Skip to main content

Table 4 Right hippocampal subfield volumes (mm3)

From: Spatial navigation is associated with subcortical alterations and progression risk in subjective cognitive decline

 

NC (n = 77)

G-SCD (n = 40)

B-SCD (n = 40)

MCI (n = 23)

F

P

Tail

533.30 ± 68.27

541.56 ± 73.41

521.76 ± 77.54

494.31 ± 68.98

1.651

0.180

Subiculum

405.03 ± 48.60

407.07 ± 50.87

398.36 ± 47.67

368.83 ± 47.03cef

3.168

0.026*

CA1

599.83 ± 77.12

590.84 ± 78.50

571.73 ± 69.33

539.58 ± 59.69c

3.776

0.012*

Fissure

174.85 ± 34.63

168.29 ± 29.36

164.64 ± 30.02

154.86 ± 24.73

2.287

0.080

Presubiculum

281.58 ± 29.56

278.40 ± 33.66

278.86 ± 30.81

256.79 ± 38.83cf

3.433

0.018*

Parasubiculum

52.84 ± 9.26

51.21 ± 8.47

52.46 ± 9.98

49.38 ± 7.39

0.917

0.434

Molecular layer

528.53 ± 58.90

525.75 ± 62.01

512.38 ± 53.09

474.96 ± 54.67cef

4.899

0.003*

Dentate gyrus

270.86 ± 34.67

264.55 ± 30.37

260.47 ± 27.93

242.87 ± 28.10cef

4.403

0.005*

CA2/3

185.85 ± 30.40

186.76 ± 28.44

179.64 ± 25.24

166.14 ± 25.92

2.611

0.053

CA4

229.72 ± 29.34

224.50 ± 25.27

222.68 ± 24.02

207.10 ± 22.62cf

3.974

0.009*

Fimbria

72.61 ± 17.86

64.33 ± 13.40a

65.69 ± 15.80b

64.57 ± 18.49

3.677

0.013*

HATA

55.43 ± 8.44

54.19 ± 9.15

53.15 ± 9.60

48.61 ± 8.14c

3.124

0.027*

  1. Data were presented as means ± standard deviation
  2. *p < 0.05, FDR corrected, controlling for sex, age, years of education, and total intracranial volume
  3. a~fPost hoc analyses showed a significant difference between groups. aNC vs G-SCD; bNC vs B-SCD; cNC vs MCI; dG-SCD vs B-SCD; eG-SCD vs MCI; fB-SCD vs MCI