Open Access

Safety and tolerability of BAN2401 - a clinical study in Alzheimer’s disease with a protofibril selective Aβ antibody

  • Veronika Logovinsky1,
  • Andrew Satlin1,
  • Robert Lai1,
  • Chad Swanson1,
  • June Kaplow1,
  • Gunilla Osswald2,
  • Hans Basun2, 3 and
  • Lars Lannfelt2, 3Email author
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy20168:14

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-016-0181-2

Received: 27 October 2015

Accepted: 25 February 2016

Published: 6 April 2016

Abstract

Background

Several monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have been in development over the last decade. BAN2401 is a monoclonal antibody that selectively binds soluble amyloid β (Aβ) protofibrils.

Methods

Here we describe the first clinical study with BAN2401. Safety and tolerability were investigated in mild to moderate AD. A study design was used with staggered parallel single and multiple ascending doses, from 0.1 mg/kg as a single dose to 10 mg/kg biweekly for four months. The presence of amyloid related imaging abnormalities (ARIA, E for edema, H for hemorrhage) was assessed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma samples were analyzed to investigate pharmacokinetics (PK) and effects on biomarkers.

Results

The incidence of ARIA-E/H on MRI was comparable to that of placebo. BAN2401 exposure was approximately dose proportional, with a serum terminal elimination half-life of ~7 days. Only a slight increase of plasma Aβ(1-40) was observed but there were no measurable effects of BAN2401 on CSF biomarkers. On the basis of these findings Phase 2b efficacy study has been initiated in early AD.

Conclusions

BAN2401 was well-tolerated across all doses. The PK profile has guided us for selecting dose and dose regimens in the ongoing phase 2b study. There was no clear guidance for an effective dose based on biomarkers.

Trial registration number

NCT01230853 ClinicalTrials.gov Registered October 27, 2010.

Keywords

Alzheimer's diseaseAmyloid-βProtofibrilImmunotherapyBAN2401mAb158ARIAClinical trial

Background

Current treatments for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have no effect on disease progression, which creates a large unmet medical need. Several monoclonal antibodies against amyloid β (Aβ) are in development as potential disease-modifying treatments. Antibodies are attractive drugs as they can be made highly specific for their target. Data from recent AD trials remain inconclusive, but provide some suggestion that a treatment effect of immunotherapy is possible. Bapineuzumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting non-selectively all forms of Aβ, generated side-effects leading to lowering of treatment doses and no treatment effect was found [12]. Solanezumab was developed to target soluble, monomeric Aβ. In two phase 3 studies, solanezumab did not meet primary endpoints [2]. However, when data from the two studies were pooled, a pattern emerged with a slowing of cognitive decline in the subgroup of mild AD. The lack of robust clinical effect with antibodies binding Aβ fibrils or monomers has drawn attention to antibodies targeting soluble, aggregated forms of Aβ.

Aβ exists in various conformational states - monomers, oligomers, protofibrils, and insoluble fibrils [10, 11, 22]. Protofibrils are soluble Aβ aggregates, larger than approximately 100 kDa, i. e., eluting in the void volume on a Size Exclusion Superdex 75 column [1, 8, 9, 19, 20]. There is increasing evidence suggesting that oligomers and protofibrils are more toxic than insoluble fibrils or monomers and that they mediate neurotoxicity and alter synaptic function [7, 10, 21, 22]. The Arctic Alzheimer mutation (AβPP E693G) has been shown to specifically increase the formation of soluble Aβ protofibrils, an Aβ species toxic to neurons and likely to be present in all cases of AD [9]. Indeed, Arctic mutation cases were negative for fibrillar amyloid, as measured by Pittsburg compound B (11C-PIB) with positron emission tomography (PET) [13]. This suggests that reducing Aβ protofibrils could provide an effective treatment approach for AD that might ameliorate neuronal toxicity and potentially improve other pathological processes, e.g., synaptic dysfunction, inflammatory changes, and, ultimately, neuronal loss [4, 5, 10].

mAb158 is a murine monoclonal antibody that was raised to target protofibrils [3], and BAN2401 is the humanized IgG1 monoclonal version that selectively binds to Aβ protofibrils. In vitro studies demonstrated that the binding characteristics are essentially indistinguishable from mAb158. BAN2401 has at least a 1000-fold higher selectivity for protofibrils compared to monomers and 10-15 times better binding to protofibrils than to fibrils [14, 15]. Treatment of transgenic mice carrying both the Swedish and the Arctic mutations with mAb158 demonstrated that plaque formation was prevented if the antibody was given before the appearance of plaque in young mice. If treatment started later in this mouse model, levels of insoluble Aβ in the brains of plaque-bearing old mice were not affected. However, in both cases, soluble Aβ protofibril levels were diminished, showing that mAb158 can selectively reduce protofibrils in vivo [6].

