Skip to main content

Table 2 Efficacy analyses for the primary and secondary outcomes with the covariate model of full analysis set

From: A phase II randomized trial of sodium oligomannate in Alzheimer’s dementia

 

Placebo (N = 83), mean (SD)

600 mg (N = 76), mean (SD)

900 mg (N = 83), mean (SD)

ADAS-cog12

 Baseline

28.1 (12.0)

26.1 (12.4)

26.16 (12.00)

 24 Ws

26.7 (14.5)

24.7 (14.4)

23.6 (13.7)

 Change

− 1.5 (7.0)

− 1.4 (6.5)

− 2.6 (5.7)

p valuea

p = 0.89

p = 0.30

ADCS-ADL

 Baseline

50.9 (17.4)

50.0 (17.4)

53.7 (16.4)

 24 Ws

49.8 (17.5)

49.5 (18.7)

53.2 (16.7)

 Change

− 1.1 (7.8)

− 0.5 (7.7)

− 0.5 (8.3)

p valuea

0.66

0.48

NPI

 Baseline

9.9 (13.7)

7.3 (10.9)

7.4 (12.2)

 24 Ws

7.8 (11.7)

7.5 (12.2)

6.2 (10.8)

 Change

− 2.1 (9.0)

0.2 (7.2)

− 1.1 (11.2)

p valuea

0.17

0.94

CIBIC+

Cases (%)

Cases (%)

Cases (%)

 Significant improvement

3 (3.6)

2 (2.6)

0 (0.0)

 Moderate improvement

6 (7.2)

9 (11.8)

13 (15.7)

 Slight improvement

32 (38.6)

18 (23.7)

29 (34.9)

 No change

25 (30.1)

23 (30.3)

35 (42.2)

 Slight deterioration

17 (20.5)

21 (27.6)

4 (4.8)

 Moderate deterioration

0 (0.0)

3 (4.0)

2 (2.4)

 Significant deterioration

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

p valueb,*

0.11

0.01

  1. Ws weeks, ADAS-cog Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive, ADCS-ADL Alzheimer’s Disease Collaborative Study–Activity of Daily Living Scale, NPI Neuropsychiatric Inventory, CIBIC Clinician’s Interview-Based Impression of Change
  2. aExact Pearson’s chi-squared test
  3. bp values were determined using two-tailed t tests
  4. *Comparison of the percentage of effectiveness in the overall efficacy evaluation (significant improvement + moderate improvement + slight improvement + no change) on the CIBIC-Plus scale of sodium oligomannate capsule and placebo at week 24 of treatment