Skip to main content
Download PDF

Low plasma neurofilament light levels associated with raised cortical microglial activation suggest inflammation acts to protect prodromal Alzheimer’s disease

Alzheimer's Research & Therapy volume 12, Article number: 3 (2020) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid levels of neurofilament light (NfL), a marker of axonal degeneration, have previously been reported to be raised in patients with clinically diagnosed Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Activated microglia, an intrinsic inflammatory response to brain lesions, are also known to be present in a majority of Alzheimer or mild cognitive impaired (MCI) subjects with raised β-amyloid load on their positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. It is now considered that the earliest phase of inflammation may be protective to the brain, removing amyloid plaques and remodelling synapses. Our aim was to determine whether the cortical inflammation/microglial activation load, measured with the translocator protein marker 11C-PK11195 PET, was correlated with plasma NfL levels in prodromal and early Alzheimer subjects.

Methods

Twenty-seven MCI or early AD cases with raised cortical β-amyloid load had 11C-(R)-PK11195 PET, structural and diffusion magnetic resonance imaging, and levels of their plasma NfL measured. Correlation analyses were performed using surface-based cortical statistics.

Results

Statistical maps localised areas in MCI cases where levels of brain inflammation correlated inversely with plasma NfL levels. These areas were localised in the frontal, parietal, precuneus, occipital, and sensorimotor cortices. Brain inflammation correlated negatively with mean diffusivity (MD) of water with regions overlapping.

Conclusion

We conclude that an inverse correlation between levels of inflammation in cortical areas and plasma NfL levels indicates that microglial activation may initially be protective to axons in AD. This is supported by the finding of an inverse association between cortical water diffusivity and microglial activation in the same regions. Our findings suggest a rationale for stimulating microglial activity in early and prodromal Alzheimer cases—possibly using immunotherapy. Plasma NfL levels could be used as a measure of the protective efficacy of immune stimulation and for monitoring efficacy of putative neuroprotective agents.

Background

Neurofilaments are found in the cytoplasm of neurons and act to transport nutrients and other molecules along axons. The subunit proteins constituting neurofilaments include neurofilament light (NfL), medium and heavy (L, M and H) proteins based on their molecular weight [1]. The neurofilaments control axonal diameter, and it has been reported that cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels of NfL provide a non-specific marker of axonal degeneration. Patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis where pyramidal tract involvement is present show greatly raised CSF NfL levels, while those with only peripheral motor neuron disease (progressive muscular atrophy) show smaller elevations [2, 3]. Multiple sclerosis cases in the chronic progressive phase of their disease also show raised CSF NfL, but those who have early relapsing remitting disease show only modest elevations [4]. Raised levels of CSF NfL have also been reported in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and Huntington’s disease [2, 5, 6]. No relationship was found between cognitive status and CSF NfL levels in AD patients, though disability of Huntington’s disease cases, when rated with the UHDRS, correlated with CSF NfL levels [6].

More recently, an ultrasensitive digital array for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) of proteins including NfL has been developed [7], which allows reliable detection of single molecules of NfL in plasma or serum. NfL plasma levels were found to correlate strongly with those measured in CSF. A large number of studies have now shown that blood NfL is a robust biomarker of neuronal injury, irrespective of the cause [8]. In the context of AD, serum NfL has been found to mark the onset of neurodegeneration in subjects at risk for familial disease [9]. A recent study found increased plasma NfL in AD patients compared to nondemented controls [10]. A larger study involving the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI-1) cohort reported raised plasma NfL in sporadic mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer cases [11]. The plasma NfL levels correlated with reduced CSF β-amyloid 1–42 and raised CSF tau in the MCI cohort. At baseline, high plasma NfL levels in the MCI and AD cohort were associated with worse Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and ADAS-COG 11 scores and subjects had larger ventricular and smaller hippocampal volumes and thinner cortices.

