Skip to main content
Download PDF

Retinal vascular and structural changes are associated with amyloid burden in the elderly: ophthalmic biomarkers of preclinical Alzheimer’s disease

Alzheimer's Research & Therapy volume 9, Article number: 13 (2017) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Retinal imaging may serve as an alternative approach to monitor brain pathology in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). In this study, we investigated the association between retinal vascular and structural changes and cerebral amyloid-β (Aβ) plaque load in an elderly cohort.

Methods

We studied a total of 101 participants, including 73 elderly subjects (79 ± 5 years, 22 male) with no clinical diagnosis of AD but reporting some subjective memory change and an additional 28 subjects (70 ± 9 years, 16 male) with clinically established AD. Following a complete dilated ocular examination, the amplitude of retinal vascular pulsations and dynamic response, retinal nerve fibre layer thickness and retinal ganglion cell layer (RGCL) thickness were determined in all patients. Systemic blood pressure and carotid-to-femoral pulse wave velocity were measured. The elderly cohort also underwent magnetic resonance imaging and 18F-florbetaben (FBB)-positron emission tomographic amyloid imaging to measure neocortical Aβ standardised uptake value ratio (SUVR), and this was used to characterise a ‘preclinical’ group (SUVR >1.4).

Results

The mean FBB neocortical SUVR was 1.35 ± 0.3. The amplitude of retinal venous pulsations correlated negatively with the neocortical Aβ scores (p < 0.001), whereas the amplitude of retinal arterial pulsations correlated positively with neocortical Aβ scores (p < 0.01). RGCL thickness was significantly lower in the clinical AD group (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

The correlation between retinal vascular changes and Aβ plaque load supports the possibility of a vascular component to AD. Dynamic retinal vascular parameters may provide an additional inexpensive tool to aid in the preclinical assessment of AD.

Background

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia, accounting for 60–70% of all dementia cases. AD is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder causing irreversible deterioration in cognitive function secondary to neuronal cell death and brain atrophy [1]. The main pathological features are the accumulation of two proteins: amyloid-β (Aβ) peptide, generated from its parent molecule, the amyloid precursor protein (APP), which aggregates into extracellular plaques, and hyper-phosphorylated tau, which forms intracellular neurofibrillary tangles [2]. Evidence now implies that neuropathological changes involving the accumulation of Aβ occur up to 20 years prior to the emergence of clinical symptoms, emphasising the importance of developing methods for early diagnosis [3].

Currently, diagnosis is based primarily upon cognitive assessments of patients presenting with symptomatic features of cognitive and behavioural change [4, 5]. On the basis of these assessments, an individual may fall into one of three categories: (1) probable AD dementia, (2) possible AD dementia or (3) probable or possible AD dementia with evidence of the AD pathophysiological process [5]. Computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are frequently used clinically in the initial diagnosis of cases where probable AD is likely, whereas positron emission tomographic (PET) amyloid imaging is less frequently included where confirmation is needed; however, this is not universal [6]. Johnson and colleagues [7] devised a set of criteria that an individual must meet before PET amyloid imaging can be considered ‘appropriate’. These criteria include (1) a cognitive complaint, (2) possible AD diagnosis and (3) whether the knowledge of the presence or absence of Aβ will increase diagnostic accuracy or certainty. However, PET is not applicable for use in population-wide screening, owing to the relatively high cost of this test. Besides PET amyloid imaging, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pathophysiological markers, including Aβ1–42, total tau and phosphorylated Tau, have also shown high specificity in confirming AD pathophysiology [4].

Because the retina is considered an extension of the central nervous system (CNS) via the optic nerve, researchers have investigated it to determine whether it can serve as a marker for AD change [8]. The advantages of including the retina in investigations for diagnosing probable AD include its low cost, easy accessibility and the non-invasive nature of the tests. Recently, researchers have identified Aβ deposits in eyes from both human AD and transgenic mouse models. Retinal imaging techniques for Aβ are being investigated for detection of potential biomarkers for preclinical AD [9]. Although human studies have identified retinal abnormalities in patients with AD, such as reduced retinal nerve fibre layer (RNFL) thickness [10] and degeneration of retinal ganglion cells [11], these deficits are not AD-specific and are seen in patients with other degenerative diseases, such as glaucoma [12]. Animal models including APP/PS1-transgenic mice show Aβ plaques depositing in the retina, and these plaques have been correlated with plaque load in the brain [1]. The investigators in the latter study also reported detecting the amyloid burden in the retina at 2.5 months of age, which preceded the brain deposition occurring from 5 months of age.

Researchers have also identified a potential association between changes in vascular parameters, both static and dynamic, and AD changes. These include retinal vessel diameter [13, 14] as well as systemic cardiovascular measurements of blood pressure and pulse wave velocity (PWV) [15, 16]. Amyloid plaques have been reported to be closely located to blood vessels in the brain [17]. Systemic changes in parameters such as increased blood pressure [15] and arterial stiffness [16] have been correlated with declining cognition. In APP/PS1-transgenic mice, increased blood pressure was associated with higher concentrations of Aβ plaques in the brain. In addition, endothelial cell function includes regulation of APP, which could support the concept of increased mechanical stress as a contributing factor in the overproduction of Aβ in the vasculature.

