Skip to main content

Table 1 Overview of studies presenting empirical evidence

From: Disclosure of amyloid positron emission tomography results to individuals without dementia: a systematic review

Author (year)

Objective

Setting

Design

Population (n)

Determinant

Assessment time points

Outcome measures

Results

Conclusion

Research context

 Researchers attitudes towards disclosure

  Shulman et al. (2013) [37]

To evaluate nondisclosure policy

Research

Survey

159 ADNI investigators and research staff

n.a.

n.a.

Practices and attitudes about returning amyloid imaging results

Small minority of CN (45%) and MCI (40%) participants do not request PET results. Most ADNI investigators did not return amyloid results to CN (94%) and MCI (90%). Majority would support disclosure to CN (58%) and MCI (73%) if FDA approval. Emphasized need for guidance on disclosure strategy

In view of FDA approval of amyloid imaging, disclosure to both CN and MCI is supported, and there is a need for 1) disclosure protocols and 2) knowledge on effect on participants

 Cognitively normal study participants attitudes towards disclosure

  Ott et al. (2016) [36]

To assess the interest in knowledge of amyloid PET status

Research

Survey

164 CN

n.a.

n.a.

Wishes to learn amyloid PET status and, if so, reasons for wanting to know

81% desired to know amyloid status, motivated by desire to participate in AD research (73%), and to prepare family for illness (60%). Main reason for not desiring amyloid status was due to depressed feelings (40%). 12% indicated to use information for making plans on ending their life when memory loss becomes imminent

Stakeholders in AD prevention research generally wish to know information about their risk for developing AD to assist future planning.

  Gooblar et al. (2015) [32]

To assess effect of education on disclosure attitude

Research

RCT

219 CN

Education intervention (education: n = 119, placebo: n = 110)

Pre- and postintervention

Interest in disclosurea

High preintervention interest (mean: 4.0 ± 1.1) in receiving amyloid imaging results, which significantly decreased after education versus placebo (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.6–5.1) when controlled for preintervention level of interest

Learning about limitations of disclosure somewhat tempers interest

  Grill et al. (2016) [33]

To assess the impact of amyloid disclosure on trial participation willingness

Research

RCT

132 self-reported CN older adults

Hypothetical ICF (transparent: n = 66, and blinded enrolment: n = 66)

Postintervention

Likelihood of enrollmentb

No significant difference in willingness to participate between transparent (70%) and blinded (61%) group.

Requirement of amyloid disclosure may not slow recruitment to preclinical AD trials

 Impact of disclosure

  Burns et al. (2017) [31]

To assess effect of amyloid disclosure

Research

Prospective cohort study

97 CN older adults

Amyloid status (amyloid positive: n = 27, amyloid negative: n = 70)

Before and at disclosure, and 6 weeks and 6 months post-disclosure

Depression (CES-D), anxiety (BAI), and test-related distress (IGT-AD)

No difference in depressive symptoms, slight increase in test-related distress, and group by time interaction in anxiety, without significant group differences

Disclosure has low risk of psychological harm

  Lim et al. (2016) [35]

To assess impact of amyloid disclosure

Research

Prospective cohort study

11 CN older adults

Psychoeducational program (amyloid positive: n = 3, amyloid negative: n = 8)

Baseline, 9 and 18 months follow-up

Subjective complaints (MAC-Q), depression (DASS-D), anxiety (DASS-A), stress symptoms (DASS-S), and impact of events scale (IES-R)

Insufficient numbers for formal comparisons. Little change in psychological factors. Psychoeducational brochure rated as very useful. Disclosure of amyloid positivity motivated lifestyle changes

Disclosing amyloid status to CN older adults, who requested the information, seems safe

  Vanderschaeghe et al. (2017) [42]

To assess how patients perceive and experience disclosure

Research

Semi-structured interviews

38 amnestic MCI patients

n.a.

2 weeks and 6 months post-disclosure

Fixed set of interview elements

2/8 PET-positive patients experienced emotional difficulties. 3/30 PET-negative patients doubted whether they received the correct result

Experienced advantages and disadvantages depended on outcome of PET result

  Grill et al. (2017) [43]

To assess how patients perceive and experience disclosure

Clinic

Semi-structured telephone interview

26 patient-caregiver dyads, mostly with dementia, some MCI

n.a.

Post-disclosure (unspecified)

Fixed set of interview elements

Most patients would undergo amyloid PET again. Regardless of outcome, patients and caregivers commonly expressed relief on learning their results

Amyloid PET may provide information that patients and families find useful

 Development of approach for amyloid disclosure

  Lingler et al. (2016) [30]

Development of amyloid disclosure protocol

Research

RCT and focus group

10 MCI care dyads

Mock disclosure (amyloid positive: n = 4, amyloid negative: n = 4, inconclusive: n = 2)

Postintervention

Satisfaction surveys, comprehension assessments, and focus groups

Recommendations included pretest counseling, screening for anxiety and depression, separate days for consent procedure, imaging, and disclosure, and follow-up to monitor the impact of disclosure, anxiety, and depression

MCI care dyads comprehended the information and were highly satisfied

  Harkins et al. (2015) [29]

Development of amyloid disclosure protocol

Research

Modified Delphi method

Experts

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

Recommendations included pretest counseling, the use of participants’ own brain images during disclosure, take-home materials, and follow-up to address emerging questions

Documents and process will be used in the A4 study

Clinical context

 Dementia specialists attitudes towards disclosure

  Klein and Kaye (2013) [34]

To assess attitudes of neurologists specializing in dementia towards the use of amyloid imaging

Clinic

Survey

135 neurologists specializing in dementia

n.a.

n.a.

Intention to use amyloid imaging in diagnosing AD and, if so, how they plan to use it

84% affirmed intention to use amyloid PET in practice. 24% intended to use PET for screening asymptomatic individuals. Patients should be counseled (92%)

Specialists generally support disclosure, but recognize complexity of scan interpretation, and need for patient counseling

  1. A4 Anti-Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic Alzheimer’s Disease, AD Alzheimer’s disease, ADNI Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, BAI Beck Anxiety Inventory, CES-D Center for Epidemiological Studies of Depression Scale, CI confidence interval, CN cognitively normal, DASS-A depression, anxiety, and stress scale, anxiety subscale, DASS-D depression, anxiety, and stress scale, depression subscale, DASS-S depression, anxiety, and stress scale, stress subscale, FDA Food and Drug Administration, ICF informed consent form, IES-R impact of events scale, revised edition, IGT-AD Impact of Genetic Testing for Alzheimer’s Disease, MAC-Q Memory Complaints Questionnaire, MCI mild cognitive impairment, n.a. non-applicable, OR odds ratio, PET positron emission tomography, RCT randomized controlled trial
  2. aFive-point Likert scale
  3. bSix-point Likert scale