Skip to main content

Table 2 Description of agreement between the 2 modes of administration of the IADL questionnaire for the total patient sample

From: Comparison of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living assessment by face-to-face or telephone interviews: a randomized, crossover study

 

Total (n = 292)

   

n

−/− (a)

n

−/+ (b)

n

+/− (c)

n

+/+ (d)

Agreement* %

K

p value

IADL (/8)

89.38%

0.66

< 0.001

Sub-score 1 (/4), i.e., phone, transportation, medications, finance

89.47%

0.69

< 0.001

Sub-score 2 (/4), i.e., shopping, food, housekeeping, laundry

85.87%

0.62

< 0.001

IADL by item (autonomy: yes vs no)

 Ability to use telephone

33

10

14

235

91.78

0.69

0.54

 Shopping

212

27

15

38

85.62

0.56

0.09

 Food preparation

209

31

8

44

86.64

0.61

< 0.001

 Housekeeping

66

41

23

162

78.08

0.52

0.03

 Laundry

137

30

16

109

84.25

0.68

0.054

 Mode of transportation

170

23

11

88

88.36

0.75

0.06

 Responsibility for own medications

188

13

21

70

88.36

0.72

0.23

 Ability to handle finances

147

50

23

72

75.00

0.47

0.002

IADL according to the level of autonomy

 8 IADL vs. 0

276

5

5

6

96.58

0.64

0.12

 ≥ 7 IADL vs. less

250

11

9

22

93.15

0.65

0.82

 ≥ 6 IADL vs. less

217

22

12

41

88.36

0.64

0.12

 ≥ 5 IADL vs. less

190

29

6

67

88.01

0.71

< 0.001

 ≥ 4 IADL vs. less

136

32

11

113

85.27

0.71

0.002

 ≥ 3 IADL vs. less

84

35

12

161

83.90

0.66

0.001

 ≥ 2 IADL vs. less

45

25

13

209

86.99

0.62

0.07

 ≥ 1 IADL vs. less

18

12

9

253

92.81

0.59

0.66

 0 IADL vs. more

253

9

12

18

92.81

0.59

0.66

  1. −/−: number of patients with no autonomy in face-to-face mode and no autonomy in telephone mode
  2. −/+: number of patients with no autonomy in face-to-face mode and autonomy in telephone mode
  3. +/−: number of patients with autonomy in face-to-face mode and no autonomy in telephone mode
  4. +/+: number of patients with autonomy in face-to-face mode and autonomy in telephone mode
  5. *Agreement was calculated as (a + d)/(a + b + c + d)
  6. p value of McNemar test
  7. Linearly weighted Cohen’s kappa when more than 2 groups, i.e., IADL/8, sub-scores 1 and 2; unweighted Cohen’s kappa when 2 groups, i.e., IADL by item and IADL according to the level of autonomy