Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of robust NODDI z-scores between CU and MCI/AD clinical status participants

From: Neuroimaging of tissue microstructure as a marker of neurodegeneration in the AT(N) framework: defining abnormal neurodegeneration and improving prediction of clinical status

GM ROIs (bilateral)

NDI z-score p-value (Kruskal–Wallis)

Cliff’s delta (95% CI)

ODI z-score p-value (Kruskal–Wallis)

Cliff’s delta (95% CI)

Superior frontal gyrus

0.11

0.28 (− 0.09–0.58)

0.002b

0.54 (0.17–0.78)d

Hippocampus

0.0061b

0.49 (0.002–0.79)d

0.001b

0.58 (0.13–0.83)d

Posterior cingulate gyrus

0.014a

0.44 (− 0.005–.73)

0.06

0.38 (− 0.018–0.67)

Inf. parietal + precuneus

0.15

0.25 (− 0.19–0.61)

0.00042c

0.63 (0.25–0.84)d

Parahippocampus

0.06

0.38 (− 0.13–0.73)

0.021a

0.41 (− 0.0150–0.71)

Temporal inferior

0.19

0.23 (− 0.22–0.60)

0.0026b

0.53 (0.06–0.81)d

WM ROIs (bilateral)

    

Uncinate fasciculus

0.059

0.33 (− 0.02–0.61)

0.003b

 − 0.53 (− 0.78 to − 0.13)d

Superior longitudinal fasciculus

0.08

0.31 (− 0.09–0.63)

0.614

0.09 (− 0.25–0.41)

Inferior longitudinal fasciculus

0.017a

0.43 (0.04–0.70)d

0.042a

0.36 (− 0.018–0.65)

Cingulum (hippocampus)

0.03a

0.44 (0.16–0.65)d

0.01a

 − 0.45 (− 0.68 to − 0.14)d

Cingulum (cingulate gyrus)

0.005a

0.50 (1.10–0.76)d

0.74

0.06 (− 0.41–0.31)

Forceps major

0.068

0.32 (− 0.07–0.63

0.92

0.017 (− 0.35–0.322)

  1. Z-scores for NODDI-ODI and NODDI-NDI were calculated with robust norms analysis as described. CU clinical diagnosis group included all participants with a clinical diagnosis of cognitively unimpaired (CU) (n = 285). MCI/AD clinical diagnosis group included all participants with a clinical diagnosis of either MCI (n = 6) or AD (n = 5). Effect size was calculated by Cliff’s delta with 95% confidence intervals
  2. a = P < 0.05
  3. b = P < 0.01
  4. C = P < 0.001, Kruskal–Wallis
  5. d = Sig. Cliff’s delta)