Microglia are part of the intrinsic immune defence of the brain but normally exist in a resting state monitoring the local constituents of brain extracellular fluid [12]. In AD, there is abnormal formation of extracellular plaques of β-amyloid protein fibrils and intraneuronal tangles of hyperphosphorylated tau. This characteristic pathology of AD is associated with an inflammatory response which involves activated microglia surrounding plaques and degenerating neurons [13]. Activated, but not resting, microglia express the translocator protein (TSPO) on the outer membranes of their mitochondria [14]. 11C-PK11195 positron emission tomography (PET) is an in vivo marker of the TSPO expressed by activated microglia. Recently, we reported that 80% of β-amyloid-positive MCI cases showed associated active inflammation and raised TSPO [15]. However, whether the inflammation was playing a protective or cidal role in the disease was unclear. It has been reported in established AD that levels of temporoparietal cortical microglial activation correlate inversely with cognitive ratings on the MMSE [16]. This suggests that the microglial phenotype may be toxic in these subjects. However, microglia are known to also express protective phenotypes releasing growth factors, clearing amyloid fibrils, and remodelling damaged synapses. Here, we report the presence of an inverse association of plasma NfL levels, acquired from cases with either prodromal (β-amyloid-positive MCI) or early clinical β-amyloid-positive AD, with their levels of cortical microglial activation measured with 11C-(R)-PK11195 PET [17]. These findings are corroborated by measurements of atrophy and microstructural integrity using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Methods

Study subjects

Subjects with MCI and clinical AD were recruited from memory clinics and by advertisement as part of an ongoing longitudinal PET study and were assessed as previously described [15]. In this report, we included amyloid-positive MCI/AD subjects who had measures of plasma NfL, an 11C-PK11195 PET scan, and whole-brain MRI with structural and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). The MCI subjects fulfilled the Petersen clinical criteria while the AD patients were diagnosed by dementia specialists using ICD-10 criteria. All subjects were assessed with MMSE and Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR). The project was approved by the regional ethics committee and all subjects gave their written informed consent.

Plasma NfL levels

Plasma NfL concentrations were measured using an ultrasensitive in house ‘single molecule array’ (SIMOA) ELISA assay, as previously described in detail [7]. The measurements were performed by a board-certified laboratory technician using a single batch of reagents.

Brain imaging

MRI was performed on a Skyra 3 Tesla system (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). An MP2RAGE (Magnetization Prepared Rapid Gradient-Echo with two gradient echo images) sequence was used for co-registration of MRI with PET, normalisation into standard space, generation of grey matter (GM) masks, and measurements of cortical thickness. DWI was obtained using a fast, clinically practical, diffusion kurtosis imaging sequence [18, 19]. Acquisitions included one b = 0 image, three b = 1000 s/mm2, and nine b = 2500 s/mm2, all acquired with 2.3-mm isotropic voxels, FOV = 220 × 220 mm2 in 38 slices, TR = 12.4 s, TE = 0.107 s, and TI = 2.1 s. Mean diffusivity (MD) was calculated from the DWI sequence. MD is an imaging biomarker of early axonal degenerative changes in AD [20].

Subjects were scanned using a High Resolution Research Tomograph (ECAT HRRT; CTI/Siemens, Knoxville, TN) as previously described [15, 21]. A mean 392 MBq dose of 11C-(R)-(1-[2-chlorophenyl]-N-methyl-N-[1-methyl-propyl]-3-isoquinolinecarboxamide) (abbreviated PK11195) was injected intravenously. The total dynamic scan time was 60.5 min (list mode 3D acquisition).

PET images were reconstructed with a 3D-OSEM (ordered subset expectation maximum) with 10 iterations and 16 subsets. Point-spread function (PSF) reconstruction was applied to minimise partial volume effects, improve image quality, contrast and quantitative accuracy, and achieve a reconstructed resolution of 2.5 mm. Images were not partial volume corrected.

Image analyses using cortical surface maps

Parametric maps of binding potential (BPND) were generated at a voxel level from the dynamic 11C-(R)-PK11195 PET images using the Simplified Reference Tissue Model (SRTM) [22] implemented in Matlab. As all anatomical regions in the brain can potentially show specific PK11195 binding in Alzheimer’s disease due to local pathology or downstream disconnection, a Supervised Cluster Analysis with 6 classes [23] (SVCA6) was used to localise a distributed cluster of voxels from the dynamic images of each MCI/AD case, which provided a reference tissue input function representing normal GM kinetics.

