|
CCs (dependent variable)
|
Fazekas
|
ARWMC
|
FreeSurfer
|
SUVR
|
|---|
|
B
|
95% CI
|
p
|
B
|
95% CI
|
p
|
B
|
95% CI
|
p
|
B
|
95% CI
|
p
|
|---|
|
EF-FL
|
.030
|
(− .251, .312)
|
.832
|
− .065
|
(− .450, .320)
|
.739
|
− .092
|
(− .723, .539)
|
.774
|
.438
|
(− .458, 1.334)
|
.337
|
|
EF-PS
|
− .007
|
(− .266, .252)
|
.956
|
.043
|
(− .313, .399)
|
.812
|
.204
|
(− .375, .783)
|
.489
|
.615
|
(− .208, 1.438)
|
.142
|
|
EF-AT
|
.250
|
(− .027, .528)
|
.077
|
.464
|
(.080, .848)
|
.018
|
.142
|
(− .49, − .777)
|
.659
|
− .549
|
(− 1.450, .351)
|
.230
|
|
FN-AM
|
− .173
|
(− .465, .119)
|
.244
|
− .164
|
(− .564, .235)
|
.418
|
− 1.034
|
(− .1.676, − .393)
|
.002*
|
− 1.216
|
(− 2.140, − .292)
|
.010
|
|
FO-AM
|
− .364
|
(− .651, − .077)
|
.013
|
− .392
|
(− .789, .004)
|
.056
|
− .862
|
(− 1.503, .222)
|
.009
|
− .250
|
(− 1.176, .677)
|
.596
|
|
VR-M
|
− .097
|
(− .395, .200)
|
.519
|
.088
|
(− .317, .494)
|
.668
|
− .070
|
(− .737, .598)
|
.837
|
− .415
|
(− 1.367, .536)
|
.390
|
|
VI-M
|
.346
|
(− .159, .452)
|
.346
|
.035
|
(− .389, .459)
|
.872
|
− .098
|
(− .787 − .592)
|
.837
|
− 1.313
|
(− 2.272, − .355)
|
.008
|
|
Language
|
.035
|
(− .252, .322)
|
.809
|
− .004
|
(− .398, .390)
|
.984
|
− .413
|
(− 1.051, .226)
|
.204
|
− .467
|
(− 1.380, .446)
|
.314
|
- CCs Cognitive Composites domain scores, EF-FL Executive Function-Fluencies, EF-PS Executive Function Processing Speed, EF-AT Executive Function Attention, FN-AM Face–Name Associative Memory, FO-AM Face–Occupations Associative Memory, VR-M Verbal Memory, VI-M Visual Memory, SUVR Standardized uptake value ratio, CI Confidence Interval
- Age, years of education, sex, and APOE e4 (none vs. one or more alleles e4) were used as adjusting variables. Multiple linear regression analysis between each CCs domain score, Fazekas, ARWMC, FreeSurfer, and SUVR was used; *Adjusted p value < .05 after correction for multiple tests (Hommel’s method)