Therefore, in this study, we aimed to determine if there was an association between retinal vascular parameters and neocortical Aβ concentrations. Vascular changes and PET amyloid scan results were documented in an elderly group of participants who had subjectively reported some memory issues but had no clinical signs of AD confirmed in testing. Vascular changes identified were then also investigated in a known group with clinically diagnosed AD dementia.

Methods

Study design

A total of 101 participants were included. Of these, 73 subjects (22 males, aged 79 ± 5 years) had no clinical signs of AD dementia, referred to as the elderly cohort, and 28 patients (16 males, aged 70 ± 9 years) had clinically diagnosed disease, referred to as the clinical AD cohort. All participants were examined in the Macquarie University Eye Clinic, where a complete medical history was taken and an eye examination was performed, including visual acuity, slit-lamp examination and intra-ocular pressure (IOP) with Goldmann tonometry. Tropicamide 1% was instilled to dilate pupils. The RNFL and retinal ganglion cell layer (RGCL) thicknesses were measured using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) (Nidek Co., Gamagori, Japan). The amplitudes of retinal vascular pulsations were measured using the Dynamic Vessel Analysis system (Imedos, Jena Germany). Following the ocular tests, all participants visited the Macquarie Heart Clinic (Sydney, Australia) for blood pressure and PWV measurements.

Elderly cohort

Seventy-three participants were residents from the Anglican Retirement Villages (ARV) across three locations in Sydney. These individuals were participants in the Kerr Anglican Retirement Villages Initiative in Ageing Health (KARVIAH) study, which required them to undertake Aβ-PET imaging. Participants who had reported any subjective memory complaints but were cognitively healthy with no confirmation of dementia by objective neuropsychological assessments were recruited. Inclusion criteria for the study included (1) aged 65–90 years, with good health and no significant cerebrovascular disease; (2) living in independent living units or similar accommodations; (3) English speaker; (4) adequate vision and hearing to enable testing; (5) memory complaint as determined by Memory Complaint Questionnaire and preferably corroborated by an informant; (6) no objective memory impairment (based on cognitive test scores); (7) normal general cognitive function as determined by a Montreal Cognitive Assessment score greater than or equal to 26 during screening; (8) no significant functional impairments/behaviour problems as indicated by the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly and the 36-item Short Form Health Survey; and (9) intact activities of daily living (ADL) (i.e., no or minimal impairment in ADLs as determined by a clinical interview). Of the 73 participants, 8 (11%) had glaucoma, 5 (7%) had macular degeneration, 41 (56%) had systemic hypertension and were on monotherapy, 7 (10%) had non-insulin-dependent diabetes, 6 (8%) had a history of transient ischaemic attack (TIA) but not confirmed stroke, 5 (7%) had ischaemic heart disease (IHD) and 22 (30%) were past smokers. The subjects visited Macquarie Medical Imaging for neuroimaging, including PET and MRI scans. Within 6 weeks of undergoing imaging, the subjects returned to Macquarie Eye Clinic for their ocular examinations.

Clinical AD cohort

A further 28 participants diagnosed with AD were referred by Macquarie Neurology. The clinical AD cohort had inclusion/exclusion criteria similar to those of the elderly cohort, and they all underwent the neuropsychological battery used in the Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study of ageing to confirm clinical AD [18].

Optical coherence tomography and vascular imaging

All participants underwent retinal OCT. The scans included a peri-papillary RNFL scan and a 9-mm × 9-mm macular scan to determine RGCL complex.

The technique used for measuring retinal vascular pulsation and dynamic vascular response has been described previously [19]. In brief, a digital camera was used to capture retinal images during a short video recording. The recording duration was 180 seconds during which three sets of flicker-induced light stimulated the retina, with each cycle lasting 30 seconds. The retinal image is registered by the software, and video analysis can then be performed, minimising effects of eye movement. Individual arteries and veins at four quadrant locations near the nerve were selected for analysis, and the vascular dilatory response of the vessels in response to flicker was recorded. The amplitude of vessel pulsatility was also determined for both arteries and veins.

Systemic vascular measurements

The participants were seated, and a standard cuff was placed around the upper arm over the brachial artery to measure blood pressure. Two consistent measurements with no more than 5-mmHg difference between the systolic values were taken and recorded. The subjects then lay supine for carotid-to-femoral PWV measurements to assess peripheral arterial stiffness. A cuff was placed around the femoral artery, and a tonometer sensor was positioned on the carotid pulse. Distances were measured from the cuff to the femoral artery, the cuff to the sternal notch, and the carotid artery to the sternal notch to calculate the time difference from the carotid artery to the femoral artery using the SphygmoCor system (AtCor Medical, West Ryde, Australia).

Neuroimaging

MRI consisted of three-dimensional, T1-weighted, magnetisation-prepared rapid gradient echo scans (repetition time 2.3 milliseconds, echo time 2.98 milliseconds and flip angle 9 degrees). Following MRI, radiolabelled 18F-florbetaben was used for the PET amyloid scans. Participants were administered 1.6 ± 1.2 μg of florbetaben with a specific activity of 105 ± 74 GBq/μmol and radiochemical purity higher than 95%. PET amyloid imaging was then performed. A transmission scan using a rotating 137Cs source was obtained for attenuation correction immediately before the emission scan.

