Skip to main content

Table 3 Models with different combinations of variables

From: Performance of the plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, measured with a novel HPLC-MS/MS method, as a biomarker of amyloid PET status in a DPUK-KOREAN cohort

 

Model

10-fold cross-validation in AD continuum

Validation in the SVCI group

Model 1

Age

0.506 (0.407, 0.512)

0.643 (0.485, 0.8)

Model 2

APOE4

0.723 (0.614, 0.717)

0.59 (0.475, 0.705)

Model 3

Age + APOE4

0.727 (0.652, 0.751)

0.699 (0.558, 0.839)

Model 4

Aβ42/Aβ40

0.818 (0.76, 0.847)

0.823 (0.702, 0.944)

Model 5

APOE4 + Aβ42/Aβ40

0.858 (0.799, 0.876)

0.775 (0.646, 0.905)

Model 6

Age + APOE4 + Aβ42/Aβ40

0.855 (0.797, 0.875)

0.777 (0.648, 0.905)

Model 7

Age + APOE4 + Aβ42/Aβ40 + diagnosis

0.916 (0.877, 0.934)

NA

  1. Values are presented as AUC (95% confidence interval for AUC). Except for model 2 vs. model 3 (p = 0.661) and model 5 vs. model 6 (p = 0.791), all two individual models showed statistically different AUC values (all p < 0.05)
  2. AUC area under the receiver operating characteristic curve