Skip to main content
Download PDF

Molecular insights into sex-specific metabolic alterations in Alzheimer’s mouse brain using multi-omics approach

Alzheimer's Research & Therapy volume 15, Article number: 8 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that is characterized by altered cellular metabolism in the brain. Several of these alterations have been found to be exacerbated in females, known to be disproportionately affected by AD. We aimed to unravel metabolic alterations in AD at the metabolic pathway level and evaluate whether they are sex-specific through integrative metabolomic, lipidomic, and proteomic analysis of mouse brain tissue.

Methods

We analyzed male and female triple-transgenic mouse whole brain tissue by untargeted mass spectrometry-based methods to obtain a molecular signature consisting of polar metabolite, complex lipid, and protein data. These data were analyzed using multi-omics factor analysis. Pathway-level alterations were identified through joint pathway enrichment analysis or by separately evaluating lipid ontology and known proteins related to lipid metabolism.

Results

Our analysis revealed significant AD-associated and in part sex-specific alterations across the molecular signature. Sex-dependent alterations were identified in GABA synthesis, arginine biosynthesis, and in alanine, aspartate, and glutamate metabolism. AD-associated alterations involving lipids were also found in the fatty acid elongation pathway and lysophospholipid metabolism, with a significant sex-specific effect for the latter.

Conclusions

Through multi-omics analysis, we report AD-associated and sex-specific metabolic alterations in the AD brain involving lysophospholipid and amino acid metabolism. These findings contribute to the characterization of the AD phenotype at the molecular level while considering the effect of sex, an overlooked yet determinant metabolic variable.

Background

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) affects millions of lives as patients lose their cognitive functions and ability to live on their own [1, 2]. Despite many efforts, AD is still poorly understood, as evidenced by many failed clinical trials and the continued lack of treatments proven to stop neuronal death, although new treatments are currently being investigated [1, 3,4,5]. In addition, nearly twice as many women develop AD compared to men, but the reasons behind this sex bias remain unclear [1, 6]. External factors such as socioeconomic differences or the increased lifespan of women may play a role, but physiological differences have also been identified [1, 6,7,8,9,10]. Therefore, further insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying AD in men and women are clearly needed.

Omics-scale approaches provide a way to comprehensively explore molecular changes across multiple pathways, leading to a better understanding of the mechanisms that underlie complex diseases [11]. Applied to AD, omics studies have identified many alterations in metabolic pathways, particularly related to energy, lipid, and amino acid metabolism [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. Interestingly, some of these changes were found to be exacerbated in females; notably, alterations in amino acid metabolism, the TCA cycle, and fatty acid metabolism were more pronounced in women [31,32,33]. In addition, mouse models of AD showed decreased mitochondrial respiration and earlier glucose hypometabolism in female brain tissue compared to males [33, 35, 36]. Sex differences in the regulation of metabolic processes might be at the origin of AD onset, and therefore need to be better characterized and explored.

The characterization and understanding of metabolic alterations underlying complex diseases such as AD can be improved through multi-omics approaches combining different layers of omics data [11, 37]. Since metabolites incorporate environmental input and represent the closest molecular link to the phenotype, metabolomics and lipidomics data complement other layers of omics data to enhance the functional understanding of a biological system in a physiologically healthy and diseased state [17,18,19, 38, 39]. The addition of other omics data layers is particularly important as genome-wide association studies alone have failed to explain the observed variability in AD [16, 40]. Multi-omics approaches have demonstrated that the combined effects of multiple molecular players (genes, proteins, metabolites) contribute to altered cellular and metabolic processes linked to AD pathology [17, 18, 39]. Therefore, the integration of multiple data layers to find colocalized and consistent changes in metabolic pathways can better explain the mechanisms underlying AD.

In an effort to generate multiple omics data layers from one sample and to integrate these data layers, classic approaches for sample preparation and data analysis need to be upgraded. A truly integrative approach would merge all layers of data for analysis, and therefore novel statistical approaches are often needed [37, 38, 41, 42]. Furthermore, inherent variability between omics data sets acquired on independent samples should be avoided, therefore methods that allow for the extraction and analysis of multiple small- and macro-molecule components of metabolism, from the same sample, should become a common practice [37]. An improved and integrative multi-omics workflow will allow for a better understanding of metabolic dysfunction at the level of the biochemical pathways that underlie the onset and progression of complex diseases.

We aimed to optimize a multi-omics approach relying on metabolomics (including lipidomics) and proteomics to identify potentially sex-biased metabolic pathways in the AD brain. To this end, we analyzed brain tissue lysate from the triple-transgenic AD (3xTg-AD) mouse (APP KM670/671NL, PSEN1 M146V, and MAPT P301L mutations). This is a well-established model that exhibits most key pathologies, including the hallmark characteristics of amyloid-beta plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles with aging, after the age of 12 months [43, 44]. Prior to these visible markers of cerebral AD pathology, the electrophysiological, morphological, and behavioral alterations were also identified at the age of 7–10 months in 3xTg-AD mice [45, 46]. Accordingly, for the present study, we chose to carry out experiments in mice aged 8 months which we hypothesized was likely to present alterations in the metabolic profile prior to appearance of established markers of AD pathology. To gain a comprehensive overview of metabolism, we first optimized a protocol to obtain high-coverage profiles of polar metabolites, lipids, and proteins from the same sample. We integrated the data obtained in an unsupervised model where we observed a clear sex bias within the disease. Integrative pathway analyses and lipid ontology analyses were performed to identify the metabolic pathways showing the strongest sex-biased alterations in AD. Our approach has led to the further characterization of sex differences in AD and can pave the way for future research into the molecular mechanisms underlying these sex biases.

Methods

Chemicals

Analytical grade acetonitrile, ammonium formate, formic acid, isopropanol, methanol, and water were purchased from Biosolve Chimie (FR), while ammonium acetate and acetic acid were purchased from Merck (USA).

Samples

All experimental procedures were approved by the Veterinary Affairs Office of the Canton of Vaud, Switzerland, and were conducted as described previously by Van der Velpen et al. (2021) [47]. In short, male and female 3xTg-AD and WT mice were sacrificed at 8 months of age by decapitation without prior anesthesia in order to avoid alterations to the metabolic profile [47]. Whole brain was collected and immediately frozen on dry ice and stored at −80°C until the day of the analysis. Analyzed tissue samples consisted of five males and seven females per genotype. Whole brain tissue samples were mechanically homogenized under liquid nitrogen and aliquots were pre-weighed (~50 mg) in lysis tubes (Soft Tissue CK 14 Tubes, Bertin Technologies, USA).

Sample preparation: polar metabolites, lipids, and proteins from brain tissue

Polar and lipid metabolite extraction

Pre-weighed homogenized brain tissue (~50 mg) was first extracted by the addition of 750 μl of methanol:water (4:1, v/v) solution with ceramic beads in the Cryolys Precellys 24 Sample Homogenizer (2 × 20s at 10,000 rpm and <10°C, Bertin Technologies, USA). Homogenized lysates were centrifuged for 15 min at 21,000 g and 4°C. 80 μl of the supernatant (polar metabolite extract) was collected for polar metabolite analysis. The remaining supernatant was collected and reserved. The residual pellet was re-extracted by the addition of 750 μl of 1-butanol:methanol (1:1, v/v), followed by homogenization and centrifugation as described above. The supernatant (lipid extract) was pooled with the reserved polar metabolite extract, evaporated to dryness under vacuum (Refrigerated CentriVap Concentrator coupled to CentriVap Cold Trap, Labconco, USA), and reconstituted in 350 μl of 1-butanol:methanol (1:1, v/v). The residual pellet was dried and stored on dry ice prior to protein extraction. Reconstituted extracts were vortexed for 30s, sonicated for 60s, and centrifuged for 15 min at 21,000 g and 4°C. Quality controls (QCs) were prepared by pooling 10 μl from each sample. A QC dilution series at 100, 50, 25, 12.5, and 6.25% was prepared for both polar and lipid metabolite analysis.

