Skip to main content
Download PDF

Near-infrared light reduces β-amyloid-stimulated microglial toxicity and enhances survival of neurons: mechanisms of light therapy for Alzheimer’s disease

Alzheimer's Research & Therapy volume 14, Article number: 84 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Low-intensity light can decelerate neurodegenerative disease progression and reduce amyloid β (Aβ) levels in the cortex, though the cellular and molecular mechanisms by which photobiomodulation (PBM) protects against neurodegeneration are still in the early stages. Microglia cells play a key role in the pathology of Alzheimer’s disease by causing chronic inflammation. We present new results concerning the PBM of both oxidative stress and microglia metabolism associated with the activation of metabolic processes by 808 nm near-infrared light.

Methods

The studies were carried out using healthy male mice to obtain the microglial cell suspension from the hippocampus. Oligomeric β-amyloid (1-42) was prepared and used to treat microglia cells. Light irradiation of cells was performed using diode lasers emitting at 808 nm (30 mW/cm2 for 5 min, resulting in a dose of 10 J/cm2). Mitochondrial membrane potential, ROS level studies, cell viability, apoptosis, and necrosis assays were performed using epifluorescence microscopy. Phagocytosis, nitric oxide and H2O2 production, arginase, and glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase activities were measured using standard assays. Cytokines, glucose, lactate, and ATP were measurements with ELISA. As our data were normally distributed, two-way ANOVA test was used.

Results

The light induces a metabolic shift from glycolysis to mitochondrial activity in pro-inflammatory microglia affected by oligomeric Aβ. Thereby, the level of anti-inflammatory microglia increases. This process is accompanied by a decrease in pro-inflammatory cytokines and an activation of phagocytosis. Light exposure decreases the Aβ-induced activity of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, an enzyme that regulates the rate of the pentose phosphate pathway, which activates nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidases to further produce ROS. During co-cultivation of neurons with microglia, light prevents the death of neurons, which is caused by ROS produced by Aβ-altered microglia.

Conclusions

These original data clarify reasons for how PBM protects against neurodegeneration and support the use of light for therapeutic research in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease.

Graphical Abstract

Background

The main morbid hallmarks in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have long been recognized as extracellular amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques and intraneuronal hyperphosphorylated tau protein (PHF-Tau), which are the main contributors to the development of pathology. Meanwhile, the role of microglia in AD pathogenesis has been assessed relatively recently [1, 2]. Microglia are resident phagocytes of the brain, which remodel neural connections [3] as well as remove apoptotic/necrotic cells [4] and unfolded proteins such as Aβ or neuromelanin. In case of damage, it helps to prevent brain infection by direct phagocytosis of bacteria and viruses [5], since phagocytosis and antigen presentation are part of the innate immune response of microglia [6,7,8]. Phagocytosis is considered useful for tissue homeostasis, since it helps to limit the spread of neurotoxic molecules from dying cells [4, 9], and is also accompanied by a decrease in the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines [10]. Furthermore, a temporary increase in the pro-inflammatory profile of microglia has been observed within phagocytosis of myelin debris [3, 11].

There is growing evidence about the role metabolism plays in driving the microglia phenotype. It was shown in transgenic mice that either together Aβ and tau or separate oligomeric and fibrillar species of Aβ1-42 can impair the oxidative phosphorylation system (OXPHOS) of mitochondria in AD [12,13,14]. Mitochondrial dysfunction has been noted as a primary marker of brain pathology in AD [15], which results in an increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) concentration, a decrease in ATP production, and an abnormal mitochondrial dynamic [16,17,18,19]. Accelerated production of free radicals and decreased ATP synthesis contribute to magnification in the aggregation of misfolded protein, including aggregates which increase the activity of lytic enzymes β- and γ-secretase APP. These processes may enhance the amyloidogenic processing of APP, promoting Aβ plaque formation, neurodegeneration, and dementia [20, 21].

A hypothesis of the mitochondrial cascade has been proposed [22,23,24], which emphasizes the role of mitochondrial bioenergy in AD. According to this hypothesis, Aβ formation is a concomitant rather than a major cause of AD pathology. This is consistent with the discovery that early mitochondrial dysfunction can lead to cognitive impairment, an increased Aβ aggregation, and pathogenesis of AD [20, 22, 23]. The important role of mitochondria in metabolism regulation is noted, in particular, in the regulation of glycolysis and OXPHOS [20, 25, 26], the activity of which determines the efficiency of phagocytosis, ROS generation, and the production of pro- or anti-inflammatory cytokines. In macrophages, mitochondria-mediated shifts from glycolysis to OXPHOS are required for anti-inflammatory stimuli to repolarize pro-inflammatory cells [27]. Probably similar metabolic processes regulate the microglia phenotype. Thus, cellular metabolism and mitochondrial status are inextricably linked to pro-inflammatory stimuli, which significantly suppress mitochondrial function. In contrast, efficient mitochondrial respiration and OXPHOS may be important for the formation of reparative and anti-inflammatory phenotype of microglia. It should be noted that there is a limited number of therapeutic approaches, which can affect the activity of microglia in vivo and change the pro-inflammatory profile of microglia to an alternative one [28,29,30,31,32].

In this regard, the need for novel treatments with new technologies are of high interest. Drug-free and non-invasive low level light therapy (LLLT), or photobiomodulation (PBM), is one promising approach allowing to stabilize cellular metabolism, primarily through the activation of the mitochondrial respiratory chain, resulting in an increased ATP production, and the stimulation of transcription factors [33,34,35,36]. LLLT uses low doses of light from red and near-infrared (NIR) lasers to achieve a therapeutic effect and has been applied for the treatments of various neurodegenerative diseases [37, 38]. It has been shown in animal models that it can facilitate neurogenesis and neuroplasticity [39], improve spatial memory [40], preserve motor and cognitive skills [40,41,42]. Also, LLLT can reduce Aβ levels, neuronal loss, and microgliosis in the brain of AD animal models [40, 42, 43], particularly in the cerebral cortex of mice [44], as well as in the visual cortex of aged mice, causing mitigation of plaque load [45]. LLLT was also shown to lessen the behavioral patterns associated with advanced amyloid deposition and reduce the expression of inflammatory markers in the AβPP transgenic mice [43]. LLLT can decelerate neurodegenerative disease progression, which is difficult to perform through pharmacological interventions. During in vitro experiments, light can improve brain cell survival, decrease apoptosis and necrosis, facilitate oxidative stress, and restore mitochondrial function [41, 43, 46]. Despite extensive scientific research in this direction, the cellular and molecular mechanisms by which PBM protects against neurodegeneration are still in the early stages.

Based on the described above LLLT advantages, we studied the effect of 808 nm light on mitochondria-mediated shifts from glycolysis to OXPHOS caused by the activation of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. Also, the functional role of light in the modulation of oxidative stress, the inflammatory response, and microglia metabolism are investigated.

Materials and methods

Animals

The animal studies were carried out at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine, using healthy male mice, 3 months old (18–20 g) in strict accordance with the Law of Ukraine of 21.02.2006 № 3447-IV “On Protection of Animals from Cruel Treatment” with the recommendations about the general ethical principles of animal experiments in the “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. - Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1996.” by the National Institutes of Health and the experimental protocols approved by the Bioethics Committee for Animal Experiments in the Institute of Biology and Medicine at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine. Before carrying out the experiments, the mice were maintained in collective cages under standard controlled conditions on a 12-h light/dark cycle and fed standard rodent chow and water ad libitum.

Microglia cell suspension

To obtain the microglial cell suspension from the hippocampus [47], after euthanasia of the mice by cervical dislocation, the isolated brain tissue was placed on top of an ice-cold 0.9% NaCl solution supplemented with 0.2% of glucose in Petri dishes. The hippocampus was isolated from the brain and homogenized in a Potter homogenizer in 0.9% NaCl solution for 10 min at room temperature. The obtained homogenate was passed through a 40-μm cell filter (BD Biosciences Discovery, USA) to extract cell conglomerates. The homogenate was transferred into a tube and centrifuged at 350×g for 10 min at room temperature. The precipitate was suspended in 1 ml of 70% isotonic PERKOL solution (GE Healthcare, USA) and transferred to a new tube. Two milliliters of 50% isotonic PERKOL solution was carefully layered on a 70% PERKOL layer. On the top of the 50% PERKOL layer, 1 ml of phosphate buffer was carefully added and centrifuged for 40 min at 1200×g. After centrifugation, two layers with cells were obtained. The upper layer, localized at the interface between the phosphate buffer and the 50% isotonic PERCOL phase, contains all elements of the central nervous system (CNS), except for microglia. The lower layer at the interface between the 70 and 50% isotonic PERCOL phases contains only microglia cells, devoid of other macrophages of the CNS. The isolated cells were washed in 10 ml of phosphate buffer by centrifugation for 5 min at room temperature, and the cells were resuspended in a RPMI-1640 medium for further assessment of functional parameters. Cell viability was determined using trypan blue, which was at least 90%.

