, a low exclusion rate (8.9%) would not impact the representativeness of the cohort. Finally, our analysis was restricted to a subgroup of the UK Biobank cohort of European ancestry. Thus, our findings may not be generalized to other ethnic groups.

In conclusion, men have a higher risk of all-cause, young-onset, and late-onset dementias than women. This association is fully mediated by health-related conditions and blood/urinary biomarkers and largely mediated by lifestyle factors. Lifestyle factors are stronger mediators for young-onset dementia whilst health-related conditions are stronger mediators for late-onset dementia. The association between sex and young-onset dementia is also slightly mediated by the Townsend index or air pollution.

Availability of data and materials

Data are available in a public, open-access repository (https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/).

References

  1. Rossor M, Collinge J, Fox N, et al. Dementia and cognitive impairment. Neurology: a queen square textbook: second edition 2016;30(3):289-336.

  2. Urwyler P, Stucki R, Rampa L, Müri R, Mosimann UP, Nef T. Cognitive impairment categorized in community-dwelling older adults with and without dementia using in-home sensors that recognise activities of daily living. Sci Rep. 2017;7:42084.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nichols E, Szoeke CEI, Vollset SE, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18:88–106.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Prince M, Wimo A, Guerchet M, Ali GC, Wu YT, M P. World Alzheimer report 2015—the global impact of dementia: an analysis of prevalence, incidence, cost and trends. London: Alzheimer's Disease International; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wimo A, Guerchet M, Ali GC, et al. The worldwide costs of dementia 2015 and comparisons with 2010. Alzheimers Dement. 2017;13:1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Niu H, Álvarez-Álvarez I, Guillén-Grima F, Aguinaga-Ontoso I. Prevalence and incidence of Alzheimer’s disease in Europe: a meta-analysis. Neurologia. 2017;32:523–32.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cao Q, Tan CC, Xu W, et al. The prevalence of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;73:1157–66.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mazure CM, Swendsen J. Sex differences in Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15:451–2.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Livingston G, Huntley J, Sommerlad A, et al. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission. Lancet. 2020;396:P413–46.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vergara RC, Zitko P, Slachevsky A, San Martin C, Delgado C. Population attributable fraction of modifiable risk factors for dementia in Chile. Alzheimers Dementia (Amst). 2022;14:e12273.

    Google Scholar 

  11. LaPlume AA, McKetton L, Anderson ND, Troyer AK. Sex differences and modifiable dementia risk factors synergistically influence memory over the adult lifespan. Alzheimers Dementia (Amst). 2022;14:e12301.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rahman A, Schelbaum E, Hoffman K, et al. Sex-driven modifiers of Alzheimer risk: a multimodality brain imaging study. Neurology. 2020;95:e166–78.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Udeh-Momoh C, Watermeyer T. Female specific risk factors for the development of Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology and cognitive impairment: call for a precision medicine approach. Ageing Res Rev. 2021;71:101459.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Xiong J, Kang SS, Wang Z, et al. FSH blockade improves cognition in mice with Alzheimer’s disease. Nature. 2022;603:470–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Guo L, Zhong MB, Zhang L, Zhang B, Cai D. Sex differences in Alzheimer’s disease: insights from the multiomics landscape. Biol Psychiatry. 2022;91:61–71.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rahman A, Jackson H, Hristov H, et al. Sex and gender driven modifiers of Alzheimer’s: the role for estrogenic control across age, race, medical, and lifestyle risks. Front Aging Neurosci. 2019;11:315.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hasselgren C, Ekbrand H, Halleröd B, et al. Sex differences in dementia: on the potentially mediating effects of educational attainment and experiences of psychological distress. BMC Psychiatry. 2020;20:434.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sudlow C, Gallacher J, Allen N, et al. UK biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age. PLoS Med. 2015;12:e1001779.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lee H, Cashin AG, Lamb SE, et al. A guideline for reporting mediation analyses of randomized trials and observational studies: the AGReMA statement. JAMA. 2021;326:1045–56.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hendriks S, Peetoom K, Bakker C, et al. Global prevalence of young-onset dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol. 2021;78:1080–90.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nebel RA, Aggarwal NT, Barnes LL, et al. Understanding the impact of sex and gender in Alzheimer’s disease: a call to action. Alzheimers Dement. 2018;14:1171–83.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mozaffarian D. Dietary and policy priorities for cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and obesity: a comprehensive review. Circulation. 2016;133:187–225.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lourida I, Hannon E, Littlejohns TJ, et al. Association of lifestyle and genetic risk with incidence of dementia. JAMA. 2019;322:430–7.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bycroft C, Freeman C, Petkova D, et al. The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data. Nature. 2018;562:203–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. (WHO) WHO. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Geneva: WHO; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shang X, Zhu Z, Zhang X, et al. Association of a wide range of chronic diseases and apolipoprotein E4 genotype with subsequent risk of dementia in community-dwelling adults: A retrospective cohort study. EClinicalMedicine. 2022;45:101335.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lin DY, Fleming TR, De Gruttola V. Estimating the proportion of treatment effect explained by a surrogate marker. Stat Med. 1997;16:1515–27.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Nevo D, Liao X, Spiegelman D. Estimation and Inference for the Mediation Proportion. Int J Biostat. 2017;13(2):/j/ijb.2017.13.issue-2/ijb-2017-0006/ijb-2017-0006.xml.