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the safety and tolerability of BAN2401 in AD patients following single and multiple ascending doses and to assess the pharmacokinetics (PK) in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). In addition, effects of BAN2401 on CSF and plasma biomarkers of AD were investigated.

Methods

Study design

A multicenter double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study was performed in subjects with mild to moderate AD. No major issues in our animal studies, or in the formal toxicological studies were seen. The starting dose was set with an acceptable margin to NOAEL (No Observed Adverse Effect Level). Estimations of dose levels were made from treatment studies in our transgenic Alzheimer mice models. The top dose was chosen from our studies on transgenic Alzheimer mice and based on lowering of Aβ protofibrils.

The study was comprised of two parts. In the single ascending dose (SAD) study, doses of 0.1, 0.3, 1, 3, 10, and 15 mg/kg were evaluated. A multiple ascending dose (MAD) part investigated doses of 0.3, 1, and 3 mg/kg administered every four weeks with a total of four doses over four months and a dose of 10 mg/kg biweekly, with a total of seven doses over four months (Fig. 1). Each cohort consisted of eight subjects, two randomized to placebo and six to BAN2401. BAN2401 was given as an i. v. infusion. Treatment periods of the SAD and MAD cohorts took place in a staggered parallel manner. Cohorts were initiated after review of the safety and PK data of the previous cohorts. Before determining to proceed to the next dose level, each SAD cohort was observed for four weeks post dose. This included assessment of a non-contrast brain MRI at three weeks after dosing to evaluate the presence of amyloid related imaging abnormalities (ARIA-E for edema/H for hemorrhage). Treatment in each MAD cohort was initiated after review of all available safety data, including data from the equivalent and the next higher single dose levels. Data included MRI, vital signs, electrocardiogram (ECG) and laboratory data collected at least three weeks post dose in the SAD study. Subjects were followed for up to 180 days after final dosing.
Fig. 1

Study design with overlapping SAD-MAD cohorts, where treatment periods took place in a staggered parallel manner. A cohort was initiated after review of the safety and PK data of the previous cohorts. SAD single ascending dose, MAD multiple ascending dose, PK pharmacokinetics

The study was carried out in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines and was in full compliance with International Conference on Harmonisation guidelines and all applicable local good clinical practice regulations.

Subjects

Eligible subjects were aged ≥50 years with mild to moderate AD, according to National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and the Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) criteria and Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores of 16-28. Subjects receiving symptomatic treatment for AD were required to have been on stable doses for at least 12 weeks prior to Baseline visit.

Safety

Safety assessments for SAD, MAD1-3, and MAD4 are outlined in Additional file 1: Addendum, Tables S1A-S3A, respectively. To assess for ARIA, regular non-contrast brain MRI scans were performed to detect ARIA-H [18] according to the schedule outlined in Additional file 1: Tables S1A-S3A. All subjects underwent MRI at baseline. Subsequent MRI scans were performed at three weeks, three months, and at the termination visit at 180 days post dose for SAD1-5 and at 90 days for SAD6. Doses were not administered until evaluation of the most recent MRI. An additional safety MRI was conducted at 90 and 180 days after the final dose for MAD1 and MAD2 cohorts, and at 90 days for MAD3 and MAD4 cohorts.

Pharmacokinetics

In the SAD cohorts, serum concentrations of BAN2401 were measured pre dose, at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 h post dose, and at 10, 21, 28, 90 and 180 days post dose. Concentrations of BAN2401 in CSF were measured in SAD6 (15 mg/kg) on day 2 for the first four subjects and on day 10 for the next four subjects. In the MAD cohorts, serum BAN2401 concentrations were measured pre dose and immediately post dose for all four infusions. Additional samples were collected at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 24 h post dose after doses 1 and 4. In addition, single samples were collected three weeks and three months post dose. A validated method for measurement of BAN2401 based on liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry (LCMS) (Frontage Laboratories, Exon, PA, USA) was used. The LCMS method had a lower limit of quantification of 0.5 μg/mL. Concentrations of BAN2401 in CSF were measured using a validated ELISA with electrochemiluminence detection with a lower limit of quantification of 3 ng/mL.

