Skip to main content

Table 1 Quality appraisal of the included studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT)

From: Equine-assisted services for people living with dementia: a systematic review

Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), v 2018

Study

Category of study

designs

†Methodological quality criteria

Borges de Araujo et al. (2018) [26]

Dabelko-Schoeny et al. (2014) [27]

Fields et al. (2018) [28]

Fields et al. (2019) [29]

Lassell et al. (2021) [31]

Lassell et al. (2022) [30]

Screening Questions

S1. Are there clear research questions?

0

0

1

1

1

1

 

S2. Do the collected data allow to address the research questions?

1

1

1

1

1

1

1. Qualitative study criteria

1.1. Is the qualitative approach appropriate to answer the research question?

   

1

 

1

 

1.2. Are the qualitative data collection methods adequate to address the research question?

   

1

 

1

 

1.3. Are the findings adequately derived from the data?

   

1

 

1

 

1.4. Is the interpretation of results sufficiently substantiated by data?

   

1

 

1

 

1.5. Is there coherence between qualitative data sources, collection, analysis and interpretation?

   

1

 

1

3. Quantitative non-randomized study criteria

3.1. Are the participants representative of the target population?

1

1

    
 

3.2. Are measurements appropriate regarding both the outcome and intervention (or exposure)?

1

1

    
 

3.3. Are there complete outcome data?

1

1

    
 

3.4. Are the confounders accounted for in the design and analysis?

0

1

    
 

3.5. During the study period, is the intervention administered (or exposure occurred) as intended?

1

1

    

4. Quantitative

descriptive

4.1. Is the sampling strategy relevant to address the research question?

  

1

 

1

 
 

4.2. Is the sample representative of the target population?

  

0

 

0

 
 

4.3. Are the measurements appropriate?

  

1

 

1

 
 

4.4. Is the risk of nonresponse bias low?

  

0

 

0

 
 

4.5. Is the statistical analysis appropriate to answer the research question?

  

1

 

1

 

‡Quality Rating

 

5

5

5

6

5

7

  1. †Quality criteria: 1 = criterion was met; 0 = criterion was not met or unclear
  2. ‡Quality rating (maximum rating is 7): 0 or 1 = low quality; 2 or 3 = low to medium quality; 4 or 5 = medium to high quality; 6 or 7 = high quality
  3. Note: a blank space means a score is not applicable