Skip to main content

Table 1 Main demographic, clinical, biological, and imaging characteristics at baseline and neuropsychological, tau-PET, and MRI data at 1 and 2 years (mean (SD))

From: Could tau-PET imaging contribute to a better understanding of the different patterns of clinical progression in Alzheimer’s disease? A 2-year longitudinal study

  

Baseline

One year

Two years

  

AD patients

n = 27

Controls

n = 12

AD patients

n = 27

Controls

n = 12

AD patients

n = 27

Controls

n = 12

Demographic data

Age (years)

68.6 (6.7)

68.7 (3.4)

-

-

-

-

 

Sex (F/M)

14/13

9/3

-

-

-

-

Education (years)

14.5 (4.4)

14.6 (3.3)

-

-

-

-

Disease duration (years)

4.3 (3.6)

NA

-

-

-

-

Cholinesterase inhibitors (n)

21

-

Introduced in 1, discontinued in 2

-

Introduced in 1

-

Functional status

CDR

0

0

12

0

12

0

12

0.5

23

0

10

0

4

0

  

1

4

0

17

0

16

0

 

2

0

0

0

0

7

0

 

3

0

0

0

0

0

0

CDR sum of boxes

3.5 (1.8)

0

5 (2)

0

6.8 (2.7)

0

Neuropsychological assessment

 Global cognitive efficiency

MMSE (/30)

23.5 (3.1)#

28.8 (1.1)

21.6 (3.9)

29.3 (0.7)

18.8 (5.7)*

29.8 (0.5)

 Memory score

FCSRT (free + total immediate and delayed recalls) (/128)

58.9 (27.4)#

108.8 (6.5)

43.9 (29.9)

110.4 (9)

28 (27.8)*

109.8 (5.3)

 Instrumental score

(Naming + praxis + Rey figure copy) (/188)

169.8 (19.6)

185.1 (1.7)

160.2 (29.3)

185.8 (1.9)

145.6 (37.6)*

185.8 (2.7)

 Executive score

(Digit spans + letter fluency 2 min + WAIS similarities)

43.4 (12.6)#

69.6 (7.9)

42.1 (15.4)

64.1 (11.1)

38.5 (18.8)

62.2 (11.3)

Genetic status

ApoE genotype (n with at least one E4 allele)

20

2

-

-

-

-

CSF biomarkers&

Amyloid peptide (pg/mL)

471.5 (113.7)

NA

-

-

-

-

Total Tau (pg/mL)

640.5 (392.1)

NA

-

-

-

-

Phospho-tau181 (pg/mL)

87.1 (37.1)

NA

-

-

-

-

Molecular PET imaging

PiB-PET SUVr (GCI)

2.89 (0.68)#

1.25 (0.08)

-

-

-

-

 

Mean Tau-PET SUVr (infero-medial temporal meta-VOI)

1.57 (0.35)#

0.96 (0.08)

-

-

1.64 (0.25)

0.97 (0.06)

Mean Tau-PET SUVr (lateral temporal VOI)

1.49 (0.33)#

0.97 (0.08)

-

-

1.53 (0.23)

0.98 (0.06)

Mean Tau-PET SUVr (lateral parietal VOI)

1.51 (0.50)#

0.92 (0.07)

-

-

1.52 (0.38)

0.94 (0.07)

Mean Tau-PET SUVr (medial parietal VOI)

1.52 (0.55)#

0.91 (0.09)

-

-

1.58 (0.46)

0.93 (0.06)

Mean Tau-PET SUVr (frontal VOI)

1.17 (0.23)#

0.95 (0.07)

  

1.24 (0.26)

0.96 (0.08)

MRI

Fazekas score (0/1/2/3)

14/9/3/1

8/4/0/0

-

-

-

-

 

Mean normalized HV

2.04 (0.30)#

2.41 (0.20)

-

-

1.9 (0.28)*

2.39 (0.25)

Mean infero-medial temporal VOI CT (mm)

2.54 (0.18)#

2.86 (0.13)

-

-

2.38 (0.20)*

2.83 (0.14)

Mean lateral temporal VOI CT (mm)

2.5 (0.14)#

2.78 (0.15)

-

-

2.35 (0.18)*

2.75 (0.15)

Mean lateral parietal VOI CT (mm)

2.05 (0.20)#

2.35 (0.16)

-

-

1.96 (0.23)

2.31 (0.16)

Mean medial parietal VOI CT (mm)

2.06 (0.19)#

2.33 (0.13)

-

-

1.98 (0.21)

2.3 (0.14)

Mean frontal VOI CT (mm)

2.42 (0.13)

2.56 (0.11)

-

-

2.35 (0.14)

2.55 (0.11)

  1. CDR Clinical Dementia Rating scale, MMSE Mini-Mental State Examination, FCSRT Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test, WAIS Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, ApoE apolipoprotein E, CSF cerebrospinal fluid, GCI Global Cortical Index, SUVr standardized uptake value ratio, VOI volume of interest, HV hippocampal volume (normalized to the intracranial volume), CT cortical thickness, mm millimeters
  2. &Measured prior to inclusion in the study by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) with INNOTEST assays (Fujirebio, Ghent, Belgium)
  3. #p < 0.05 in the comparison with controls at baseline after Bonferroni correction for 18 tests
  4. *p < 0.05 in the comparison of the 2-year trajectories between AD patients and controls after Bonferroni correction for 15 tests