Protein preparation

Protein material after solvent extraction was resuspended in lysis buffer (1% Sodium deoxycholate, 30mM Tris pH 8.6, 10 mM DTT ) and re-homogenized in a FastPrep system. Aliquots of samples (100 μg at 2 μg/μl) were Cys-reduced/alkylated and digested following a modified version of the iST method [48], desalted on a Waters Oasis MCX plate, and dried. For peptide MS2 library construction, samples were mixed to create a pool, which was manually separated into 7 fractions by off-line basic reversed-phase (bRP) using the Pierce High pH Reversed-Phase Peptide Fractionation Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

LC-HRMS

Polar and lipid metabolite analysis

Polar and lipid metabolite extracts were analyzed by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography (1290 UHPLC System, Agilent Technologies) coupled to a quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer (6550 iFunnel Q-TOF LC/MS, Agilent Technologies) with an electrospray ionization source (Dual Agilent Jet Stream Electrospray Ionization) controlled by Agilent MassHunter Workstation Data Acquisition Software. ESI source conditions can be found in the supporting information.

Lipid analysis was carried out, in both positive and negative ionization modes, using a Zorbax Eclipse Plus C18 column (1.8 μm, 2.1 × 100 mm, Agilent Technologies) as described by Carrard and Gallart-Ayala et al. (2021) [49]. Briefly, mobile phases A and B consisted of 10 mM ammonium acetate and 0.1% acetic acid in acetonitrile:water (3:2, v/v) and isopropanol:acetonitrile:water (44:5:1, v/v) respectively. Flow rate was 0.6 ml/min, injection volume 2 μl, and column temperature 60°C. Separation of polar metabolites was carried out as described by Gallart-Ayala et al. (2018) [50]. Briefly, separation was performed for positive ionization mode using an Acquity UPLC BEH amide column (1.7 μm, 2.1 × 100 mm, Waters, IE). Mobile phase A consisted of 20 mM ammonium formate and 0.1% formic acid in water and mobile phase B consisted of 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile. Flow rate was 0.4 ml/min, injection volume 2 μl, and column temperature 25°C. For negative ionization mode, separation was performed on a SeQuant ZIC-pHILIC column (5 μm, 2.1 × 100 mm, Merck, DE) preceded by a guard column (SeQuant ZIC-pHILIC Guard Kit, 2.1 × 20 mm, PEEK coated guard column, Merck, DE). Mobile phase A consisted of 20 mM ammonium hydroxide and 20 mM ammonium acetate in water and mobile phase B consisted of pure acetonitrile. Flow rate was 0.3 ml/min, injection volume 2 μl, and column temperature 30°C.

Full details on MS acquisition can be found in the supporting information. Briefly, sample data were acquired in full scan acquisition mode in the range of 50–1700 m/z at a rate of 2 spectra/s. QCs at the beginning of the analytical run were acquired by tandem mass spectrometry through iterative data-dependent acquisition over five iterations with rolling exclusion, in the range of 30–1700 m/z at a rate of 3 spectra/s with a narrow isolation width (~1.3 amu). Different collision energy conditions were tested on tissue extracts to determine the optimal conditions for the highest coverage (Figure S1). As a result, we concluded that the combined 25–40 eV for lipidomics analysis in both positive and negative mode, 10–25 eV for metabolomics analysis in positive ionization mode, and 10 eV for metabolomics analysis in negative ionization mode provided the best coverage.

QCs and QC dilution series were analyzed at the beginning and end of analytical runs. QCs were further injected regularly between every ten samples throughout the overall analytical run.

Protein analysis

To profile brain proteomes we applied a Data-Independent Acquisition (DIA) strategy. LC-MS/MS analysis was carried out on a TIMS-TOF Pro (Bruker, Bremen, Germany) mass spectrometer interfaced through a nanospray ion source to an Ultimate 3000 RSLCnano HPLC system (Dionex). Peptides were separated on a reversed-phase (custom packed) 40 cm C18 column (75 μm ID, 100Å, Reprosil Pur 1.9 μm particles, Dr. Maisch, Germany) at a flow rate of 0.250 μl/min with a linear 6–45% acetonitrile gradient in 107 min. Identical LC gradients were used for data-dependent and data-independent acquisition (DDA resp. DIA using PASEF) measurements using standard MS methods as published [51]. Detailed description of the instrument and data processing parameters can be found in the supporting information.

Data processing

Metabolomics and lipidomics data were converted to ABF file format and uploaded to MS-DIAL software (ver. 4.48) for peak detection, chromatogram alignment, and peak annotation [52, 53]. Polar and lipid metabolites were annotated based on accurate mass and MS/MS spectral matching using, respectively, the Fiehn HILIC and LipidBlast mass spectral libraries [54, 55]. Polar metabolites were further annotated based on accurate mass and MS/MS spectral matching using METLIN Cloud spectral library (https://metlincloud2.massconsortium.com/) [56, 57]. The peak area for each annotated metabolite was taken for statistical analyses.

Metabolomics and lipidomics data were normalized to sample tissue weight (Table S6 and S7). The systematic bias in peak area over time (signal intensity drift) inherently present in LC-MS data was corrected using an adaptive cubic smoothing spline algorithm (LOWESS) on pooled QC samples injected regularly between samples over the course of the run [58]. Positive linearity across the QC dilution series was visually inspected and metabolites (including lipids) with a coefficient of variation > 30% across QCs and/or r2 < 0.65 were discarded. Metabolomics and lipidomics data were log10 transformed prior to analysis.

For protein identification and quantitation by DIA, Bruker MS data were processed with Spectronaut 14.10 (Biognosys, Schlieren, Switzerland). A library was constructed from the DDA data for the bRP fractions by searching the reference mouse proteome (RefProt, www.UNIPROT.org) (55485 sequences). The library contained 7951 protein groups. Peptide-centric analysis of DIA data with Spectronaut used the library described above and standard parameters, leading to the identification and quantitation of 6742 protein groups. Exported protein group intensities normalized by Spectronaut were further analyzed with Perseus [59]. Only protein groups quantitated by on average 3 precursors were kept (5115 proteins — see Table S8). Intensities were log2-transformed and Welch t-tests were computed to compare all conditions.

Statistical analysis

The significant effects of genotype, sex, and their interaction (sex:genotype) on polar metabolites, lipids, and proteins were tested using an ANOVA with a non-sequential sum of square (type III) to deal with the unbalanced design between males and females. Polar metabolites and lipids were log10 transformed to normalize their error distribution. P-values for the effects of sex, genotype, and sex:genotype were adjusted for multiple testing using the Benjamini & Hochberg procedure to control for false discovery rate (FDR).

Multi-omics analysis was performed using Multi-Omics Factor Analysis (MOFA2 version 1.2.0) [60]. Polar metabolites, lipids, and proteins datasets were further transformed independently using EigenMS [61] to improve dataset normalization and reduce the undesired source of variation as suggested by MOFA authors. MOFA model training was started with 8 factors, 0.005 variance explained threshold for factor drop and “slow” convergence mode of the ELBO. Other options were set as default.

Pathway and enrichment analyses

Integrative analysis of proteins and polar metabolites was performed using the online MetaboAnalyst software (ver. 4.0 and 5.0) [62]. Proteins and polar metabolites with a significant raw p-value for interaction effect were uploaded for Joint Pathway Analysis. The following analysis parameters were chosen: hypergeometric test for enrichment analysis, degree centrality for topology measure, and combining p-values weighted at the pathway level for integration.

Lipid ontology analysis was performed using the online LION/web Lipid Ontology Enrichment software [63]. Lipid species and their corrected p-value for genotype effect were uploaded for ranked analysis.

Protein enrichment in KEGG was first performed by mapping uniprot ID to keggid and keggid to KEGG pathways using the KEGGREST R package (v1.32.0). KEGG pathways enrichment was then performed using a rank sum test or a hypergeometric test. Background universe for enrichment analysis contained all proteins that were quantified. Individual proteins involved in lysophospholipid metabolism were found by matching identifiers with UniProt results for the keywords “phospholipase A1,” “phospholipase A2,” “lysophospholipid acyltransferase,” and “lysophospholipase” [64]. Matches were manually curated based on function.