Surface-based cortical statistics were used to perform the analyses. For each subject, the cortical surface was extracted from the individual MP2RAGE image using Fast Accurate Cortex Extraction (FACE) [24]. To map the PK11195 PET and DWI signal onto the surface, individual cortical surfaces were transformed into the PET/DWI native space, respectively, using a rigid body co-registration with the MP2RAGE image. The signal was then interpolated and mapped to the surface approximating the middle cortical layer, in order to minimise the influence of partial volume effects. Before mapping the PK11195 signal, the PET image was smoothed using a 4-mm full width at half maximum (FWHM) Gaussian filter to compensate for potential inaccuracies in the co-registration. Individual surfaces were registered to the cortical surface of an average non-linear anatomical template in the MNI space using a feature-driven surface registration algorithm [25, 26]. Parameter values were then mapped to the average surface and smoothed using a 20-mm FWHM geodesic Gaussian kernel. Smoothing along the cortical surface eliminates unwanted blurring across gyri caused by smoothing in voxel space.

Cortical thickness was determined by estimating the distance between the white matter (WM)-GM surface and the GM-CSF surface at each location of the cortical surface, producing a cortical thickness surface map for each individual. Using the same approach as before, individual cortical thickness maps were mapped to the average surface and smoothed.

Statistical analyses

Correlation between parameters was calculated at each point/vertex on the cortical surface using a linear regression model implemented in Python 3.7.3 (Python Software Foundation). This produced a statistical map of the cortical surface with each vertex indicating regression slopes different from zero. Vertices with positive t-values indicate positive correlations and vice versa. In order to adjust for multiple comparisons, results from both positive and negative correlations were family-wise error rate (FWER) corrected using cluster-extent-based thresholding with varying primary cluster-defining thresholds for significance of p < 0.01 and p < 0.001 (both shown as overlay in figures). We chose to show thresholds of p < 0.01 and p < 0.001 as our primary findings. In Additional files 1, 2, 3, and 4, we have added the more lenient threshold of p < 0.05 to better comprehend the patterns of correlations. The cluster-extent threshold for significance was calculated using a Gaussian random field implemented in Statistical Parametric Mapping 12 (SPM12; Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging) taking into account the estimated intrinsic smoothness based in residual maps [27]. Visbrain was used for visualisation of the surface-based statistical maps [28]. Spearman’s Rho (ρ) was applied to test for correlation between NfL–MMSE and NfL–CDR sum-of-boxes (CDR-SOB).

Results

Twenty-seven MCI/AD subjects (8 females/19 males) were included in the analyses. The subjects had a mean age of 73.6 years (± 6.1), mean MMSE score of 25.9 (± 3.0), and a mean plasma NfL level of 27.9 pg/mL (± 10.7). One AD subject had no DWI sequence due to claustrophobia, so MD analyses only include 26 subjects.

Plasma NfL correlated inversely with PK11195 BPND levels in areas of frontal, parietal, precuneus, occipital, and sensorimotor cortices in the 27 MCI/AD cases (Fig. 1). MD correlated positively with plasma NfL levels in areas of the temporal lobes and the cingulate cortex (Fig. 2a). Levels of MD correlated inversely with PK11195 BPND primarily in parietal areas (Fig. 2b) and overlapped with areas of PK11195–NfL inverse correlation. It should be noted that not all subjects had whole-brain coverage for the DWI sequence, which led to lack of statistical inference in the most superior and inferior parts of the cerebrum (shown as dark grey areas on the figures involving MD). Finally, cortical thickness correlated inversely with plasma NfL levels in a single cluster in the left frontal lobe (Fig. 2c). There were no correlations between cortical thickness and PK11195 binding. Additionally, no correlations were detected between MMSE ratings and plasma NfL levels (ρ = − 0.057, P = 0.78) or cortical PK11195 binding, or between CDR-SOB scores and plasma NfL levels (ρ = 0.257, P = 0.20) or PK11195 binding.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Correlations between 11C-PK11195 BPND and plasma NfL. Surface-based cortical statistics displaying negative correlations between 11C-PK11195 BPND and plasma NfL levels in frontal, parietal, precuneus, occipital, and sensorimotor areas across 27 prodromal and early AD cases. The presented maps are cluster-level FWER corrected at p < 0.05, with two different cluster-defining primary thresholds: p < 0.01 and p < 0.001

