Skip to main content

Table 1 Cluster characteristics at baseline

From: Uncovering heterogeneous cognitive trajectories in mild cognitive impairment: a data-driven approach

Characteristic

Stable MCI (cluster 1), N = 255

Mild decliners (cluster 2), N = 336

Moderate decliners (cluster 3), N = 240

Aggressive decliners (cluster 4), N = 105

p value

Age, years

70 (7)

74 (8)a

74 (7)a

74 (7)a

< 0.001

Education, years

17 (2)

16 (3)a

16 (3)a

15 (3)a

< 0.001

Gender, n (%)

    

0.020

 Male

136 (53%)

221 (66%)

140 (58%)

60 (57%)

 

 Female

119 (47%)

115 (34%)a

100 (42%)

45 (43%)

 

APOE4 carriers

93 (36%)

147 (44%)

161 (67%)a, b

69 (66%)a, b

< 0.001

Follow-up duration, years

3.54 (1.39)

3.29 (1.48)a

3.07 (1.40)a

2.32 (1.36)a, b, c

< 0.001

MMSE

29 (1)

28 (2)a

27 (2)a, b

26 (2)a, b, c

< 0.001

ADAS-Cog-13

10 (3)

15 (4)a

21 (4)a, b

26 (5)a, b, c

< 0.001

Memory composite score

0.88 (0.50)

0.22 (0.40)a

− 0.30 (0.40)a, b

− 0.64 (0.40)a, b, c

< 0.001

Executive function composite scored

0.75 (0.76)

0.32 (0.77)a

− 0.11 (0.75)a, b

− 0.73 (0.73)a, b, c

< 0.001

aVVe

21 (11)

27 (13)a

27 (12)a

33 (14)a, b, c

< 0.001

aEVf

2.62 (0.41)

2.35 (0.51)a

2.10 (0.43)a, b

1.98 (0.47)a, b, c

< 0.001

aHVg

5.03 (0.67)

4.48 (0.77)a

4.10 (0.68)a, b

3.87 (0.60)a, b, c

< 0.001

Brain FDG SUVRsh

1.29 (0.06)

1.27 (0.06)a

1.21 (0.08)a, b

1.20 (0.08)a, b

< 0.001

Brain amyloid SUVRsi

1.10 (0.16)

1.23 (0.22)a

1.36 (0.25)a, b

1.43 (0.20)a, b

< 0.001

CSF Aβ42j, pg/ml

200 (46)

176 (54)a

140 (39)a, b

139 (31)a, b

< 0.001

CSF t-tauk, pg/ml

64 (31)

85 (49)a

114 (55)a, b

129 (64)a, b, c

< 0.001

CSF p-taul, pg/ml

30 (16)

39 (24)a

48 (23)a, b

52 (25)a, b

< 0.001

  1. Notes: Continuous variables are summarized as mean (standard deviation), and categorical variables are summarized as n (%). Differences between the clusters were assessed with ANOVA for continuous variables and Pearson’s x 2 tests for categorical variables. When group differences were detected with ANOVA or Pearson’s x 2 tests, we used pairwise t-tests or x 2 tests in post hoc analyses and corrected for multiple testing using the FDR correction
  2. Abbreviations: MCI mild cognitive impairment, APOE apolipoprotein E, MMSE Mini-Mental State Examination, ADAS-Cog-13 Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale 13, aVV adjusted ventricular volume, aEV adjusted entorhinal cortex volume, aHV adjusted hippocampal volume, FDG fludeoxyglucose, SUVRs standardized uptake value ratios, Aß42 ß-amyloid, t-tau total tau, p-tau phosphorylated tau
  3. a p < 0.05 compared with stable MCI
  4. b p < 0.05 compared with mild decliners
  5. c p < 0.05 compared with moderate decliners
  6. dNumber of participants for executive function analysis: stable MCI: n = 255; mild decliners: n = 335; moderate decliners: n = 240; aggressive decliners: n = 104
  7. eNumber of participants for aVV analysis: stable MCI: n = 245; mild decliners: n = 321; moderate decliners: n = 224; aggressive decliners: n = 100
  8. fNumber of participants for aEV analysis: stable MCI: n = 224; mild decliners: n = 281; moderate decliners: n = 190; aggressive decliners: n = 90
  9. gNumber of participants for aHV analysis: stable MCI: n = 228; mild decliners: n = 282; moderate decliners: n = 191; aggressive decliners: n = 89
  10. hNumber of participants for FDG PET analysis: stable MCI: n = 237; mild decliners: n = 262; moderate decliners: n = 174; aggressive decliners: n = 59
  11. iNumber of participants for AV45 PET analysis: stable MCI: n = 182; mild decliners: n = 179; moderate decliners: n = 83; aggressive decliners: n = 41
  12. jNumber of participants for CSF Aβ42 analysis: stable MCI: n = 177; mild decliners: n = 213; moderate decliners: n = 152; aggressive decliners: n = 63
  13. kNumber of participants for CSF t-tau analysis: stable MCI: n = 176; mild decliners: n = 208; moderate decliners: n = 150; aggressive decliners: n = 62
  14. lNumber of participants for CSF p-tau analysis: stable MCI: n = 177; mild decliners: n = 213; moderate decliners: n = 152; aggressive decliners: n = 63