Data analysis

Retinal and florbetaben-PET analyses were performed blinded to each other and to other study data. We processed the PET-FBB images and quantified the retention by the standardised uptake value ratio (SUVR), which is the standardised uptake value normalised by the average uptake in the cerebellum as a reference. The SUVR of the neocortex was computed as the average SUVR in the grey matter masked neocortical region composed of the frontal, superior parietal, lateral temporal, occipital, and anterior and posterior cingulate regions using Computational Analysis of PET from AIBL image-processing software(CapAIBL; https://capaibl-milxcloud.csiro.au/). For further analysis, subjects with a cut-off value greater than 1.4 were then categorised as the preclinical AD group, and participants with a cut-off less than 1.4 were designated as the elderly control group [20]. Neocortical Aβ was expressed as the average SUVR for the regions of interest (ROIs). The ROIs included frontal, superior parietal, lateral temporal, lateral occipital, and anterior and posterior cingulate regions. For a within-group analysis, all measured parameters were assessed for the preclinical group (neocortical amyloid load [NAL] ≥1.4) and the elderly control group (NAL <1.4). The vascular imaging data were analysed by extracting a 20-second window of recording with the highest signal-to-noise ratio selected and then passing it through a low-pass filter with a cut-off frequency of 3 Hz. Peaks and troughs of the signal were detected using spike software (Cambridge Electronic Design, UK) [19], and the difference between these was designated as the pulse amplitude. RNFL, macular thickness and pulsatility of vessels were compared with the SUVR values using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc analysis between high and low NAL values. Linear regression was then applied to assess the relationships between the vascular imaging and OCT measurements across all subjects, as well as the systemic measurements. Adjustments were made for age, where necessary, before analysis. Prism software (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA) was used for all statistical analyses.

Results

Participant demographics are shown in Table 1. All cohorts had similar characteristics, except for a much higher proportion of females in the elderly and preclinical AD groups. Adjustments for age did not statistically alter the end results.

Table 1 Participant demographics
Full size table

Retinal vascular parameters

The amplitude of retinal arterial pulsations (RAP) was assessed and analysed across the three subgroups: (1) participants with an NAL less than 1.4 (n = 50), the elderly control group; (2) participants with an NAL greater than 1.4 (n = 23), the preclinical AD group; and (3) the clinical AD group (n = 28), with the assumption that this group would have an Aβ SUVR greater than 2 [20] (assuming that the diagnosis was 100% accurate, though in clinical practice this figure is around 80%). The mean RAP values across these three groups were 4 ± 1.2 μm, 5.2 ± 1.2 μm and 4.6 ± 1 μm, respectively. One-way ANOVA revealed a significant difference across the three groups (p = 0.001). Post hoc multiple comparisons revealed that there were significant differences between groups 1 and 3 (p = 0.03) and between groups 1 and 2 (p = 0.006), but no significant difference between groups 2 and 3 (p = 0.14) (Fig. 1a). The association between RAP amplitude and neocortical Aβ SUVR in the grouped control and preclinical AD cohort was assessed using linear regression. A positive association between the two was observed (p = 0.01, r = 0.33) (Fig. 1b). RAP amplitude was significantly higher in the preclinical group than in the elderly control subjects. When we added the data from the clinical AD group, the trend did not continue. However, the difference in RAP between preclinical and clinical AD was non-significant. Also, we expect that the RAP trend might have continued to increase if we had the actual Aβ SUVR for this group.

Fig. 1
figure1

Association between retinal arterial pulsations (RAP) and standardised uptake value ratio (SUVR). Left: Mean and SD of RAP across control subjects, preclinical Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and clinical AD. Right: Linear association between RAP and SUVR obtained from control subjects and participants with preclinical AD

Full size image

A similar approach was taken when we analysed the amplitude of retinal venous pulsations (RVP). The mean RVP values across these three groups were 5.8 ± 1 μm, 5.2 ± 1 μm and 4.9 ± 1.2 μm, respectively. One-way ANOVA revealed a significant difference across the three groups (p = 0.004). Post hoc multiple comparisons revealed that there were significant differences between groups 1 and 3 (p = 0.006) and between groups 1 and 2 (p = 0.03), but no significant difference was observed between groups 2 and 3 (p = 0.37) (Fig. 2a). The association between amplitude of RVP and neocortical Aβ SUVR in the grouped control and preclinical AD cohort was assessed using linear regression. A negative association between the two was observed (p = 0.003, r = 0.4) (Fig. 2b).

Fig. 2
figure2

Association between retinal venous pulsations (RVP) and standardised uptake value ratio (SUVR). Left: Mean and SD of RVP across control subjects, preclinical Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and clinical AD. Right: Linear association between RVP and SUVR obtained from control subjects and participants with preclinical AD

Full size image

Flicker-induced retinal vasodilation

We also assessed flicker light-induced retinal vasodilation. Table 2 shows the mean vasodilation percentages in the control (NAL <1.4), preclinical (NAL ≥1.4) and clinical AD cohorts. Although the mean retinal arterial and venous dilation was slightly lower in the preclinical group than in the control subjects, we did not observe any statistically significant difference (p = 0.39). The relationship between neocortical Aβ SUVR and retinal arterial and venous dilation, assessed by linear regression, was also non-significant (p = 0.1).