Determination of the primary microglia derived from mice was performed by flow cytometry using primary rabbit anti-mouse IBA1 Polyclonal antibodies (Invitrogen, USA) and secondary goat anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 647 antibodies (Invitrogen, USA) (Method and Fig. S1 see in Supplementary Materials).

Light treatment

Light irradiation was performed using diode lasers emitting at 808 nm. Light power density was adjusted to be 30 mW/cm2, and the light irradiation time was 5 min for each sample, resulting in the irradiation dose of 9 J/cm2. These light power density and dose were chosen because NIR light with such parameters was shown to provide positive effects on cells and tissues, while not causing cell phototoxicity [48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56]. It should be noted that one session of CW irradiation was used to explore the biochemical pathways initiated by light but not to determine the best parameters for LLLT. In contrast, the control experiments were conducted in the dark.

Prior to the light treatment, microglia cells were labeled with fluorescent probes for MtMP and ROS. The stained cells in a colorless DMEM medium were then irradiated for 5 min. Concurrently with irradiation, the epifluorescence microscopy images of microglia were captured every minute to measure the change of fluorescence signal.

Mitochondrial membrane potential and ROS level studies, using epifluorescence microscopy

Microglia were transferred into 35 mm glass-bottom dishes and cultured. After 24 h, the growth medium was removed. Then, microglia were incubated for 1 h at 37 °C in DMEM medium containing one of the following fluorescence probes: Image-iT™ TMRM reagent MtMP indicator (orange fluorescent, 548/574 nm, 1 μg/ml), or CM-H2DCFDA general oxidative stress indicator of ROS (green fluorescent, 504/525 nm, 2 μg/ml, diluted in 4 mM Pluronic F-127 suspension), or MitoSOX™ mitochondrial superoxide indicator of ROS (red fluorescent, 548/605 nm, 2 μg/ml), or ROS-Glo™ H2O2 assay, specific for the direct detection of H2O2 in the medium (green fluorescent, 504/525 nm). Also, H2O2 indicator fluorescence in the medium was determined using a fluorimeter (Jenway 6270, UK). After incubation with a probe, the stained microglia were thoroughly washed with colorless DMEM. The colorless DMEM was also used in the light-exposure experiments. Changes in the probe fluorescence signal (caused by the MtMP or ROS level) were detected and imaged using a Nikon Eclipse Ti-U microscope. To determine fluorescence changes, the epifluorescence microscopy images were acquired every 1 min. Control epifluorescence microscopy images were always taken in the absence of light irradiation or in the addition of Aβ (Sigma-Aldrich, USA).

Negative controls were assessed as follows: unstained microglia were examined for autofluorescence in the green and red emission ranges. Following fluorescence probe loading, the cells were incubated in dark and imaged, exhibiting a low level of fluorescence which was reasonably stable during the experiments.

Cell viability, apoptosis and necrosis assays by epifluorescence microscopy

Neurons were received from Procell laboratories: primary mouse cortical neurons were isolated from C57BL/6 embryonic mice. Neuron cells were transferred into a Boyden chamber and placed on the upper compartment with a pore membrane, with microglia cells placed in the lower compartment (Fig. S2, Supplementary Materials). The cells were allowed to adhere. Then, before connecting the compartments, microglia cells were irradiated by 808 nm light, or treated with Aβ, or treated with both 808 nm light and Aβ. After light exposure, Aβ addition or co-cultivation with microglia, DMEM was removed and the cells were incubated at 37 °C in the medium containing fluorescent probes: 5 μg/ml Annexin V (50 min), 1 μg/ml Calcein (30 min), and 1 μg/ml Propidium Iodide (5 min). After dye loading, the cells were washed thoroughly and filled with DMEM. Fluorescence images were captured using a Nikon Eclipse Ti-U microscope and quantified (i.e., the integral fluorescence intensity over the entire area of every image was calculated using the Nikon microscope software).

Hydrogen peroxide production

H2O2 was quantified using ROS-Glo H2O2 assay (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Following the experimental treatment, the luminescence of the cell medium lysates at 37 °C was determined using a CLARIOstar luminescence microplate reader (BMG Labtech, Germany), in comparison to a H2O2 standard curve (0.013 μM – 10 mM) [57].

Phagocytosis assay

Isolated microglia cells were plated on 24-well plates at a density of 5 × 104 cells/cm2 and divided into 4 groups (1—control, 2—808 nm light, 3—Aβ in darkness, 4—Aβ + 808 nm), then incubated for 24 h in a standard incubation medium. Further, after replacing the DMEM medium to a DMEM medium without FBS, microglia were cultivated in the presence (stimulated) or absence (non-stimulated) of 1 μM oligomeric Aβ (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and/or light influence. After a time determined by the experiment, fluorescently labeled Aβ (ThermoFisher Scientific, China) was added to the incubation medium for 30 min. This labeled Aβ was used as a phagocytosis object. To stop phagocytosis, the cells were fixed with 0.4% formalin. Then, the cells were washed and the fluorescence of non-engulfed Aβ was quenched by addition of 0.2% trypan blue (ThermoFisher Scientific, UK) for 1 min, while the cellular fluorescence was determined using a fluorimeter (Jenway 6270, UK). The index of cellular fluorescence intensity was determined, it showed the amount of Aβ engulfed by the cells (phagocytosis index) and the number of phagocytic cells per 100 cells in the field of view (index of the phagocytosis coefficient). The counting was carried out based on the readings of at least 3 fields in each dish.

Nitric oxide production, arginase, and glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase activities

The level of NO production was measured in the microglia supernatant, using the Griess reaction [58]. The arginase activity in cell lysates was assessed by the method proposed by Classen et al. [59]. G6PD activity was assessed using a commercial assay (Cell Signalling Technology, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All these methods are described in Supplementary Materials.

Oligomeric β-amyloid (1-42) preparation

The oligomeric Aβ (p1-42, used at a concentration of 1 μM) synthetic peptide (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was suspended in 100% 1,1,1,3,3,3 hexafluoro-2-propanol (HFIP) at 6 mg/ml and incubated for complete solubilization under shaking at 37 °C for 1.5 h, as described previously [60]. To obtain oligomeric Aβ, HFIP was removed by evaporation in a SpeedVac and Aβ was resuspended at a concentration of 5 mM in DMSO and sonicated for 20 s, as described elsewhere [61]. The pre-treated Aβ was diluted in phosphate buffered saline (20 mM NaH2PO4, 140 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) to 400 μM. The obtained solution was supplemented by 2% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS; in H2O) to a final concentration of 0.2% SDS and incubated for 6 h at 37 °C. Further, the obtained solution was diluted three times with H2O and incubated for 18 h at 37 °C [13]. This was followed by centrifugation for 20 min at 3000×g and concentrating the supernatant to 1.8 ml by dialysis against 5 mM NaPi, 35 mM NaCl pH 7.4 overnight at 6 °C with a 30-kD centriprep and subsequent centrifugation of the concentrate for 10 min at 10,000×g. The obtained supernatant was stored in 100 μl aliquots at − 80 °C.

Aβ oligomerization

HFIP-treated Aβ stored at − 80 °C in DMSO was oligomerized by dilution and vortexing in PBS followed by incubation overnight at 4 °C [62]. Oligomer formation was confirmed by Western blot using polyclonal Anti-Amyloid Oligomer antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). Oligomeric Aβ migrated at approximately 38 kDa, indicating the presence of hexamers/octamers (Fig. S3, see in Supplementary Materials), which coincides with the literature data [60].

Cytokines, glucose, lactate, and ATP measurements with ELISA

Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin 1 beta (IL1-β), glucose, lactate, and ATP was assayed by mouse-specific commercially available kits ELISA, according to the manufacturer’s protocols (ThermoFisher Scientific, USA). Bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was used as a positive control. A multilink spectrophotometer μQuant (Bio-Tek, USA) was used to measure optical absorption that were extrapolated to the calibration curve. Glucose consumption was calculated according to the formula C1-C2 = C3, where C1 is the initial glucose concentration in the medium, C2 is the glucose concentration in the medium after incubation with Aβ, and C3 is the amount of glucose consumed.

Statistical analysis

Control and sample measurements were subjected to statistical analysis with two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test. The results are expressed as means + SD were statistically analyzed using the Origin software. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Light-induced suppression of IL1-β and TNF-α interleukin secretion in Aβ-treated microglia cells

In the present study, we aimed to determine the potential of light as a tool for controlling microglial inflammation caused by toxic oligomeric Aβ [63]. The Aβ concentration of 1 μM was used, which caused both an increase of pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion and ROS generation, in contrast to nanomolar concentrations, which do not cause an inflammatory response in vitro [64].

