Skip to main content

Table 2 Effects of GV1001 on primary and secondary endpoints in FAS and PPS

From: Efficacy and safety of GV1001 in patients with moderate-to-severe Alzheimer’s disease already receiving donepezil: a phase 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter clinical trial

Variables

Week

LS mean of CFB (± SE) in FAS

Placebo (group 1)

GV1001 0.56 mg (group 2)

P value

GV1001 1.12 mg (group 3)

P value

n = 27

n = 26

 

n = 28

 

SIB

12

− 3.7 (1.4)

− 0.1 (1.5)

0.178

0.7 (1.4)*

0.030

24

− 6.9 (1.9)

− 2.1 (2.0)

0.097

− 0.3 (1.9)*

0.027

K-MMSE

12

− 0.0 (0.5)

− 0.8 (0.6)

0.215

0.2 (0.5)

0.858

24

− 0.7 (0.6)

− 1.2 (0.6)

0.365

− 0.4 (0.6)

0.751

CDR-SOB

12

0.5 (0.2)

0.4 (0.2)

0.772

0.4 (0.2)

0.594

24

1.1 (0.3)

0.5 (0.3)

0.182

0.8 (0.3)

0.518

NPI

12

4.6 (2.6)

0.9 (2.6)

0.263

− 4.8 (2.4)*

0.018

24

− 1.6 (4.3)

3.5 (4.3)

0.419

− 2.1 (4.3)

0.792

GDS

12

− 0.1 (0.1)

0.0 (0.1)

0.203

− 0.1 (0.1)

0.664

24

− 0.1 (0.1)

0.0 (0.1)

0.075

− 0.1 (0.1)

0.476

ADCS-ADL

12

− 2.3 (0.8)

− 0.1 (0.8)

0.148

− 0.3 (0.7)

0.166

24

− 4.0 (1.0)

− 2.4 (1.0)

0.451

− 2.7 (1.0)

0.420

Variables

Week

LS mean of CFB (± SE) in PPS

Placebo (group 1)

GV1001 0.56 mg (group 2)

P value

GV1001 1.12 mg (group 3)

P value

n = 26

n = 22

 

n = 25

 

SIB

12

− 4.0 (1.4)

0.4 (1.5)

0.123

1.0 (1.4)*

0.016

24

− 7.2 (1.9)

− 1.5 (2.0)

0.070

− 0.1 (1.9)*

0.018

K-MMSE

12

− 0.1 (0.5)

− 0.7 (0.6)

0.288

0.4 (0.6)

0.596

24

− 0.7 (0.6)

− 1.1 (0.6)

0.446

− 0.2 (0.6)

0.575

CDR-SOB

12

0.5 (0.2)

0.4 (0.3)

0.829

0.4 (0.2)

0.739

24

1.1 (0.3)

0.4 (0.4)

0.183

0.8 (0.3)

0.602

NPI

12

4.6 (2.6)

1.0 (2.7)

0.296

− 5.1 (2.6)*

0.017

24

− 1.6 (4.3)

3.3 (4.4)

0.456

− 2.2 (4.4)

0.818

GDS

12

− 0.1 (0.1)

0.0 (0.1)

0.209

− 0.1 (0.1)

0.948

24

− 0.1 (0.1)

0.0 (0.1)

0.073

− 0.1 (0.1)

0.733

ADCS-ADL

12

− 2.3 (0.8)

− 0.1 (0.9)

0.225

− 0.4 (0.8)

0.248

24

− 4.0 (1.0)

− 2.4 (1.1)

0.516

− 2.7 (1.0)

0.470

  1. P value for the differences between the treatment and placebo groups
  2. The differences between the treatment group and placebo group were assessed using MMRM analysis
  3. Abbreviations: FAS full analysis set, PPS per-protocol set, LS least square, CFB change from baseline, SE standard error, SIB Severe Impairment Battery, K-MMSE Korean Mini-Mental State Examination, CDR-SOB Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes, NPI Neuropsychiatric Inventory, GDS Global Deterioration Scale, ADCS-ADL Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living, MMRM Mixed-effects Model Repeated Measures
  4. *P < 0.05