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Surface based cortical statistics. a Areas with positive correlation between MD and levels of plasma NfL in temporal and cingulate regions. b Areas with negative correlation between MD and 11C-PK11195 BPND in parietal, precuneus, and occipital regions. c Areas with negative correlation between cortical thickness and NfL in frontal region. The presented maps are cluster-level FWER corrected at p < 0.05, with two different cluster-defining primary thresholds: p < 0.01 and p < 0.001. Dark grey indicate areas not covered in all subjects by DWI

Full size image

Discussion

This paper is the first to report in vivo an inverse association of plasma NfL concentrations with levels of cortical microglial activation imaged with PET in patients with prodromal or early mild AD confirmed by the presence of raised cortical β-amyloid deposition detected with 11C-PiB PET. Since plasma NfL levels are now a well-established biomarker for the extent of axonal damage, these results suggest that cortical microglial activation in early Aβ-positive individuals may initially play a protective role.

Plasma NfL levels have been shown to correlate strongly with those in CSF [7]. A recent study by Ashton et al. found that plasma NfL concentrations correlated with both severity of post-mortem neurofibrillary tangle pathology and nerve cell loss from neurodegeneration [29]. We have previously found PK11195 binding to be associated with amyloid load in prodromal AD [15]. In that series, it was noted that amyloid-positive MCI/AD subjects with absent or very low tau load still presented with high PK11195 binding [21]. This finding emphasises that β-amyloid aggregation can trigger an inflammatory brain response in vivo independent and ahead of the presence of tau tangles.

Activated microglia can be seen surrounding amyloid plaques and degenerating neurons containing tau tangles in Alzheimer brain slices with immunohistochemical stains [30]. The role of these microglia is still being debated. It has been suggested that initially microglia may be protective, attempting to clear toxic amyloid oligomers in early disease and releasing nerve growth factors. Subsequently, they fail to achieve this function and their levels decline. A later wave of microglia is then activated as tau tangles form and their load rises and these microglia express a toxic phenotype releasing cytokines which kill neurons and their axons so driving disease progression [17]. PK11195 PET is unable to discriminate between protective and cytotoxic activated microglia as both these microglial phenotypes express TSPO. If the majority of activated microglia in our MCI and early AD cohort exhibit a protective phenotype, then this could explain our observation of an inverse correlation between cortical microglial load and plasma NfL levels.

Surface-based cortical statistics showed that areas where brain inflammation levels correlated with plasma NfL levels in our MCI/AD group were localised in frontal, cingulate, parietal, precuneus, occipital, and sensorimotor cortices. The first four areas are particularly targeted by amyloid deposition [31], while occipital and primary sensorimotor cortices usually are relatively spared. Pyramidal cells in layers 3 and 5 of association cortical areas project to the brainstem and spinal cord, and hence, it is most likely that degeneration of these axons is responsible for the leakage of NfLs into the plasma.

We also found cortical areas where there was an inverse correlation between MD and PK11195 binding. These areas overlapped with areas of NfL–PK11195 inverse association, but were smaller in extent. As both NfL and MD are considered surrogate markers of axon loss, this result could corroborate a model of activated microglia in areas of intact microstructure. MD correlated positively with NfL in areas associated with early involvement in AD. Specifically, the left medial temporal lobe, the right lateral temporal lobe, and the cingulate cortex showed this association. These areas may represent a later disease stage where microglia are no longer protective and neurodegeneration has started. We found only a few small areas of inverse correlation between plasma NfL levels and cortical thickness. Cortical thickness is not sensitive to the initial neurodegeneration on an individual basis, and with the small sample size studied here; the statistical power is probably insufficient to pick up strong correlations for cortical thickness measurements.

While other studies have found association between cognitive function, e.g. MMSE and NfL [32], we found no associations between cognitive function (MMSE, CDR-SOB) and neither plasma NfL levels or cortical PK11195 binding. This could be due to our small sample size and the fact that it consist of MCI/early AD cases.

