Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of the whole cohort and DLB clusters

From: Parsing heterogeneity within dementia with Lewy bodies using clustering of biological, clinical, and demographic data

 

Whole cohort

Cluster 1

Cluster 2

Cluster 3

Cluster 4

Between-cluster ANOVA

(N = 107)

(n = 39)

(n = 25)

(n = 24)

(n = 19)

(p-value)

Age

68 (± 8.7)

70 (± 7.2)b,d

64 (± 7.7)a,c

71 (± 10)a,d

64 (± 6.9)a,c

0.001

Sex, n men (%)

77 (72.0%)

28 (71.8%)

21 (84.0%)d

21 (87.5%)d

7 (36.8%)b,c

0.001

Education, years mean (SD)

11 (± 3.8)

11 (± 2.8)b,d

8.2 (± 2.4)a,c,d

12 (± 3.5)a,d

15 (± 3.3)a,b,c

<0.001

Disease duration, years mean (SD)

4.3 (± 3.8)

4.2 (± 4.9)d

3.7 (± 2.7)d

3.5 (± 2.3)d

6.3 (± 3.8)a,b,c

0.013

MMSE score, mean (SD)

25 (± 4.0)

24 (± 3.9)d

22 (± 3.9)d

25 (± 3.8)d

28 (± 2.0)a,b,c

<0.001

Core clinical features

 Parkinsonism, n present (%)

87 (81 %)

33 (85 %)c

25 (100%)c

11 (46 %)a,b,d

18 (95 %)c

<0.001

 Visual hallucinations, n present (%)

68 (64 %)

29 (74 %)b

8 (32 %)a

17 (71 %)

14 (74 %)

0.003

 Cognitive fluctuations, n present (%)

90 (84 %)

39 (100 %)b

12 (48 %)a,d

20 (83 %)

19 (100 %)b

<0.001

 Probable RBD, n present (%)

68 (64 %)

23 (59 %)

20 (80 %)

15 (62 %)

10 (53 %)

0.234

CSF biomarkers

 Aβ42, n abnormal (%)

31 (29 %)

16 (41 %)

6 (24 %)

8 (33 %)

1 (5 %)

0.037*

 Total tau, n abnormal (%)

23 (21 %)

4 (10 %)c

0 (0 %)c

19 (79 %)a,b,d

0 (0 %)c

<0.001

 p-tau, n abnormal (%)

38 (36 %)

11 (28 %)c

4 (16 %)c

23 (96 %)a,b,d

0 (0 %)c

<0.001

 AD CSF profile, n abnormal (%)

     

<0.001

  AD pathology

12 (11 %)

3 (8 %)

1 (4 %)

8 (33 %)

0 (0 %)

 

  AD pathological change

19 (18 %)

13 (33 %)

5 (20%)

0 (0 %)

1 (5%)

 

  Amyloid independent tau-pathology

26 (24 %)

8 (21 %)

3 (12 %)

15 (63 %)

0 (0 %)

 

  Normal

50 (47 %)

15 (38 %)

16 (64 %)

1 (4 %)

18 (95 %)

 

Visual rating scales

 MTA, n abnormal (%)

35 (33 %)

23 (59 %)b,c

5 (20 %)a

3 (12 %)a

4 (21 %)

<0.001

 GCA-F, n abnormal (%)

42 (39 %)

20 (51 %)d

11 (44 %)d

11 (46 %)d

0 (0 %)a,b,c

0.002

 PA, n abnormal (%)

61 (57 %)

19 (49 %)

19 (76 %)d

19 (79 %)d

4 (21 %)b,c

<0.001

 Fazekas, n high WMH burden (%)

29/92 (32%)§

15/32 (47%)d

6/24 (25%)

7/18 (39%)

1/17 (6%)a

0.018

  1. No missing data was recorded for the rest of the variables. ap < 0.05 compared to cluster 1. bp<0.05 compared to cluster 2. cp<0.05 compared to cluster 3. dp<0.05 compared to cluster 4. §Available data for Fazekas is n = 92. *Does not survive Hochberg’s correction in post hoc pair-wise comparisons. Abbreviations: ANOVA analysis of variance, MMSE Mini-Mental State Examination, Aβ42 amyloid-beta 1-42, p-tau phosphorylated tau, AD Alzheimer’s disease, MTA medial temporal lobe atrophy, GCA-F global cortical atrophy-frontal subscale, PA posterior brain atrophy, na not applicable