Data visualization

Graphs were made in Python. Boxplots were generated from fold-change values where the abundance of a given compound in a sample was normalized to the median male WT value for the said compound. This was done to have consistent axes but does not change the distribution. Given the broad range of compound abundances, data was standardized prior representation: first, standard scores were calculated for each compound in a sample using the sample mean and standard deviation (x-μ)/σ. Then the median score for a given group (male or female, WT or 3xTg-AD) was used to generate heatmaps.

Results

From simultaneous extraction of polar metabolites, lipids, and proteins to multi-omics analysis

With the goal of integrating metabolomics, lipidomics, and proteomics data, we aimed to reduce variability between these datasets as much as possible. Therefore, as opposed to using independent samples to extract each data layer, we developed a sequential extraction protocol to extract polar metabolites, complex lipids, and proteins from the same sample while relying on single-phase extraction methods. The first step consisted of the extraction of polar metabolites using a methanol:water (4:1 v/v) solution (Fig. 1). An aliquot of this extract was analyzed by hydrophilic interaction chromatography coupled to high-resolution mass spectrometry (HILIC-HRMS) for the measurement of polar and moderately polar metabolites. Complex lipids were recovered from the remaining pellet by a subsequent extraction with 1-butanol:methanol (1:1 v/v, BuMe) (Fig. 1) [65, 66]. For maximized coverage of amphipathic and non-polar lipids, methanolic and BuMe extracts were pooled, pre-concentrated, and analyzed using reversed phase liquid chromatography (RPLC) coupled to HRMS. Finally, the precipitated protein pellet was used for proteomics analysis with nanoLC-HRMS (Fig. 1). The content of each acquired data layer (e.g., polar metabolome, lipidome, and proteome), was characterized by matching against either experimentally acquired or in silico created spectral libraries of tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) data (see Materials and Methods for detailed description). As a result, we identified a comprehensive panel of metabolites and proteins, consisting of 119 polar metabolites, 600 unique lipid species, and 5115 reliably quantified proteins, which constitute a molecular signature of mouse brain tissue (Table S1–S3).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Extraction pipeline to obtain multiple data layers from the same sample. A sequential extraction method followed by an untargeted mass spectrometry approach was used to obtain multiple data layers from the same samples of whole brain homogenate (50 mg) from male and female WT and 3xTg-AD mice. A first extraction (pink arrows) was performed with methanol:water (4:1, v/v), and an aliquot of the resulting supernatant was analyzed for polar metabolites. The same sample was extracted a second time with BuMe (butanol:methanol 1:1, v/v, yellow arrows), and the pool from both organic solvent extractions was evaporated, reconstituted and analyzed for complex lipids. Proteins from the remaining pellet were extracted and digested by a modified iST method (1% Na+DCA, 30mM Tris 10 mM DTT), then analyzed (green arrows). Omics data were acquired using LC-ESI-HRMS. Using MS/MS spectral matching, 119 polar metabolites, 600 unique lipid species, and 5115 proteins were annotated with high confidence. WT: wild-type; 3xTg-AD: triple transgenic Alzheimer’s disease model; LC: liquid chromatography; ESI: electrospray ionization; HRMS: high resolution mass spectrometry; MS/MS: tandem mass spectrometry

Full size image

This multi-layered molecular signature was explored using Multi-Omics Factor Analysis (MOFA) to identify the dimensions (i.e., factors) that capture the joint or specific source of variation within the analyzed omics set of 3xTg-AD and wild-type (WT) animals [60]. In parallel, we calculated the significant effect of genotype, sexes, and sex:genotype interaction for each molecular species (Table S1–S3). As illustrated in Fig. 2A, the metabolic profiles of the polar metabolome, lipidome, and proteome showed a strong sample clustering by genotype and sex. In particular, Factor 1 captured the difference between 3xTg-AD and WT genotype, with a small sex bias within the 3xTg-AD group (Fig. 2A). This factor explained the largest part of the variance among all datasets (Fig. 2B). Accordingly, we observed that Factor 1 top contributors have a significant effect of genotypes (Figure S2 Factor 1). Factor 2 identified molecular features with weak differences between male and female under WT condition but that strongly diverge under 3xTg-AD. Top contributors to Factor 2 displayed a large genotype effect carried by the WT female response (set as the reference) with a strong sex:genotype interaction that reduces or inverts this response in males, nicely highlighted by lipidomics data (Figure S2 Factor 2). Although variance in proteomics data could be explained by Factor 2, this response was surprisingly absent in the annotated mouse metabolome (Fig. 2) which suggests that this response is either lipid-specific or beyond the coverage of our methods. Factor 3 captured a smaller part of variance that is opposed to Factor 2. A strong sex difference is observed in WT mice, but this difference disappeared under 3xTg-AD. However, because of the smaller effect sizes within this factor, most of these data do not pass the significant FDR threshold of our linear model (Figure S2 Factor 3). Finally, Factor 4 revealed some unknown small source(s) of variation within our dataset.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Multi-omics factor analysis. A Samples plotted according to factor values from MOFA. Male and female animals are represented by the colors blue and orange, respectively. WT and 3xTg-AD animals are represented by circles and crosses, respectively. B Percent of variance explained by each omics data layer per MOFA factor. MOFA, multi-omics factor analysis; M, male; F, female; WT, wild-type; 3xTg-AD, triple transgenic Alzheimer’s disease model

Full size image

Integrative enrichment analysis reveals sex-biased amino acid metabolism in the triple-transgenic AD mouse brain

Following MOFA analysis, the revealed significant alterations from the top Factors were mapped onto biochemically relevant pathways using integrative enrichment analysis. Within amino acid metabolism, both the alanine, aspartate, and glutamate pathway and the arginine biosynthesis pathway were found to be significantly affected in the AD mouse model in a sex-dependent fashion (Table S4). The alanine, aspartate, and glutamate pathway exhibited two areas of coordinated sex-biased changes upon AD (Fig. 3). Metabolites implicated in the conversion of N-acetyl-aspartyl-glutamate (NAAG) to aspartate (i.e., N-acetyl-aspartyl-glutamate, N-acetyl-aspartate, and aspartate) showed consistently lower levels in male 3xTg-AD compared to WT, while this decrease was not seen in females (Fig. 3) (interaction effect, pN-acetyl-aspartyl-glutamate = 0.019, pN-acetyl-aspartate = 0.008, pAspartate = 0.007). Accordingly, the expression of the Folh1 enzyme which initiates this conversion was also downregulated in males (interaction effect pFolh1 = 0.021). Changes were also observed in the part of the pathway associated with the synthesis of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA). The enzymes Abat and Gad1, responsible for its synthesis, were downregulated in 3xTg-AD females but not in males (Fig. 3) (interaction effect, pAbat = 0.006, pGad1 = 0.004). However, total GABA levels were not significantly changed in any of the populations (Table S2). On the other hand, the intermediate metabolite N-acetyl-GABA, derived from putrescine through a different pathway, was significantly increased in the 3xTg-AD animals compared to WT (genotype effect pN-acetyl-GABA = 0.005) (Fig. 3). Finally, although other individual enzymes of the alanine, aspartate, and glutamate metabolic pathway also showed genotype- and sex-biased expression, the metabolite data is not sufficient to explain their downstream effects (Fig. 3, Figure S3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Interaction effects in the Alanine, Aspartate, and Glutamate metabolic pathway. Selected measured metabolites (beige background) and proteins (gray background, bold title) from the alanine, aspartate, and glutamate metabolic pathway are represented by boxplots. Each line of the boxplot is a quartile of the compound abundancy per sample group (relative to the median value of male WT). Boxes are colored blue or orange with triangular or circular points for males and females, respectively. Asterisks above plots denote significant p-values for a sex:genotype interaction effect, less than 0.05 (*) or less than 0.01 (**). M, male; F, female; WT, wild-type; 3xTg-AD, triple transgenic Alzheimer’s disease model