Limitations

Our study was cross-sectional, so we are unable to delineate the longitudinal relationship between plasma NfL and brain inflammation in AD from these data. The current study is single centre and based on a relatively small sample of early AD cases, so the results need to be confirmed in a larger cohort. We chose to visualise cluster-defining thresholds of p < 0.01 and p < 0.001. In other imaging modalities, a threshold of p < 0.01 is considered too lenient [33]; however, this has not been tested for PET and diffusion MR imaging. Compared to newer TSPO tracers now available, PK11195 PET has a low signal-to-noise ratio due to a high background signal. In favour of PK11195 PET, however, is the finding that the signals are not significantly influenced by the TSPO polymorphism expressed by subjects unlike newer PET TSPO markers; this simplifies the interpretation of imaging findings.

Conclusion

We have found that in early and prodromal Alzheimer patients raised plasma levels of NfL protein, a marker of axonal neurodegeneration, are inversely correlated with raised levels of PK11195 binding, a marker of microglial activation / neuroinflammation, in cortical areas. As raised plasma NfL reflect active neurodegeneration, our finding supports the view that inflammation initially plays a protective role in AD. Both these modalities have the potential to provide useful biomarkers in future studies on the efficacy of neuroprotective agents. The inverse correlation of levels of raised activated microglia in early AD with reduced plasma levels of NfL could suggest that initially boosting microglia activation, possibly with immunotherapy targeting abnormal protein aggregations, in early disease could be protective, but this hypothesis needs to be tested in further studies.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available on reasonable request.

References

  1. Hoffman PN, Lasek RJ. The slow component of axonal transport: identification of major structural polypeptides of the axon and their generality among mammalian neurons. J Cell Biol. 1975;66:351–66. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.66.2.351.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rosengren LE, Karlsson JE, Karlsson JO, Persson LI, Wikkelsø C. Patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and other neurodegenerative diseases have increased levels of neurofilament protein in CSF. J Neurochem. 1996;67:2013–8. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-4159.1996.67052013.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Skillbäck T, Mattsson N, Blennow K, Zetterberg H. Cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light concentration in motor neuron disease and frontotemporal dementia predicts survival. Amyotroph Lateral Scler Front Degener. 2017;18:397–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/21678421.2017.1281962.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Teunissen CE, Iacobaeus E, Khademi M, Brundin L, Norgren N, Koel-Simmelink MJA, et al. Combination of CSF N-acetylaspartate and neurofilaments in multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2009;72:1322–9. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181a0fe3f.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Olsson A, Csajbok L, Öst M, Höglund K, Nylén K, Rosengren L, et al. Marked increase of beta-amyloid(1-42) and amyloid precursor protein in ventricular cerebrospinal fluid after severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurol. 2004;251:870–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-004-0451-y.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Niemelä V, Landtblom AM, Blennow K, Sundblom J. Tau or neurofilament light-which is the more suitable biomarker for Huntington’s disease? PLoS One. 2017;12:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172762.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gisslén M, Price RW, Andreasson U, Norgren N, Nilsson S, Hagberg L, et al. Plasma concentration of the neurofilament light protein (NFL) is a biomarker of CNS injury in HIV infection: a cross-sectional study. EBioMedicine. 2016;3:135–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2015.11.036.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zetterberg H. Neurofilament light: a dynamic cross-disease fluid biomarker for Neurodegeneration. Neuron. 2016;91:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.06.030.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Weston PSJ, Poole T, Ryan NS, Nair A, Liang Y, Macpherson K, et al. Serum neurofilament light in familial Alzheimer disease: a marker of early neurodegeneration. Neurology. 2017;89:2167–75. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000004667.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Lewczuk P, Ermann N, Andreasson U, Schultheis C, Podhorna J, Spitzer P, et al. Plasma neurofilament light as a potential biomarker of neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2018;10:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-018-0404-9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mattsson N, Andreasson U, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Weiner MW, Aisen P, et al. Association of plasma neurofilament light with neurodegeneration in patients with Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurol. 2017;74:557–66. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.6117.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kreutzberg GW. Microglia: a sensor for pathological events in the CNS. Trends Neurosci. 1996;19:312–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-2236(96)10049-7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. McGeer EG, McGeer PL. Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment: a field in its infancy. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;19:355–61. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-2010-1219.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Scarf AM, Kassiou M. The Translocator protein. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:677–80. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.110.086629.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Parbo P, Ismail R, Hansen KV, Amidi A, Mårup FH, Gottrup H, et al. Brain inflammation accompanies amyloid in the majority of mild cognitive impairment cases due to Alzheimer’s disease. Brain. 2017;140:2002–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awx120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Edison P, Archer H, Hinz R, Hammers A, Tai Y, Hotton G, et al. Amyloid, hypometabolism, and cognition in Alzheimer disease. An [ 11C ]PIB and [18F ]FDG PET study. Neurology. 2007;68:501–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fan Z, Brooks DJ, Okello A, Edison P. An early and late peak in microglial activation in Alzheimer’s disease trajectory. Brain 2017:aww349. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/aww349.