Target engagement and pharmacodynamics

Plasma concentrations of Aβ(1-40) were measured at the same time points as for the PK assessments. It was not possible to measure reliably plasma Aβ(1-42) due to technical difficulties. Evidence for a dose relationship with plasma biomarkers was evaluated. Aβ(1-42), t-tau, and p-tau concentrations were measured in the CSF collected at baseline and in SAD6 and MAD4 10-14 days after the final dose in each cohort. All statistics were descriptive.

Ethical approval

Ethical approvals were obtained from Copernikus Group IRB, 1 Triangle Drive, #100, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, Veterans Administration Long Beach Health Care, System IRB, MC 09-151, 5901 East 7th Street, Long Beach, CA 90822, and Research Compliance Administration, IUPUI 980 Indiana Avenue, Room 3315 Indianapolis, IN 46202. Informed consent was obtained from all patients participating in the trial.

Results

Subjects

Participant demographics are shown in Table 1. Mean age of the 48 subjects in the SAD cohorts was 70.9 years and mean MMSE score was 23.8. For the 32 subjects in the MAD cohorts, the mean age was 70.0 years and the mean MMSE score was 23.3. Overall, demographic and other baseline characteristics of the groups treated with BAN2401 were similar to those of subjects on placebo. Subject disposition is shown in Fig. 2.
Table 1

Subject demographics percentages are based on the total number of subjects with nonmissing values in relevant treatment group

 

SAD study

MAD study

 

Placebo

BAN2401 (mg/kg)

Placebo

BAN2401 (mg/kg)

 

(N = 12)

0.1 (N = 6)

0.3 (N = 6)

1 (N = 6)

3 (N = 6)

10 (N = 6)

15 (N = 6)

Total (N = 36)

(N = 8)

0.3 (N = 6)

1 (N = 6)

3 (N = 6)

10 (N = 6)

Total (N = 24)

Age: mean year (SD)

72.1 (9.2)

70.0 (12.0)

72.7 (6.5)

75.0 (14.0)

68.2 (8.4)

68.7 (9.1)

70.8 (11.5)

70.9 (10.0)

70.0 (11.70)

69.0 (13.19)

69.0 (6.99)

71.8 (11.48)

70.3 (9.81)

70.0 (9.97)

Female gender, n (%)

5 (41.7)

4 (66.7)

2 (33.3)

2 (33.3)

3 (50.0)

2 (33.3)

5 (83.3)

18 (50.0)

2 (25.0)

2 (33.3)

5 (83.3)

4 (66.7)

2 (33.3)

13 (54.2)

MMSE (mean)

23.5

25.2

24.7

23.5

24.0

24.2

21.5

23.8

24.1

24.0

21.7

23.7

23.8

23.3

MMSE Mini Mental State Examination, SAD single ascending dose, MAD multiple ascending dose

Fig. 2

Patient disposition. SAD single ascending dose, MAD multiple ascending dose

Safety

The numbers of subjects experiencing treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are shown in Tables 2 and 3. There were no trends to suggest an increasing incidence of TEAEs with increasing dose across the SAD cohorts. All of the TEAEs were classified as mild or moderate. The most frequently observed TEAEs with a single dose of BAN2401 were dizziness (8.3 vs. 8.3 % on placebo), fatigue (5.6 vs 8.3 % on placebo), and sinusitis (5.6 vs 0 % on placebo).
Table 2

Adverse events in SAD cohorts. Those TEAEs that occurred in more than one cohort in the SAD study are listed

MedDRA Preferred Term

Placebo

BAN2401 (mg/kg)

(N = 12) (%)

0.1 (N = 6) (%)

0.3 (N = 6) (%)

1 (N = 6) (%)

3 (N = 6) (%)

10 (N = 6) (%)

15 (N = 6) (%)

Total (N = 36) (%)

Subjects with any TEAE

8 (66.7)

6 (100.0)

1 (16.7)

3 (50.0)

3 (50.0)

2 (33.3)

5 (83.3)

20 (55.6)

Dizziness

1 (8.3)

2 (33.3)

0

1 (16.7)

0

0

0

3 (8.3)

Fatigue

1 (8.3)

0

0

0

0

0

2 (33.3)

2 (5.6)

Sinusitis

0

1 (16.7)

0

0

1 (16.7)

0

0

2 (5.6)

Asymptomatic ARIA-H

0

0

1 (16.7)

1 (16.7)

0

0

0

2 (5.6)

For each row category, a subject with 2 or more TEAEs with the same PT in that category was counted only once. A TEAE is defined as an AE which started after first dose and within 90 days of last dose.