Full size image

The second significantly enriched pathway was arginine biosynthesis (Fig. 4). Here, however, we observed fewer coordinated hubs of sex-biased alterations. Nonetheless, it is interesting to note an increase in arginine levels in 3xTg-AD females compared to WT, but not in males (interaction effect pArginine = 0.006). Similarly, the expression of neighboring enzyme Nos1 was lower in 3xTg-AD females compared to WT (pNos1 = 0.031). We also observed genotype differences in this pathway (Table S1–S3), notably, decreased levels of Glul (genotype effect pGlul = 0.036), essential for the elimination of ammonia as glutamine in the healthy brain, in 3xTg-AD mice.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Interaction effects in the Arginine biosynthesis pathway. Measured metabolites (beige background) and proteins (gray background, bold title) from the arginine biosynthesis pathway are represented by boxplots. Each line of the boxplot is a quartile of the compound abundancy per sample group (relative to the median value of male WT). Boxes are colored blue or orange with triangular or circular points for males and females, respectively. Asterisks above plots denote significant p-values for a sex:genotype interaction effect, less than 0.05 (*) or less than 0.01 (**). M, male; F, female; WT, wild-type; 3xTg-AD, triple transgenic Alzheimer’s disease model

Full size image

Lipid ontology enrichment analysis reveals altered fatty acid and lysophospholipid metabolism in the triple-transgenic AD mouse brain

To elucidate alterations (and potentially sex biases) in lipid metabolism, we performed lipid ontology analysis on molecular species exhibiting a genotype effect. According to enrichment analysis, long-chain free fatty acids (FFAs) and lysophospholipids (LPLs) were significantly affected in association with the AD phenotype (Figs. 5 and 6, Table S5). In addition, analysis of proteins involved in lipid metabolic pathways also supported the observed changes at the metabolite level (Fig. 5, Figure S4). While not all individual FFA species reached significance, both total long-chain free fatty acids and the enzymes involved in early fatty acid elongation were depleted in transgenic animals (Fig. 5) (genotype effect pTotal FFA = 0.009, pHadhb = 0.005, pHadh = 0.068 (ns), pHadha = 0.024, pEchs1 = 2.0E−5, pMecr = 0.001, pPpt1 = 4.2E−11). One long-chain fatty acid transporter was also significantly decreased in transgenic animals (genotype effect pSlc27a1 = 2.2E−7) (Figure S4).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Genotype effects in long-chain free fatty acids. A Heatmap of median standard scores of long-chain free fatty acid species abundance in each sample group. B Schema of free fatty acid elongation in the mitochondria. Proteins are represented by boxplots where each line of the boxplot is a quartile of the compound abundancy per sample group (relative to the median value of male WT). Boxes are colored blue or orange with triangular or circular points for males and females, respectively. Asterisks above plots denote significant p-values for a genotype effect, less than 0.05 (*), less than 0.01 (**), or less than 0.001 (***). FA, free fatty acid; M, male; F, female; WT, wild-type; 3xTg-AD, triple transgenic Alzheimer’s disease model

Full size image
Fig. 6
figure 6

Sex-specific genotype-related differences in lysophospholipids. Heatmap of median standard scores of lysophospholipid species abundance in each sample group. Asterisks next to the plot denote significant p-values for a genotype effect, less than 0.05 (*), less than 0.01 (**), or less than 0.001 (***). LPC, lysophosphatidylcholine; O, ether linkage; P plasmalogen linkage; LPE, lysophosphatidylethanolamine; LPG, lysophosphatidylglycerol; LPI, lysophosphatidylinositol; LPS lysophosphatidylserine; M, male; F, female; WT, wild-type; 3xTg-AD, triple transgenic Alzheimer’s disease model

Full size image

Lysophospholipids were also enriched based on a genotype effect, however, closer observation revealed that a decrease in transgenic animals was driven by females only (Fig. 6). LPLs and in particular lysophatidylcholines followed a consistent trend of decreased levels in female 3xTg-AD only (Fig. 6). Total lysophospholipids in female 3xTg-AD were significantly lower compared to the other groups (pTotal LPL = 0.019). We further explored the proteins involved in LPL metabolism and found two specific enzymes, Lclat1 and Enpp2, that also exhibited a significant genotype effect driven by females (Figure S4) (genotype effect pLclat1 = 0.021, pEnpp2 = 0.049).

Discussion

To characterize the metabolic changes underlying AD and sex biases therein, we applied an untargeted discovery approach for broad coverage of the polar metabolome, lipidome, and proteome without a priori hypotheses. By using multiple layers of data that complement each other, data-driven hypotheses generated from one omics type can be cross-validated by another and we can obtain additional determinant insights into altered metabolism [37, 38]. To facilitate data integration and limit variability between these datasets, we developed a sequential extraction protocol to recover all omics data layers from the same sample, as opposed to using independent samples (Fig. 1). While biphasic methods exist to simultaneously extract both polar and lipid metabolites, single-phase methods tailored to each are more reproducible and effective [65,66,67,68,69]. This is particularly true for amphipathic lipids which can be lost through biphasic extractions as they diffuse and partition between both phases. Therefore, we performed two consecutive single-phase extractions with methanol:water (4:1, v/v) and 1-butanol:methanol (1:1, v/v) and pooled both extracts for lipid analysis (Fig. 1). Since proteins are essentially insoluble in pure organic solvents, the precipitated protein pellet can be lysed and reconstituted for proteomics analysis, allowing for extraction of a wide range of proteins from the same sample (Fig. 1). A combined acquisition using high-resolution MS1 and MS2 (MS/MS) data allowed for metabolite annotation with a high level of confidence. While the quality and quantity of the acquired MS/MS data is limited by the instrument sensitivity and scanning speed (in addition to available spectral libraries), the acquisition of multiple data layers compensates to a certain extent for this type of inherent bias, since protein data allow to bridge the gaps in the segments of the pathways where metabolite information is lacking, or vice versa [70]. Using an integrative multivariate analysis approach (i.e., MOFA), the acquired comprehensive metabolite and protein signatures of brain tissue revealed both AD-associated alterations and disease-related sex differences in brain metabolism. The identification of sex differences at the molecular level is essential to understand the molecular mechanisms behind sex biases observed in AD prevalence and symptoms [9, 71,72,73,74,75,76]. To gain understanding on the biochemical and physiological relevance of revealed metabolic alterations, the data were further explored in the context of metabolic pathways and lipid ontology, thereby highlighting AD-related sex biases in amino acid and lysophospholipid metabolism and deregulated free fatty acid elongation in the AD brain (Figs. 3, 4, and 5).

Alterations in amino acid metabolism in AD are sex-dependent

Within alanine, aspartate, and glutamate metabolism, we found two coordinated hubs of sex-biased alterations in AD (Fig. 3). The alanine, aspartate, and glutamate pathway is connected to various cellular processes including energy metabolism and the biosynthesis of neurotransmitters. Sex biases within this pathway can therefore influence multiple aspects of cell behavior and health, and by extension AD pathology. Multiple alterations in alanine, aspartate, and glutamate metabolism in AD have been previously reported [29, 32, 77,78,79] and correlated to key AD pathologies [29]. As discussed in further detail below, some of these changes can be directly linked to cognitive function.

At the entrance to the alanine, aspartate, and glutamate pathway lies NAAG, which is transformed into N-acetyl-aspartate (NAA) and finally aspartate (Fig. 3). NAAG is a neurotransmitter with a role in cognition while its product NAA is a marker of viable neurons [80, 81]. Previously reported reduction in both NAAG and NAA in AD can indicate both impaired cognition and neuronal loss [81,82,83]. Our findings showed in addition that NAAG and NAA levels were particularly depleted in 3xTg-AD males, suggesting worsened cognitive function compared to the females (Fig. 3). These results at the metabolite level were further supported by a significant downregulation of the Folh1 enzyme, which catalyzes the transformation of NAAG into NAA, in 3xTg-AD males (compared to WT) (Fig. 3), although this enzyme was differentially expressed in males and females regardless of genotype. These findings might imply a compensatory mechanism to reduce the catabolism of NAAG and preserve the necessary amounts for brain function. The potential of different mechanisms underlying loss of cognitive function in AD between each sex, such as sex-hormone-driven effects, must be further explored as they might have important implications for prognosis and presumed therapeutic strategies.