  29. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser A. 1995;57:289–300.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hebert LE, Weuve J, Scherr PA, Evans DA. Alzheimer disease in the United States (2010-2050) estimated using the 2010 census. Neurology. 2013;80:1778–83.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Seshadri S, Wolf PA, Beiser A, et al. Lifetime risk of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. The impact of mortality on risk estimates in the Framingham Study. Neurology. 1997;49:1498–504.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Neu SC, Pa J, Kukull W, et al. Apolipoprotein E genotype and sex risk factors for Alzheimer disease: a meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol. 2017;74:1178–89.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jack CR Jr, Wiste HJ, Weigand SD, et al. Age, sex, and APOE ε4 effects on memory, brain structure, and β-amyloid across the adult life span. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72:511–9.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Giacomucci G, Mazzeo S, Padiglioni S, et al. Gender differences in cognitive reserve: implication for subjective cognitive decline in women. Neurol Sci. 2022;43:2499–508.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Shinohara M, Murray ME, Frank RD, et al. Impact of sex and APOE4 on cerebral amyloid angiopathy in Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;132:225–34.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Cavedo E, Chiesa PA, Houot M, et al. Sex differences in functional and molecular neuroimaging biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease in cognitively normal older adults with subjective memory complaints. Alzheimers Dement. 2018;14:1204–15.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Eikelboom WS, Pan M, Ossenkoppele R, et al. Sex differences in neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease dementia: a meta-analysis. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2022;14:48.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Gu Y, Nieves JW, Stern Y, Luchsinger JA, Scarmeas N. Food combination and Alzheimer disease risk: a protective diet. Arch Neurol. 2010;67:699–706.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Gong J, Harris K, Peters SAE, Woodward M. Sex differences in the association between major cardiovascular risk factors in midlife and dementia: a cohort study using data from the UK Biobank. BMC Med. 2021;19:110.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kjeldsen EW, Thomassen JQ, Juul Rasmussen I, Nordestgaard BG, Tybjærg-Hansen A, Frikke-Schmidt R. Plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and risk of dementia: observational and genetic studies. Cardiovasc Res. 2022;118:1330–43.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Ancelin ML, Ripoche E, Dupuy AM, et al. Sex differences in the associations between lipid levels and incident dementia. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;34:519–28.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang M, Ding D, Zhao Q, et al. Kidney function and dementia risk in community-dwelling older adults: the Shanghai Aging Study. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2021;13:21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Sommerlad A, Perera G, Singh-Manoux A, Lewis G, Stewart R, Livingston G. Accuracy of general hospital dementia diagnoses in England: sensitivity, specificity, and predictors of diagnostic accuracy 2008-2016. Alzheimers Dement. 2018;14:933–43.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Sibbett RA, Russ TC, Deary IJ, Starr JM. Dementia ascertainment using existing data in UK longitudinal and cohort studies: a systematic review of methodology. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17:239.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wilkinson T, Schnier C, Bush K, et al. Identifying dementia outcomes in UK Biobank: a validation study of primary care, hospital admissions and mortality data. Eur J Epidemiol. 2019;34:557–65.

    Google Scholar 

  46. 2020 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.12068.

  47. Basit S, Wohlfahrt J, Boyd HA. Pre-eclampsia and risk of dementia later in life: nationwide cohort study. BMJ. 2018;363:k4109.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was conducted using the UK Biobank resource. We thank the participants of the UK Biobank.