AE adverse event, MAD multiple ascending dose, MedDRA Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities, PT preferred term, SAD single ascending dose, TEAE treatment emergent adverse event

Table 3

Adverse events in MAD cohorts. Those TEAEs that occurred in more than one cohort in the MAD study are listed

MedDRA Preferred Term

Placebo

BAN2401 (mg/kg)

(N = 12) (%)

0.3 (N = 6) (%)

1 (N = 6) (%)

3 (N = 6) (%)

10 (N = 6) (%)

Total (N = 36) (%)

Subjects with any TEAE

6 (75.0)

4 (66.7)

3 (50.0)

4 (66.7)

4 (66.7)

15 (62.5)

Upper respiratory tract infection

1 (12.5)

2 (33.3)

0

0

2 (33.3)

4 (16.7)

Headache

2 (25.0)

1 (16.7)

0

1 (16.7)

1 (16.7)

3 (12.5)

Orthostatic hypotension

0

1 (16.7)

0

2 (33.3)

0

3 (12.5)

Nausea

0

0

0

1 (16.7)

1 (16.7)

2 (8.3)

Procedural pain

0

1 (16.7)

0

0

1 (16.7)

2 (8.3)

Sinusitis

0

0

1 (16.7)

1 (16.7)

0

2 (8.3)

Somnolence

0

1 (16.7)

0

0

1 (16.7)

2 (8.3)

Urinary tract infection

0

0

0

1 (16.7)

1 (16.7)

2 (8.3)

Vomiting

0

0

0

0

2 (33.3)

2 (8.3)

For each row category, a subject with 2 or more TEAEs with the same PT in that category was counted only once. A TEAE is defined as an AE which started after first dose and within 90 days of last dose.

AE adverse event, MAD multiple ascending dose, MedDRA Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities, PT preferred term, SAD single ascending dose, TEAE treatment emergent adverse event

One subject on BAN2401 in the 0.3 mg/kg SAD cohort developed new asymptomatic ARIA-H during treatment. The subject had two microhemorrhages at baseline and developed new asymptomatic ARIA-Hs identified on routine MRI on Days 90 and 180. The subject remained clinically stable throughout the study.

One subject on BAN2401 in the 1 mg/kg SAD cohort experienced an asymptomatic ARIA-H, discovered on Day 21 routine MRI scan considered by the investigator to be possibly related to the study drug. This macrohemorrhage was just above the upper size limit of microhemorrhages. The subject remained asymptomatic throughout the study, and the ARIA-H had completely resolved by Day 180. There was one case initially interpreted as vasogenic edema in a subject on active drug in the 3 mg/kg SAD cohort. However, this was not considered study related as it was associated with a brain nodule secondary to metastasis from a primary lung tumor, present prior to the initiation of treatment.

The most frequently observed TEAEs in subjects treated with multiple doses of BAN2401 were upper respiratory tract infection (16.7 vs. 12.5 % on placebo), headache (12.5 vs. 25 % on placebo), and orthostatic hypotension (12.5 vs. 0 % on placebo) (Tables 2 and 3). All of the TEAEs were classified as mild or moderate with no severe TEAEs.

Six subjects in the MAD cohorts, of which one was on placebo, had ARIA-Hs detected by MRI at baseline. In the 1 mg/kg MAD cohort, new asymptomatic ARIA-Hs emerged during the study in the two subjects on placebo and in one subject on active treatment. The subject on BAN2401 (1 mg/kg) had two new ARIA-Hs identified on MRI after three doses. All three of these subjects remained clinically stable throughout the study. No new abnormal neurological or MRI findings associated with these ARIA-Es were observed.

Over the course of the entire study there were no symptomatic ARIA-Es, ARIA-Es or superficial hemosiderosis seen with either single or multiple BAN2401 doses. No subject experienced a TEAE that resulted in discontinuation or death.

The incidence of treatment-emergent, out-of-range values in hematology, clinical chemistry, or urinalysis parameters was comparable between different doses of BAN2401 and placebo throughout the treatment period. The mean values of vital signs in subjects treated with various BAN2401 doses were generally stable and comparable to those on placebo throughout the treatment period.