Another neurotransmitter produced through glutamate metabolism is GABA. GABA has been previously reported to be increased in the AD brain and linked to impaired cognition and increased reactive astrocytes surrounding amyloid plaques, as reviewed elsewhere [84]. While we did not find any significant changes in total GABA levels, multiple enzymes and intermediates in different GABA synthesis routes were altered (Fig. 3). This observation of unchanging GABA levels might be due to our analysis of the whole brain, where some areas or cell types may compensate for each other. Indeed, in healthy brain tissue GABA will be produced by GABAergic neurons; however, if these die reactive astrocytes can compensate by producing GABA from putrescine via MAO-B [85, 86]. Our results provide partial evidence of this manner of compensation by reactive astrocytes, since we found a significant increase in the intermediate metabolite of this pathway, N-acetyl-GABA, in 3xTg-AD animals. This would suggest a hyperactivation of this pathway in AD and could also explain the lack of change in total GABA levels. However, we did not find any significant changes in the expression levels of MAO-B (Table S1), although this does not necessarily indicate a lack of change in its activity.

We have in addition found a sex difference within GABA synthesis in AD; enzymes Abat and Gad1 were significantly depleted in 3xTg-AD females. It would make sense for the compensatory pathway to be further upregulated in this case, and we do see a more dramatic increase in N-acetyl-GABA in this population, although it did not reach significance for an interaction effect. One study has provided evidence for a stronger increase of GABA in murine AD females compared to males and linked it to progressive cognitive decline [87]. Clearly, the potential of sex differences in GABA synthesis (perhaps involving reactive astrocytes) could benefit from further research.

Reactive astrocytes may also be implicated based on our findings related to arginine metabolism. We have observed significantly increased arginine levels in 3xTg-AD females (Fig. 4). Accumulation of arginine in AD has previously been reported in the mouse brain and in both the human brain and plasma [27, 30, 32, 88, 89]. Furthermore, arginine accumulation has been linked to inflammation, another hallmark of AD [1, 90]. Previous studies have reported the accumulation, and later release, of arginine by astrocytes in inflammatory environments to reduce the production of free radicals by Nos [88, 90]. However, to our knowledge, our study is the first report of sex-biased arginine increase in AD. We can therefore speculate on the possibility of sex-biased phenotypes within reactive astrocytes which have recently been placed in the center of AD pathology as an early event (i.e., reactive astrogliosis) in AD progression [91, 92]. This would not be so surprising, since sex differences in glial cells have been previously described, reviewed elsewhere [93], and were recently also reported in microglial cells in AD [94].

Arginine biosynthesis in the brain is also linked to ammonia waste management, as the vast majority of ammonia is incorporated into glutamine by Glul and transported in this way to the liver for disposal via the urea cycle [90, 95]. We found that Glul expression was significantly decreased in the 3xTg-AD brain compared to WT (Fig. 4). This result is in accordance with previous reports on the failure of ammonia elimination mechanisms in AD [95, 96]. In normal conditions, the urea cycle in the brain is not complete due to the lack of Otc enzyme expression, so Glul is essential for the removal of ammonia. However, in AD, ammonia was shown to accumulate [95, 96]. The excess of ammonia has been linked to impaired cognition and memory, increased blood-brain barrier permeability, and diminished energy metabolism [95]. Unable to deal with the excessive ammonia, Otc expression can be induced in cerebral vascular endothelial cells, creating a complete urea cycle [97]. However, our results did not reveal the increase in Otc expression in 3xTg-AD mouse brain.

Alterations in lipids imply the link to inflammation in the AD brain

Our study found an overall decrease in long-chain FFAs (regardless of saturation state) in the 8-month 3xTg-AD brain compared to WT (Fig. 5A). In addition, protein enrichment analysis showed that the levels of proteins involved in fatty acid elongation and one long-chain FFA transporter (Scl27a1) from the Slc27a family were significantly downregulated in the 3xTg-AD brain (Fig. 5B, Figure S4). These findings imply that FFA transport into and synthesis within AD brains might be altered. Previous reports of FFA levels in AD in both the blood and in the brain have been contradictory, as both accumulation and depletion were observed in humans and mice [33, 79, 98,99,100,101,102,103,104]. One plausible explanation for these reported differences might be variable alterations in FFA levels with the stage of disease progression. Given the strong associations previously revealed between FFA levels and memory, neuronal signaling (e.g., long-term potentiation, neurotransmitter release), and inflammation, FFA metabolism might have an essential role in AD pathology [105,106,107,108].

Lysophospholipids, and notably their most abundant subclasses lysophosphatidylcholines and lysophosphatidylethanolamines, have been widely reported to be decreased in AD [26, 102, 109,110,111,112]. Our study further uncovered a sex bias; we found that the observed decrease was driven by females (Fig. 6). LPLs have been recognized as important bioactive molecules that participate in multiple signaling cascades and can remodel cellular membranes [113, 114]. Moreover, decreased lysophosphatidylcholine has previously been correlated to amyloid β load [112]. To explore the mechanisms underlying LPL decrease in 3xTg-AD females, we further focused on the enzymes involved in LPL metabolism. A primary pathway of LPL metabolism is through the Land’s cycle. Phospholipases A cleave glycerophospholipids into a FFA and an LPL, while lysophospholipid acyltransferases (LPAT) catalyze the opposite reaction. Previous studies have suggested decreased LPLs to be caused by decreased phospholipase A2 activity and increased LPAT activity [115, 116]. We did not find phospholipase levels to be decreased in female 3xTg-AD mice. However, one LPAT enzyme, Lclat1, had significantly higher expression in 3xTg-AD females and therefore could explain the LPL sex bias that we observed (Figure S4). Alternatively, beyond the Land’s cycle, LPLs can be degraded by phospholipases. We found a significant increase in the expression of phospholipase Enpp2 in 3xTg-AD mice which was, once again, driven by females (Figure S4). If Enpp2 is indeed more active, more of the lysophosphatidic acid will be produced. This hypothesis has interesting potential because lysophosphatidic acid has been associated with Alzheimer’s pathology biomarkers [117], the disruption of neurotransmission, and increased permeability of the blood-brain barrier [109, 118,119,120]. Further efforts will be needed to untangle lysophospholipid metabolism in the AD brain and its implications.

Limitations

Our study is exploratory in nature, relying on global untargeted approaches and acquired omics data with the aim to generate data-driven hypotheses. These hypotheses need to be further investigated using orthogonal and targeted experimental approaches with statistical rigor. In addition, the untargeted analyses were performed on a homogenate of a whole brain tissue which presents some limitations. Different brain regions and cell types can have different metabolic profiles and activity, therefore our results reflect an averaged effect across many different cell types and structurally and functionally distinct regions. Finally, at 8 months this mouse model does not yet exhibit amyloidẞ plaques and neurofibrillary tangles, the well-established pathological markers of AD [44]. The metabolic profile may further change as the disease advances and tangles appear.

Conclusion

Through multi-omics data integration and pathway-level analyses, we have identified several areas of altered metabolism in AD. Moreover, we have highlighted metabolic sex biases within AD that may contribute to explaining the known differences in disease prevalence and symptoms. This exploratory data-driven study provides a starting point for further research into mechanisms of impaired cognition that may be related to different neurotransmitters for each sex, into the role of ammonia waste management in the AD brain, the relationship between AD and oxidative stress initiated by NOS, the roles of long-chain FFA in memory, and the relevance of LPLs and lysophosphatidic acid metabolism in the development of AD in females.