Table 2 Flicker-induced retinal vasodilation
Full size table

Retinal structural measurements

The average RNFL thickness across the three groups (i.e., control subjects [NAL <1.4], preclinical AD [NAL ≥1.4] and clinical AD) was 93 ± 18 μm, 101 ± 15 μm and 99 ± 17 μm, respectively. We did not observe a significant difference in RNFL thickness between the three groups (p > 0.05). The association between the amplitude of RNFL thickness and neocortical Aβ SUVR in the grouped control and preclinical cohort was also not significant (p > 0.05). The average RGCL thicknesses across the three groups were 96 ± 9 μm, 98 ± 9 μm and 91 ± 2 μm, respectively. A significant difference in RGCL thickness across the three groups was observed (p = 0.02). Post hoc multiple comparisons revealed that there were significant differences between groups 1 and 3 (p = 0.03) and between groups 2 and 3 (p = 0.005), but no significant difference was observed between groups 1 and 2 (p = 0.7) (Fig. 3a). The association between RGCL thickness and neocortical Aβ SUVR in the grouped control and preclinical cohort, as assessed by linear regression, was also not significant (p = 0.27). Collectively, there was only a small degree of retinal structural changes identifiable with OCT, and this was found only in the RGCL analysis.

Fig. 3
figure3

Association between retinal ganglion cell layer (RGCL) thickness and standardised uptake value ratio (SUVR). Left: Mean and SD of RGCL thickness across control subjects, participants with preclinical Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and participants with clinical AD. Right Linear association between RGCL thickness and SUVR obtained from control subjects and participants with preclinical AD

Full size image

Systemic vascular parameters

We also investigated for differences in systemic cardiovascular parameters between the subgroups. Pulse pressure (PP = systolic blood pressure − diastolic blood pressure) and PWV were assessed. The average PP and PWV across the three groups were, respectively, 68 ± 13 mmHg, 8.8 ± 1.4 m/second; 65 ± 12 mmHg, 8.7 ± 1.5 m/second; and 67.4 ± 13.3 mmHg, 8.8 ± 1.4 m/second. There was no significant association between PP, PWV and neocortical Aβ SUVR in the grouped control and preclinical cohort (p = 0.4) across all subjects. Subgroup analysis also did not reveal any significant difference (p = 0.3) between PP, PWV and neocortical Aβ SUVR in the elderly subjects vs the preclinical AD group.

Finally, we applied an analysis of covariance to investigate whether co-morbidities including hypertension, diabetes, TIA, IHD and a history of smoking influenced the association between RVP, RAP and Aβ SUVR. The results showed that the differences between the slopes were not significant (p > 0.05).

Discussion

In this study, we investigated the association between retinal haemodynamics and cerebral Aβ load in a cohort of elderly participants with no clinical diagnosis of AD but who had subjective memory complaints, and we subdivided these for further analysis according to PET scan results (elderly control subjects [NAL <1.4], preclinical AD [NAL ≥1.4]). Participants with confirmed clinical signs of AD were also included to replicate the trend observed in our preclinical AD cohort. We observed a negative correlation between amplitude of RVP and Aβ SUVR in the preclinical cohort. The correlation was positive when we compared RAP amplitude and Aβ SUVR. When data from our clinical AD cohort were added for comparison, with the assumption that these patients would have an Aβ SUVR greater than 2.0 [20], we observed a continuing trend in our control subjects and preclinical AD cohort, further supporting the association between retinal haemodynamics and cerebral Aβ load.

Recent studies have shown a significant association between measures of vascular function (PP, arterial stiffness, endothelial function, carotid intima-media thickness, endothelial cell response to stress) and cognitive function [16, 21, 22]. Mechanical forces on endothelial cells result in activation of a range of cell-signalling pathways as well as alterations in cell morphology, cell function and gene expression [23]. In contrast, effects of dynamic forces due to pulsatile pressure and flow result in cyclic strain on the cell membrane. Cyclic stretch has also been shown to induce retinal expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and has been implicated in the exacerbation of diabetic retinopathy by high blood pressure [24].

Recent studies have highlighted the link between endothelial nitric oxide (NO) and cerebrovascular function, in modulation of the processing of APP, in affecting the functional status of microglia, and on cognitive function [25]. Loss of NO in cultured human cerebrovascular endothelium has been shown to increase the expression of APP and β-site amyloid precursor protein-cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1), thereby resulting in increased secretion of Aβ peptides (Aβ1–40 and Aβ1–42) [26]. Increased expression of APP and BACE1, as well as increased production of Aβ peptides, was also detected in the cerebral microvasculature and brain tissue of endothelial nitric oxide synthase-deficient mice.

Collectively, the higher retinal arterial pulse amplitude observed may be due to mechanical cyclic stretch (to simulate the mechanical pulsatile effect of arterial pressure) in response to upregulation of APP expression as well as deposition of Aβ plaques. Further studies are required to elucidate underlying mechanisms involved in regulating retinal arterial pulse amplitude in AD. It may be a primary risk factor, or it may occur secondary to local endothelially induced changes.

