Skip to main content

Table 3 Two-year change from baseline in NTB and CDR-SB scores and progression to dementia according to the IWG-2, NIA-AA 2011, and NIA-AA 2018 criteria

From: Research diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer’s disease: findings from the LipiDiDiet randomized controlled trial

 

N with data

Change in NTB composite

Change in NTB memory

Change in NTB executive functioning

Change in NTB total

Change in CDR-SB

Progression to dementia

Estimate

p

Estimate

p

Estimate

p

Estimate

p

Estimate

p

N (%)

HR (95% CI)

IWG-2

 No prodromal AD

24

−0.018

Ref

−0.004

Ref

−0.085

Ref

0.048

Ref

0.42

Ref

7/26 (26.9)

Ref

 Prodromal AD

76

−0.254

0.11

−0.266

0.11

−0.097

0.93

−0.107

0.13

1.18

0.03

34/81 (42.0)

4.6 (1.6–13.7)

NIA-AA 2011

 SNAP

13

0.081

Ref

0.128

Ref

−0.044

Ref

0.057

Ref

0.56

Ref

1/13 (7.7)

Ref

 Inconclusive/uninformative

22

0.129

0.79

0.087

0.85

0.014

0.75

0.109

0.71

0.21

0.51

4/25 (16.0)

2.0 (0.2–18.7)

 Intermediate AD likelihood

135

−0.192

0.07

−0.209

0.06

−0.144

0.50

−0.169

0.05

1.29

0.08

64/155 (41.3)

6.8 (0.9–50.0)

 High AD likelihood

86

−0.195

0.08

− 0.186

0.08

−0.083

0.80

−0.084

0.23

1.08

0.23

40/93 (43.0)

7.4 (1.0–54.7)

NIA-AA 2018

 Non-Alzheimer’s pathologic change

13

0.057

Ref

0.049

Ref

−0.088

Ref

0.038

Ref

0.48

Ref

1/13 (7.7)

Ref

 Alzheimer’s and concomitant suspected non-Alzheimer’s pathologic change

22

−0.154

0.31

−0.125

0.45

−0.112

0.91

0.029

0.96

0.43

0.91

10/25 (40.0)

3.5 (0.4–29.4)

 AD

64

−0.274

0.08

−0.299

0.09

−0.087

0.99

−0.134

0.20

1.43

0.03

30/68 (44.1)

9.4 (1.2–72.7)

  1. Estimates for change in NTB and CDR-SB scores are least-squares means for change from baseline over 2 years within each group. Negative values indicate decline over time, except for CDR-SB where positive values indicate decline. p-values are shown for the difference in the least-squares means over 2 years between each group and the respective reference group. Numbers of participants are as per modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis. CDR-SB data were missing for nine participants (IWG-2, NIA-AA 2018) and 32 participants (NIA-AA 2011). Isolate amyloid pathology/Alzheimer’s pathologic change was excluded from the analyses (N = 1)
  2. Abbreviations: AD, Alzheimer’s disease; CDR-SB, Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes; IWG, International Working Group; NIA-AA, National Institute on Aging–Alzheimer’s Association; NTB, Neuropsychological Test Battery; SNAP, suspected non-AD pathology