Availability of data and materials

The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE [121] partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD033164. The mass spectrometry polar metabolomics and lipidomics data have been deposited into the MetaboLights repository with the dataset identifier MTBLS4812 [122].

Abbreviations

3xTg-AD:

Triple-transgenic Alzheimer’s disease mouse model

AD:

Alzheimer’s disease

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

BuMe:

1-butanol:methanol

ESI:

Electrospray ionization

FFA:

Free fatty acid

GABA:

Gamma-aminobutyric acid

HILIC:

Hyrophilic-interaction chromatography

HRMS:

High-resolution mass spectrometry

LOWESS:

Locally weighted scatterplot smoothing

LPAT:

Lysophospholipid acyltransferases

LPL:

Lysophospholipid

MOFA:

Multi-omics factor analysis

NAA:

N-acetyl-aspartate

NAAG:

N-acetyl-aspartyl-glutamate

QC:

Quality control

RPLC:

Reversed-phase chromatography

WT:

Wild-type

References

  1. Alzheimer's Association. 2021 Alzheimer's Disease Facts and Figures. Alzheimer's Dement. 2021;17(3):327–406.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alzheimer Europe. Dementia in Europe yearbook 2019: Estimating the prevalence of dementia in Europe, in Dementia in Europe yearbook, A. Europe, Editior: Alzheimer Europe; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cummings J, Morstorf T, Zhong K. Alzheimer's disease drug-development pipeline: few candidates, frequent failures. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2014;6(4):37.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Budd Haeberlein S, et al. Two Randomized Phase 3 Studies of Aducanumab in Early Alzheimer’s Disease. J Prev Alzheimer's Dis. 2022;9(2):197–210.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Swanson CJ, et al. A randomized, double-blind, phase 2b proof-of-concept clinical trial in early Alzheimer's disease with lecanemab, an anti-Aβ protofibril antibody. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2021;13(1):80.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferretti MT, et al. Sex differences in Alzheimer disease — the gateway to precision medicine. Nat Rev Neurol. 2018;14(8):457–69.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Duarte A, et al. Brain insulin signalling, glucose metabolism and females' reproductive aging: a dangerous triad in Alzheimer's disease. Neuro Pharm. 2018;136:223–42.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Altmann A, et al. Sex modifies the APOE-related risk of developing Alzheimer's disease. Ann Neurol. 2014;75(4):563–73.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim S, et al. Gender differences in risk factors for transition from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease: A CREDOS study. Compr Psychiatry. 2015;62:114–22.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhao L, et al. Sex differences in metabolic aging of the brain: insights into female susceptibility to Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2016;42:69–79.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sancesario GM, Bernardini S. Alzheimer's disease in the omics era. Clin Biochem. 2018;59:9–16.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. de Leon M, et al. Prediction of cognitive decline in normal elderly subjects with 2-[(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose/poitron-emission tomography (FDG/PET). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(19):10966–71.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pagani M, et al. Early identification of MCI converting to AD: a FDG PET study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44(12):2042–52.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hoyer S. Abnormalities of glucose metabolism in Alzheimer's disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1991;640:53–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Liang WS, et al. Alzheimer's disease is associated with reduced expression of energy metabolism genes in posterior cingulate neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(11):4441–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Freudenberg-Hua Y, Li W, Davies P. The Role of Genetics in Advancing Precision Medicine for Alzheimer’s Disease—A Narrative Review. Front Med (Lausanne). 2018;5:108.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Darst, B.F., et al., Integrated analysis of genomics, longitudinal metabolomics, and Alzheimer’s risk factors among 1,111 cohort participants. 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Garcia-Segura, M.E., et al., Pathway-based integration of multi-omics data reveals lipidomics alterations validated in an Alzheimer’s Disease mouse model and risk loci carriers, in medRxiv. 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Baloni, P., et al., Multi-Omic Analyses Characterize the Ceramide/Sphingomyelin Pathway as a Therapeutic Target in Alzheimer’s Disease. 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Johnson ECB, et al. Large-scale proteomic analysis of Alzheimer’s disease brain and cerebrospinal fluid reveals early changes in energy metabolism associated with microglia and astrocyte activation. Nat Med. 2020;26(5):769–80.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Higginbotham L, et al. Integrated proteomics reveals brain-based cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in asymptomatic and symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Adv. 2020;6(43):eaaz9360.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bader JM, et al. Proteome profiling in cerebrospinal fluid reveals novel biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease. Mol Syst Biol. 2020;16(6):e9356.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Koal T, et al. Sphingomyelin SM(d18:1/18:0) is significantly enhanced in cerebrospinal fluid samples dichotomized by pathological amyloid-beta42, tau, and phospho-tau-181 levels. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;44(4):1193–201.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim M, et al. Association between plasma ceramides and phosphatidylcholines and hippocampal brain volume in late onset Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;60:809–17.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Fonteh A, et al. Alterations in cerebrospinal fluid glycerophospholipids and phospholipase A2 activity in Alzheimer's disease. J Lipid Res. 2013;54(10):2884–97.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Chan R, et al. Comparative lipidomic analysis of mouse and human brain with Alzheimer's Disease. JBC. 2012;287(4):2678–88.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Varma V, et al. Brain and blood metabolite signatures of pathology and progression in Alzheimer disease: a targeted metabolomics study. PLoS Med. 2018;15(1):e1002482.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kaddurah-Daouk R, et al. Alterations in metabolic pathways and networks in Alzheimer's disease. Transl. Psychiatry. 2013;3(4):e244.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Paglia G, et al. Unbiased metabolomic investigation of Alzheimer's disease brain points to dysregulation of mitochondrial aspartate metabolism. J Proteome Res. 2016;15(2):608–18.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Graham S, et al. Untargeted metabolomic analysis of human plasma indicates differentially affected polyamine and L-arginine metabolism in mild cognitive impairment subjects converting to Alzheimer's disease. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0119452.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Arnold M, et al. Sex and APOE ε4 genotype modify the Alzheimer's disease serum metabolome. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1148.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. van der Velpen V, et al. Systemic and central nervous system metabolomic alterations in Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2019;11:93.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Demarest TG, et al. Biological sex and DNA repair deficiency drive Alzheimer’s disease via systemic metabolic remodeling and brain mitochondrial dysfunction. Acta Neuropathologica. 2020;140(1):25–47.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Whiley L, et al. Evidence of altered phosphatidylcholine metabolism in Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2014;35(2):271–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Djordjevic J, et al. Early onset of sex-dependent mitochondrial deficits in the cortex of 3xTg Alzheimer's mice. Cells. 2020;9(6):1541.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Vandal M, et al. Age-dependent impairment of glucose tolerance in the 3xTg-AD mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. FASEB J. 2015;29(10):4273–84.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Pinu F, et al. Systems biology and multi-omics integration: viewpoints from the metabolomics research community. Metabolites. 2019;9:76.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Buescher JM, Driggers EM. Integration of omics: more than the sum of its parts. Cancer Metab. 2016;4(1):4.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Clark C, et al. An integrative multi-omics approach reveals new central nervous system pathway alterations in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer's Res Ther. 2021;13(1):71.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Ridge PG, et al. Assessment of the genetic variance of late-onset Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2016;41:200.e13-200.e20.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Gligorijević V, Pržulj N. Methods for biological data integration: perspectives and challenges. J R Soc Interface. 2015;12(112):20150571.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Subramanian I, et al. Multi-omics Data Integration, Interpretation, and Its Application. Bioinform Biol Insights. 2020;14:1177932219899051.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Oddo S, et al. Triple-transgenic model of Alzheimer's disease with plaques and tangles: intracellular Aβ and synaptic dysfunction. Neuron. 2003;39:409–21.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Belfiore R, et al. Temporal and regional progression of Alzheimer's disease-like pathology in 3xTg-AD mice. Aging cell. 2019;18(1):e12873.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Rosenberg N, et al. Overexpression of UCP4 in astrocytic mitochondria prevents multilevel dysfunctions in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. bioRxiv. 2022:2022.01.25.477694.

