Skip to main content
Download PDF

Choroid plexus volume as a novel candidate neuroimaging marker of the Alzheimer’s continuum

Alzheimer's Research & Therapy volume 16, Article number: 149 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Enlarged choroid plexus (ChP) volume has been reported in patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and inversely correlated with cognitive performance. However, its clinical diagnostic and predictive value, and mechanisms by which ChP impacts the AD continuum remain unclear.

Methods

This prospective cohort study enrolled 607 participants [healthy control (HC): 110, mild cognitive impairment (MCI): 269, AD dementia: 228] from the Chinese Imaging, Biomarkers, and Lifestyle study between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2022. Of the 497 patients on the AD continuum, 138 underwent lumbar puncture for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) hallmark testing. The relationships between ChP volume and CSF pathological hallmarks (Aβ42, Aβ40, Aβ42/40, tTau, and pTau181), neuropsychological tests [Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI), and Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scores], and multimodal neuroimaging measures [gray matter volume, cortical thickness, and corrected cerebral blood flow (cCBF)] were analyzed using partial Spearman’s correlation. The mediating effects of four neuroimaging measures [ChP volume, hippocampal volume, lateral ventricular volume (LVV), and entorhinal cortical thickness (ECT)] on the relationship between CSF hallmarks and neuropsychological tests were examined. The ability of the four neuroimaging measures to identify cerebral Aβ42 changes or differentiate among patients with AD dementia, MCI and HCs was determined using receiver operating characteristic analysis, and their associations with neuropsychological test scores at baseline were evaluated by linear regression. Longitudinal associations between the rate of change in the four neuroimaging measures and neuropsychological tests scores were evaluated on the AD continuum using generalized linear mixed-effects models.

Results

The participants’ mean age was 65.99 ± 8.79 years. Patients with AD dementia exhibited the largest baseline ChP volume than the other groups (P < 0.05). ChP volume enlargement correlated with decreased Aβ42 and Aβ40 levels; lower MMSE and MoCA and higher NPI and ADL scores; and lower volume, cortical thickness, and cCBF in other cognition-related regions (all P < 0.05). ChP volume mediated the association of Aβ42 and Aβ40 levels with MMSE scores (19.08% and 36.57%), and Aβ42 levels mediated the association of ChP volume and MMSE or MoCA scores (39.49% and 34.36%). ChP volume alone better identified cerebral Aβ42 changes than LVV alone (AUC = 0.81 vs. 0.67, P = 0.04) and EC thickness alone (AUC = 0.81 vs.0.63, P = 0.01) and better differentiated patients with MCI from HCs than hippocampal volume alone (AUC = 0.85 vs. 0.81, P = 0.01), and LVV alone (AUC = 0.85 vs.0.82, P = 0.03). Combined ChP and hippocampal volumes significantly increased the ability to differentiate cerebral Aβ42 changes and patients among AD dementia, MCI, and HCs groups compared with hippocampal volume alone (all P < 0.05). After correcting for age, sex, years of education, APOE ε4 status, eTIV, and hippocampal volume, ChP volume was associated with MMSE, MoCA, NPI, and ADL score at baseline, and rapid ChP volume enlargement was associated with faster deterioration in NPI scores with an average follow-up of 10.03 ± 4.45 months (all P < 0.05).

Conclusions

ChP volume may be a novel neuroimaging marker associated with neurodegenerative changes and clinical AD manifestations. It could better detect the early stages of the AD and predict prognosis, and significantly enhance the differential diagnostic ability of hippocampus on the AD continuum.

Background

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a complex, heterogeneous disorder with multifaceted neuropathological characteristics, including the widespread accumulation of beta-amyloid (Aβ) plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, and blood–brain barrier (BBB) dysfunction, which significantly complicate the diagnosis and treatment of AD in clinical practice [1, 2]. The proposed updated amyloid, tau, neurodegeneration [AT(N)] research framework accelerates the diagnosis of the AD continuum by 6–18 years compared with previous recommendations [3, 4]. However, the high costs and invasiveness of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) testing and positron emission tomography limit their usefulness for detecting pathological hallmarks in clinical practice [5, 6]. Traditional structural imaging is convenient and inexpensive, but lacks the molecular specificity to directly determine the neural source of volume or thickness loss [7, 8]. Historically, the structural indicators of AD neuropathology that are considered optimal, including cortical and hippocampal atrophy and ventricular dilation, often occur in normal aging processes and other neurodegenerative diseases [9]. Therefore, they cannot serve as stand-alone indicators for early diagnosis in the AD continuum [10, 11]. There is an urgent need to identify a non-invasive, reliable neuroimaging marker associated with the multiomic features of the AD continuum to further elucidate the complexity and heterogeneity of AD pathogenesis. Furthermore, we need to examine the value of combining multiple structural neuroimaging measures in enabling early detection and development of treatment strategies for patients across the AD continuum.

The choroid plexus (ChP) is an important multifunctional structure involved in CSF secretion, immune surveillance, and BBB preservation, all of which are closely linked to multiple pathological pathways in AD [12, 13]. Impaired ChP function has been recently discovered in patients in the AD continuum, including reduced clearance of CSF Aβ and Tau [14, 15]. Preliminary studies revealed that aging-related CSF changes were associated with significant ChP remodeling, which was correlated with cognitive performance in patients with AD [16, 17]. Therefore, ChP may represent a hitherto overlooked but important candidate neuroimaging marker to track the onset and development of AD. The existing evidence only presents preliminary differences in ChP volume during different stages of the AD continuum at baseline [18, 19]. The association between ChP volume and clinical manifestations, multifunctional brain structures, and other multiomic neurodegenerative characteristics of the AD continuum remains unclear: the exact role and mechanism by which the ChP is involved in the onset and development of AD are unknown.

