Skip to main content

Table 8 Mean RF accuracies and F1-scores (in %) for the AIBL data set (no information rate 57.14%)

From: Data analysis with Shapley values for automatic subject selection in Alzheimer’s disease data sets using interpretable machine learning

Exclusion method

Zero-cutoff

Max valid

Max test

 

n

ACC (in %)

F1 (in %)

n

ACC (in %)

F1 (in %)

n

ACC (in %)

F1 (in %)

Random (-)

41

58.57

66.42

445

66.07

75.81

LOO (LR)

84

62.50

68.81

102

56.79

64.44

402

68.21

76.33

LOO (RF)

49

57.86

65.40

23

61.79

69.45

186

68.93

76.63

Data Shapley (LR)

152

61.79

69.52

340

61.07

65.79

399

73.57

75.74

Data Shapley (RF)

164

57.86

68.94

134

60.36

70.05

14

65.36

72.30

  1. Different methods were used to identify and focus on the training subjects with the most informative data. The zero-cutoff method excluded all training subjects with Data Shapley values smaller than zero. Max valid was the threshold achieved by maximizing the results for the independent validation set. Max test was the optimistic threshold which achieved the best results for the test set. Ten repetitions with different seeds were performed for every exclusion data set. The best results are highlighted in bold