Skip to main content

Table 2 Cortical investigation

From: Intracortical diffusion tensor imaging signature of microstructural changes in frontotemporal lobar degeneration

Training cohort AngleR PerpPD ParlPD MD Cortical thickness GM_fr
HS vs SV η2p=0.159* η2p =0.374* η2p =0.166* η2p =0.168* η2p =0.279* η2p =0.146*
HS vs BV η2p =0.116* η2p =0.537* η2p =0.426* η2p =0.353* η2p =0.327* η2p =0334*
HS vs PNFA η2p =0.064 η2p =0.314* η2p =0.173* η2p =0115* η2p =0.055 η2p =0.040
HS vs CBS η2p =0.021 η2p =0.338* η2p =0.220* η2p =0.116* η2p =0.061 η2p =0.049
HS vs PSP-RS η2p =0.004 η2p =0.126* η2p =0.123* η2p =0.060 η2p =0078 η2p =0.087
SV vs BV η2p =0.010 η2p =0.020 η2p =0.064 η2p =0.027 η2p =0.000 η2p =0.030
SV vs PNFA η2p =0.021 η2p =0.009 η2p =0.000 η2p =0.006 η2p =0.088 η2p =0.028
SV vs CBS η2p =0.065 η2p =0.019 η2p =0.000 η2p =0.014 η2p =0.107* η2p =0.033
SV vs PSP-RS η2p =0.108* η2p =0.158* η2p =0.019 η2p =0.050 η2p =0.114* η2p =0.022
BV vs PNFA η2p =0.003 η2p =0.059 η2p =0.067 η2p =0.062 η2p=0.094* η2p =0.116*
BV vs CBS η2p =0.031 η2p =0.098* η2p =0.073 η2p =0.090 η2p =0.119* η2p =0.116
BV vs PSP-RS η2p =0.065 η2p =0.291* η2p =0.173* η2p =0.165* η2p =0.125* η2p =0.120
PNFA vs CBS η2p =0.013 η2p =0.001 η2p =0.000 η2p =0.001 η2p =0.000 η2p =0.000
PNFA vs PSP-RS η2p =0.037 η2p =0.109* η2p =0.021 η2p =0.021 η2p =0.000 η2p =0.002
CBS vs PSP-RS η2p =0.006 η2p =0.100* η2p =0.028 η2p =0.014 η2p =0.000 η2p =0.002
Test cohort AngleR PerpPD ParlPD MD Cortical thickness GM_fr
HS vs SV η2p =0.293* η2p =0.340* η2p =0.100* η2p =0.188* η2p =0.228* η2p =0.141*
HS vs BV η2p =0.229* η2p =0.362* η2p =0.170* η2p =0.264* η2p =0.257* η2p =0.205*
HS vs PNFA η2p =0.072 η2p =0.247* η2p =0.108* η2p =0.168* η2p =0.045 η2p =0.043
HS vs CBS η2p =0.118* η2p =0.248* η2p =0.102* η2p =0.215* η2p =0.058 η2p =0.086
HS vs PSP-RS η2p =0.101* η2p =0.109* η2p =0.007 η2p =0.033 η2p =0.000 η2p =0.039
SV vs BV η2p =0.002 η2p =0.010 η2p =0.023 η2p =0.027 η2p =0.009 η2p =0.020
SV vs PNFA η2p =0.046 η2p =0.001 η2p =0.006 η2p =0.004 η2p =0.039 η2p =0.010
SV vs CBS η2p =0.067 η2p =0.019 η2p =0.000 η2p =0.002 η2p =0.066 η2p =0.004
SV vs PSP-RS η2p =0.042 η2p =0.180* η2p =0.113* η2p =0.046 η2p =0.151* η2p =0.019
BV vs PNFA η2p =0.030 η2p =0.005 η2p =0.002 η2p =0.004 η2p =0.065 η2p =0.040
BV vs CBS η2p =0.041 η2p =0.048 η2p =0.029 η2p =0.013 η2p =0.102* η2p =0.037
BV vs PSP-RS η2p =0.024 η2p =0.210* η2p =0.171* η2p =0.102* η2p =0.179* η2p =0.057
PNFA vs CBS η2p =0.001 η2p =0.012 η2p =0.011 η2p =0.000 η2p =0.000 η2p =0.002
PNFA vs PSP-RS η2p =0.001 η2p =0.146* η2p =0.131* η2p =0.061 η2p =0.030 η2p =0.000
CBS vs PSP-RS η2p =0.000 η2p =0.114* η2p =0.102* η2p =0.065 η2p =0.033 η2p =0.006
  1. General Linear Model (GLM) post hoc. η2p = partial eta-squared. All values reported remained statistically significant after false discovery rate correction (FDR < 0.05)