In this study, we investigated the associations of ChP volume with pathological CSF hallmarks, neuropsychological tests, and multimodal neuroimaging measures; and analyzed the diagnostic accuracy of ChP volume to identify cerebral pathological deposition, and differentiate among patients with AD dementia, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and healthy controls (HCs). Importantly, we examined the longitudinal association between baseline ChP volume and subsequent clinical progression of the AD continuum. Our principal hypotheses were that (1) enlarged ChP volume was highly associated with the severity of pathological CSF hallmarks, neuropsychological tests, and the structure and perfusion of other cognition-related brain regions; (2) ChP volume could mediate the association between CSF hallmarks and neuropsychological tests on the AD continuum; (3) ChP volume could identify the absence/presence of cerebral Aβ42 deposition, and differentiate among stages along the Alzheimer’s continuum; and (4) increased ChP volume would accelerate the deterioration in the clinical presentations.

Methods

Participants

This study used data prospectively collected from the Chinese Imaging, Biomarkers, and Lifestyle (CIBL) study between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2022. The CIBL study [20, 21] was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Capital Medical University, Beijing Tiantan Hospital (Beijing, China; KY-2021-028-01) and registered at Chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2100049131). All participants or their caregivers provided written informed consent. The AD continuum included patients with MCI and AD dementia who met the 2011 or 2018 National Institute on Aging Alzheimer’s Association workgroup diagnostic criteria [3, 22]. We also enrolled HCs aged ≥ 50 years without subjective or objective memory impairment or history of neurological diseases. Trained research coordinators interviewed patients with MCI/AD personally at approximately 6-month intervals until June 30, 2023. A detailed flowchart of the eligibility criteria at baseline and follow-up is presented in Supplementary Fig. 1. This study conformed to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines (Supplementary Material S01).

Clinical measures and neuropsychological tests

Data on age, sex, years of education, body mass index (BMI), apolipoprotein E allele 4 (APOE ε4) status; medical history of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, stroke, coronary heart disease, and hyperlipidemia; and smoking and alcohol consumption habits were collected. Each participant underwent comprehensive neuropsychological battery testing, including the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) [23], Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) [24], Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) [25], and Activities of Daily Living (ADL) (Supplementary Material S02).

CSF biomarker collection and measurements

Patients on the AD continuum who agreed to undergo lumbar puncture fasted overnight for a minimum of 6 h. Sterile polypropylene tubes were used to collect CSF and inverted gently to disrupt potential gradient effects, centrifuged at 1500 r/min to separate any cellular debris, and stored at − 80 °C. The CSF levels of Aβ42 and Aβ40, Aβ42/40 ratio, total Tau protein (tTau), and phosphorylated Tau 181 (pTau181) at baseline were measured using the direct enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; Beijing Hightrust Diagnostics, Co, Ltd, China). The resulting optical densities were measured at 450 nm using an RT-6100 Auto Analyzer micro-ELISA plate reader (Rayto Life and Analytical Sciences Co., Ltd. Shenzhen, China). CSF biomarker levels (pg/mL) were calculated using standard curves from the assay kits based on the values obtained from the optical readings. We defined either Aβ42 < 650 pg/mL or Aβ42/40 ratio ≤ 0.064 as Aβ42 positivity.

Brain multimodal neuroimaging

Structural three-dimensional T1-weighted imaging (3D-T1WI) and 7-delay pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (pCASL) were performed using a 3.0-T magnetic resonance scanner (SIGNA Premier; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) with a 48-channel head coil. Scan parameters of the 3D-T1WI were as follows: repetition time, 7.3 ms; echo time, 3.0 ms; inversion time, 450 ms; flip angle, 12°; field of view, 256 mm×256 mm; acquisition matrix, 256 × 256; slice thickness, 1.0 mm; slice number, 176; and scan time, 4 min 56 s. The gray matter (GM) volume and cortical thickness of well-documented cognition-related brain regions were quantified using FreeSurfer (version 6.0, http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/) [26], including the cortical volume, subcortical GM volume, lateral ventricular volume (LVV), hippocampal volume, white matter hypointensity (WMH) volume, and estimated total intracranial volume (eTIV), and the average whole cortical thickness, entorhinal cortical thickness (ECT), middle temporal cortical thickness, and parahippocampal cortical thickness [27,28,29]. The regional corrected cerebral blood flow (cCBF), including the whole brain, hippocampus, thalamus, middle cingulate cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, middle frontal cortex, superior temporal cortex, precuneus, and angular gyrus [30], was extracted from the preprocessed pCASL image using the corrected arterial transit time values based on the third version of the automated anatomical labelling atlas.

The ChP was segmented based on 3D-T1WI using a deep learning algorithm developed by the authors using 3D nnU-Net as previously described [31]. The ChP of 90 HCs were imaged using 3T scanners [GE Premier, USA (n = 30), Philips CX, The Netherlands (n = 30), and Siemens Prisma, Germany (n = 30)] at our hospital, and manually labelled by a junior neuroradiologist (Zhuo Z., with 5 years of experience in neuroradiology) and a senior neuroradiologist (Duan Y., with 15 years of experience). Subsequently, a senior radiologist with 20 years of experience (Liu Y.) performed a manual visual check and modification (if necessary) for segmentation quality control. A subset of 60 randomly selected disease cases was utilized for training the 3D nnU-Net, and the remaining 30 cases were used for testing the trained model (Dice score = 0.8; P < 0.001). Finally, the resulting deep learning model was used to segment all the T1-weighted images used in this study, and the ChP volume was subsequently calculated. Supplementary Material S03 details the multimodal neuroimaging parameters and processing.

All automatic segmentation was performed by a junior neuroradiologist (Zhuo Z.), and the preliminary segmentation results were reviewed and modified for segmentation quality control by a senior neuroradiologist (Duan Y.). All the final automatic segmentation results were assessed and approved by another senior neuroradiologist (Liu Y.) who was blinded to all clinical data. For quality control of ChP segmentation, we focused on the following features by visual inspection: (1) the location of segmentation; (2) the distribution of the ChP; and (3) the morphology of the segmentation. If the ChP segmentation was outside the ventricular areas, the segmentation involved non-ChP tissues, or the 3D rendered images of ChP morphology appeared odd, manual correction was conducted using ITK- SNAP software. For quality control of brain tissue segmentation using FreeSurfer, the initial detection of inaccurate segmentations was based on Euler numbers [32], and subsequent visual checks and modification were performed using FSLeyes according to the standard operating procedure of the FreeSurfer’s quality control guidelines (https://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/fswiki). The detailed data exclusion procedure is presented in eFigure 1.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables are expressed as raw numbers (percentages) and assessed using the χ2 test. Normally distributed continuous variables are presented as the mean [standard deviation (SD)] and evaluated using univariate analysis of variance or independent t-tests; skewed data are presented as the median with interquartile range (IQR) and evaluated using the Kruskal–Wallis or Mann–Whitney U test. Post hoc pairwise comparisons were adjusted using Bonferroni correction.