With respect to static retinal imaging, many researchers have investigated the correlation between retinal vascular calibre and cognitive decline [27–29]. However, the limitation with static measures is that often the biomarkers observed are not specific to the disease and can be seen in other diseases that may affect retinal pathology (e.g., hypertension, diabetes). In the Rotterdam study, researchers reported that larger retinal venular calibres were associated with an increased risk of dementia [30]. These findings are contradictory to those of another study in which investigators reported that narrower venular calibre is associated with likeliness of AD development [28]. In our cohort, we did not observe any significant association between retinal venous and arterial diameters with Aβ SUVR. However, studying dynamic indices of retinal vessels, including retinal pulsatility and local arterial PWV, within retinal vessels (a measure of arterial stiffness) is more likely to be applicable in identifying those at risk.

In this study, we also investigated endothelial dysfunction in retinal vasculature and its association with neocortical Aβ scores. Endothelial dysfunction plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of vascular abnormalities, and various feedback mechanisms are involved in retinal autoregulation. Previous studies have demonstrated that NO is involved in retinal vasodilation during flicker light stimulation [31, 32]. Although we observed significantly lower vasodilation in retinal arteries and veins in the clinical AD cohort in comparison with the participants having an Aβ SUVR less than 1.4, we did not see any significant association between the percentage of retinal vasodilation during flicker stimulation and Aβ SUVR.

The origin of spontaneous RVP in the eye is debated, with some researchers suggesting abnormalities in the ocular perfusion pressure in combination with high central retinal vein pressures as the main factor [33–35], whereas others argue for an imbalance in translaminar pressure gradient across the lamina cribrosa (IOP-CSF pressure) [36, 37]. Lower venous pulsations are also observed in primary open angle glaucoma [38]. Glaucoma and AD share common features of age-related risk, chronic decline in function and focal degeneration of neurons. Both diseases are characterised as degenerative disorders involving the CNS, and even though glaucoma is primarily an optic nerve disorder, secondary changes have been observed in the radiations and visual cortex. Glaucoma has been reported to be associated with AD pathophysiology [39, 40]. There are also reports suggesting that glaucoma prevalence is higher in AD (2.6 to 5.2 times) [41]; both diseases are associated with microbleeding [42, 43]. In our cohort, we did find a higher-than-average incidence of subjects with glaucoma (8 of 73 [about 11%]), but subanalysis did not identify this group of participants as showing any significant difference in parameters other than thinner RGCL/RNFL, as expected.

Retinal structural changes, including RNFL and RGCL thickness, have been reported in AD [44–46]. Although most reports of thinning of RNFL and GCL are associated with AD severity, some suggest a non-significant correlation between retinal structures and AD severity [45, 47]. Our findings show a non-significant correlation between RNFL thickness and Aβ SUVR. When assessing macular RGCL, we observed only a slightly significant reduction in the thickness when we compared patients with clinical AD with the elderly control subjects and participants with preclinical AD. The results were not changed when the subjects with glaucoma and macular degeneration were excluded.

The vascular contribution to the broad range of cognitive impairment leading to AD has been recognised [48, 49], including by professional societies providing statements based on epidemiological evidence linking loss of vascular function and development of dementia [50]. Studies of associations of vascular function and cognitive impairment are converging on the question whether AD can be considered part of the spectrum of vascular disease [51]. There is accumulating evidence suggesting an association of arterial blood pressure, arterial stiffness and reduced endothelial function with AD [22, 52], but there have been conflicting findings in the literature, and it is clearly not a simple relationship with arterial blood pressure per se. Infusing hypertensive doses of angiotensin II in APP/PS1-transgenic mice produced a 100% increase in soluble Aβ in the brain and a 25% reduction in cerebral microvessel density [53]. We assessed central PP (systolic − diastolic) and PWV and their association with Aβ SUVR. No significant association or correlation was observed between these cardiovascular parameters and neocortical Aβ scores.

Limitations of our study include that we did not have neuroimaging data from our clinically confirmed AD group, because we could not ethically justify scanning these patients. It was anticipated that 80% of participants with clinical AD would have high PET scores (>2). Additionally, there might be a false-positive rate within our cohort (i.e., healthy elderly subjects with SUVR >1.4) leading to classification as preclinical AD. Whereas this would not affect the association between SUVR and retinal vascular changes, future scans and recording will elucidate the number of false-positives within the cohort. We also acknowledge that a large proportion of our cognitively healthy participants were receiving treatment for systemic hypertension. In this age group, this is extremely common, but if our hypothesis is correct that there is a link with arterial pulse waves and chronic brain damage, then this treatment may be most likely masking the effect.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates a significant correlation between amplitude of retinal vascular pulsatility and neocortical Aβ scores, independent of other risk factors. Arterial pulsation was increased while venous pulsation was reduced. Future studies will further elucidate whether these biomarkers have a correlation not only with cerebral Aβ plaques but also with the development of subsequent clinical dementia, because these participants are all being followed longitudinally. If a clinical correlation is confirmed, although direct cause and effect cannot be certain, screening of eyes in those considered at risk of AD may aid in the development of an additional inexpensive approach for identifying increased risk as well as serving to potentially monitor vascular function in these individuals.