Pharmacokinetics

SAD cohorts

Mean serum concentration time profiles of BAN2401 for ascending doses are shown in Fig. 3a and findings for the pharmacokinetic parameters are listed in Table 4. The median tmax occurred at approximately 1.8 to 2.2 h from the start of infusion. The mean Cmax and the AUC increased approximately proportionally with BAN2401 dose from 0.3-15 mg/kg. Single BAN2401 doses from 0.3-15 mg/kg showed first order elimination kinetics. Due to limitations in the assay, mean serum half-lives for BAN2401 were only estimated for subjects receiving 10 and 15 mg/kg of BAN2401 and were 165 h (6.9 days) and 174 h (7.3 days), respectively.
Fig. 3

a Pharmacokinetics of BAN2401, with mean serum concentration of BAN2401 in SAD cohorts. b Mean serum concentration of BAN2401 after the last dose in MAD cohorts of 0.3 – 3 mg/kg every 28 days (4 doses), or 10 mg/kg biweekly (7 doses). SAD single ascending dose, MAD multiple ascending dose

Table 4

Pharmacokinetic parameters of BAN2401

Cohort

n

Dose (mg/kg)

Cmax (μg/mL)

AUC(0-24) (μg*h/mL)

AUC(0-inf) (μg*h/mL)

t1/2 (h)

SAD1

6

0.1

NC

NC

NC

NC

SAD2

6

0.3

8.50 (2.4)

NC

NC

NC

SAD3

6

1

24.7 (3.6)

NC

NC

NC

SAD4

6

3

74.2 (11)

1390 (140)

7430 (1210)

NC

SAD5

6

10

264 (32.4)

5010 (550)

38000 (7340)

165 (45.5)

SAD6

6

15

418 (54.5)

7630 (593)

66900 (17600)

174 (36.1)

MAD1

6

0.3

7.26 (1.5)

133 (23)

NA

NC

MAD2

3

1

30.6 (4.6)

470 (110)

NA

NC

MAD3

5

3

68.8 (9)

1220 (132)

NA

NC

MAD4

6

10

307 (70.2)

5720(1230)

NA

127(30)

PK parameters for the MAD cohorts were calculated after the final dose of BAN2401. Values reported are Mean (SD)

AUC area under the curve, NC not calculated due to insufficient data, NA not applicable for dosing with multiple doses.

MAD cohorts

Mean serum concentration time profiles are shown in Fig. 3a and b and findings for other pharmacokinetic parameters are listed in Table 4. Overall, mean Cmax and AUC values for the first dose of BAN2401 in each MAD cohort were consistent with corresponding doses in the SAD cohorts. Mean Cmax and AUC values of the first dose and the final dose increased approximately dose proportionately from 0.3 mg/kg monthly to 10 mg/kg biweekly. The PK profile during the elimination phase was consistent with first-order kinetics. The mean half-life of BAN2401 ranged from approximately 127 h (5.3 days) after the final dose in the 10 mg/kg biweekly MAD cohort, to 174 h (7.3 days) in the 15 mg/kg SAD cohort.

As expected based on the half-life, no accumulation was observed when BAN2401 was administered at 28 day intervals. Biweekly infusions of BAN2401 (10 mg/kg) achieved steady state serum concentrations after the third dose, i.e., after approximately six weeks of treatment. The minimum observed concentration at steady-state (Css, min) achieved with this dosing regimen was approximately 40 μg/mL, with an accumulation factor of approximately 1.4.

CSF: serum ratios

Concurrent concentrations of BAN2401 in serum and CSF are shown in Table 5, together with the CSF:serum ratios at 24 h and Day 10-14 after dosing. Due to sampling error only two subjects in the 15 mg/kg SAD group had CSF concentrations measured on Day 10. One subject had a CSF concentration of 624 ng/mL (CSF: serum ratio 0.81 %) and the other a CSF concentration of 72 ng/mL (CSF:serum ratio 0.07 %). In the three lower dose MAD cohorts in which there was no accumulation, the CSF:serum ratios were 0.04 - 0.08 % at 24 h after the final dose (Table 5). However, in the 10 mg/kg biweekly MAD cohort there was BAN2401 accumulation in serum. In this cohort, the CSF:serum ratio was 0.13 % at 24 h after the final dose, and increased to 0.29 % at 14 days after the final dose.
Table 5

CSF and corresponding serum concentrations and CSF: serum ratios

 

BAN2401 levels 24 h after final dose

BAN2401 levels 10-14 days after final dose

Cohort (dose mg/kg)

CSF (ng/mL)

Serum (μg/mL)

CSF:serum Ratio

CSF (ng/mL)