Partial Spearman’s correlation (adjusted for age, sex, years of education, APOE ε4 status, and eTIV) was employed to determine the correlation coefficients between both ChP volume and ChP/eTIV, a similar index presented in previous studies [19, 33], and CSF hallmarks (Aβ42, Aβ40, Aβ42/40, tTau, and pTau181 levels), neuropsychological tests (MMSE, MoCA, NPI, and ADL scores), and multimodal neuroimaging measures (GM volume, cortical thickness and cCBF of cognition-related brain regions). To estimate the association of ChP/eTIV with these measures, we only adjusted for age, sex, years of education, and APOE ε4 status.

Simple mediation models were developed using bootstrapping with 5,000 iterations by establishing three pathways to explain the effects of each neuroimaging measure (ChP volume, hippocampal volume, LVV, or ECT) alone on the association between the CSF hallmarks (Aβ42 and Aβ40 levels) and neuropsychological tests. Under this framework, the total effect (TE) was divided into natural direct effects (NDEs) and natural indirect effects (NIEs), and the mediation effect was quantified as a percentage (NIE/TE x 100) [34]. The NDEs represent the effect of CSF hallmarks on the neuropsychological tests independent of four neuroimaging measures. The NIEs represent the effect of CSF hallmarks on neuropsychological tests, which could be explained by changes in each neuroimaging measure. In addition, to examine and discuss different potential causal pathways, simple mediation models were also developed by establishing three pathways to explain the effects of CSF hallmarks on the association between ChP volume and the neuropsychological tests. Age, sex, years of education, APOE ε4 status, and eTIV at baseline were included as confounders in the mediating analyses based on the results of the above-mentioned univariate analysis.

The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were used to estimate the ability of each neuroimaging measure alone, combined ChP and hippocampal volume, or the combination of the four neuroimaging measures to identify the cerebral Aβ42 changes (< 650 pg/mL or not). Furthermore, these factors were also used to differentiate between patients with AD dementia and those with MCI, patients with AD dementia and those with normal cognition, and patients with MCI and those with normal cognition based on binary logistic regression models with adjustment for age, sex, years of education, APOE ε4 status, and eTIV. DeLong’s test was performed to statistically compare the AUCs.

Multiple linear regression models were used to determine the relationship of each neuroimaging measure alone and combined ChP and hippocampal volume with the neuropsychological tests in patients across the AD continuum at baseline with adjustment for age, sex, years of education, APOE ε4 status, and eTIV. Generalized linear mixed-effects models with a random intercept and slope were utilized to discern the longitudinal association between the rate of change in each neuroimaging measure alone and the rate of change in neuropsychological tests and between the rate of change in the combined ChP and hippocampal volume and the rate of change in neuropsychological tests in patients on the AD continuum during the follow-up period. This model used maximum likelihood estimation, a normal distribution with identity links, and the Kenward–Roger method to approximate the degrees of freedom. Participant (slope and intercept) was considered a random effect, whereas age, sex, years of education, APOE ε4 status, and the rates of change in the above-mentioned neuroimaging measures and eTIV were considered fixed effects. The rates of change were calculated by dividing the changes in the variables between baseline and follow-up by the follow-up duration (months). The results are presented as standardized β values with their corresponding 95% CIs to represent the strength of their association. Two-tailed P-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant for all analyses. All statistical analyses were performed using the SAS version 9.4 software (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA) and SPSS version 29.0 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

The analysis included 607 participants [age: 65.99 ± 8.79 years, females: 363 (59.80%); HCs, n = 110; MCI, n = 269; and AD dementia, n = 228]. Of the 497 patients on the AD continuum, 138 (27.77%) underwent lumbar puncture for CSF hallmark testing (MCI, n = 33; AD dementia, n = 105). Table 1 presents the participants’ demographic, clinical, CSF, and neuroimaging characteristics at baseline. Patients with AD dementia exhibited higher ChP volume and ChP/eTIV compared to that of patients with MCI and HCs (all P < 0.001). Figure 1 depicts representative 3D T1-weighted images of ChP volume in age- and sex-matched patients from the three groups.

Table 1 Demographic, clinical, CSF, and neuroimaging characteristics of all participants at baseline
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

Comparisons among three representative 3D-T1 weighted images of the ChP volume in the three groups. The ChP volume (red) is the largest in patients with AD dementia, followed by those with MCI and HCs. All participants are 72-year-old men. The MMSE and MoCA scores of the HC are 30 and 28, respectively (A). The MoCA score is 23 in patients with MCI with 10 years of education (B), whereas the MoCA score is 17 in patients with AD with 13 years of education (C)

Full size image

Baseline correlations of ChP with CSF hallmarks, neuropsychological tests, and multimodal neuroimaging measures in the AD continuum

Figure 2 illustrates a heatmap showing the correlation of ChP volume with CSF hallmarks, neuropsychological tests, and multimodal neuroimaging measures at baseline in patients on the AD continuum.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Heatmap of the baseline correlation between ChP volume (and ChP/eTIV) and CSF biomarkers, neuropsychological tests, and multimodal neuroimaging in the Alzheimer’s continuum. Partial Spearman’s correlation is performed after adjusting for age, sex, years of education, APOE ε4 status, and eTIV. -v, volume of the brain region; -t, cortical thickness of the brain region; -c, corrected cerebral blood flow (cCBF) of the brain region. The number of CSF analyses is 138, the number of regional cCBF is 288, and the number of neuropsychological assessments and brain structural measures is 497. The asterisks represent significant results: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001

Full size image

ChP volume (and ChP/eTIV) enlargement was correlated with decreased CSF Aβ42 (r= -0.310) and Aβ40 levels (r=-0.207), MMSE (r=-0.301) and MoCA scores (r=-0.281), but increased NPI (r = 0.208) and ADL scores (r = 0.311). This enlargement was correlated with a decline in the subcortical GM (r=-0.150) and hippocampal (r=-0.197) volumes; average CT of the whole brain (r=-0.333), entorhinal cortex (r=-0.280), middle temporal lobes (r=-0.366), and parahippocampal gyrus (r=-0.262); and cCBF values of the whole brain (r= -0.176), thalamus (r= -0.177), middle cingulate cortex (r=-0.20), posterior cingulate cortex (r=-0.263), middle frontal cortex (r=-0.14), superior temporal cortex (r=-0.194), precuneus (r=-0.207), and angular gyrus (r=-0.208), after adjusting for confounding factors (all P < 0.05).

