From: Considerations regarding a diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease before dementia: a systematic review
Consideration | Refs | Arguments | |
---|---|---|---|
Clinical | |||
1 | Validity | • Clinical criteria have limited validity • Biomarkers enhance diagnostic certainty and accuracy • Validity is strong or sufficient (in selected cohorts) • Predictive value for progression is demonstrated (in selected cohorts) | |
2 | Lack of validity | [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39] | • Validity is uncertain and insufficient or needs further research • Predictive value is uncertain and limited or needs further research • Discerning normal aging from latent disease is difficult or impossible • Many individuals with AD biomarkers never develop dementia • Abnormal biomarkers are not the sole cause of AD • Procedures may be burdensome or risky • Consequences of misdiagnosis are severe |
3 | Utility | [14, 16,17,18,19, 21,22,23,24, 26,27,28,29,30,31,32, 34,35,36, 40] | • Drugs can suppress symptoms in some patients • Lifestyle changes or interventions may be beneficial • Early diagnosis may lead to better healthcare |
4 | Lack of utility | [14,15,16,17,18, 20,21,22,23,24, 26,27,28,29,30,31,32, 34,35,36, 38, 40] | • Utility is absent and uncertain or needs further research • There is no disease-modifying therapy • Lifestyle changes or interventions have uncertain or modest effect at best • Lifestyle changes should be done regardless |
5 | Protocols and training | [14, 16,17,18, 20,21,22,23, 25, 26, 28, 30,31,32, 36,37,38,39,40] | • Protocols, methods, and materials are scarce or required • Knowledge of genetic or oncological markers may offer a starting point • Healthcare professionals need to develop knowledge and skills |
6 | Disclosure | [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25, 27,28,29,30,31,32, 34,35,36,37,38,39,40] | • There is growing consensus toward the use of biomarkers and sharing of results • Disclosure is difficult, especially to a person with (full) insight • Safety may be improved by informed consent, pre-test counseling, post-disclosure support, take-home materials, time for reflection, involvement of a relative, and tailoring the approach to the individual’s needs • Research into the impact of disclosure is scarce or required |
Personal | |||
7 | Certainty | • An in vivo (biomarker) diagnosis of AD is inherently uncertain • Individuals may appreciate an uncertain risk prediction • Individuals may understand uncertainty | |
8 | Uncertainty | • Early detection may lead to more or longer uncertainty • Individuals may expect a certain diagnosis • Individuals may misinterpret test results • It is hard to deal and live with uncertainty | |
9 | Actionability (personal utility) | [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25, 27, 28, 31, 32, 34,35,36,37,38,39] | • Individuals and relatives can prepare for the future • Individuals can advance plans or improve quality of life • Individuals can contribute to or profit from prevention trials |
10 | Lack of actionability (personal utility) | • There is no actionability • Results may be too uncertain for decisions • Preparing for the future should be done regardless | |
11 | Positive psychological impact | • Result may lead to positive emotions, e.g., relief, solace, or social exoneration (by providing an explanation for behavior or functioning) • There is value in knowing, understanding, and accepting the situation | |
12 | Negative psychological impact | [14, 16,17,18, 20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32, 34,35,36,37,38,39,40] | • Result may lead to negative emotions, e.g., fear, anxiety, and depression • There is risk of catastrophic reactions (euthanasia or suicide) • Negative reactions may be over-rated, limited, or preventable • Early detection may increase (subjective) cognitive decline (stereotype threat) |
13 | Right to (not) know | [14, 15, 17, 19,20,21,22,23,24,25, 27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35, 39] | • Individuals have a right to know their status in research and the clinic • Individuals have a right to not know their status in research and the clinic • Right to (not) know may be overruled by the principle of primum non nocere (first, do no harm) |
14 | Wish to (not) know | [14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22, 24, 25, 28, 29, 31, 32, 35, 36, 38, 39] | • Many individuals wish to know • Some individuals do not wish to know • Individual’s preference should be included in the informed consent |
Societal | |||
15 | Share | • Patients have the right to privacy and confidentiality • Fear of stigma and discrimination may prevent individuals from seeking help • A predementia diagnosis may lead to support | |
16 | Support | • Services are needed to help individuals cope with predementia AD | |
17 | Stigma | [14, 16, 20,21,22,23,24,25,26, 28,29,30, 32, 34, 35, 37, 38, 40] | • Label of AD may lead to loss of status, identity, or personhood • Label of AD may lead to public stigma, e.g., pity, patronizing, and distancing • Label of AD may lead to self-stigma • Label of AD may lead to spillover stigma (extends to relatives) • Predementia detection may increase the stigma of AD • Predementia detection may decrease the stigma of AD |
18 | Discrimination | [14, 16, 17, 20,21,22,23,24, 27,28,29,30,31,32,33, 35, 37,38,39,40] | • Predementia detection may lead to discrimination in employment, insurance, rights (voting and driving), health care, legal status |
19 | Policy and law | • Current laws do not protect individuals from biomarker discrimination • Regulation and law should regulate confidentiality and privacy • Regulation and law should regulate obligation to (not) disclose • Regulation and law should regulate forced screening or testing | |
20 | Misconception | [14,15,16,17, 19,20,21,22,23,24,25, 27,28,29,30,31,32, 34,35,36,37,38] | • The concept of predementia AD is difficult to explain and understand • (Re) conceptualization of AD may lead to misconceptions • At-risk individuals are prone to (therapeutic) misconceptions • Healthcare professionals are prone to misinterpretation • The general public is prone to misconceptions |
21 | Engagement and education | • Patients and the public should be involved in the design of protocols and policy • Education may improve awareness, acceptance, and attitudes | |
22 | Advance research | [14,15,16, 18, 20, 22, 23, 27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35, 37, 38, 40] | • Therapies are more likely to prevent than cure AD • Predementia phase offer opportunities to stop, delay, or slow symptom onset • Potential interventions will target patients in early stages of the disease |
23 | Medicalization | • Predementia detection may lead to medicalization and overdiagnosis • Predementia detection may increase urgency or treating AD • Predementia detection may decrease urgency or treating AD | |
24 | Resources | [14, 16,17,18, 20, 22,23,24, 27, 28, 30,31,32,33, 35, 37, 39] | • Tests and treatment may not be affordable or accessible for all • Predementia detection may exhaust healthcare and overwhelm current systems • Predementia detection may prioritize prevention over care or other research • Early detection may lead to higher cost • Early detection may lead to lower cost |
25 | Hope | • Research (participation) should not be motivated by false hope | |
26 | Fear | • There is a lot of fear for (the implications) of AD • Predementia detection may increase fear |