Serum (μg/mL)

CSF:serum ratio

SAD6 (15)

96.3 (45.1)

265 (63.1)

0.04 % (0.03 %)

72.2, 624a

104 (31.3)

0.07 %, 0.81%a

MAD1 (0.3)

3.47 (2.1)

4.85 (1.3)

0.08 % (0.05 %)

CSF not collected

MAD2 (1)

8.89 (5.31)

17.6 (1.05)

0.04 % (0.03 %)

MAD3 (3)

25.0 (13.3)

44.1 (4.55)

0.06 % (0.04 %)

MAD4 (10)

263 (106)

211 (46.0)

0.13 % (0.03 %)

116 (109)

37.5 (21.8)

0.29 % (0.14 %)

Values are expressed as mean and (SD)

CSF cerebrospinal fluid, SAD single ascending dose, MAD multiple ascending dose

aIndividual values are shown because n = 2

Target engagement and pharmacodynamics

BAN2401 was associated with small dose-dependent increases in plasma Aβ(1-40) in the MAD cohorts within a few hours after the first dose as well as the final dose (Fig. 4, Table 6). Plasma Aβ(1-40) levels declined over time with the fall in serum concentration of BAN2401. However, there were no clear effects of BAN2401 on CSF Aβ(1-42), t-tau, or p-tau (data not presented) compared with placebo in the MAD cohorts.
Fig. 4

Mean concentrations of Aβ(1-40) versus nominal time for SAD cohorts. amyloid β, SAD single ascending dose

Table 6

Plasma pharmacodynamics in MAD cohort

 

Placebo

MAD2

MAD3

MAD4

Plasma Aβ(1-40) mean (SD) concentration (pg/mL)

Maximal % change from baseline

-27.39 (48.98)

15.92 (97.17)

39.71 (17.91)

120.71 (53.21)

24 h post final dose

13.42 (28.09)

16.99a

17.50 (9.14)

86.20 (48.06)

Percentage change from baseline in Aβ (1-40)

amyloid β, MAD multiple ascending dose

aInsufficient “n” to calculate SD

Discussion

Bapineuzumab and other early Aβ immunotherapy programs have encountered safety issues mainly due to ARIA-Es. A beneficial safety profile allowing for efficacious dose levels without undesired side effects is pivotal for success. Safety and tolerability were the primary outcome measures in this first-in-human study with BAN2401 in subjects with mild-to-moderate AD. In this study, BAN2401 was safe and well-tolerated at all doses tested. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached with either single or multiple dosing.

Asymptomatic ARIA-H occurred in 3/60 (5 %) subjects treated with BAN2401, which is a lower incidence than that observed in subjects treated with placebo (2/20, 10 %). The incidence of ARIA in both placebo and BAN2401 treatment groups at base-line was within the expected levels [16]. For the ongoing phase 2b study there were no dosing limitations based on safety, as all doses were safe and tolerable.

Results of the non-compartmentalized PK analyses indicate that BAN2401 is characterized by linear PK, with dose-proportional exposure and first order elimination. The mean serum half-life of BAN2401 was approximately seven days, which was reliably determined when given at doses of 10 mg/kg or higher. This was shorter than predicted from animal PK studies. Consequently, a more frequent biweekly dosing interval was considered important, and an additional MAD cohort with 10 mg/kg biweekly dosing was added. The 10 mg/kg biweekly dose achieved minimum steady state levels of approximately 40 μg/mL after three doses, with an accumulation factor of approximately 1.4. The PK profile has guided us for selecting dose and dose regimens in the ongoing phase 2b study.

BAN2401 penetrated the blood-brain barrier and could be measured in CSF as a surrogate for CNS exposure. Due to the limited numbers of CSF samples, a cautious interpretation of the data is necessary. CSF concentration 24 h after a single dose was 0.04 % of its serum concentration and after monthly multiple doses 0.04 - 0.08 %, but was somewhat higher, 0.13 % at 24 h post dose at steady state after biweekly dosing. Over a 14-day interval at steady state with multiple dosing at 10 mg/kg biweekly, the CSF: serum ratio increased to 0.29 %, which may suggest a longer half-life in CSF vs. plasma.