The selected concentration of Aβ (1 μM) and light irradiation did not cause changes of the isolated microglia viability during the 24 h period (Fig. 1A). At the same time, Aβ stimulated a pronounced increase in pro-inflammatory cytokines IL1-β and TNF-α in the first hours of incubation (blue line on Fig. 1B). After 3 h, the concentration of IL1-β increased by 400%, in comparison to the control and remained at the same level during the entire experiment. The concentration of TNF-α smoothly increased and exceeded the control values by 550% after 6 h, with a subsequent increase during 24 h. Light irradiation, which was applied immediately after adding Aβ to the medium, significantly reduced the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines over the next 24 h. Thus, light exposure in this experiment prevented the development of the pro-inflammatory phenotype of microglia but does not completely abolish it (green line on Fig. 1B).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Microglia cell viability and secretion of TNF-α and IL1-β (pg/ml) by microglia depending on the incubation time with Aβ (1 μM). A Cell viability determined using trypan blue solution. B TNF-α and IL1-β assayed by mouse-specific ELISA kits for measuring optical absorption. The cells were irradiated with low-intensity light at 808 nm with a light dose of 10 J/cm2. The data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 8 replicates in each group); p < 0.05 indicates the data with a statistically significant difference (two-way ANOVA test)

Full size image

Further, the light effect on pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion by microglia stimulated with Aβ was clarified. After 6 h of cell incubation with Aβ, the medium was changed (blue and green dotted lines on Fig. 1B) and light irradiation was applied (green dotted line on Fig. 1B). After 12 h, the concentration of IL1-β and TNF-α in the medium with non-irradiated microglia exceeded the control values by 250% and 500%, respectively. After light irradiation, the concentration of IL1-β and TNF-α remained at the control values. A relatively small increase in the TNF-α concentration in irradiated microglia was observed by 24 h (Fig. 1B). Thus, 808 nm light applied after 6 h of Aβ-treated microglia reduced pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion almost to the control values. From these observations, it can be concluded that light has a stronger effect on pre-Aβ-activated pro-inflammatory microglia (green dotted line on Fig. 1B) and a less effect on Aβ-treated microglia, which is not yet pro-inflammatory (green line on Fig. 1B).

Light-activated phagocytosis of Aβ-treated microglia cells

One of the hallmarks for an alternative activation of phagocytes is an enhancement of phagocytic activity [65, 66]. Phagocytosis of isolated microglia during 24 h was assessed by the uptake of fluorescent Aβ added to the incubation medium for 30 min at each time point of measurements (Fig. 2; full-combine photos with a brightfield and merged images can be found in Fig. S4, Supplementary Materials). Isolated microglia during planting were divided into 4 groups, as illustrated in Fig. 2, 1—control (gray column), 2—808 nm light (red column), 3—Aβ in darkness (blue column), and 4—Aβ + 808 nm (green column), and incubated for 24 h in a standard incubation medium. Then, the medium was changed to a serum-free DMEM and the cells of groups 3 and 4 were preincubated with non-fluorescent Aβ for 30 min, 2 h, 4 h, 16 h, and 24 h before the addition of fluorescent Aβ, which was then added to all groups for 30 min as a marker of phagocytosis. The cells of groups 2 and 4 were irradiated 30 min before the addition of fluorescent Aβ at each time point of measurements. The percentage of phagocytic cells in the first group was taken as the control, since in this group, the microglia were not preactivated with Aβ or irradiated.

Fig. 2
figure 2

NIR light activation phagocytosis of Aβ-treated microglia cells. Changes in the fluorescence signal from Aβ following stimulation by non-fluorescent Aβ, low-intensity light at 808 nm with 10 J/cm2, and both Aβ and light over time was recorded. The representative transmission microscopy images show phagocytosis of Aβ by microglia after 30 min, 2 h, 4 h, 16 h, and 24 h. The enlarged brightfield and merged images are presented in Fig. S4, Supplementary Materials. The data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 6 replicates in each group); *p < 0.05 indicates data with a statistically significant difference evaluated in relation to the control level, and #p < 0.05 indicates data with a statistically significant difference evaluated in relation to the level during co-cultivation with Aβ-treated microglia (two-way ANOVA test)

Full size image

Microglia preincubated with Aβ 30 min before the addition of fluorescent Aβ (group 3) showed the maximum phagocytic response, which exceeded the control values by 30% (Fig. 2). After 24 h, microglial phagocytosis in this group was 25% lower than in the control. In the first hours after light irradiation, phagocytosis was increased in average by 10%, after 16 h by 38%, and after 24 h by 44% (Fig. 2, group 4). Light did not affect phagocytosis of non-activated microglia (Fig. 2, group 2), which indicated that light specifically promotes cell phagocytosis.

Light effect on NO, arginase and G6PD production in Aβ-treated microglia cells

Besides the expression of cytokines and phagocytosis activity, the direction of arginine metabolism is known as a generally accepted indicator of functional polarization of phagocytes. An increase in nitric oxide (NO) production as a result of iNOS activity is taken as a sign of classical activation (the marker for M1 polarization); an increase in arginase activity is considered as a sign of an alternative activation of phagocytes (the marker for M2 polarization). The treatment of isolated microglia with either bacterial LPS, as a positive control, or Aβ causes pro-inflammatory metabolic activation with an increase in NO synthesis (by 82 and 49%) with a simultaneous decrease in arginase activity (by 47 and 36%), respectively (Fig. 3). Light irradiation, which was applied 6 h after cell cultivation with LPS and Aβ, caused a decrease in NO synthesis and an increase in arginase activity almost to the control values after 12 h.

Fig. 3
figure 3

NIR light effect on NO, arginase and G6PD production in Aβ-treated microglia cells. The cells were irradiated with low-intensity light at 808 nm with 10 J/cm2. The data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 8 replicates in each group); *p < 0.05 indicates data with a statistically significant difference evaluated in relation to the control level, and #p < 0.05 indicates data with a statistically significant difference evaluated in relation to the level during co-cultivation with Aβ-treated microglia (two-way ANOVA test)

Full size image

Among glycolytic enzymes, glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) plays an important role since it regulates the activity of the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), in which there is regeneration of cytosolic nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate [NADP(H)] from NADP, which is required for the activation of NADPH oxidase (NOX). NOX is a membrane-bound enzyme complex facing extracellular space; therefore, it is one of the main sources of extracellular ROS, which can be toxic to surrounding cells, including neurons. Balanced G6PD levels are essential for normal cell function, while increased or decreased levels cause cellular damage due to oxidative stress [67].

The incubation of microglia with LPS or Aβ for 12 h stimulated G6PD activity by 26% and 18%, respectively. This coincides with the literature data that confirms G6PD activation in the brains of AD patients, including the hippocampus, para-hippocampal gyrus, parolfactory gyrus, and cerebellum [68]. Light excitation (6 h after Aβ adding) reduced G6PD activity, contributing to a more balanced level corresponding to inactivated microglia (Fig. 3). The light effect on G6PD activity in Aβ-treated microglia cells is probably not a direct effect, but a consequence of a change in the overall bioenergetic balance of microglia.

Light alters energetic metabolism in Aβ-activated microglia cells

In microglia, the initiation of the classic pro-inflammatory response depends on reprogramming towards glycolytic metabolism [69]. The main markers of glycolytic reprogramming are an increased glucose consumption, an increased lactate production as a result of a decreased mitochondrial respiration, and an activation of glycolytic pathway enzymes for the rapid production of ATP providing chemotaxis and phagocytosis [70,71,72,73,74].

The registration of glucose consumption, lactate production, and ATP synthesis of isolated microglia was performed during a 24-h period (Fig. 4). Glucose consumption was compared between the control, LPS, Aβ activated cells, and after light exposure. In each case, glucose was measured in the culture medium at a time from 0 to 24 h, and the difference between the starting and ending glucose concentration referred to the corresponding time point. Six hours after the activation of microglia, glucose consumption increased by 134% and 83% in the case of treatment by LPS and Aβ, and after 24 h by 93% and 69%, respectively. Light exposure on microglia incubated with Aβ caused a noticeable decrease in glucose consumption, which in the first hours exceeded the control values by less than 50%, and after 24 h by 23%.