Mediating effect of ChP volume on the association between CSF hallmarks and neuropsychological tests on the AD continuum

Figure 3 presents the simple mediating effect of ChP volume, hippocampal volume, LVV, or ECT alone on the association between CSF biomarkers and neuropsychological tests on the AD continuum.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Simple mediating effects of ChP volume, hippocampal volume, LVV, and ECT alone on the association of CSF hallmarks and neuropsychological tests

Full size image

The associations between CSF Aβ42 levels and MMSE scores mediated by the ChP volume, hippocampal volume, and LVV alone were 19.08%, 39.25%, and 10.81%, respectively (Fig. 3A). Furthermore, the associations between CSF Aβ42 levels and MoCA scores mediated by the ChP volume, hippocampal volume, and LVV alone were 21.87%, 47.02%, and 14.34%, respectively (Fig. 3B). There was no mediating effect of ECT on these associations (all P > 0.05).

The associations between CSF Aβ40 levels and MMSE scores mediated by ChP volume, hippocampal volume, and ECT alone were 36.57%, 48.59%, and 32.19%, respectively (Fig. 3C). The associations between CSF Aβ40 levels and MoCA scores mediated by ChP volume was 42.00%; no mediating effect of hippocampal volume, LVV, or ECT was observed on the association between CSF Aβ40 levels and MoCA scores (all P > 0.05; Fig. 3D).

Notably, while the associations between ChP volume and MMSE and MoCA scores mediated by the CSF Aβ42 levels were 39.49% and 34.36%, respectively, no mediating effect of CSF Aβ40 levels on the association between ChP volume and these two scores was observed. All four neuroimaging measures exerted no mediating effect on the association between CSF hallmarks and the NPI score or ADL score (all P > 0.05).

Diagnostic accuracy of ChP volume to identify cerebral pathological deposition and disease stages

Figure 4 presents the ROC curves of four neuroimaging measures to identify the presence/absence of cerebral Aβ deposition and to differentiate among patients with AD dementia, MCI, and HCs.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Receiver operating characteristic curves of four neuroimaging measures for discriminating the cerebral Aβ42 change and distinguishing different stages of the AD continuum. (A) The AUC of ChP volume alone is higher than that of LVV (P = 0.038) and ECT (P = 0.008) alone, and that of combined ChP and hippocampal volume is higher than that of hippocampal volume alone (P = 0.033). However, the combination of four neuroimaging measures (P = 0.443) or that of ChP and hippocampal volume (P = 0.735) does not show significant advantage over ChP volume alone; (B) The AUC of ChP volume alone is higher than those of hippocampal volume (P = 0.009) and LVV (P = 0.031) alone. The AUC of combined ChP and hippocampal volumes is higher than that of hippocampal volume alone (P = 0.009) but not higher than that of ChP volume alone (P = 0.654); (C) The AUC of combined ChP and hippocampal volumes is higher than those of hippocampal volume alone (P = 0.008) and ChP volume alone(P < 0.001); (D) The AUC of combined ChP and hippocampal volumes is higher than those of hippocampal volume alone (P = 0.004) and ChP volume alone (P = 0.001)

Full size image

ChP volume alone exhibited higher diagnostic accuracy in identifying cerebral Aβ42 changes on the AD continuum than LVV (AUC = 0.806 vs. 0.669, P = 0.038) and ECT alone (AUC = 0.806 vs.0.629, P = 0.008). No significant difference was observed between the ChP and hippocampal volume alone (AUC = 0.806 vs. 0.717, P = 0.166); however, the ability of combined ChP and hippocampal volume (AUC = 0.815 vs. 0.806, P = 0.735) or combined four neuroimaging measures (AUC = 0.826 vs. 0.806, P = 0.443) to identify cerebral Aβ42 changes showed no significant advantage compared with that of ChP volume alone (Fig. 4A).

ChP volume alone demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy in differentiating patients with MCI from the HCs than hippocampal volume (AUC = 0.845 vs. 0.805, P = 0.009) and LVV alone (AUC = 0.845 vs.0.817, P = 0.031), although no significant difference was observed between ChP volume and EC thickness alone (AUC = 0.845 vs. 0.845, P = 0.981). However, combined ChP and hippocampal volume did not provide a significant advantage over ChP volume alone in differentiating patients with MCI from HCs (AUC = 0.845 vs. 0.845, P = 0.654; Fig. 4B).

ChP volume alone exhibited lower diagnostic accuracy in differentiating patients with AD from those with MCI than hippocampal volume (AUC = 0.791 vs. 0.843, P = 0.007), LVV (AUC = 0.791 vs. 0.832, P = 0.004), and ECT alone (AUC = 0.791 vs. 0.836, P = 0.018; Fig. 4C).

There was no significant difference regarding their ability to differentiate patients with AD dementia from HCs for ChP volume (AUC = 0.946), hippocampal volume (AUC = 0.955, P = 0.398), LVV (AUC = 0.953, P = 0.355) and ECT alone (AUC = 0.969, P = 0.05; Fig. 4D).

More importantly, when the ChP and hippocampal volumes were combined, the diagnostic efficiency for identifying cerebral Aβ42 changes and differentiating patients with AD dementia from those with MCI, patients with AD dementia from HCs, and patients with MCI from HCs increased to 0.816 (95%CI: 0.720–0.911), 0.863 (95%CI: 0.831–0.895), 0.972 (95%CI: 0.957–0.986), and 0.845 (95%CI: 0.803–0.888), respectively, all of which were significantly higher than the diagnostic efficiency of hippocampal volume alone (P = 0.029, P = 0.008, P = 0.004, and P = 0.009, respectively).