  18. Hansen B, Lund TE, Sangill R, Jespersen SN. Experimentally and computationally fast method for estimation of a mean kurtosis. Magn Reson Med. 2013;69:1754–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.24743.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hansen B, Lund TE, Sangill R, Jespersen SN. Erratum: Hansen, Lund, Sangill, and Jespersen. Experimentally and computationally fast method for estimation of a mean kurtosis (Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 69:1754–1760 (2013). Magn Reson Med 2014;71:2250. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Weston PSJ, Simpson IJA, Ryan NS, Ourselin S, Fox NC. Diffusion imaging changes in grey matter in Alzheimer’s disease: a potential marker of early neurodegeneration. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2015;7:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-015-0132-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Parbo P, Ismail R, Sommerauer M, Stokholm MG, Hansen AK, Hansen KV, et al. Does inflammation precede tau aggregation in early Alzheimer’s disease? A PET study. Neurobiol Dis. 2018;117:211–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2018.06.004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lammertsma AA, Hume SP. Simplified reference tissue model for PET receptor studies. Neuroimage. 1996;4:153–8. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.1996.0066.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Turkheimer FE, Edison P, Pavese N, Roncaroli F, Anderson AN, Hammers A, et al. Reference and target region modeling of [11C]-(R)-PK11195 brain studies. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:158–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Eskildsen SF, Østergaard LR. Active surface approach for extraction of the human cerebral cortex from MRI. Med Image Comput Comput Interv. 2006;9:823–30.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fonov V, Evans AC, Botteron K, Almli CR, McKinstry RC, Collins DL. Unbiased average age-appropriate atlases for pediatric studies. Neuroimage. 2011;54:313–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.033.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Eskildsen SF, Østergaard LR. Evaluation of five algorithms for mapping brain cortical surfaces. Proc - 21st Brazilian Symp Comput Graph Image Process 2008:137–44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/SIBGRAPI.2008.16.

  27. Friston KJ, Worsley KJ, Frackowiak RSJ, Mazziotta JC, Evans AC. Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent. Hum Brain Mapp. 1994;1:210–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.460010306.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Combrisson E, Vallat R, O’Reilly C, Jas M, Pascarella A, Saive AL, et al. Visbrain: A multi-purpose GPU-accelerated open-source suite for multimodal brain data visualization. Front Neuroinform. 2019;13:1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2019.00014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ashton NJ, Leuzy A, Lim YM, Troakes C, Hortobágyi T, Höglund K, et al. Increased plasma neurofilament light chain concentration correlates with severity of post-mortem neurofibrillary tangle pathology and neurodegeneration. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2019;7:5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-018-0649-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Nagele RG, Wegiel J, Venkataraman V, Imaki H, Wang KC, Wegiel J. Contribution of glial cells to the development of amyloid plaques in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging. 2004;25:663–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2004.01.007.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Braak H, Braak E. Frequency of stages of Alzheimer-related lesions in different age categories. Neurobiol Aging. 1997;18:351–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-4580(97)00056-0.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lin YS, Lee WJ, Wang SJ, Fuh JL. Levels of plasma neurofilament light chain and cognitive function in patients with Alzheimer or Parkinson disease. Sci Rep. 2018;8:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35766-w.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Eklund A, Nichols TE, Knutsson H. Cluster failure: why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:7900–5. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602413113.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Bettina Grumsen for great technical assistance.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the Olav Thon Foundation, the European Research Council, the Swedish Research Council, the Danish Council of Independent Research, the Lundbeck Foundation, and NEURODIN an AU Pilot Centre funded by the Aarhus University Research Foundation.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Peter Parbo and Lasse Stensvig Madsen contributed equally to this work.