Fig. 4
figure 4

NIR light effect on glucose consumption, lactate production, and ATP synthesis in Aβ-treated microglia cells. The cells were irradiated with low-intensity light at 808 nm with 10 J/cm2. The data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 8 replicates in each group); p < 0.05 indicates the data with a statistically significant difference (two-way ANOVA test)

Full size image

Initial glucose consumption levels by microglia were similar to lactate production rates (Table 1). After LPS or Aβ influenced microglia showed a high initial rate of released lactate by 350% and 275% higher than in the control after 6 h and by 350% and 300% after 24 h, respectively. ATP production decreased during the first hours of cell cultivation with LPS and Aβ, reaching a plateau between 6 and 12 h. Light application slowed down lactate formation (after 6 h) in relation to the Aβ-treated cells, which coincided with the formation rate in the control. After 24 h, lactate production in this group of cells remained by as much as 50% lower than in the cells without light irradiation. After light irradiation, ATP synthesis approached the control values, and, after 24 h, it exceeded ATP production by 155% in relation to the Aβ-treated cells.

Table 1 Bioenergetic parameters in microglia: initial rates of glucose consumption and lactate production by isolated microglia (nmol/106 cells/min)
Full size table

These obtained results have demonstrated an effective influence of light on energetic metabolism of microglia. LPS and Aβ-treated microglia showed a high initial rate of glucose consumption and lactate production with a simultaneous decrease in ATP synthesis, that is consistent with literature data [75]. Light reduced glucose consumption and lactate production, stimulating ATP synthesis. This apparently suggests an increase in mitochondrial respiration and a decrease in glycolysis. Quantification of glycolytic and mitochondrial ATP can be determined based on the principle of the Pasteur effect [75, 76]. According to the Pasteur effect, an additional production of lactate resulting from the inhibition of respiration is equivalent to a lack of mitochondrial ATP. In our experiments, lactate production by microglia in the control increased by 223% upon the inhibition of mitochondrial respiration with antimycin A (AA). The difference in lactate production in the presence and absence of AA (∆-lactate) is ATP produced anaerobically to compensate for the decrease in oxidative phosphorylation following the AA inhibition of mitochondrial respiration. Basal lactate production represents glycolytic ATP synthesis [76]. The ratio of ∆-lactate (the difference between glycolytic lactate, that is, basal lactate, and lactate after respiratory inhibition by AA) upon basal lactate, represents the ratio of mitochondrial ATP over glycolytic ATP production. In LPS- or Aβ-treated microglia, basal lactate production increased by 36% and 23%; at the same time, there was a decrease in the ratio of oxidative-ATP/glycolytic-ATP by 71% and 52%, respectively (Table 1). The obtained results demonstrate the dominance of glycolysis over mitochondrial respiration in activated LPS- or Aβ-treated microglia, which corresponds by the literature data [77]. Otherwise, light irradiation is able to cancel the effect of Aβ-activated mitochondrial respiration and inhibit glycolysis, which is confirmed by a decrease in basal lactate production to the control values and an increase in mitochondrial ATP production by 61% (Table 1).

Light influence on mitochondrial membrane potential

Mitochondria are recognized as one of the main light acceptors [78]. To understand the mechanism of light action on bioenergetic parameters in microglia and the associated decrease in secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, ROS generation, NO production, and phagocytosis activation, we studied mitochondrial membrane potential (MtMP) under light irradiation. Figure 5 shows the effect of 808 nm light on the MtMP level in microglia. Representative images show the transmission, epifluorescence, and their merged images of the cells labeled with TMRM, a fluorescent probe for MtMP. The changes of the MtMP level (assessed as the integrated TMRM fluorescence signal from the imaged cells) under and after irradiation with NIR light is presented in Fig. 5; the representative epifluorescence microscopy images of the TMRM labeled cells under and after light irradiation are shown in Fig. S5, Supplementary Materials. During the first 5 min, the effect of Aβ on MtMP did not differ from the control values (Fig. 5, the epifluorescence microscopy images are presented in Fig. S5A, Supplementary Materials). After treating microglia 4 h with Aβ, MtMP decreased by 10%, and, after 16 and 24 h, by 40 and 56% compared to the control (Fig. 5, the epifluorescence microscopy images are presented in Fig. S5B, Supplementary Materials). Light, independently alone or with Aβ, increased MtMP from the 30th second and reached the maximum value at the 3rd minute. After 5 min of irradiation and turning off the light, MtMP gradually returned to the control values and reached 38% after 24 h. It is worth noting that a similar long-lasting light effect on MtMP has also been reported in other works [79, 80]. MtMP of microglia treated with Aβ and after light exposure showed a great difference in comparison to that treated with Aβ alone. Thus, light has a significant effect during the entire time range of measurements.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Mitochondrial membrane potential activation following Aβ and 808 nm light exposure. Microscope images showing the transmission brightfield, epifluorescence, and merged images of macrophages labeled with TMRM. Changes in the MtMP level (TMRM fluorescence signal) following stimulation by low-intensity light during 5 min at 30 mW/cm2 (equivalent to 10 J/cm2). Dynamics of MtMP (the integrated fluorescence signal) following irradiation with red/NIR light. More images are presented in Fig. S5, Supplementary Materials. The data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 6 replicates in each group); p < 0.05 indicates the data with a statistically significant difference (two-way ANOVA test)

Full size image

NIR light abolishes ROS production by Aβ-stimulated microglia

Extracellular ROS generation by means of NOX2 enzyme in microglia is a key response to inflammatory stimuli serving as an antimicrobial defense mechanism [81]. There is also evidence of the activation of this enzyme in AD [82]. The regulator of this enzyme activity is G6PD, the activation of which, in our experiments, is increased in Aβ-treated microglia; therefore, we investigated the level of extracellular ROS in our model (Fig. 6 and the epifluorescence microscopy images are presented in Fig. S6, Supplementary Materials).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Light effect on the general ROS generation, mitochondrial ROS generation, and ROS in the medium measured for Aβ-treated microglia. Microscope images showing the transmission brightfield, epifluorescence, and merged images of macrophages labeled with CM-H2DCFDA for general ROS detection, MitoSOX™ for mitochondrial ROS detection, and ROS-Glo™ for ROS in the medium. Graphs show the dynamics of ROS generation following stimulation by low-intensity light at 808 nm with 10 J/cm2 during 24 h. The enlarged images are presented in Fig. S6, Supplementary Materials. The data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 6 replicates in each group); p < 0.05 indicates the data with a statistically significant difference (two-way ANOVA test)

Full size image

NOX2 is not the only potential cellular source of ROS, as the production of mitochondrial ROS also plays a significant role in many physiological and pathological processes [83]. The investigation of Aβ-treated microglia revealed no changes in general ROS (Fig. 6 and Fig. S6A-B) and mitochondrial ROS (Fig. 6 and Fig. S6C-D) as well as ROS in the medium (Fig. 6 and Fig. S6E-F) within 2 h. After 24 h, mitochondrial ROS increased by no more than 10%. Light exposure, both independently and in the presence of Aβ in the first 2 h, stimulated the general (15%) and mitochondrial (10%) ROS generation, which by 24 h, in the absence of Aβ, decreased almost to the control values. Microglia treated with Aβ for more than 2 h started to increase ROS in the medium, and, after 24 h, increase ROS on average by 60%, but after light exposure, this index did not exceed 15% (Fig. 6 and the epifluorescence microscopy images are presented in Fig. S6, Supplementary Materials).

ROS generation by immune cells targets pathogens. However, during the AD development, when pathogens are absent, ROS generation can damage brain neurons, contributing to neurodegeneration. A model of in vitro co-cultivation of isolated microglia cells and neurons was used to investigate the relationship between Aβ-induced ROS production in microglia and neuronal survival. Experiments, using epifluorescence microscopy images with Calcein (green) to visualize the live cells, Annexin (blue) for apoptosis and Propidium Iodide (red) for necrosis detection, showed that 1 μM of Aβ has no direct neuronal toxicity within 48 h (Fig. 7 and the epifluorescence microscopy images are presented in Fig. S7, Supplementary Materials). Light exposure and co-cultivation with microglia also have not affected neuronal survival. While, the Aβ addition into co-cultures significantly reduced the survival rate of neurons, increasing their apoptosis and necrosis. Such an effect was largely prevented by light irradiation of microglia, 2 h after starting of incubation with Aβ. The same results have been obtained, using routine counting of the cells stained with trypan blue dye (Fig. S8, Supplementary Materials).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Increased neuron cell viability after NIR exposure in a co-culture with Aβ stimulated microglia. A Schematic illustration of neuron cell cultivation in the Boyden chamber under different conditions, from left to right: control, light application (808 nm, 10 J/cm2), Aβ addition, co-cultivation with microglia (M), co-cultivation with Aβ-treated microglia (Aβ-M), co-cultivation with Aβ-M after light application. B Epifluorescence microscopy images showing the effect of 808 nm light, Aβ, co-cultivation with M, co-cultivation with Aβ-M, co-cultivation with Aβ-M + 808 nm light on neuron cell viability with Calcein (green) to visualize the live cells, Annexin (blue) for apoptosis, and Propidium Iodide (red) for necrosis detection during 48 h. The enlarged images are presented in Fig. S7, Supplementary Materials. C Columns present the quantification of viable, apoptotic and necrotic neuron cells. The data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 8 replicates in each group); *p < 0.05 indicates data with a statistically significant difference evaluated in relation to the control level, and #p < 0.05 indicates data with a statistically significant difference evaluated in relation to the level during a co-cultivation with Aβ-treated microglia (two-way ANOVA test)

Full size image

These results suggest that a decrease in neuronal survival during a co-culturing with Aβ-treated microglia is associated with an increase in ROS generation by microglia. Light irradiation of Aβ-treated microglia decreases ROS generation, promoting neuronal survival.

