Skip to main content

Table 4 Cluster-based permutation test for the relationships of TF activity with visual function and retinal thickness

From: Early visual alterations in individuals at-risk of Alzheimer’s disease: a multidisciplinary approach

 

FH − 

FH + 

FH − 40-60ɛ4−

FH + 40-60ɛ4+

 

n

rho

p

n

rho

p

n

rho

p

n

rho

p

Sensor space

 VA

32

0.377

0.502

95

0.234

*0.005

14

0.488

0.604

27

0.450

*0.008

 CS-3

30

0.382

0.550

91

0.202

0.469

14

0.596

0.118

27

0.360

0.095

 CS-6

30

0.365

0.741

91

0.195

0.478

14

0.573

0.396

27

0.366

0.371

 CS-12

30

0.337

0.893

91

0.191

0.435

14

0.568

0.840

27

0.361

0.092

 CS-18

30

0.363

0.3321

91

0.215

0.205

14

0.486

0.679

27

0.476

*0.036

 IPL-N1

      

13

0.624

 − 0.653

1

1

21

0.514

 − 0.480

1

1

 IPL-N2

      

13

0.630

 − 0.581

0.852

1

21

 − 0.492

0.267

 IPL-S1

      

13

0.616

 − 0.641

1

1

21

0.500

0.351

 IPL-I1

      

13

0.633

 − 0.601

0.995

1

21

0.498

 − 0.503

0.695

1

 IPL-I2

      

13

 − 0.647

1

21

 − 0.487

0.203

 INL-I2

      

13

0.636

 − 0.602

0.428

1

20

 − 0.542

1

Source space (Calcarine cortex)

 VA

32

-

-

94

0.246

0.007

14

-

-

26

0.399

0.034

 CS-3

30

-

-

90

-

-

14

0.470

0. 256

26

0.355

0.219

 CS-6

30

-

-

90

-

-

14

0.527

0.200

26

0.336

0.290

 CS-12

30

-

-

90

-

-

14

-

-

26

-

-

 CS-18

30

0.331

0.202

90

-

-

14

-

-

26

0.436

0.028

 IPL-N1

      

13

-

-

21

-

-

 IPL-N2

      

13

-

-

21

-

-

 IPL-S1

      

13

-

-

21

-

-

 IPL-I1

      

13

-

-

21

 − 0.458

0.183

 IPL-I2

      

13

-

-

20

 − 0.530

0.332

 INL-I2

      

13

-

-

21

-

-

  1. At the top, results in the sensor space. At the bottom, results in the source space, averaged in calcarine cortex following AAL atlas. Correlations with visual acuity and contrast sensitivity were left tailed contrasts, due to the theoretical hypotheses, while those with macular thickness were two-tailed. The differences in n with the original groups were due to invalid results in MEG or MRI. *p<0.05