Funding

XS receives support from Postdoctoral Research Funds of Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital (BY012021047). XLZ receives GDPH Supporting Fund for Talent Program (KJ2020633). ZZ receives support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82101173) and the Research Foundation of Medical Science and Technology of Guangdong Province (B2021237). HY receives support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81870663, 82171075), the Outstanding Young Talent Trainee Program of Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital (KJ012019087), Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital Scientific Research Funds for Leading Medical Talents and Distinguished Young Scholars in Guangdong Province (KJ012019457), and Talent Introduction Fund of Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital (Y012018145). MH receives support from the High-level Talent Flexible Introduction Fund of Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital (No. KJ012019530). MH also receives support from the University of Melbourne at Research Accelerator Program and the CERA Foundation. The Centre for Eye Research Australia receives Operational Infrastructure Support from the Victorian State Government. The sponsor or funding organization had no role in the design or conduct of this research. The sponsor or funding organization had no role in the design, conduct, analysis, or reporting of this study. The funding sources did not participate in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Guangdong Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital (Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510080, China

    Xianwen Shang, Zhuoting Zhu, Yu Huang, Xueli Zhang, Xiayin Zhang, Shulin Tang, Yijun Hu, Honghua Yu & Mingguang He

  2. Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, 510080, China

    Xianwen Shang, Zhuoting Zhu, Yu Huang & Xiayin Zhang

  3. Centre for Eye Research Australia, Melbourne, VIC, 3002, Australia

    Xianwen Shang, Zhuoting Zhu, Katerina Kiburg, Jiahao Liu & Mingguang He

  4. Department of Medicine (Royal Melbourne Hospital), University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3050, Australia

    Xianwen Shang & Eddy Roccati

  5. Wicking Dementia Research and Education Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia

    Eddy Roccati

  6. State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510060, China

    Wei Wang & Mingguang He

  7. Monash e-Research Center, Faculty of Engineering, Airdoc Research, Nvidia AI Technology Research Center, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, 3800, Australia

    Zongyuan Ge

Authors
  1. Xianwen Shang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eddy Roccati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhuoting Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Katerina Kiburg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yu Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Xueli Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xiayin Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jiahao Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Shulin Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Yijun Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Zongyuan Ge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Honghua Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Mingguang He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

XS, ER, and MH conceived and designed the study. ZZ and WW performed data curation. XS conducted data analysis and drafted the initial manuscript. XS, ER, ZZ, KK, WW, YH, XLZ, XYZ, JL, ST, YH, HY, ZG, and MH made critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors read the manuscript and approved the final draft.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xianwen Shang, Honghua Yu or Mingguang He.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The UK Biobank Study’s ethical approval has been granted by the National Information Governance Board for Health and Social Care and the NHS North West Multicenter Research Ethics Committee (REC reference: 16/NW/0274). All participants provided informed consent through electronic signature at recruitment.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Diagram for pathways in the mediation analysis. Figure S2. Flowchart for population selection from the UK Biobank. Figure S3. Sex differences in the incidence of all-cause dementia mediated by individual chronic diseases. Figure S4. Sex differences in the incidence of young-onset dementia mediated by individual chronic diseases. Figure S5. Sex differences in the incidence of late-onset dementia mediated by individual chronic diseases. Figure S6. Mediators of sex differences in the incidence of dementia among individuals by excluding those who were diagnosed with dementia in the first five years of follow-up. Figure S7. Mediators of sex differences in the incidence of dementia among individuals with complete data. Table S1. Codes for international classification disease and self-reported fields for dementia. Table S2. Chronic conditions used to create the multimorbidity score for dementia. Table S3. Potential mediators tested in the analysis. Table S4. Other baseline characteristics in women and men. Table S5. Categorical variables in imputed and non-imputed data. Table S6. Continuous variables in imputed and non-imputed data. Table S7. Risk for incident dementia associated with mediators.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shang, X., Roccati, E., Zhu, Z. et al. Leading mediators of sex differences in the incidence of dementia in community-dwelling adults in the UK Biobank: a retrospective cohort study. Alz Res Therapy 15, 7 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-022-01140-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-022-01140-2

Keywords

  • Sex
  • Dementia
  • Lifestyle
  • Multimorbidity risk score
  • Biomarker
  • Mediation analysis

Alzheimer's Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1758-9193