Discussion

Reactive microglia are recognized as one of the main pathological signs of AD. Investigating the metabolism of microglia, we found that the impact of Aβ induces an inflammatory reaction, associated with the metabolic transition from OXPHOS to glycolysis, which coincides with the literature data [70,71,72,73,74] (Fig. 8, left part). The data obtained can be explained by adaptive metabolic reprogramming of microglia supports immune function, which depends on rapid ATP generation for energy-intensive chemotaxis, cytokine production, and phagocytosis [84,85,86] (Fig. 8, left part). The discovered activation of glycolysis and the associated pentose phosphate shunt (PPP) pathway, in which activity is regulated by G6PD, is important for ROS generation through the activation of NOX (Fig. 8, left part). ROS are necessary for the degradation of absorbed biomaterials in phagolysosomes [87, 88] and play an important role in the clearance of Aβ and tau. In the brains of AD mice, the proteomic analysis demonstrated a relationship between pro-inflammatory microglia and glycolytic metabolism [89], suggesting a protective function of hyperglycolytic microglia in AD. Similar observations were made in cultured microglia and isolated from the brains of AD mice, where microglial glycolysis disrupted chemotaxis and phagocytosis of microglia [90]. Additionally, a number of studies have shown that the stimulation of mitochondrial OXPHOS, but not glycolysis, activates microglial phagocytosis of Aβ [91, 92]. A possible explanation for this contradiction may be associated with the acute and chronic effect of Aβ on microglia function. Since glycolysis is metabolically ineffective [92], a constant dependence on glycolysis in microglia can lead to a disruption of its immune response over time, which we observed in the example of the decrease in phagocytosis. The initial effect of Aβ on microglia activates glycolytic metabolism and stimulates phagocytosis. A chronic Aβ influence causes a metabolic dysregulation and a decrease of basic immune functions, including phagocytosis and cytokine secretion [75] (Fig. 8, left part).

Fig. 8
figure 8

NIR light and Aβ are the metabolic regulators of microglial phenotype and function. The proposed metabolic processes are based on the research in this article and from research papers focused on microglia and referenced in the text. Arg, arginase; CCO, cytochrome C oxidase; GLUT, glucose transport; G6PD, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase; I-V, complexes CI-CV of electron transport chain; iNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase; NADPH/NADP+, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate; NO, nitric oxide; NOX, NADPH oxidase; OXPHOS, oxidative phosphorylation; PPP, pentose phosphate pathway; ROS, reactive oxygen species; Src, Src-family protein kinases; TCA, tricarboxylic acid; TLR, Toll-like receptor

Full size image

In our experiments, the effect of light on glycolytic microglia stimulated by Aβ promoted the restoration of mitochondrial function (Fig. 8, right part). The increase in mitochondrial activity reduced the glycolytic metabolism of microglia, which led to the decrease in the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines and extracellular ROS generation, enhancing the survival of neurons incubated together with Aβ-activated microglia (Fig. 8, right part). Another positive factor was a noticeable increase in phagocytosis after light exposure, which decreased with a prolonged incubation of microglia with Aβ. Similar results, associated with an increase in phagocytosis and a decrease in the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, after incubation with Aβ, were obtained using antibodies that increased the quality of mitochondria by activating mitophagy [93]. Also, the effects of ligands on the translocator protein (TSPO), which is mainly expressed on the outer mitochondrial membrane of microglia [94, 95], was reported to lead to an improved mitochondrial OXPHOR and a decreased cell death, being a result of reduced ROS and Aβ levels in H1299 cells [96, 97]. However, the use of pharmaceutical drugs required invasive intervention, in contrast to light irradiation.

The effect of light irradiation (808 nm) on Aβ-treated microglia was reflected in the ability to reverse the action of Aβ on microglial metabolism, affecting mitochondria and, as a consequence, the PPP/NOX, and decreasing ROS generation (Fig. 8, right part). These findings complement the growing evidence that NIR light does not only suppress the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines but also helps in the regulation of major metabolic changes occurring in activated immune cells [54, 78]. ROS generation is probably not the single damaging effect of Aβ on the brain, as evidenced by weak effects of antioxidants in clinical trials in AD [78]. It should be noted that antioxidants are probably affecting inflammation by decreasing surrounding ROS, while NIR alters microglial metabolism, decreasing ROS generation.

NO, a product of iNOS activity, inhibits mitochondrial respiration of pro-inflammatory macrophages [36]. Probably, with a chronic Aβ influence, this dysfunction prevents the transformation of microglia into the anti-inflammatory phenotype, leaving it in a metabolically disadvantageous state, which leads to a violation of its immune function. Thus, the inhibition of NO production can improve mitochondrial metabolic abnormalities and promote the reprogramming of macrophages towards the anti-inflammatory phenotype. Redirecting microglia from the deleterious phenotype to the regenerative one is a key concept for the development of new therapies targeting these cells [98].

Using light at 808 nm wavelength, we found the reprogramming of microglia to be associated with the mitochondria activation (increased membrane potential of mitochondria and mitochondrial ATP production) and a decreased glycolysis. Today cytochrome c oxidase (CCO), the IV complex of mitochondrial respiratory chain, is recognized as one of the main chromophores that absorb red/NIR light, since it contains two different copper centers, CuA and CuB, and two heme centers, heme-a and heme-a3 [99,100,101,102,103]. NO, an increase in the production of which was recorded after incubation with Aβ, can inhibit CCO by binding to the binuclear center CuB/a3 of CCO [104, 105]. This inhibition can be explained by direct rivalry between NO and O2 for the binuclear center, and this binding is reversible (Fig. 8, right part). One of the hypotheses suggesting why light can activate mitochondria after their NO blockade is explained by the ability of light to photodissociate non-covalently bound NO, absorbing photon of red/NIR light by CCO, increasing the respiration rate and ATP production [106]. The light ability to reverse the inhibition caused by NO binding to CCO has been shown both in isolated mitochondria and in whole cells [107]. Photodissociation of NO can be a trigger mechanism for the reprogramming of microglia from glycolysis to OXPHOS after its chronic activation by Aβ.

Thus, the chronic Aβ influence causes metabolic changes in microglia to a pro-inflammatory phenotype. We consider that the increase in extracellular ROS after Aβ influence may be critical for the initiation of neuroinflammation, since the observed decrease in the survival of neurons when incubating with Aβ-treated microglia (Fig. 8, left side). On the contrary, light irradiation restores the functions of microglial mitochondria, reduces extracellular ROS generation, and increases neuron survival (Fig. 8, right side).

Limitations

The main limitation in this study is that in vitro experiments are difficult to interpret and transfer to the whole organism (in vivo), which we intend to do in the future. In this case, the parameters of light delivery to the brain cells through the skin and skull will change accordingly. At this stage, the conclusions are applicable only to in vitro experiments. Therefore, the findings presented in this study should be considered investigatory and will need to be further verified in studies using microglia of different origins and in vivo experiments.