  46. Javonillo DI, et al. Systematic Phenotyping and Characterization of the 3xTg-AD Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:785276.

    Google Scholar 

  47. van der Velpen V, et al. Sex-specific alterations in NAD+ metabolism in 3xTg Alzheimer’s disease mouse brain assessed by quantitative targeted LC-MS. J Neurochem. 2021;159:378–88.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kulak NA, et al. Minimal, encapsulated proteomic-sample processing applied to copy-number estimation in eukaryotic cells. Nat Methods. 2014;11(3):319–24.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Carrard J, et al. Metabolic View on Human Healthspan: A Lipidome-Wide Association Study. Metabolites. 2021;11(5):287.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Gallart-Ayala H, et al. A global HILIC-MS approach to measure polar human cerebrospinal fluid metabolome: Exploring gender-associated variation in a cohort of elderly cognitively healthy subjects. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2018;1037:327–37.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Meier F, et al. Online Parallel Accumulation–Serial Fragmentation (PASEF) with a Novel Trapped Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometer*. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2018;17(12):2534–45.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Reifycs. Analysis Base File Converter. 2020; Available from: https://www.reifycs.com/AbfConverter/.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Tsugawa H, et al. MS-DIAL: data-independent MS/MS deconvolution for comprehensive metabolome analysis. Nat Methods. 2015;12(6):523–32.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. MoNA - MassBank of North America. News: Fiehn HILIC Library; 2018. p. 2021. Available from: https://mona.fiehnlab.ucdavis.edu/

    Google Scholar 

  55. Kind T, et al. LipidBlast in silico tandem mass spectrometry database for lipid identification. Nat Methods. 2013;10(8):755–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Guijas C, et al. METLIN: a technology platform for identifying knowns and unknowns. Anal Chem. 2018;90(5):3156–64.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Xue J, et al. METLIN MS2 molecular standards database: a broad chemical and biological resource. Nat Methods. 2020;17:953–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Broadhurst D, et al. Guidelines and considerations for the use of system suitability and quality control samples in mass spectrometry assays applied in untargeted clinical metabolomic studies. Metabolomics. 2018;14(6):72.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Tyanova S, et al. The Perseus computational platform for comprehensive analysis of (prote) omics data. Nature Methods. 2016;13(9):731–40.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Argelaguet R, et al. Multi-Omics Factor Analysis—a framework for unsupervised integration of multi-omics data sets. Mol Syst Biol. 2018;14(6):e8124.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Karpievitch Y, et al. Metabolomics Data Normalization with EigenMS. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e116221.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Xia J, et al. MetaboAnalyst: a web server for metabolomic data analysis and interpretation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:W652–60.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Molenaar M, et al. LION/web: a web-based ontology enrichment tool for lipidomic data analysis. GigaScience. 2019;8(6):giz061.

    Google Scholar 

  64. The UniProt Consortium. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;49(D1):480–9.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Alshehry Z, et al. An efficient single phase method for extraction of plasma lipids. Metabolites. 2015;5(2):389–403.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Löfgren L, Forsberg G, Stahlman M. The BUME method: a new rapid and simple chloroform-free method for total lipid extraction of animal tissue. Sci Rep. 2016;6:27688.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Wong M, et al. Comparison of single phase and biphasic extraction protocols for lipidomic studies using human plasma. Front Neurol. 2019;10:879.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Pellegrino R, et al. LC/MS lipid profiling from human serum: a new method for global lipid extraction. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2014;406.

  69. Reis A, et al. A comparison of five lipid extraction solvent systems for lipidomic studies of human LDL. J Lipid Res. 2013;54(7):1812–24.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Li CX, et al. Integration of multi-omics datasets enables molecular classification of COPD. Eur Respir J. 2018;51(5):1701930.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Buckley RF, et al. Sex Differences in the Association of Global Amyloid and Regional Tau Deposition Measured by Positron Emission Tomography in Clinically Normal Older Adults. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76(5):542–51.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Hua X, et al. Sex and age differences in atrophic rates: an ADNI study with n=1368 MRI scans. Neurobiol Aging. 2010;31(8):1463–80.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Babapour Mofrad R, et al. Sex differences in CSF biomarkers vary by Alzheimer disease stage and APOE ε4 genotype. Neurology. 2020;95(17):e2378–88.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Sundermann EE, et al. Sex differences in Alzheimer’s-related Tau biomarkers and a mediating effect of testosterone. Biol Sex Diff. 2020;11(1):33.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Oveisgharan S, et al. Sex differences in Alzheimer’s disease and common neuropathologies of aging. Acta Neuropathologica. 2018;136(6):887–900.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Liesinger AM, et al. Sex and age interact to determine clinicopathologic differences in Alzheimer’s disease. Acta Neuropathologica. 2018;136(6):873–85.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Trushina E, et al. Identification of altered metabolic pathways in plasma and CSF in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease using metabolomics. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e63644.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Wilkins J, Trushina E. Application of metabolomics in Alzheimer's disease. Front Neurol. 2018;8:719.

    Google Scholar 

  79. González-Domínguez R, García-Barrera T, Gómez-Ariza JL. Using direct infusion mass spectrometry for serum metabolomics in Alzheimer’s disease. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2014;406(28):7137–48.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Neale JH, Olszewski R. A role for N-acetylaspartylglutamate (NAAG) and mGluR3 in cognition. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2019;158:9–13.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Schuff N, et al. N-Acetylaspartate as a Marker of Neuronal Injury in Neurodegenerative Disease, in N-Acetylaspartate. Boston: Springer US; 2006. p. 241–62.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Hollinger KR, et al. The NAAG'ing Concerns of Modeling Human Alzheimer's Disease in Mice. J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;68(3):939–45.

    Google Scholar 

  83. Jaarsma D, Veenma-van der Duin L, Korf J. N-Acetylaspartate and N-acetylaspartylglutamate levels in Alzheimer's disease post-mortem brain tissue. J Neurol Sci. 1994;127(2):230–3.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Solas M, Puerta E, Ramirez MJ. Treatment Options in Alzheimer´s Disease: The GABA Story. Curr Pharm Des. 2015;21(34):4960–71.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Jo S, et al. GABA from reactive astrocytes impairs memory in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease. Nat Med. 2014;20(8):886–96.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Yoon B-E, Lee CJ. GABA as a rising gliotransmitter. Front Neural Circuits. 2014;8:141.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Roy U, et al. Sex- and age-specific modulation of brain GABA levels in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2018;62:168–79.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Liu P, et al. Altered arginine metabolism in Alzheimer's disease brains. Neurobiol Aging. 2014;35(9):1992–2003.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Pan X, et al. Alzheimer's disease–like pathology has transient effects on the brain and blood metabolome. Neurobiol Aging. 2016;38:151–63.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Wiesinger H. Arginine metabolism and the synthesis of nitric oxide in the nervous system. Prog Neurobiol. 2001;64(4):365–91.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Kumar A, Fontana IC, Nordberg A. Reactive astrogliosis: A friend or foe in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. J Neurochem. 2021.

  92. Escartin C, et al. Reactive astrocyte nomenclature, definitions, and future directions. Nat Neurosci. 2021;24(3):312–25.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Chowen JA, Garcia-Segura LM. Role of glial cells in the generation of sex differences in neurodegenerative diseases and brain aging. Mech Ageing Dev. 2021;196:111473.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Casaletto KB, et al. Sex-specific effects of microglial activation on Alzheimer's disease proteinopathy in older adults. Brain. 2022;145(10):3536–45.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Seiler N. Ammonia and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurochem Int. 2002;41(2):189–207.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Tumani H, et al. Glutamine Synthetase in Cerebrospinal Fluid, Serum, and Brain: A Diagnostic Marker for Alzheimer Disease? Arch Neurol. 1999;56(10):1241–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Bensemain F, et al. Evidence for induction of the ornithine transcarbamylase expression in Alzheimer's disease. Mol Psychiatry. 2009;14(1):106–16.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Wang G, et al. Plasma Metabolite Profiles of Alzheimer’s Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment. J Proteome Res. 2014;13(5):2649–58.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Wang D-C, et al. Serum fatty acid profiles using GC-MS and multivariate statistical analysis: potential biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2012;33(6):1057–66.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Barupal DK, et al. Sets of coregulated serum lipids are associated with Alzheimer's disease pathophysiology. Alzheimer's Dement. 2019;11:619–27.