Abbreviations

AD:

Alzheimer’s disease

ADL:

Activities of daily living

AIBL:

Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle study

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

APP:

Amyloid precursor protein

ARV:

Anglican Retirement Villages

Aβ:

Amyloid-β

BACE1:

β-Site amyloid precursor protein-cleaving enzyme 1

CNS:

Central nervous system

CSF:

Cerebrospinal fluid

DBP:

Diastolic blood pressure

IHD:

Ischaemic heart disease

IOP:

Intra-ocular pressure

KARVIAH:

Kerr Anglican Retirement Villages Initiative in Ageing Health study

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

NAL:

Neocortical amyloid load

NO:

Nitric oxide

OCT:

Optical coherence tomography

PET:

Positron emission tomographic

PP:

Pulse pressure

PWV:

Pulse wave velocity

RAP:

Retinal arterial pulsations

RGCL:

Retinal ganglion cell layer

RNFL:

Retinal nerve fibre layer

ROI:

Region of interest

RVP:

Retinal venous pulsations

SBP:

Systolic blood pressure

SUVR:

Standardised uptake value ratio

TIA:

Transient ischaemic attack

References

  1. 1.

    Koronyo Y, Salumbides BC, Black KL, Koronyo-Hamaoui M. Alzheimer’s disease in the retina: imaging retinal Aβ plaques for early diagnosis and therapy assessment. Neurodegener Dis. 2012;10:285–93.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Moore KM, Girens RE, Larson SK, Jones MR, Restivo JL, Holtzman DM, et al. A spectrum of exercise training reduces soluble Aβ in a dose-dependent manner in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2016;85:218–24.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Holtzman DM, Morris JC, Goate AM. Alzheimer’s disease: the challenge of the second century. Sci Transl Med. 2011;3:77sr1. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3002369.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Dubois B, Feldman HH, Jacova C, Hampel H, Molinuevo JL, Blennow K, et al. Advancing research diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer’s disease: the IWG-2 criteria. Lancet Neurol. 2014;13:614–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, Hyman BT, Jack CR, Kawas CH, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7:263–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Johnson KA, Fox NC, Sperling RA, Klunk WE. Brain imaging in Alzheimer disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012;2:a006213.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Johnson KA, Minoshima S, Bohnen NI, Donohoe KJ, Foster NL, Herscovitch P, et al. Appropriate use criteria for amyloid PET: a report of the Amyloid Imaging Task Force, the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, and the Alzheimer’s Association. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:476–90. doi:10.2967/jnumed.113.120618.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Guo L, Duggan J, Cordeiro MF. Alzheimer’s disease and retinal neurodegeneration. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2010;7:3–14.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Koronyo-Hamaoui M, Koronyo Y, Ljubimov AV, Miller CA, Ko MK, Black KL, et al. Identification of amyloid plaques in retinas from Alzheimer’s patients and noninvasive in vivo optical imaging of retinal plaques in a mouse model. Neuroimage. 2011;54 Suppl 1:S204–17. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.020.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Berisha F, Feke GT, Trempe CL, McMeel JW, Schepens CL. Retinal abnormalities in early Alzheimer’s disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:2285–9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17460292. Accessed 20 July 2012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Paquet C, Boissonnot M, Roger F, Dighiero P, Gil R, Hugon J. Abnormal retinal thickness in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci Lett. 2007;420:97–9. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2007.02.090.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Golzan SM, Morgan WH, Georgevsky D, Graham SL. Correlation of retinal nerve fibre layer thickness and spontaneous retinal venous pulsations in glaucoma and normal controls. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0128433. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0128433.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Lesage SR, Mosley TH, Wong TY, Szklo M, Knopman D, Catellier DJ, et al. Retinal microvascular abnormalities and cognitive decline: the ARIC 14-year follow-up study. Neurology. 2009;73:862–8. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181b78436.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Patton N, Pattie A, MacGillivray T, Aslam T, Dhillon B, Gow A, et al. The association between retinal vascular network geometry and cognitive ability in an elderly population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:1995–2000. doi:10.1167/iovs.06-1123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Waldstein SR, Rice SC, Thayer JF, Najjar SS, Scuteri A, Zonderman AB. Pulse pressure and pulse wave velocity are related to cognitive decline in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Hypertension. 2008;51:99–104. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.107.093674.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Elias MF, Robbins MA, Budge MM, Abhayaratna WP, Dore GA, Elias PK. Arterial pulse wave velocity and cognition with advancing age. Hypertension. 2009;53:668–73. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.108.126342.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Smith EE, Greenberg SM. Beta-amyloid, blood vessels, and brain function. Stroke. 2009;40:2601–6. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.536839.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ellis KA, Bush AI, Darby D, De Fazio D, Foster J, Hudson P, et al. The Australian Imaging, Biomarkers and Lifestyle (AIBL) study of aging: methodology and baseline characteristics of 1112 individuals recruited for a longitudinal study of Alzheimer’s disease. Int Psychogeriatr. 2009;21:672–87. doi:10.1017/S1041610209009405.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Golzan SM, Graham SL, Leaney J, Avolio A. Dynamic association between intraocular pressure and spontaneous pulsations of retinal veins. Curr Eye Res. 2011;36:53–9. doi:10.3109/02713683.2010.530731.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Villemagne VL, Ong K, Mulligan RS, Holl G, Pejoska S, Jones G, et al. Amyloid imaging with 18F-florbetaben in Alzheimer disease and other dementias. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:1210–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Zeki Al Hazzouri A, Newman AB, Simonsick E, Sink KM, Sutton Tyrrell K, Watson N, et al. Pulse wave velocity and cognitive decline in elders: the Health, Aging, and Body Composition study. Stroke. 2013;44:388–93. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.673533.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Pase MP, Herbert A, Grima NA, Pipingas A, O’Rourke MF. Arterial stiffness as a cause of cognitive decline and dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intern Med J. 2012;42:808–15. doi:10.1111/j.1445-5994.2011.02645.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Ando J, Yamamoto K. Effects of shear stress and stretch on endothelial function. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2011;15:1389–403. doi:10.1089/ars.2010.3361.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Suzuma I, Hata Y, Clermont A, Pokras F, Rook SL, Suzuma K, et al. Cyclic stretch and hypertension induce retinal expression of vascular endothelial growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2: potential mechanisms for exacerbation of diabetic retinopathy by hypertension. Diabetes. 2001;50:444–54. doi:10.2337/diabetes.50.2.444.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Katusic ZS, Austin SA. Endothelial nitric oxide: protector of a healthy mind. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:888–94. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/eht544.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Austin SA, Santhanam AV, Katusic ZS. Endothelial nitric oxide modulates expression and processing of amyloid precursor protein. Circ Res. 2010;107:1498–502. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.233080.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Baker ML, Marino Larsen EK, Kuller LH, Klein R, Klein BEK, Siscovick DS, et al. Retinal microvascular signs, cognitive function, and dementia in older person: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Stroke. 2007;38:2041–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Cheung CYL, Ong YT, Ikram MK, Ong SY, Li X, Hilal S, et al. Microvascular network alterations in the retina of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2014;10:135–42. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2013.06.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Frost S, Kanagasingam Y, Sohrabi H, Vignarajan J, Bourgeat P, Salvado O, et al. Retinal vascular biomarkers for early detection and monitoring of Alzheimer’s disease. Transl Psychiatry. 2013;3:e233. doi:10.1038/tp.2012.150.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    de Jong FJ, Schrijvers EMC, Ikram MK, Koudstaal PJ, de Jong PTVM, Hofman A, et al. Retinal vascular caliber and risk of dementia: the Rotterdam study. Neurology. 2011;76:816–21. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21288987.