Conclusions

Aβ-treated microglia showed the metabolic changes and shifting to the inflammatory phenotype as well as that Aβ is a powerful activator of microglial ROS generation by means of NOX. Light exposure can reverse such Aβ-induced changes and protect neurons from damage. The regulation of activated microglia, using NIR light, may provide a therapeutic strategy for controlling the progression of neuroinflammatory conditions in Alzheimer’s disease. Summarizing, this study provides new insights into the role of NIR light in modulating oxidative stress and microglia metabolism. Because NIR PBM gives an opportunity to suppress ROS generation and to restore metabolic homeostasis, further investigation of this method has significant potential for therapeutic development.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AA:

Antimycin A

Aβ:

Amyloid β

Aβ-M:

Aβ-treated microglia

AD:

Alzheimer’s disease

Arg:

Arginase

CCO:

Cytochrome C Oxidase

CNS:

Central nervous system

GLUT:

Glucose transport

G6PD:

Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase

HFIP:

1,1,1,3,3,3 Hexafluoro-2-propanol

IL1-β:

Interleukin 1 beta

iNOS:

Inducible nitric oxide synthase

I-V:

Complexes CI-CV of electron transport chain

LLLT:

Low level light therapy

M:

Microglia

NADPH/NADP+:

Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate

NED:

N-1-naphthylethylenediamine dihydrochloride

NIR:

Near-infrared

NO:

Nitric oxide

NOX:

NADPH oxidase

OXPHOS:

Oxidative phosphorylation

PHF-Tau:

Intraneuronal hyperphosphorylated tau protein

PPP:

Pentose phosphate pathway

ROS:

Reactive oxygen species

SDS:

Sodium dodecyl sulfate

Src:

Src-family protein kinases

TCA:

Tricarboxylic acid

TLR:

Toll-like receptor

TNF-α:

Tumor necrosis factor alpha

TSPO:

Translocator protein

References

  1. Heneka MT, Carson MJ, Khoury JE, Landreth GE, Brosseron F, Feinstein DL, et al. Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14(4):388–405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ransohoff RM, Khoury JE. Microglia in health and disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2016;8(1):a020560.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Paolicelli RC, Bolasco G, Pagani F, Maggi L, Scianni M, Panzanelli P, et al. Synaptic pruning by microglia is necessary for normal brain development. Science. 2011;333(6048):1456–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Green DR, Oguin TH, Martinez J. The clearance of dying cells: table for two. Cell Death Differ. 2016;23(6):915–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Nau R, Ribes S, Djukic M, Eiffert H. Strategies to increase the activity of microglia as efficient protectors of the brain against infections. Front Cell Neurosci. 2014;8:138.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Litman GW, Cannon JP, Rast JP. New insights into alternative mechanisms of immune receptor diversification. Adv Immunol. 2005;87:209–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sierra A, Encinas JM, Deudero JJP, Chancey JH, Enikolopov G, Overstreet-Wadiche LS, et al. Microglia shape adult hippocampal neurogenesis through apoptosis-coupled phagocytosis. Cell Stem Cell. 2010;7(4):483–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Sierra A, Abiega O, Shahraz A, Neumann H. Janus-faced microglia: beneficial and detrimental consequences of microglial phagocytosis. Front Cell Neurosci. 2013;7:6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Wolf SA, Boddeke HWGM, Kettenmann H. Microglia in physiology and disease. Annu Rev Physiol. 2017;79(1):619–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Takahashi K, Rochford CDP, Neumann H. Clearance of apoptotic neurons without inflammation by microglial triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-2. J Exp Med. 2005;201(4):647–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Siddiqui TA, Lively S, Schlichter LC. Complex molecular and functional outcomes of single versus sequential cytokine stimulation of rat microglia. J Neuroinflammation. 2016;13(1):66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rhein V, Song X, Wiesner A, Ittner LM, Baysang G, Meier F, et al. Amyloid- and tau synergistically impair the oxidative phosphorylation system in triple transgenic Alzheimer’s disease mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(47):20057–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Eckert A, Hauptmann S, Scherping I, Meinhardt J, Rhein V, Dröse S, et al. Oligomeric and fibrillar species of β-amyloid (Aβ42) both impair mitochondrial function in P301L tau transgenic mice. J Mol Med. 2008;86(11):1255–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lustbader JW. ABAD directly links Aβ to mitochondrial toxicity in Alzheimer’s disease. Science. 2004;304(5669):448–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hauptmann S, Scherping I, Dröse S, Brandt U, Schulz KL, Jendrach M, et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction: an early event in Alzheimer pathology accumulates with age in AD transgenic mice. Neurobiol Aging. 2009;30(10):1574–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang X, Su B, Siedlak SL, Moreira PI, Fujioka H, Wang Y, et al. Amyloid- overproduction causes abnormal mitochondrial dynamics via differential modulation of mitochondrial fission/fusion proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(49):19318–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Perry G, Moreira P, Santos M, Oliveira C, Shenk J, Nunomura A, et al. Alzheimer disease and the role of free radicals in the pathogenesis of the disease. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2008;7(1):3–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Müller WE, Eckert A, Kurz C, Eckert GP, Leuner K. Mitochondrial dysfunction: common final pathway in brain aging and Alzheimer’s disease — therapeutic aspects. Mol Neurobiol. 2010;41(2-3):159–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Eckert A, Schulz KL, Rhein V, Götz J. Convergence of amyloid-β and tau pathologies on mitochondria in vivo. Mol Neurobiol. 2010;41(2-3):107–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Sharma C, Kim S, Nam Y, Jung UJ, Kim SR. Mitochondrial dysfunction as a driver of cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(9):4850.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Macdonald R, Barnes K, Hastings C, Mortiboys H. Mitochondrial abnormalities in Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s disease: can mitochondria be targeted therapeutically? Biochem Soc Trans. 2018;46(4):891–909.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mancuso M, Calsolaro V, Orsucci D, Carlesi C, Choub A, Piazza S, et al. Mitochondria, cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Alzheimers Dis. 2009;2009:1–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Swerdlow RH, Burns JM, Khan SM. The Alzheimer’s disease mitochondrial cascade hypothesis: progress and perspectives. BBA-Mol Basis Dis. 2014;1842(8):1219–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Swerdlow RH, Perry G, Avila J, Tabaton M, Zhu X. Mitochondria and mitochondrial cascades in Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;62(3):1403–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Park J, Choi H, Min J-S, Park S-J, Kim J-H, Park H-J, et al. Mitochondrial dynamics modulate the expression of pro-inflammatory mediators in microglial cells. J Neurochem. 2013;127(2):221–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Devanney NA, Stewart AN, Gensel JC. Microglia and macrophage metabolism in CNS injury and disease: the role of immunometabolism in neurodegeneration and neurotrauma. Exp Neurol. 2020;329:113310.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Van den Bossche J, Baardman J, Otto NA, van der Velden S, Neele AE, van den Berg SM, et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction prevents repolarization of inflammatory macrophages. Cell Rep. 2016;17(3):684–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Dong Y, Li X, Cheng J, Hou L. Drug development for Alzheimer’s disease: microglia induced neuroinflammation as a target? Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:558–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Abe N, Choudhury ME, Watanabe M, Kawasaki S, Nishihara T, Yano H, et al. Comparison of the detrimental features of microglia and infiltrated macrophages in traumatic brain injury: a study using a hypnotic bromovalerylurea. Glia. 2018;66:2158–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Li Y, Lu B, Sheng L, Zhu Z, Sun H, Zhou Y, et al. Hexokinase 2-dependent hyperglycolysis driving microglial activation contributes to ischemic brain injury. J Neurochem. 2018;144:186–200.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lauro C, Chece G, Monaco L, Antonangeli F, Peruzzi G, Rinaldo S, et al. Fractalkine modulates microglia metabolism in brain ischemia. Front Cell Neurosci. 2019;13:414.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Lauro C, Catalano M, Trettel F, Limatola C. Fractalkine in the nervous system: neuroprotective or neurotoxic molecule? Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015;1351:141–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Souza NHC, Ferrari RAM, Silva DFT, Nunes FD, Bussadori SK, Fernandes KPS. Effect of low-level laser therapy on the modulation of the mitochondrial activity of macrophages. Braz J Phys Ther. 2014;18(4):308–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Chung H, Dai T, Sharma SK, Huang Y-Y, Carroll JD, Hamblin MR. The nuts and bolts of low-level laser (light) therapy. Ann Biomed Eng. 2011;40(2):516–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Gao X, Xing D. Molecular mechanisms of cell proliferation induced by low power laser irradiation. J Biomed Sci. 2009;16(1):4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Hamblin MR, Hamblin MR, Waynant RW, Demidova TN, Anders J. Mechanisms of low level light therapy, Proc. of SPIE, mechanisms for low-light. Therapy. 2006;6140:614001.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Anders JJ, Arany PR, Baxter GD, Lanzafame RJ. Light-emitting diode therapy and low-level light therapy are photobiomodulation therapy. Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2019;37(2):63–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chang J, Ren Y, Wang R, Li C, Wang Y, X. Ping Chu, Transcranial low-level laser therapy for depression and Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychiatry. 2018;08(02):477–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Duarte KCN, Soares TT, Magri AMP, Garcia LA, Le Sueur-Maluf L, Renno ACM, et al. Low-level laser therapy modulates demyelination in mice. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2018;189:55–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. da Luz Eltchechem C, Salgado ASI, Zângaro RA, da Silva Pereira MC, Kerppers II, da Silva LA, et al. Transcranial LED therapy on amyloid-β toxin 25–35 in the hippocampal region of rats. Lasers Med Sci. 2017;32(4):749–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Bathini M, Raghushaker CR, Mahato KK. The molecular mechanisms of action of photobiomodulation against neurodegenerative diseases: a systematic review. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2020:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10571-020-01016-9.