There were no apparent effects of BAN2401 on CSF t-tau, p-tau or Aβ(1-42). At present there is no validated assay for measuring protofibrils in human CSF. Thus, it was not possible to assess target engagement of BAN2401 in CSF. However, ex vivo immunoprecipitation experiments with BAN2401 demonstrated that the antibody was able to pull-down virtually all Aβ(1-42) from AD brain tissue in the fraction containing mainly soluble Aβ aggregates. This indicates a high level of target engagement in affected brains [17]. There was no clear guidance for an effective dose based on biomarkers. For this reason, several doses and dose regimens are being tested in the ongoing phase 2b study. BAN2401 treatment led to only a slightly increased plasma Aβ(1-40) (Table 6), which was most evident at 10 mg/kg biweekly, and this would be consistent with low affinity of BAN2401 for monomeric Aβ present in human plasma.

Traditionally, SAD and MAD studies involve the completion of each cohort before proceeding to a higher dose. In this study, we used a design allowing the SAD and MAD cohorts to be intercalated and conducted in staggered parallel fashion. Thus, the study duration was significantly shortened. An adequate duration of follow up for the assessment of ARIA and other potential adverse events could still be ensured prior to initiation of higher dose cohorts. In addition, PK results from completed earlier cohorts were used to amend the MAD dose frequency to reflect the shorter than expected half-life and to investigate if the PK profile in CSF might be comparable to that in serum. Use of this innovative study design enabled all cohorts to be completed within 12 months. It demonstrated that in this Phase 1 study BAN2401 was safe and well-tolerated at single doses up to 15 mg/kg and multiple doses up to 10 mg/kg biweekly. On the basis of this study, a Phase 2b efficacy study has been initiated in a combined population of prodromal AD and mild AD dementia.

Conclusions

Several monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of AD have been in development over the last decade. BAN2401 is a monoclonal antibody that selectively binds soluble Aβ protofibrils. The first clinical study described in this paper demonstrates that that BAN2401 was safe and well tolerated in mild to moderate AD. The presence of ARIA was assessed at multiple time points with MRI. The incidence of ARIA on MRI was comparable to that of placebo. BAN2401 exposure was approximately dose proportional, with a serum terminal elimination half-life of approximately seven days. Only a slight increase of plasma Aβ(1-40) was observed but there were no measurable effects of BAN2401 on CSF biomarkers. On the basis of these findings, a Phase 2b efficacy study has been initiated in early AD.

Abbreviations

AD: 

Alzheimer’s disease

ARIA: 

Amyloid related imaging abnormalities

AUC: 

Area under the curve

Aβ: 

Amyloid β

CSF: 

Cerebrospinal fluid

MAD: 

Multiple ascending dose

MRI: 

Magnetic resonance imaging

PET: 

Positron emission tomography

PK: 

Pharmacokinetics

SAD: 

Single ascending dose

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Patients, caregivers, investigators, site personnel and the BAN2401 project teams at Eisai and at BioArctic Neuroscience are thanked for their contributions.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Eisai, Inc.
(2)
BioArctic Neuroscience AB
(3)
Department of Public Health/Geriatrics, Uppsala University