  31. 31.

    Kondo M, Wang L, Bill A. The role of nitric oxide in hyperaemic response to flicker in the retina and optic nerve in cats. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1997;75:232–5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9253963. Accessed 17 Jan 2013.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Dorner GT, Garhofer G, Kiss B, Polska E, Polak K, Riva CE, et al. Nitric oxide regulates retinal vascular tone in humans. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2003;285:H631–6. doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00111.2003.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Stodtmeister R. Central retinal vein: its pulsation and pressure in glaucoma [in German]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2015;232:147–51. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1383397.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Ventzke S, Priddy F, Spoerl E, Haustein M, Matthe E, Pillunat LE, et al. During Valsalva maneuver the pressure in the central retinal vein may be higher than the intraocular pressure [abstract]. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55:4335. http://iovs.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid = 2269837. Accessed 3 Mar 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Abegão Pinto L, Willekens K, Van Keer K, Shibesh A, Molenberghs G, Vandewalle E, et al. Ocular blood flow in glaucoma - the Leuven Eye Study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016;94:592–8. doi:10.1111/aos.12962.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Jonas JB, Ritch R, Panda-Jonas S. Cerebrospinal fluid pressure in the pathogenesis of glaucoma. Prog Brain Res. 2015;221:33–47. doi:10.1016/bs.pbr.2015.06.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Jonas JB, Wang N, Yang D. Translamina cribrosa pressure difference as potential element in the pathogenesis of glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2016;5:5–10. doi:10.1097/APO.0000000000000170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Morgan WH, Hazelton ML, Azar SL, House PH, Yu DY, Cringle SJ, et al. Retinal venous pulsation in glaucoma and glaucoma suspects. Ophthalmology. 2004;111:1489–94. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.12.053.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Sivak JM. The aging eye: common degenerative mechanisms between the Alzheimer’s brain and retinal disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54:871–80. doi:10.1167/iovs.12-10827.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Ou Y, Grossman DS, Lee PP, Sloan FA. Glaucoma, Alzheimer disease and other dementia: a longitudinal analysis. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2012;19:285–92. doi:10.3109/09286586.2011.649228.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Bayer AU, Ferrari F, Erb C. High occurrence rate of glaucoma among patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Eur Neurol. 2002;47:165–8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Stone J, Johnstone DM, Mitrofanis J, O’Rourke M. The mechanical cause of age-related dementia (Alzheimer’s disease): the brain is destroyed by the pulse. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;44:355–73. doi:10.3233/JAD-141884.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Drance SM. Disc hemorrhages in the glaucomas. Surv Ophthalmol. 1989;33:331–7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2655138. Accessed 22 Mar 2016.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Gao L, Liu Y, Li X, Bai Q, Liu P. Abnormal retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and macula lutea in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2015;60:162–7. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2014.10.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Pillai JA, Bermel R, Bonner-Jackson A, Rae-Grant A, Fernandez H, Bena J, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer thinning in Alzheimer’s disease: a case-control study in comparison to normal aging, Parkinson’s disease, and non-Alzheimer’s dementia. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2016;31:430–6. doi:10.1177/1533317515628053.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Garcia-Martin E, Bambo MP, Marques ML, Satue M, Otin S, Larrosa JM, et al. Ganglion cell layer measurements correlate with disease severity in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Ophthalmol. 2016;94:e454–9. doi:10.1111/aos.12977.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Berisha F, Feke GT, Trempe CL, McMeel JW, Schepens CL. Retinal abnormalities in early Alzheimer’s disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:2285–9. doi:10.1167/iovs.06-1029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    de la Torre JC. Is Alzheimer’s disease a neurodegenerative or a vascular disorder? Data, dogma, and dialectics. Lancet Neurol. 2004;3:184–90. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474442204006830. Accessed 19 Nov 2013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    de la Torre JC. Alzheimer disease as a vascular disorder: nosological evidence. Stroke. 2002;33:1152–62. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000014421.15948.67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Faraco G, Iadecola C. Hypertension: a harbinger of stroke and dementia. Hypertension. 2013;62:810–7. doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.01063.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Dede DS, Yavuz B, Yavuz BB, Cankurtaran M, Halil M, Ulger Z, et al. Assessment of endothelial function in Alzheimer’s disease: is Alzheimer’s disease a vascular disease? J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007;55:1613–7. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01378.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Poels MMF, Zaccai K, Verwoert GC, Vernooij MW, Hofman A, van der Lugt A, et al. Arterial stiffness and cerebral small vessel disease: the Rotterdam Scan Study. Stroke. 2012;43:2637–42. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.642264.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Cifuentes D, Poittevin M, Dere E, Broquères-You D, Bonnin P, Benessiano J, et al. Hypertension accelerates the progression of Alzheimer-like pathology in a mouse model of the disease. Hypertension. 2015;65:218–24.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Luke Saunders for his review and suggestions on the statistical methods employed in this study.