Baseline and longitudinal associations between ChP volume and clinical presentations in patients across the AD continuum

Table 2 summarizes the association of ChP volume, hippocampal volume, LVV, ECT alone, and combined ChP and hippocampal volumes with the neuropsychological tests in patients across the AD continuum at baseline.

Table 2 Associations of ChP volume, hippocampal volume, LVV, ECT alone, and combined ChP and hippocampal volumes with the neuropsychological tests in patients in the AD continuum at baseline
Full size table

After correcting for age, sex, years of education, APOE ε4 status, and eTIV, ChP volume alone was associated with MMSE (β=-0.32, P < 0.001), MoCA (β=-0.34, P < 0.001), NPI (β = 0.23, P < 0.001), and ADL scores (β = 0.31, P < 0.001) at baseline (Table 2, Model 1). After correcting for hippocampal volume and the above-mentioned confounders, ChP volume was also associated with MMSE (β=-0.23, P < 0.001), MoCA (β=-0.24, P < 0.001), NPI (β = 0.19, P < 0.001), and ADL scores (β = 0.23, P = 0.006) at baseline (Table 2, Model 2). The interaction between ChP and hippocampal volumes was only observed for the MMSE score at baseline (P = 0.002; Table 2, Model 3).

Among the 497 patients on the AD continuum at baseline, 155 (MCI: 86 and AD: 69) were followed-up for an average of 10.0 ± 4.5 months. The clinical profiles of participants lost to follow-up, and those who completed follow-up are listed in Supplementary eTable 1. Table 3 presents the longitudinal associations between the rates of change in ChP volume, hippocampal volume, LVV, ECT alone, or combined ChP and hippocampal volumes and the rates of change in neuropsychological tests in patients in the AD continuum during the follow-up period.

Table 3 The longitudinal association of the rate of change in both ChP volume, hippocampal volume, LVV, ECT alone, or combined ChP and hippocampal volumes with the rate of changes in neuropsychological tests in patients on the AD continuum over follow-up
Full size table

After correcting for age, sex, years of education, APOE ε4 status, and the rate of change in eTIV, rapidly enlarged ChP volume was longitudinally associated with a faster increased in the NPI score (β = 5.16, P = 0.024; Table 3, Model 1). After correcting for hippocampal volume and the above-mentioned confounders, rapidly enlarged ChP volume was also longitudinally associated with a faster increased in the NPI score (β = 5.25, P = 0.023; Table 3, Model 2). Moreover, there was no interaction between ChP and hippocampal volumes in these associations (P = 0.435; Table 3, Model 3).

Discussion

This study demonstrated that ChP volume enlargement was correlated with the CSF hallmarks of AD, neuropsychological changes, and multimodal neuroimaging measures across the AD continuum. Moreover, ChP volume mediated the association between CSF hallmarks (Aβ42 and Aβ40) and cognitive impairment. These findings preliminarily revealed that abnormalities in the ChP linked an upstream pathological event with downstream clinical manifestations and were closely related to multi-dimensional measures of neurodegenerative changes along the AD continuum. Moreover, we observed that ChP volume possessed higher diagnostic accuracy in identifying cerebral Aβ42 changes or differentiating patients with MCI from the HCs than hippocampal volume, LVV, or ECT alone after accounting for important demographic factors. Additionally, the combination of ChP and hippocampal volumes was more effective in identifying cerebral Aβ changes and discriminating between the presence of AD dementia, MCI, and normal cognition than hippocampal volume alone, suggesting the early diagnostic value of ChP volume on the AD continuum. Furthermore, we found that faster ChP volume enlargement was associated with more rapid deterioration in the severity of NPS during follow-up, which was not observed in the association of the hippocampal volume, LVV, or ECT with these clinical symptoms. Given the high heterogeneity of the AD continuum, our study provides evidence for a novel, reliable structural neuroimaging marker to assist in early detection and prediction of the AD continuum in clinical practice.

Consistent with our findings, a previous study also identified negative associations between ChP volume and CSF proteins (Aβ, total and phosphorylated-Tau) in patients with MCI or AD dementia [14]. To our knowledge, our study is the first to reveal that ChP volume possesses high diagnostic efficiency for identifying patients with MCI and HCs, which is higher than that of hippocampal volume, LVV, or ECT alone after accounting for important demographic factors. Moreover, when the ChP and hippocampal volumes were combined, the diagnostic efficiency for identifying the cerebral Aβ42 changes and differentiating patients with AD dementia from those with MCI, patients with AD dementia from HCs, and patients with MCI from HCs increased significantly compared with the diagnostic efficiency of hippocampal volume alone. Our findings suggest an advantageous assisted diagnostic value of ChP volume during the early stages of the AD continuum. The glymphatic system is a fluid-clearance pathway that promotes CSF/interstitial fluid exchange for effective waste–solute transport and drainage, including Aβ [35, 36]. In this process, the ChP plays a crucial role in regulating CSF dynamics and maintaining brain homeostasis [37]. Recent studies have indicated that Aβ accumulation and neurofibrillary tangle-like inclusions could lead to physiological dysfunction of the ChP, causing stromal fibrosis, stromal dystrophic calcification, blood vessel thickening, inflammation, and reduced CSF production, consequently affecting the structure and function of the ChP [38, 39]. Given that Aβ accumulation is a key pathological hallmark of the AD continuum, which is positively correlated with clinical progression and severity [40], we conducted mediation analyses and discovered that ChP volume mediated a robust association between CSF Aβ levels and cognitive impairment, and the CSF Aβ levels also mediated the association between ChP volume and cognitive impairment. Therefore, ChP abnormality could serve as a non-invasive surrogate marker of impaired Aβ clearance in the brain, which is crucial in connecting Aβ-related neurodegeneration with cognitive impairment in the AD continuum.

