Skip to main content

Table 2 Participation in communication skills training, ability to cope with uncertainty, and preferred role in decision-making

From: Communication about diagnosis, prognosis, and prevention in the memory clinic: perspectives of European memory clinic professionals

 

n = 160

Have you participated in any communication skills training/courses?

 Yes, both during my education as after completion of my education

40 (25%)

 Yes, after completing my education

20 (13%)

 Yes, as part of my education

65 (41%)

 No

35 (22%)

How long ago was the most recent communication course that you participated in? (n = 125)

 This month

8 (6%)

 This year

21 (17%)

 More than a year ago

44 (35%)

 More than 5 years ago

36 (29%)

 More than 10 years go

16 (13%)

Ability to cope with uncertainty (PRUS)

32.5 ± 8.4

Preferred role in decision-making about AD biomarker testing (CPS)

 The patient makes the final decision about whether or not to pursue diagnostic testing and which tests to use

10 (7%)

 The patient makes the final decision about whether or not to pursue diagnostic testing and which tests to use after seriously considering the clinician’s/my opinion

36 (27%)

 The patient and the clinician/I share the responsibility for deciding about whether or not to pursue diagnostic testing and which tests are best for the patient

66 (49%)

 The clinician makes/I make the final decision about whether or not to pursue diagnostic testing and which tests to use, but seriously consider the patient’s opinion

20 (15%)

 The clinician makes/I make the final decision about whether or not to pursue diagnostic testing and which tests to use

2 (2%)

  1. Data are presented as n (%) or mean ± SD. PRUS: a higher score means a lower self-reported ability to cope with uncertainty (potential range 12–72)
  2. Abbreviations: PRUS Physician’s Reaction to Uncertainty Scale, AD Alzheimer’s disease, CPS Control Preferences Scale