    Google Scholar 

  101. González-Domínguez R, et al. Metabolic screening of regional brain alterations in the APP/PS1 transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease by direct infusion mass spectrometry. J Pharm Biomed. 2015;102:425–35.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Zhang X, et al. Untargeted lipidomics reveals progression of early Alzheimer’s disease in APP/PS1 transgenic mice. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):14509.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. Snowden S, et al. Association between fatty acid metabolism in the brain and Alzheimer disease neuropathology and cognitive performance: a nontargeted metabolomic study. PLoS Med. 2017;14(3):e1002266.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Cunnane SC, et al. Plasma and brain fatty acid profiles in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2012;29(3):691–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Weiser MJ, Butt CM, Mohajeri MH. Docosahexaenoic Acid and Cognition throughout the Lifespan. Nutrients. 2016;8(2):99.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Dyall SC, Michael-Titus AT. Neurological benefits of omega-3 fatty acids. Neuromolecular Med. 2008;10(4):219–35.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Tallima H, El Ridi R. Arachidonic acid: Physiological roles and potential health benefits – A review. J Advanc Res. 2018;11:33–41.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Mallick R, Basak S, Duttaroy AK. Docosahexaenoic acid, 22:6n-3: Its roles in the structure and function of the brain. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2019;79(1):21–31.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  109. Frisardi V, et al. Glycerophospholipids and glycerophospholipid-derived lipid mediators: A complex meshwork in Alzheimer’s disease pathology. Prog Lipid Res. 2011;50(4):313–30.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  110. González-Domínguez R, García-Barrera T, Gómez-Ariza JL. Combination of metabolomic and phospholipid-profiling approaches for the study of Alzheimer's disease. J Proteomics. 2014;104:37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  111. González-Domínguez R, et al. Application of metabolomics based on direct mass spectrometry analysis for the elucidation of altered metabolic pathways in serum from the APP/PS1 transgenic model of Alzheimer's disease. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2015;107:378–85.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Grimm MOW, et al. From brain to food: Analysis of phosphatidylcholins, lyso-phosphatidylcholins and phosphatidylcholin–plasmalogens derivates in Alzheimer's disease human post mortem brains and mice model via mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A. 2011;1218(42):7713–22.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Grzelczyk A, Gendaszewska-Darmach E. Novel bioactive glycerol-based lysophospholipids: New data – New insight into their function. Biochimie. 2013;95(4):667–79.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. Graham TR, Kozlov MM. Interplay of proteins and lipids in generating membrane curvature. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2010;22(4):430–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Ross BM, et al. Phospholipid-metabolizing enzymes in Alzheimer's disease: increased lysophospholipid acyltransferase activity and decreased phospholipase A2 activity. J Neurochem. 1998;70(2):786–93.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. Gattaz WF, et al. Decreased phospholipase A2 activity in Alzheimer brains. Biol Psychiatry. 1995;37(1):13–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. Ahmad S, et al. Association of lysophosphatidic acids with cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers and progression to Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer's Res Ther. 2020;12(1):124.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. Ye X, et al. Lysophosphatidic acid in neural signaling. NeuroReport. 2002;13:17.

    Google Scholar 

  119. Moolenaar WH, van Meeteren LA, Giepmans BNG. The ins and outs of lysophosphatidic acid signaling. BioEssays. 2004;26(8):870–81.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. Schulze C, et al. Lysophosphatidic Acid Increases Tight Junction Permeability in Cultured Brain Endothelial Cells. J Neurochem. 1997;68(3):991–1000.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  121. Perez-Riverol Y, et al. The PRIDE database resources in 2022: a hub for mass spectrometry-based proteomics evidences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50(D1):D543–52.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  122. Haug K, et al. MetaboLights: a resource evolving in response to the needs of its scientific community. Nucleid Acids Res. 2019;48(D1):D440–4.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank our former postdoctoral researcher Vera van der Velpen for her contribution to sample collection during her postdoctoral training at Metabolomics Platform, University of Lausanne.

Funding

The authors thank the Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne for core funding, the Foundation Pierre Mercier pour la science (research grant to JI), Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no. 316030_183377 to JI) and the Synapsis Foundation - Alzheimer Research Switzerland (research grant no. 2020-PI06 to JYC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Metabolomics Unit, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

    Abigail Strefeler, Tony Teav, Hector Gallart-Ayala & Julijana Ivanisevic

  2. Bioinformatics Competence Center, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

    Maxime Jan & Nicolas Guex

  3. Protein Analysis Facility, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

    Manfredo Quadroni

  4. Department of Fundamental Neurosciences, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

    Nadia Rosenberg & Jean-Yves Chatton

Authors
  1. Abigail Strefeler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maxime Jan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Manfredo Quadroni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tony Teav
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Nadia Rosenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jean-Yves Chatton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Nicolas Guex
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hector Gallart-Ayala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Julijana Ivanisevic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

HGA and JI designed the study and supervised the project. JYC and NR provided the animal samples. AS collected and processed polar metabolome and lipidome data. MQ acquired and processed protein data. MJ and NG performed bioinformatics analysis. AS and MJ analyzed and interpreted data. AS wrote the manuscript with support from MJ, MQ, HGA, and JI. All authors provided critical feedback and review of the final manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hector Gallart-Ayala or Julijana Ivanisevic.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All experimental procedures were approved by the Veterinary Affairs Office of the Canton of Vaud, Switzerland (authorization number VD3106.c) and were conducted in strict accordance with the animal care guidelines outlined in the Swiss Ordinance on Animal Experimentation to minimize the number and suffering of animals used in all experiments of this study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Supplementary information about materials and methods – detailed description of untargeted analysis of polar metabolites, lipids and proteins. Supplementary figures: Figure S1. Analysis of collision energies to result in maximum identification of polar and lipid metabolites. Figure S2. Effects of omics data and contributions to MOFA factors. Figure S3. Additional measured metabolites (beige background) and proteins (grey background, bold title) from the alanine, aspartate, and glutamate metabolic pathway. Figure S4. Additional proteins involved in lipid metabolism. (A) Free fatty acid transporter Slc27a1. (B) Enzymes Lclat1 and Epp1 involved in lysophospholipid metabolism. Figure S5. Supplementary proteomics data. (A) Boxplots of raw protein quantities before 3-precursor filtering. (B) Principal component analysis on proteomics data (see also Supplementary Table S4).

Additional file 2:

List of all compounds identified through proteomics (Table S1), metabolomics (Table S2), or lipidomics (Table S3) analyses by MS/MS spectral matching, including results of ANOVA analysis on each identified compound for genotype, sex, or sex:genotype interaction effects. Table S4. Results output of MetaboAnalyst joint pathway analysis. Table S5. Results output of LION lipid ontology analysis using lipids ranked according to genotype effect, calculated using either a RankSum or a Fisher Exact Test analysis. Table S6. Supplementary table of metabolomics data from untargeted mass spectrometry analysis, normalized to [mg] tissue weight. Table S7. Supplementary table of lipidomics data from untargeted mass spectrometry analysis, normalized to [mg] tissue weight. Table S8. Supplementary table of proteomics data from untargeted mass spectrometry analysis.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Strefeler, A., Jan, M., Quadroni, M. et al. Molecular insights into sex-specific metabolic alterations in Alzheimer’s mouse brain using multi-omics approach. Alz Res Therapy 15, 8 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-023-01162-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-023-01162-4

Keywords

  • Alzheimer’s disease
  • Multi-omics
  • Metabolomics
  • Lipidomics
  • Proteomics
  • 3xTg AD mouse
  • Sex differences
  • Amino acids
  • Lysophospholipids

Alzheimer's Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1758-9193