Consistently, we found a relationship between ChP volume enlargement and more severe atrophy and lower cerebral perfusion in well-known cognition-related brain regions, further confirming the underlying connection between ChP and these brain regions. Previous research exploring the association between ChP and other essential brain areas in the AD continuum is extremely scarce [19]. Recent studies indicated that ChP volume enlargement correlated with reduced cortical thickness and progressive local brain atrophy in patients with multiple sclerosis [41, 42]. ChP volume was significantly correlated with neuroinflammatory changes in the anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex and circulating cytokine elevation in patients with depression [43, 44]. A murine model study revealed that impairment in the structure and transport function of the ChP was correlated with CSF nutritional composition alterations, which further affected hippocampal plasticity [45]. Similarly, another mouse injection experiment demonstrated that in vitro generated plasma extracellular vesicles (pEV) with similar characteristics as AD-pEV could accumulate in the ChP of injected animals and reach the primary hippocampal neurons [46], further indicating the connection among these brain regions. Collectively, these results solidified our hypothesis regarding a strong association between ChP volume and other neurodegenerative measures, thereby highlighting its significance in the pathophysiology of the AD continuum.

Consistent with our findings, retrospective studies also revealed that ChP volume was larger in patients with AD dementia than in those with MCI and HCs at baseline [14, 19]. Notably, we demonstrated that ChP volume serves as a potent novel measure for discriminating AD dementia, MCI, and normal cognition after accounting for important demographic factors, providing a unique insight into the clinical value of ChP in the AD continuum. A recent study found that ChP volume possessed high diagnostic efficiency in differentiating between patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration and HCs [47], reiterating its pathological role in the neurodegenerative process. Importantly, we found that rapid ChP volume enlargement was longitudinally associated with accelerated deterioration in the severity of NPS during the follow-up period. The association was not merely a consequence of the decrease in whole brain or hippocampal volume involved in AD but represents an independent process with a higher predictive value than that of other well-known brain regions in the change of NPS. These findings suggest the early diagnostic and predictive value of ChP volume in the AD continuum. Although the exact mechanism regarding the association between the ChP volume and the NPS progression remains unclear, previous research indicated that ChP volume enlargement reflected aging and impaired ChP function, leading to blood–CSF barrier disruption and subsequent reduction in CSF Aβ clearance; in patients with AD, this disruption culminates in clinical progression and neurodegeneration [39, 48]. This result was also consistent with the above-mentioned findings and previous observations that ChP volume was strongly related to abnormal cerebral Aβ deposition, which triggers irreversible AD pathological processes [49, 50]. In addition, ChP plays a pivotal role in regulating the trafficking of immune cells from the brain parenchyma into the CSF. It has recently attracted attention as a key structure in the initiation of neuroinflammatory responses. The latter is another important pathophysiological hallmark of the onset and development of the AD continuum [51]. A recent retrospective study found that ChP volume was significantly positively associated with neuroinflammatory plasma biomarkers (GFAP) [52]. An observational study found that a significantly greater CP volume in patients with depression was positively correlated with [11C]PK11195 PET (neuro-inflammatory markers) binding in the anterior cingulate, prefrontal, and insular cortices, but not with the peripheral inflammatory markers [53]. A translational framework study also revealed that ChP enlargement was strongly linked to acute and ongoing neuroinflammatory activity in mouse models and in patients with multiple sclerosis. These findings suggest that the degradation of the ChP structure could co-occur with neuroinflammation, which could contribute to the development of neurodegeneration and clinical progression. However, a preliminary post-mortem study with in vivo findings revealed that the ChP damage in AD was consistent with increased cytokine levels but without evidence of inflammatory activation or infiltrates [16].

A notable strength of this study is its large-scale and longitudinal design, which facilitated in-depth exploration of the role and clinical values of ChP regarding the onset and development of neurodegeneration in the AD continuum through neuropsychological assessment for the first time. Nevertheless, this study had some limitations. First, the follow-up sample was relatively small owing to the loss of follow-up resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. Nevertheless, it remains the largest longitudinal study investigating the role of the ChP in the AD continuum. Second, functional changes in the ChP were not identified using multimodal imaging (ASL and diffusion tensor imaging), but ChP volume provided simpler and more convenient and feasible structural imaging clinically. Finally, the invasive nature of lumbar puncture prevented analysis of the temporal dynamics between ChP volume and CSF biomarkers.

Conclusions

This study reveals the overarching role of the ChP in neurodegeneration in the AD continuum by examining the relationships between ChP enlargement and increased cerebral Aβ accumulation, cognitive decline, and decreased cerebral volumes, cortical thickness, and perfusion, and the strong mediating effect of ChP volume on the association between upstream cerebral pathology and downstream clinical changes. It could better detect the early stages of the AD continuum and predict prognosis, and significantly enhance the differential diagnostic ability of hippocampus on the AD continuum. These findings indicate that ChP volume could be a non-invasive, sensitive, reliable, and translational imaging marker for early detection and prediction across the AD continuum. Future research should explore functional changes in the ChP, clinically validate this diagnostic and prognostic marker on the AD continuum, and determine whether clinical interventions targeting the ChP can improve cognitive function and outcomes.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