  2. Peter Parbo and Lasse Stensvig Madsen Indicates joint first authorship

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

    Peter Parbo, Lasse Stensvig Madsen, Rola Ismail & David J. Brooks

  2. Department of Clinical Physiology, Viborg Regional Hospital, Viborg, Denmark

    Peter Parbo

  3. Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden

    Henrik Zetterberg & Kaj Blennow

  4. Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Mölndal, Sweden

    Henrik Zetterberg & Kaj Blennow

  5. Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK

    Henrik Zetterberg

  6. UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, London, UK

    Henrik Zetterberg

  7. Center of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark

    Simon F. Eskildsen

  8. Department of Biomedicine/Interdisciplinary Nanoscience Centre (iNANO), Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark

    Thomas Vorup-Jensen

  9. Institute of Neuroscience, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    David J. Brooks

Authors
  1. Peter Parbo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lasse Stensvig Madsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rola Ismail
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Henrik Zetterberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kaj Blennow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Simon F. Eskildsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Thomas Vorup-Jensen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. David J. Brooks
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

PP and DJB designed the study. In the revision process, LSM contributed substantially to the analyses of the study. PP, RI, and TVJ collected the data. PP, LSM, SFE, HZ, KB, and DJB contributed to the data analysis. PP and DJB wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Parbo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The project was approved by the regional ethics committee, and all subjects gave their written informed consent.

Consent for publication

All subjects involved and the authors gave their consent for publication of these findings.

Competing interests

PP and RI declare that they have no competing interests. HZ has served on scientific advisory boards for Roche Diagnostics, Wave, Samumed, and CogRx and is a co-founder of Brain Biomarker Solutions in Gothenburg AB, a GU Ventures-based platform company at the University of Gothenburg (unrelated to the current study). TV-J has received a personal fee from Roche and research grants from the Danish Multiple Sclerosis Society (unrelated to the current study). DJB received research grants from the Danish Council for Independent Research and the Lundbeck Foundation during the conduct of the study. He is a Consultant for GE Healthcare and Biogen™, and has served on Advisory Boards and received personal fees from AstraZeneca, Cytox, Shire, Novartis, GSK, Navidea, UCB, and Acadia. He has been awarded research grants and non-financial support from the Medical Research Council (UK), Alzheimer’s Research Trust (UK), Michael J Fox Foundation, and the European Commission (unrelated to the current study).

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional files

Additional file 1:

Figure S1. Correlations between 11C-PK11195 BPND and plasma NfL levels at three different cluster defining thresholds: p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < 0.001. All are cluster-level FWER corrected at p < 0.05. Including scatter plot of subject mean values of the largest cluster surviving p < 0.05 FWER correction with a primary cluster defining threshold of p < 0.01 (indicated by black arrow).

Additional file 2:

Figure S2. Correlations between MD and plasma NfL levels at three different cluster defining thresholds: p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < 0.001. All are cluster-level FWER corrected at p < 0.05. Including scatter plot of subject mean values of the largest cluster surviving p < 0.05 FWER correction with a primary cluster defining threshold of p < 0.01 (indicated by black arrow). Dark grey indicate areas not covered in all subjects by DWI.

Additional file 3:

Figure S3. Correlations between 11C-PK11195 BPND and MD at three different cluster defining thresholds: p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < 0.001. All are cluster-level FWER corrected at p < 0.05. Including scatter plot of subject mean values of the largest cluster surviving p < 0.05 FWER correction with a primary cluster defining threshold of p < 0.01 (indicated by black arrow). Dark grey indicate areas not covered in all subjects by DWI.

Additional file 4:

Figure S4. Correlations between cortical thickness and plasma NfL levels at three different cluster defining thresholds: p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < 0.001. All are cluster-level FWER corrected at p < 0.05. Including scatter plot of subject mean values of the largest cluster surviving p < 0.05 FWER correction with a primary cluster defining threshold of p < 0.01 (indicated by black arrow).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parbo, P., Madsen, L.S., Ismail, R. et al. Low plasma neurofilament light levels associated with raised cortical microglial activation suggest inflammation acts to protect prodromal Alzheimer’s disease. Alz Res Therapy 12, 3 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-019-0574-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-019-0574-0

Keywords