Skip to main content

Table 1 Study designs of the identified studies

From: Cost-effectiveness of physical activity interventions for prevention and management of cognitive decline and dementia—a systematic review

Study

Country

Design

Time horizon

Sample size

Intervention

Inclusion criteria

CHEERS items

CHEC-list

D’Amico et al. [25] (2016)

UK

Trial-based CEA

3 months

Total: 52

Study group: 30

Control group: 22

Study group: 12-week individually tailored walking program lasting for 20–30 min daily, designed to become progressively more intensive + standard-of-care

Control group: standard-of-care

Diagnosis of dementia defined by ICD-10 DCR, or \(\ge\) 1 BPSD symptoms, and has a carer willing to participate with the exercise regimen

24

18

Davis et al. [26] (2013)

Canada

Trial-based CEA

6 months

Total: 86

Study groups: 28 in RT group and 30 in AT group

Control group: 28

RT group: 2 × 1 h/week resistance training for 6 months

AT group: 2 × 1 h/week aerobic training for 6 months

Control group: 2 × 1 h/week balance and tone classes for 6 months

Community dwelling women aged 70–80 years, MMSE \(\ge\) 24, answered “yes” to the question “Do you have any difficulty with your memory”, scored \(\ge\) 6/8 on the Lawton and Brody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living

24

18

Davis et al. [27] (2017)

Canada

Trial-based CEA

12 months

Total: 70

Study group: 25

Control group: 35

Study group: 3 × 1 h/week aerobic training + standard-of-care + education for 6 months

Control group: standard-of-care + education

Diagnosis of mild subcortical vascular cognitive impairment: community dwelling older adults with the presence of cognitive syndrome and small vessel ischemic disease or MoCA score < 26, MMSE score \(\ge\) 20

23

19

Eckert et al. [28] (2021)

Germany

Trial-based CEA

24 weeks

Total: 118

Study group: 63

Control group: 55

Study group:

12-week home-based exercise (walking, balance, strength training) by sports scientists with home visits and phone calls

Control group: unspecific flexibility training

Cognitively impaired geriatric patients discharged from ward rehabilitation, aged \(\ge\) 65 years, MMSE score range 17–26, living in the community or in assisted living

24

19

Kato et al [22] (2022)

Japan

Model-based CEA

10 years

Total: simulated 1000

Study group: 90-min weekly session focused on physical and cognitive activities, which was conducted 40 times in the first year. Then, individuals stayed in well or MCI state receive the program twice a year

Control group: no intervention

Community-dwelling healthy adults aged 65 years old

24

18

Khan et al. [31] (2019)

UK

Trial-based CEA

12 months

Total: 494

Study group: 329

Control group: 161

Study group: 2 × (1–1.5) h/week supervised exercise for 4 months + 3 × 50 min/week unsupervised exercise for 8 months; combining aerobic and resistance training + standard-of-care

Control group: standard-of-care

Mild-to-moderate dementia: diagnosis of dementia defined by DSMIV and standardized MMSE score of > 10

24

19

Pitkälä et al. [24] (2013)

Finland

Trial-based CEA

12 months

Total: 210

Study groups: 70 in GE group and 70 in HE group

Control group: 70

GE group: 2 × 1 h/week group-based exercise for 12 months, groups of 10 patients, supervised by 2 physiotherapists and registered nurses

HE group: 2 × 1 h/week tailored home-based exercise, supervised by a physiotherapist

Control group: standard-of-care

Diagnosis of AD, aged \(\ge\) 65 years, has a spouse living together, and the ability to walk independently

20

15

Sopina et al. [32] (2017)

Denmark

Trial-based CEA

16 weeks

Total: 200

Study group: 107

Control group: 93

Study group: 3 × 1 h/week for 16 weeks moderate-to-high intensity aerobic exercises (on bicycle, cross trainer and treadmill supervised by physiotherapist)

Control group: standard-of-care

Diagnosis of mild AD, aged 50–90 years, MMSE \(\ge\) 20

23

19

Van Santen et al. [23] (2021)

Netherland

Trial-based CEA

6 months

Total: 112

Study group: 73

Control group: 39

Study group: 6-month 2 times/week exergaming (interacting cycling) + regular activity program (music listening, singing, arts & crafts, cooking, gymnastics, and outdoor walking)

Control group: regular activity program

Diagnosis of any type of dementia, all ages, community-dwelling, > 2 visit/week at the day-care centers, has an informal caregiver willing to participate

22

17

Baal et al. [29] (2016)

UK

Model-based CEA

Lifetime

Total: simulated 1000

Study group: hypothetical increase of physical activity level by 1 level (out of total 5 levels)

Control group: no increase

Simulated 2012 English population aged 40–65 years old

22

17

Wimo et al. [30] (2022)

Sweden

“Hybrid” CEA

Lifetime

Simulated 100,000

Study group: A 2-year multidomain lifestyle intervention (individual and group sessions to foster tailored dietary changes, 1 to 3 aerobic exercise and 2 to 5 resistance training sessions per week, and group and individual cognitive training)

Control group: standard-of-care with regular health advice

Adults aged 60 to 77 years that are at risk of dementia (with CAIDE dementia risk scores of at least 6 points and cognition near or slightly below that expected for age)

24

19

  1. Studies were grouped by the study design and then ordered alphabetically within each group. Time horizon indicates the time over which the costs and effects are measured. CHEERS indicates for Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards; CHEC-list Consensus on Health Economic Criteria list; UK United Kingdom, CEA cost-effectiveness analysis, MCI mild cognitive impairment, ICD-10 DCR International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision, Diagnostic Criteria for Research (1992), BPSD behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, RT resistance training, AT aerobic training, HE home-based exercise, GE group-based exercise, MoCA Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MMSE Mini Mental State Examination score, AD Alzheimer’s Disease, DSMIV Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, 4th Edition, The CAIDE risk score provides an estimate of dementia risk based on several risk factors (age, sex, education, systolic blood pressure, total serum cholesterol, obesity, physical inactivity)