  42. Cho GM, Lee SY, Park JH, Kim MJ, Park KJ, Choi BT, et al. Photobiomodulation using a low-level light-emitting diode improves cognitive dysfunction in the 5XFAD mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease, J Gerontol. A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020;75(4):631–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. De Taboada L, Yu J, El-Amouri S, Gattoni-Celli S, Richieri S, McCarthy T, et al. Transcranial laser therapy attenuates amyloid-β peptide neuropathology in amyloid-β protein precursor transgenic mice. J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;23(3):521–35.

  44. Purushothuman S, Johnstone DM, Nandasena C, Mitrofanis J, Stone J. Photobiomodulation with near infrared light mitigates Alzheimer’s disease-related pathology in cerebral cortex– evidence from two transgenic mouse models. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2014;6(1):2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Iaccarino HF, Singer AC, Martorell AJ, Rudenko A, Gao F, Gillingham TZ, et al. Gamma frequency entrainment attenuates amyloid load and modifies microglia. Nature. 2016;540(7632):230–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Zhou T, Ohulchanskyy TY, Qu J. Effect of NIR light on the permeability of the blood-brain barriers in in vitro models. Biomed Opt Express. 2021;12(12):7544.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Frank MG, Wieseler-Frank JL, Watkins LR, Maier SF. Rapid isolation of highly enriched and quiescent microglia from adult rat hippocampus: Immunophenotypic and functional characteristics. J Neurosci Methods. 2006;151(2):121–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Rhee Y-H, Moon J-H, Choi S-H, Ahn J-C. Low-level laser therapy promoted aggressive proliferation and angiogenesis through decreasing of transforming growth factor-β1 and increasing of Akt/hypoxia inducible factor-1α in anaplastic thyroid cancer. Photomed Laser Surg. 2016;34(6):229–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Ehrlicher A, Betz T, Stuhrmann B, Koch D, Milner V, Raizen MG, et al. Guiding neuronal growth with light. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99(25):16024–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Rizzi CF, Mauriz JL, Freitas Corrêa DS, Moreira AJ, Zettler CG, Filippin LI, et al. Effects of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on the nuclear factor (NF)-κB signaling pathway in traumatized muscle. Lasers Surg Med. 2006;38(7):704–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Imrigha NAA, Bidin N, Lau PS, Musa N, Zakaria N, Krishnan G. Photobiomodulation therapy on wound treatment subsequent to Q-switched Nd: YAG laser tattoo removal in rat model. J Biophotonics. 2017;10(10):1287–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Hamblin MR. Mechanisms and applications of the anti-inflammatory effects of photobiomodulation. AIMS Biophysics. 2017;4(3):337–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Pires de Sousa MV, Ferraresi C, Kawakubo M, Kaippert B, Yoshimura EM, Hamblin MR. Transcranial low-level laser therapy (810 nm) temporarily inhibits peripheral nociception: photoneuromodulation of glutamate receptors, prostatic acid phophatase, and adenosine triphosphate. Neurophotonics. 2016;3(1):015003.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Song JW, Li K, Liang ZW, Dai C, Shen XF, Gong YZ, et al. Low-level laser facilitates alternatively activated macrophage/microglia polarization and promotes functional recovery after crush spinal cord injury in rats. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Golovynska I, Golovynskyi S, Stepanov YV, Garmanchuk LV, Stepanova LI, Qu J, et al. Red and near-infrared light induces intracellular Ca2+ flux via the activation of glutamate N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(9):15989–6002.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Golovynska I, Golovynskyi S, Stepanov YV, Stepanova LI, Qu J, Ohulchanskyy TY. Red and near-infrared light evokes Ca2+ influx, endoplasmic reticulum release and membrane depolarization in neurons and cancer cells. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol. 2021;214:112088.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Muñoz M, Martínez MP, López-Oliva ME, Rodríguez C, Corbacho C, Carballido J, et al. Hydrogen peroxide derived from NADPH oxidase 4- and 2 contributes to the endothelium-dependent vasodilatation of intrarenal arteries. Redox Biol. 2018;19:92–104.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Joshi DJ, Chitre NM, Bansal A, Murnane KS, D’Souza MJ. Formulation and characterization of microcapsules encapsulating PC12 cells as a prospective treatment approach for Parkinson’s disease. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2021;22(4):149.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Corraliza IM, Campo ML, Soler G, Modolell M. Determination of arginase activity in macrophages: a micromethod. J Immunol Methods. 1994;174(1-2):231–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Barghorn S, Nimmrich V, Striebinger A, Krantz C, Keller P, Janson B, et al. Globular amyloid beta-peptide1-42 oligomer - a homogenous and stable neuropathological protein in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurochem. 2005;95(3):834–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Ferrari A, Hoerndli F, Baechi T, Nitsch RM, Götz J. β-Amyloid induces paired helical filament-like tau filaments in tissue culture. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(41):40162–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Stine WB, Jungbauer L, Yu C, LaDu MJ. Preparing synthetic Aβ in different aggregation states. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;670:13–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Dahlgren KN, Manelli AM, Stine WB, Baker LK, Krafft GA, LaDu MJ. Oligomeric and fibrillar species of amyloid-β peptides differentially affect neuronal viability. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(35):32046–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Wickstead ES, Karim HA, Manuel RE, Biggs CS, Getting SJ, McArthur S. Reversal of β-amyloid-induced microglial toxicity in vitro by activation of Fpr2/3. Oxidative Med Cell Longev. 2020;2020:2139192.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Sica A, Mantovani A. Macrophage plasticity and polarization: in vivo veritas. J Clin Investig. 2012;122(3):787–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Butler CA, Popescu AS, Kitchener EJA, Allendorf DH, Puigdellívol M, Brown GC. Microglial phagocytosis of neurons in neurodegeneration, and its regulation. J Neurochem. 2021;158(3):621–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Tiwari M. Glucose 6 phosphatase dehydrogenase (G6PD) and neurodegenerative disorders: mapping diagnostic and therapeutic opportunities. Genes Dis. 2017;4(4):196–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Balazs L, Leon M. Evidence of an oxidative challenge in the Alzheimer’s brain. Neurochem Res. 1994;19(9):1131–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Fairley LH, Wong JH, Barron AM. Mitochondrial regulation of microglial immunometabolism in Alzheimer’s disease. Front Immunol. 2021;12:624538.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Hammond TR, Dufort C, Dissing-Olesen L, Giera S, Young A, Wysoker A, et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing of microglia throughout the mouse lifespan and in the injured brain reveals complex cell-state changes. Immunity. 2019;50(1):253–271.e6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Wang L, Pavlou S, Du X, Bhuckory M, Xu H, Chen M. Glucose transporter 1 critically controls microglial activation through facilitating glycolysis. Mol Neurodegener. 2019;14(1):2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Freemerman AJ, Johnson AR, Sacks GN, Milner JJ, Kirk EL, Troester MA, et al. Metabolic reprogramming of macrophages. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(11):7884–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Michl J, Ohlbaum DJ, Silverstein SC. 2-Deoxyglucose selectively inhibits fc and complement receptor-mediated phagocytosis in mouse peritoneal macrophages II. Dissociation of the inhibitory effects of 2-deoxyglucose on phagocytosis and ATP generation. J Exp Med. 1976;144(6):1484–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Pavlou S, Wang L, Xu H, Chen M. Higher phagocytic activity of thioglycollate-elicited peritoneal macrophages is related to metabolic status of the cells. J Inflamm (Lond). 2017;14(1):4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Baik SH, Kang S, Lee W, Choi H, Chung S, Kim J-I, et al. A breakdown in metabolic reprogramming causes microglia dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease. Cell Metab. 2019;30(3):493–507.e6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Holmsen H, Robkin LM. Effects of antimycin Aβ and 2-deoxyglucose on energy metabolism in washed human platelets. Thromb Haemost. 2018;42(05):1460–72.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Cheng J, Zhang R, Xu Z, Ke Y, Sun R, Yang H, et al. Early glycolytic reprogramming controls microglial inflammatory activation. J Neuroinflammation. 2021;18(1):129.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Hamblin M. Photobiomodulation for Alzheimer’s disease: has the light dawned? Photonics. 2019;6(3):77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Ferraresi C, Kaippert B, Avci P, Huang Y-Y, de Sousa MVP, Bagnato VS, et al. Low-level laser (light) therapy increases mitochondrial membrane potential and atp synthesis in C2C12 myotubes with a peak response at 3-6 h. Photochem Photobiol. 2014;91(2):411–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Huang Y-Y, Nagata K, Tedford CE, McCarthy T, Hamblin MR. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) reduces oxidative stress in primary cortical neurons in vitro. J Biophotonics. 2012;1–10:1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  81. Spooner R, Yilmaz Ö. The role of reactive-oxygen-species in microbial persistence and inflammation. Int J Mol Sci. 2011;12(1):334–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Ma MW, Wang J, Zhang Q, Wang R, Dhandapani KM, Vadlamudi RK, et al. NADPH oxidase in brain injury and neurodegenerative disorders. Mol Neurodegener. 2017;12(1):7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Zorov DB, Juhaszova M, Sollott SJ. Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) and ROS-induced ROS release. Physiol Rev. 2014;94(3):909–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Brusco J, Haas K. Interactions between mitochondria and the transcription factor myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF2) regulate neuronal structural and functional plasticity and metaplasticity. J Physiol. 2015;593(16):3471–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Jha AK, Huang SC-C, Sergushichev A, Lampropoulou V, Ivanova Y, Loginicheva E, et al. Network integration of parallel metabolic and transcriptional data reveals metabolic modules that regulate macrophage polarization. Immunity. 2015;42(3):419–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Feingold KR, Shigenaga JK, Kazemi MR, McDonald CM, Patzek SM, Cross AS, et al. Mechanisms of triglyceride accumulation in activated macrophages. J Leukoc Biol. 2012;92(4):829–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Geng J, Sun X, Wang P, Zhang S, Wang X, Wu H, et al. Kinases Mst1 and Mst2 positively regulate phagocytic induction of reactive oxygen species and bactericidal activity. Nat Immunol. 2015;16(11):1142–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Koo SJ, Szczesny B, Wan X, Putluri N, Garg NJ. Pentose phosphate shunt modulates reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide production controlling trypanosoma cruzi in macrophages. Front Immunol. 2018;9:202.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Johnson ECB, Dammer EB, Duong DM, Ping L, Zhou M, Yin L, et al. Large-scale proteomic analysis of Alzheimer’s disease brain and cerebrospinal fluid reveals early changes in energy metabolism associated with microglia and astrocyte activation. Nat Med. 2020;26(5):769–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. McIntosh A, Mela V, Harty C, Minogue AM, Costello DA, Kerskens C, et al. Iron accumulation in microglia triggers a cascade of events that leads to altered metabolism and compromised function in APP/PS1 mice. Brain Pathol. 2019;29(5):606–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Pan R-Y, Ma J, Kong X-X, Wang X-F, Li S-S, Qi X-L, et al. Sodium rutin ameliorates Alzheimer’s disease–like pathology by enhancing microglial amyloid-β clearance. Sci Adv. 2019;5(2):eaau6328.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Rubio-Araiz A, Finucane OM, Keogh S, Lynch MA. Anti-TLR2 antibody triggers oxidative phosphorylation in microglia and increases phagocytosis of β-amyloid. J Neuroinflammation. 2018;15(1):247.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Fang EF, Hou Y, Palikaras K, Adriaanse BA, Kerr JS, Yang B, et al. Mitophagy inhibits amyloid-β and tau pathology and reverses cognitive deficits in models of Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Neurosci. 2019;22(3):401–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Cosenza-Nashat M, Zhao ML, Suh HS, Morgan J, Natividad R, Morgello S, et al. Expression of the translocator protein of 18 kDa by microglia, macrophages and astrocytes based on immunohistochemical localization in abnormal human brain. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2009;35(3):306–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Gulyas B, Makkai B, Nagy K, Vas A, Kasa P, Andersson J, et al. In vitro evidence for competitive TSPO binding of the imaging biomarker candidates vinpocetine and two iodinated DAA1106 analogues in post mortem autoradiography experiments on whole hemisphere human brain slices. Curr Radiopharm. 2009;2(1):42–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Barron AM, Garcia-Segura LM, Caruso D, Jayaraman A, Lee JW, Melcangi RC, et al. Ligand for translocator protein reverses pathology in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci. 2013;33(20):8891–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Zeineh N, Denora N, Laquintana V, Franco M, Weizman A, Gavish M. Efficaciousness of low affinity compared to high affinity TSPO ligands in the inhibition of hypoxic mitochondrial cellular damage induced by cobalt chloride in human lung H1299 cells. Biomedicines. 2020;8(5):106.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  98. Fumagalli M, Lombardi M, Gressens P, Verderio C. How to reprogram microglia toward beneficial functions. Glia. 2018;66(12):2531–49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Passarella S, Karu T. Absorption of monochromatic and narrow band radiation in the visible and near IR by both mitochondrial and non-mitochondrial photoacceptors results in photobiomodulation. J Photochem Photobiol B. 2014;140:344–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Beauvoit B, Kitai T, Chance B. Contribution of the mitochondrial compartment to the optical properties of the rat liver: a theoretical and practical approach. Biophys J. 1994;67(6):2501–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Pastore MGSPD. Specific helium-neon laser sensitivity of the purified cytochrome c oxidase. Int J Radiat Biol. 2009;76(6):863–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Karu TI, Kolyakov SF. Exact action spectra for cellular responses relevant to phototherapy. Photomed Laser Surg. 2005;23(4):355–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Wong-Riley MTT, Liang HL, Eells JT, Chance B, Henry MM, Buchmann E, et al. Photobiomodulation directly benefits primary neurons functionally inactivated by toxins. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(6):4761–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Beltran B, Mathur A, Duchen MR, Erusalimsky JD, Moncada S. The effect of nitric oxide on cell respiration: a key to understanding its role in cell survival or death. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(26):14602–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. Brown GC. Regulation of mitochondrial respiration by nitric oxide inhibition of cytochrome c oxidase. BBA-Bioenergetics. 2001;1504(1):46–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Karu TI, Pyatibrat LV, Afanasyeva NI. Cellular effects of low power laser therapy can be mediated by nitric oxide. Lasers Surg Med. 2005;36(4):307–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Borutaite V, Budriunaite A, Brown GC. Reversal of nitric oxide-, peroxynitrite- and S-nitrosothiol-induced inhibition of mitochondrial respiration or complex I activity by light and thiols. BBA-Bioenergetics. 2000;1459(2-3):405–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Pre-registered