  1. Scheltens P, De Strooper B, Kivipelto M, et al. Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet. 2021;397(10284):1577–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32205-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Kurz C, Walker L, Rauchmann BS, et al. Dysfunction of the blood-brain barrier in Alzheimer’s disease: evidence from human studies. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2022;48(3):e12782. https://doi.org/10.1111/nan.12782.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jack CR Jr, Bennett DA, Blennow K, et al. NIA-AA Research Framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2018;14(4):535–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jia J, Ning Y, Chen M, et al. Biomarker changes during 20 years preceding Alzheimer’s Disease. N Engl J Med. 2024;390(8):712–22. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2310168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kompaníková P, Bryja V. Regulation of choroid plexus development and its functions. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2022;79(6):304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-022-04314-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Čarna M, Onyango IG, Katina S, et al. Pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease: involvement of the choroid plexus. Alzheimers Dement. 2023;19(8):3537–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.12970.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ramusino MC, Vitali P, Anzalone N, et al. Vascular lesions and brain atrophy in Alzheimer’s, vascular and mixed dementia: an optimized 3T MRI protocol reveals distinctive radiological profiles. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2022;19(6):449–57. https://doi.org/10.2174/1567205019666220620112831.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tadayon E, Pascual-Leone A, Press D, et al. Choroid plexus volume is associated with levels of CSF proteins: relevance for Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2020;89:108–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2020.01.005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Alawode DOT, Heslegrave AJ, Ashton NJ, et al. Transitioning from cerebrospinal fluid to blood tests to facilitate diagnosis and disease monitoring in Alzheimer’s disease. J Intern Med. 2021;290(3):583–601. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.13332.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Chuluunbat M, Matsuda D, Fujita K, et al. Identification and validation of a gray matter volume network in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurol Sci. 2022;440:120344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2022.120344.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ossenkoppele R, Smith R, Ohlsson T, et al. Associations between tau, Aβ, and cortical thickness with cognition in Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2019;92(6):e601–12. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000006875.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Duan W, Sehrawat P, Balachandrasekaran A, et al. Cerebral blood Flow is Associated with Diagnostic Class and Cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s Disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;76(3):1103–20. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-200034.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Yu J, Li J, Huang X. The Beijing version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment as a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment: a community-based study. BMC Psychiatry. 2012;12:156. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-12-156.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Leung VP, Lam LC, Chiu HF, et al. Validation study of the Chinese version of the neuropsychiatric inventory (CNPI). Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2001;16(8):789–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.427.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kecskemeti S, Freeman A, Travers BG, et al. FreeSurfer based cortical mapping and T1-relaxometry with MPnRAGE: test-retest reliability with and without retrospective motion correction. NeuroImage. 2021;242:118447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118447.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Veitch DP, Weiner MW, Aisen PS, et al. Understanding disease progression and improving Alzheimer’s disease clinical trials: recent highlights from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Alzheimers Dement. 2019;15(1):106–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2018.08.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lombardi G, Crescioli G, Cavedo E, et al. Structural magnetic resonance imaging for the early diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease in people with mild cognitive impairment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;3(3):CD009628. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009628.pub2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang X, Huang W, Su L, et al. Neuroimaging advances regarding subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurodegener. 2020;15(1):55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-020-00395-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Saunders NR, Dziegielewska KM, Fame RM, et al. The choroid plexus: a missing link in our understanding of brain development and function. Physiol Rev. 2023;103(1):919–56. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00060.2021.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kant S, Stopa EG, Johanson CE, et al. Choroid plexus genes for CSF production and brain homeostasis are altered in Alzheimer’s disease. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2018;15(1):34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12987-018-0120-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Scarpetta V, Bodaleo F, Salio C, et al. Morphological and mitochondrial changes in murine choroid plexus epithelial cells during healthy aging. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2023;20(1):19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12987-023-00420-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Gião T, Teixeira T, Almeida MR, et al. Choroid Plexus in Alzheimer’s Disease-The Current State of Knowledge. Biomedicines. 2022;10(2):224. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10020224.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Choi JD, Moon Y, Kim HJ, et al. Choroid Plexus volume and permeability at Brain MRI within the Alzheimer Disease Clinical Spectrum. Radiology. 2022;304(3):635–45. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.212400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jiang J, Hong Y, Li W, et al. Chain Mediation Analysis of the Effects of Nutrition and Cognition on the Association of Apolipoprotein E ɛ4 with neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer’s Disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2023;96(2):669–81. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-230577.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jiang J, Liu Y, Wang A, et al. Development and validation of a nutrition-related genetic-clinical-radiological nomogram associated with behavioral and psychological symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease. Chin Med J (Engl). 2023. https://doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000002914.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(3):263–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Katzman R, Zhang MY, Ouang-Ya-Qu, et al. A Chinese version of the Mini-mental State examination; impact of illiteracy in a Shanghai dementia survey. J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41(10):971–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(88)90034-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Leuzy A, Mattsson-Carlgren N, Palmqvist S, et al. Blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer’s disease. EMBO Mol Med. 2022;14(1):e14408. https://doi.org/10.15252/emmm.202114408.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Márquez F, Yassa MA. Neuroimaging biomarkers for Alzheimer’s Disease. Mol Neurodegener. 2019;14(1):21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-019-0325-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Chandra A, Dervenoulas G, Politis M, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Magnetic resonance imaging in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. J Neurol. 2019;266(6):1293–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-018-9016-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Isensee F, Jaeger PF, Kohl SAA, et al. nnU-Net: a self-configuring method for deep learning-based biomedical image segmentation. Nat Methods. 2021;18(2):203–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-020-01008-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Monereo-Sánchez J, de Jong JJA, Drenthen GS, et al. Quality control strategies for brain MRI segmentation and parcellation: practical approaches and recommendations - insights from the Maastricht study. NeuroImage. 2021;237:118174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Muller J, Sinnecker T, Wendebourg MJ, et al. Choroid Plexus volume in multiple sclerosis vs Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum disorder: a Retrospective, cross-sectional analysis. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2022;9(3):e1147. https://doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000001147.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Serang S, Jacobucci R. Exploratory Mediation Analysis of Dichotomous Outcomes via regularization. Multivar Behav Res. 2020;55(1):69–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2019.1608145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lohela TJ, Lilius TO, Nedergaard M. The glymphatic system: implications for drugs for central nervous system diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2022;21(10):763–79. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-022-00500-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hablitz LM, Nedergaard M. The Glymphatic System: a Novel Component of Fundamental Neurobiology. J Neurosci. 2021;41(37):7698–711. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0619-21.2021.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Christensen J, Li C, Mychasiuk R. Choroid plexus function in neurological homeostasis and disorders: the awakening of the circadian clocks and orexins. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2022;42(7):1163–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X221082786.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Shen X, Xia L, Liu L, et al. Altered clearance of beta-amyloid from the cerebrospinal fluid following subchronic lead exposure in rats: roles of RAGE and LRP1 in the choroid plexus. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2020;61:126520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtemb.2020.126520.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Municio C, Carrero L, Antequera D, et al. Choroid Plexus aquaporins in CSF Homeostasis and the Glymphatic System: their relevance for Alzheimer’s Disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(1):878. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24010878.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Hampel H, Hardy J, Blennow K, et al. The Amyloid-β pathway in Alzheimer’s Disease. Mol Psychiatry. 2021;26(10):5481–503. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-021-01249-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Chen X, Luo D, Zheng Q, et al. Enlarged choroid plexus related to cortical atrophy in multiple sclerosis. Eur Radiol. 2023;33(4):2916–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09277-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ricigliano VAG, Morena E, Colombi A, et al. Choroid Plexus Enlargement in Inflammatory multiple sclerosis: 3.0-T MRI and translocator protein PET evaluation. Radiology. 2021;301(1):166–77. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2021204426.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Bravi B, Melloni EMT, Paolini M, et al. Choroid plexus volume is increased in mood disorders and associates with circulating inflammatory cytokines. Brain Behav Immun. 2023;116:52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2023.11.036.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Althubaity N, Schubert J, Martins D, et al. Choroid plexus enlargement is associated with neuroinflammation and reduction of blood brain barrier permeability in depression. Neuroimage Clin. 2022;33:102926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102926.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Liu K, Li H, Zeng N, et al. Decline of stress resilience in aging rats: focus on choroid plexus-cerebrospinal fluid-hippocampus. World J Biol Psychiatry. 2023;24(6):508–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/15622975.2022.2151044.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Lee JH, Ostalecki C, Oberstein T, et al. Alzheimer’s disease protease-containing plasma extracellular vesicles transfer to the hippocampus via the choroid plexus. EBioMedicine. 2022;77:103903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.103903.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Assogna M, Premi E, Gazzina S, et al. Association of Choroid Plexus volume with serum biomarkers, clinical features, and Disease Severity in patients with Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration Spectrum. Neurology. 2023;101(12):e1218–30. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000207600.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Novakova Martinkova J, Ferretti MT, Ferrari A, et al. Longitudinal progression of choroid plexus enlargement is associated with female sex, cognitive decline and ApoE E4 homozygote status. Front Psychiatry. 2023;14:1039239. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1039239.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Palmqvist S, Insel PS, Stomrud E, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid and plasma biomarker trajectories with increasing amyloid deposition in Alzheimer’s disease. EMBO Mol Med. 2019;11(12):e11170. https://doi.org/10.15252/emmm.201911170.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Lee WJ, Brown JA, Kim HR, et al. Regional Aβ-tau interactions promote onset and acceleration of Alzheimer’s disease tau spreading. Neuron. 2022;110(12):1932–e19435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2022.03.034.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Lee H, Ozturk B, Stringer MS, et al. Choroid plexus tissue perfusion and blood to CSF barrier function in rats measured with continuous arterial spin labeling. NeuroImage. 2022;261:119512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119512.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Bouhrara M, Walker KA, Alisch R. Association of Plasma Markers of Alzheimer’s Disease, Neurodegeneration, and Neuroinflammation with the Choroid Plexus Integrity in Aging. Aging Dis. 2024 Jan;8. https://doi.org/10.14336/AD.2023.1226.