Funding

SMG was supported by a Dementia Research Foundation (Alzheimer’s Australia) fellowship. He is currently a recipient of a National Health and Medical Research Council-Australian Research Council Dementia Fellowship. This research was supported by funds from the Hillcrest Foundation, the Rebecca L. Cooper Medical Research Foundation and a Macquarie Research Development Grant. KG is supported by the Anglican Retirement Villages (ARV). PET amyloid imaging and MRI in the non-clinical KARVIAH cohort was funded by the ARV Foundation for Aged Care. KG is also a recipient of a top-up PhD scholarship from the Cooperative Research Centre for Mental Health.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated and analysed during the present study are not publicly available, owing to ethics considerations and privacy restriction. Data may be available from the corresponding author once approval from the Macquarie University Human Research Ethics Committee has been sought.

Authors’ contributions

SMG, KG, GS, CO, RNM and SLG conceived of and designed the study. SMG, KG and DG acquired data. SMG, KG, DG, AA, PC, KS, VG, RC, GS, CO, RNM and SLG analysed and interpreted the data. SMG, AA, PC, KS, VG, RC, GS, CO, RNM and SLG critically revised the manuscript. SLG, RNM, RC and AA supervised the study. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Tenants of Helsinki. All subjects provided informed consent and the study was approved by Macquarie University Human Ethics committee.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Vision Science Group, Graduate School of Health (Orthoptics Discipline), University of Technology Sydney, 15 Broadway, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia

    S.Mojtaba Golzan

  2. Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    S.Mojtaba Golzan, Dana Georgevsky, Vivek Gupta & Stuart L. Graham

  3. KaRa Institute of Neurological Diseases, Macquarie Park, NSW, 2113, Australia

    Kathryn Goozee, Pratishtha Chatterjee & Ralph N. Martins

  4. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Kathryn Goozee, Alberto Avolio, Pratishtha Chatterjee, Roger Chung & Ralph N. Martins

  5. Anglican Retirement Village, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Kathryn Goozee

  6. School of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia

    Kathryn Goozee & Ralph N. Martins

  7. Australian e-Health Research Centre, CSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Herston, QLD, Australia

    Kaikai Shen

  8. ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Greg Savage

  9. Macquarie Neurology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Carolyn F. Orr

Authors
  1. S.Mojtaba Golzan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kathryn Goozee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dana Georgevsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alberto Avolio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Pratishtha Chatterjee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kaikai Shen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Vivek Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Roger Chung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Greg Savage
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Carolyn F. Orr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Ralph N. Martins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Stuart L. Graham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S.Mojtaba Golzan.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Golzan, S., Goozee, K., Georgevsky, D. et al. Retinal vascular and structural changes are associated with amyloid burden in the elderly: ophthalmic biomarkers of preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Alz Res Therapy 9, 13 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-017-0239-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Retinal imaging
  • Vascular biomarkers
  • Alzheimer’s disease
  • Early diagnosis

Alzheimer's Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1758-9193