References

  1. Ahmed M, Davis J, Aucoin D, Sato T, Ahuja S, et al. Structural conversion of neurotoxic amyloid-[beta]1-42 oligomers to fibrils. Nature Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17:561–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Doody RS, Thomas RG, Farlow M, Iwatsubo T, Vellas B, Joffe S, Kieburtz K, Raman R, Sun X, Aisen PS, Siemers E, Liu-Seifert H, Mohs R. Phase 3 trials of solanezumab for mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s Disease. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:311–21.Google Scholar
  3. Englund H, Sehlin D, Johansson AS, Nilsson LN, Gellerfors P, Paulie S, Lannfelt L, Pettersson FE. Sensitive ELISA detection of amyloid-beta protofibrils in biological samples. J Neurochem. 2007;103:334–45.Google Scholar
  4. Jicha GA. Is passive immunization for Alzheimer’s disease ‘alive and well’ or ‘dead and buried’? Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2009;9:481–91.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Lacor PN, Buniel MC, Chang L, Fernandez SJ, Gong Y, Viola KL, Lambert MP, Velasco PT, Bigio EH, Finch CE, Krafft GA, Klein WL. Synaptic targeting by Alzheimer’s-related amyloid oligomers. J Neuroscience. 2004;24:10191–200.Google Scholar
  6. Lord A, Gumucio A, Englund H, Sehlin D, Sundquist VS, Söderberg L, Möller C, Gellerfors P, Lannfelt L, Pettersson FE, Nilsson LN. An amyloid-beta protofibril-selective antibody prevents amyloid formation in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2009;36:425–34.Google Scholar
  7. Lublin AL, Gandy S. Amyloid-β oligomers: possible roles as key neurotoxins in Alzheimer’s disease. Mt Sinai J Med. 2010;77:43–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Mastrangelo IA, Ahmed M, Sato T, Liu W, Wang C, Hough P, Smith SO. High-resolution atomic force microscopy of soluble Abeta42 oligomers. J Mol Biol. 2006;358:106–19.Google Scholar
  9. Nilsberth C, Westlind-Danielsson A, Eckman CB, Condron MM, Axelman K, Forsell C, Luthman J, Teplow DB, Younkin, SG, Näslund J, Lannfelt L. The ‘Arctic’ APP mutation (E693G) causes Alzheimer’s disease by enhanced Abeta protofibril formation. Nat Neurosci. 2001;4:887–93.Google Scholar
  10. O’Nuallain B, Freir DB, Nicoll AJ, Risse E, Ferguson N, Herron CE, Collinge J, Walsh DM. Amyloid β-protein dimers rapidly form stable synaptotoxic protofibrils. J Neurosci. 2010;30:14411–9.Google Scholar
  11. Paravastua AK, Leapmanb RD, Yaua WM, Tycko R. Molecular structural basis for polymorphism in Alzheimer’s amyloid fibrils. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105:18349–54.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Salloway S, Sperling R, Fox NC, Blennow K, Klunk W, Raskind M, Sabbagh M, Honig LS, Porsteinsson AP, Ferris S, Reichert M, Ketter N, Nejadnik B, Guenzler V, Miloslavsky M, Wang D, Lu Y, Lull J, Tudor IC, Liu E, Grundman M, Yuen E, Black R, Brashear HR. Two phase 3 trials of bapineuzumab in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer’s Disease. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:322–33.Google Scholar
  13. Schöll M, Wall A, Thordardottir S, Ferreira D, Bogdanovic N, Långström B, Almkvist O, Graff C, Nordberg A. Low PiB PET retention in presence of pathologic CSF biomarkers in Arctic APP mutation carriers. Neurology. 2012;79:229–36.Google Scholar
  14. Sehlin D, Englund H, Simu B, Karlsson M, Ingelsson M, Nikolajeff F, Lannfelt L, Ekholm Pettersson F. Large aggregates are the major soluble Aβ species in AD brain fractionated with density gradient ultracentrifugation. PLoS One. 2012;7:e32014.Google Scholar
  15. Sehlin D, Hedlund M, Lord A, Englund H, Gellerfors P, Paulie S, Lannfelt L, Pettersson FE. Heavy-chain complementarity-determining regions determine conformation selectivity of anti-Aβ antibodies. Neurodegener Dis. 2011;8:117–23.Google Scholar
  16. Sperling RA, Jack CR, Black SE, Frosch MP, Greenberg SM, Hyman BT, Scheltens P, Carrillo MC, Thies W, Bednar MM, Black RS, Brashear HR, Grundman M, Siemers ER, Feldman HH, Schindler RJ. Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities in amyloid-modifying therapeutic trials: recommendations from the Alzheimer’s Association Research Roundtable Workgroup. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7:367–85.Google Scholar
  17. Tucker S, Möller C, Tegerstedt K, Lord A, Laudon H, Sjödahl J, Söderberg L, Spens E, Sahlin C, Waara ER, Satlin A, Gellerfors P, Osswald G, Lannfelt L. The murine version of BAN2401 (mAb158) selectively reduces amyloid-β protofibrils in brain and cerebrospinal fluid of tg-ArcSwe mice. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;43:575–88.Google Scholar
  18. Viswanathan A, Chabriat H. Cerebral microhemorrhage. Stroke. 2006;37:550–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Walsh DM, Hartley DM, Kusumoto Y, Fezoui Y, Condron MM, Lomakin A, Benedek GB, Selkoe DJ, Teplow DB. Amyloid beta-protein fibrillogenesis. Structure and biological activity of protofibrillar intermediates. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:25945–52.Google Scholar
  20. Walsh DM, Lomakin A, Benedek GB, Condron MM, Teplow DB. Amyloid β-protein fibrillogenesis. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:22364–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Walsh DM, Selkoe DJ. Deciphering the molecular basis of memory failure in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuron. 2004;44:181–93.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Yu X, Zheng J. Polymorphic structures of Alzheimer’s β-amyloid globulomers. PLoS One. 2011;6:e20575.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Logovinsky et al. 2016

Advertisement