  53. Fleischer V, Gonzalez-Escamilla G, Ciolac D, et al. Translational value of choroid plexus imaging for tracking neuroinflammation in mice and humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021;118(36):e2025000118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2025000118.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to all CIBL study participants and researchers for their involvement in this study.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (grant numbers: 2021YFC2500100 and 2021YFC2500103) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers: 82071187 and 81870821).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

    Jiwei Jiang, Zhizheng Zhuo, Anxin Wang, Wenyi Li, Shirui Jiang, Yunyun Duan, Qiwei Ren, Min Zhao, Linlin Wang, Shiyi Yang, Yaou Liu & Jun Xu

  2. National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing, China

    Jiwei Jiang, Zhizheng Zhuo, Anxin Wang, Wenyi Li, Shirui Jiang, Yunyun Duan, Qiwei Ren, Min Zhao, Linlin Wang, Shiyi Yang, Yaou Liu & Jun Xu

  3. The Affiliated Hospital of Yunnan University, Kunming, China

    Maher Un Nisa Awan

Authors
  1. Jiwei Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zhizheng Zhuo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anxin Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wenyi Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shirui Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yunyun Duan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Qiwei Ren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Min Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Linlin Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Shiyi Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Maher Un Nisa Awan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Yaou Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Jun Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Jiwei Jiang designed the study and wrote the manuscript; Zhizheng Zhuo and Yunyun Duan performed imaging acquisition and segmentation; Anxin Wang and Wenyi Li analyzed the data; Jiwei Jiang; Shirui Jiang draw the figures; Qiwei Ren, Min Zhao, Linlin Wang, Shiyi Yang and Maher Un Nisa Awan collected the data; Yaou Liu designed the study and revised the manuscript. Jun Xu aided in study screening procedures and funding.All authors critically reviewed the manuscript, agreed to be fully accountable for ensuring the integrity and accuracy of the work, and read and approved the final manuscript before submission.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yaou Liu or Jun Xu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study utilized prospectively collected data from the Chinese Imaging, Biomarkers, and Lifestyle (CIBL) study between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2022, which was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Capital Medical University, Beijing Tiantan Hospital (Beijing, China; KY-2021-028-01) and registered at Chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2100049131). All participants or their caregivers provided written informed consent.

Consent for publication

All participants or their caregivers provided written informed consent for the publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Abbreviations

Activities of Daily Living (ADL).

Alzheimer’s disease (AD).

Blood–brain barrier (BBB).

Body mass index (BMI).

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).

Cortical thickness (CT).

Choroid plexus (ChP).

Corrected cerebral blood flow (cCBF).

Chinese Imaging, Biomarkers, and Lifestyle (CIBL).

Healthy controls (HCs).

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).

Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).

Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI).

Natural direct effects (NDEs).

Natural indirect effects (NIEs).

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC).

Gray matter (GM).

White matter hypointensity (WMH).

Total effect (TE).

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, J., Zhuo, Z., Wang, A. et al. Choroid plexus volume as a novel candidate neuroimaging marker of the Alzheimer’s continuum. Alz Res Therapy 16, 149 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-024-01520-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-024-01520-w

Keywords

Alzheimer's Research & Therapy

ISSN: 1758-9193