This study was not pre-registered.

Funding

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61835009, 61950410610, 61875135, 62127819), Shenzhen Basic Research Project (JCYJ20170818090620324), and Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine (0118 U000244).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yurii V. Stepanov, Iuliia Golovynska and Renlong Zhang contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Biomedical Optics and Photonics, College of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, People’s Republic of China

    Yurii V. Stepanov, Iuliia Golovynska, Renlong Zhang, Sergii Golovynskyi, Tymish Y. Ohulchanskyy & Junle Qu

  2. Institute of Biology and Medicine, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, 01601, Ukraine

    Liudmyla I. Stepanova, Taisa Dovbynchuk & Liudmyla V. Garmanchuk

  3. Laboratory of Experimental Oncology, National Cancer Institute of Ukraine, Kyiv, 03022, Ukraine

    Oleksandr Gorbach

Authors
  1. Yurii V. Stepanov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Iuliia Golovynska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Renlong Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sergii Golovynskyi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Liudmyla I. Stepanova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Oleksandr Gorbach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Taisa Dovbynchuk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Liudmyla V. Garmanchuk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Tymish Y. Ohulchanskyy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Junle Qu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization and design: YVS and IG. Experiments: YVS, IG, RZ, LIS, and TD. Data analysis: YVS, IG, and SG. Figures: IG and SG. Validation of results: YVS, IG, and LIS. Writing of first draft: YVS and IG. Editing manuscript: SG, JQ, TYO. Material support, supervision, administration: JQ, LVG, TYO. All authors approved the submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junle Qu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures were approved by our local animal ethics committee in IBM-KNU Ukraine and in detailed described in the section Materials and Methods.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Methods. Figure S1. Flow cytometry gating scheme of dots and histogram-plots of primary microglia cells. Figure S2. Neurons and microglia transferring into a Boyden chamber of two medium-filled compartments separated by a microporous membrane. Figure S3. Approximate molecular weight of Aβ1-42 oligomers following Western blotting under non-denaturing conditions. Results. Figure S4. NIR light activation phagocytosis of Aβ-treated microglia cells. Figure S5. Mitochondrial membrane potential activation following Aβ and 808 nm light treatment. Figure S6. NIR light effect on general ROS generation, mitochondrial ROS generation and ROS generation in the medium measured for Aβ-treated microglia. Figure S7. Increased neuron viability after 808 nm light exposure in co-culture with Aβ stimulated microglia. Figure S8. Increased neuron viability after 808 nm light exposure in co-culture with Aβ-stimulated microglia.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stepanov, Y.V., Golovynska, I., Zhang, R. et al. Near-infrared light reduces β-amyloid-stimulated microglial toxicity and enhances survival of neurons: mechanisms of light therapy for Alzheimer’s disease. Alz Res Therapy 14, 84 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-022-01022-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-022-01022-7

Keywords

Alzheimer's Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1758-9193