Skip to main content

Table 1 Cohort demographics

From: Endo-lysosomal proteins and ubiquitin CSF concentrations in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease

Cohort

Group

N (F/M)

Age, median (IQR)

N, APOE ε4 +/−a

1–42 ng/L, median (IQR)

P-tau181 ng/L, median (IQR)

T-tau ng/L, median (IQR)

Pilot study

Control

24 (8/16)

72 (62–74)

833 (714–998)

42 (36–51)

288 (218–320)

AD

19 (9/10)

76 (71–81)b

390 (351–456)c

92 (81–104)c

940 (710–1090)c

Clinical study I

Stable MCI

15 (6/9)

67 (59–76)

1200 (880–1500)

54 (40–59)

230 (190–320)

Prodromal AD

10 (7/3)

66 (59–74)

380 (270–480)d,e

96 (77–160)f,g

690 (510–1100)f,g

AD

6 (2/4)

70 (57–79)

400 (330–460)d

98 (81–120)g,h

600 (540–860)g,h

PD

10 (5/5)

60 (54–68)

850 (580–1000)

34 (24–48)

140 (110–180)

Clinical study II

Control

44 (30/14)

75 (68–78)

10/17

890 (660–1100)

45 (38–53)

320 (270–390)

AD

36 (23/13)

73 (67–77)

25/10

380 (300–440)i,j

74 (65–100)g,i

680 (510–870)g,i

PD

11 (6/5)

69 (68–76)

660 (430–910)

37 (33–47)

220 (170–320)

  1. aN carriers of one or two APOE ε4 alleles (+) and non-carriers (−)
  2. bP ≤ 0.01, vs control, Wilcoxon 2-sample rank sum test
  3. cP ≤ 0.0001, vs control, Wilcoxon 2-sample rank sum test
  4. dP ≤ 0.001, vs stable MCI, Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn post hoc
  5. eP ≤ 0.05, vs PD, Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn post hoc
  6. fP ≤ 0.01, vs stable MCI, Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn post hoc
  7. gP ≤ 0.001, vs PD, Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn post hoc
  8. hP ≤ 0.05, vs stable MCI, Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn post hoc
  9. iP ≤ 0.001, vs control, Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn post hoc
  10. jP ≤ 0.01, vs PD, Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn post hoc